Bruno Bettelheim, the author of “Cinderella: A story of Sibling Competition and Oedipal Conflicts,” thinks that Cinderella is among the very best fairytales of all time due to the fact that the tale has a deeper significance than what fulfills the eye and it is something that everybody can relate with at some point in their life. Being a Freudian psychologist, Bettelheim thinks that a person’s conscious mind takes the fairytale for stated value, while the exact same person’s unconscious mind can see the precise same fairytale extremely in a different way.
Bettelheim tells that all kids can connect to Cinderella on the levels of sibling competition and oedipal conflicts. The sibling competition part of the essay has the truth worth to it because similar to Cinderella is pressed down and deteriorated by her sis, at one time in their life a child will feel hopelessly topped by his/her bros and/or sis. A child does not understand the complex function of his/her life.
However, children comprehend Cinderella and kids can relate the story to what they comprehend. Bettelheim states, “in spite of the name “sibling competition,” this miserable enthusiasm has just by the way to do with a kid’s actual siblings and siblings. The real source of it is the kid’s feeling about his/her parents. When a child’s older bro or sibling is more skilled than he, this arouses just momentary feelings of jealousy,” (653) In Bettelheim’s oedipal part of his essay he discusses this phase as the sexual feelings a child might obtain towards their moms and dad of the opposite sex.
The child may become hostile or jealous towards the parent of the opposite sex. In this stage the child questions if they are loved or not. Bettelheim believes children think, though they will not admit it, Cinderella did something to deserve her treatment. The child may begin to believe that they deserve to be punished like Cinderella. “Every child believes at some period of his life-and this is not only at rare moments-that because of his secret wishes, if not also his clandestine actions, he deserves to be degraded, banned from the presence of others, relegated to a netherworld of smut,” (654). Bettelheim also believes that, although they think Cinderella may have “deserved” what she got, the children can see she was still saved in the end.
Bettelheim’s psychoanalytic approach can be a little over bearing if you have never taken a psychology course and learned about the oedipal stage in life. Sigmund Freud explains these processes that and how they happen at young ages. It is disturbing to think that I may have participated in this stage! I am aware that this “stage” is something psychologists believe is real, however, I do not think that it should be compared to the story of Cinderella. I liked and disliked Bruno Bettelheim’s essay all at the same time. I would have to say I agreed with many of his points. The inner child in me simply wants to read a fairytale for its face value, a good story. I feel more often than not, that we complicate the most simple and beautiful things by dissecting them. I see a fairytale as entertainment; a way for words and pictures to come together and fuel ones imagination. The innocence can be lost so easily when harsh dissection unleashed with no boundaries.
The author sees Cinderella as having a great effect on children. Although Cinderella was helped with magic, the children understand that it was through her own efforts that she was able to get out of her situation of constant degradation. The story gives confidence to children that they, too, can survive worse situations.