The ethical provision of any organization whether social, political or economic inclined, is to serve the public interest in legal and just way. However, this may be violated by the organization through deformation of the set regulations, fraudulent and corrupt acts compromising the key responsibility of serving the public interest.
An organization may turn against the persons it is objected to serving. A food producing company may engage in production methods which produce unhealthy foods, hence compromising the health of the customers.
A health facility such as a hospital may engage in unnecessary surgery to generate more profits. Engineer my bribe project overseer to authenticate a project that could otherwise be underestimated. Whenever the interest of an organization surpasses the public interest, fraud, illegal and unethical actions are involved. This threatens health, security and general interest of the public.
Both the public and private organizations operate in a confidential mode. Although there are regulations to guard the organization’s operations and public interest, it turns out challenging to note cases where an organization defiles the ethical provisions.
It involves the act of whistleblowing to reveal to the concerned various acts within an organization that endanger the interest of concerned parties.
Whistleblowers sound an alarm from within the organization to alert the public or the concerned on the illegal acts been undertaken within the organization that is in contrary to the public expectations. Whistleblowers are part of the organizations. A Whistleblower is either a stake order or a staff of the organization who has a better understanding of the operations of a particular objective (Bok.
1-2).
Whistleblowing is a fight between an individual and an organization to serve the public interest. The whistleblower stands out as the ambassador to reveal unethical acts by the company. Although it seems like a matter of just calling the media and speaking, the whistleblower will be left alone to withstand the aftermaths. Although the interests of the public may be served after the whistleblowing, the whistleblower is subjected to persecution and allegations. The repercussion of whistleblowing is catastrophic based that the organization is stable financially with a great influence on both the public and other organizations (Near, Janet and Marcia 160).
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
