Taxable Income and Principles of Taxation Law
This report helps to understand the concept of taxation law and analyse the different aspects of taxation. It also provides the data and information related to the taxable income and lays down the different principles. It also provides the relationship between the capital gain and capital losses in relation to the rental property. It also accesses the information regarding the annual payment in respect of lotteries. It also discusses the principle of tax evasion and tax avoidance. This report will explain the value and importance of taxable earning and various alternate methods to realise and treat capital losses relatively to rental property. It will help the reader to access and understand the facts and of tax avoidance & evasion. It will reveal the value and importance of such evasion principles in management of businesses and companies of Australia.
Gross annual income can be known as the Annual payment income that can be earned by the entities on the yearly basis. It can be stated that from the lottery an individual can earn a lump sum and that can be received annually. The act of lottery is recognised as the gambling that consist of receivables by drawing the number of prizes. There are different regulations that can be established by the government in respect of lottery to protect the interest of the public in general. It can be noted that if the winner receives the sum of the lottery then he/she is liable for paying the amount of capital gain tax on that lottery. In the situation of annuity pay-outs, the winner has an opportunity to earn the jackpots. It also consists of interest that can be accumulated from the investment over the time period of annuity (Cai, et. al., 2017).
It can be asserted that rather than the payment of annuity income, the sum received by the winner can be fixed every year with the amount of $50,000 and that can be restricted to the nature of payout in a situation of family emergency and financial emergency. It can also be stated that the winner has no capability to pay the more amount of investments as a result into the generation of cash and that can be compared to the sum of interest that can be earned on annuities. Apart from this, the payment of annuity income the tax can be levied on the $50000as they receive the revenue of $50000 from the lottery.
The other reason recognising the revenue that can be earned from lottery as the income of annual payment is that the individual has received the inflow of cash from the lottery for next 20 years. It can also note that the number of estates of deceased after the death of an individual can be recognised as the income of deceased. In this context, the winner can receive the amount of $50,000 on which he receives the sum of money for the first time in the next 20 years.
Annual Lottery Payments and Taxation
It can be determined that under the system of accrual basis. The expenses and revenues are recorded when they are realized. Along with that income should be matched with the expenditure. It can be noted that expenses are recorded at the time of occurrence and when the cash is paid. Taxable income can be defined as the sum of income that helps to calculate the tax which can be paid by the corporation and individuals in every year. The gross income can be adjusted against the exemptions and reductions that can be allowed in the taxation year. It consists of salary, bonus, investment income in respect of individuals.
Apart from this, in respect of a company, the taxable income consists the income that can be generated by selling the services and products. It also consists the subsidies that can be provided to their clients. It does not include the expenditure that can be made by the corporations from the income to calculate the taxable income.
Additionally, it refers to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) that can be conducted by the government of Australia and also it provides the subsidized drugs to their residents along with the foreigners and that comes under the Reciprocal Health Care agreement. This type of scheme enhances the residents and able to access the affordable an consistent range of drugs and medicines. They also face the scrutiny that leads to the increase in cost. Corner pharmacy calculated the taxable income as: It can be noted that corner pharmacy has followed the system of accrual basis and that helps them to calculate the taxable income and the expenditure and the cost of sales can be allowed as the deductions for tax purposes due to this the corner pharmacy has the taxable income of amount of $170000.
It can be stated that IRC V Duke of Westminister [1936] lays down the principle in which court provided an opportunity to an individual to maintain and manage their statement of affairs in that manner so that they can pay less tax. They have the ability to carry out this type of creative tax planning that helps in future. In the case of Duke of Westminster they provide an opportunity in which they hire a gardener and also make them payment of income from the income of post-tax, but to reduce the amount of tax the Duke stops the payment of gardener rather than the covenant and also agreed to pay the amount at the specified period. This case denotes the concept of tax avoidance (Oishi, et. al, 2018).
Capital Gain and Loss in Relation to Rental Property
It can be stated that the case tax avoidance is the condition in which the company needs to make some arrangements to manage and control the financial statements of affairs that help to facilitate the tax reduction of tax liability within the system of law. It can be defined as the usage or process for the modification of the accounts of financial statements of an individual that helps to deduct the value of tax and that can be paid by the taxpayer on the income that can be earned by the individuals. They also adopt the practice in which the taxpayer less their liability of tax which means tax evasion that lays down the illegal activities to deduct the liability of taxpayer.
In today modern era, this principle is irrelevant and substituted by the Ramsay principle. Under this principle, the corporations made the capital gains by entering to the number of transactions to generate the illusion in respect of capital losses that helps to avoid the capital gains than in that case the authority has the power to charge tax on all the transactions. The reason behind this is that the corporations manage the stages in a pre-decided manner to save the value of tax and did not serve any saleable purpose (La Torre, et. al., 2018).
It can also be evaluated that this principle does not influence the amount of capital gain but it consists of all different kinds of taxation and also put the condition on the taxpayer to involve in the method of creative tax planning. There is another method in which the taxpayer has the capability to avoid the imposition by the provision of anti-avoidance and that helps in the execution of an equitable tax system. This provision helps in the complexities of the legislation and there is a method of compliance cost in which the taxpayer can be self-accessed (Miles, 2017).
There is the establishment of regulation and legislation under the part IV A that can be used to avoid the tax arrangements and that does not involve any saleable substance. This system can’t be applied before the end of financial year to create the fear in banks and tax payers to frame the arrangements in respect of repayment of money that can be borrowed for the saleable purpose. It can be defined as the usage or process for the modification of the accounts of financial statements of an individual that helps to deduct the value of tax and that can be paid by the taxpayer on the income that can be earned by the individuals. They also adopt the practice in which the taxpayer less their liability of tax which means tax evasion that lays down the illegal activities to deduct the liability of taxpayer. In the today’s era, income tax and practice can be adjusted and handled as per companies’ needs and individual requirements. Practice should be adopted and applied as per deduction of tax could be done in order to pay tax by the taxpayer on the value he earned as taxable income. In today’s time, the taxation office of Australia scrutinizes the avoidance of tax and also inspects the affairs of tax that can be paid by the public and private companies that are operating in Australia. They also enhance the corporation that they are paying the right value of tax or not (La Torre, et. al., 2018).
Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance
Capital gain can be defined as the number of capital assets that gives the high amount than the value of purchase price. It has unrealised value until the sale of that particular assets. On the other side, the capital loss can be defined as the value that can be obtained by the seller and that has less value against the price of purchase. It can also be noted that the loss incurred by the parties can be termed as the capital loss and that can be set off against the capital gain on the rental property for the time period of 8 years. As per the case, the capital assets can be recognised as the rental property and it can be observed that the individuals purchased the rental property in a joint manner (Bankman, et. al, 2017). The Joseph has right to receive the 20% of the profit from the property and wife is entitled to 80% of profit that can be gained from the profit. Capital gain has unrealised value till the sales of that asset. On the other hand the capital loss can be taken as the price of obtaining value that is entitled to seller and it creates less value over purchase price. Such losses are incurred by individual parties and companies who can be set off by capital gain over rental property. So Joseph has a right to receive 20% of amount as a profit and his wife was entitled to 80% of profit. It should be described that loss incurred by individual or parties.
Apart from this, if there is a loss then, in that case, Joseph has entitled to bear all the loss. In the provide case, if the parties enter into contract and according to that, they contribute 20:80 ratio. But later on, it can be analysed that party has loss of $40000 and that can be bear by the Joseph. Although in this respect, a rule was framed that capital loss or capital gain is carried to next coming years and if they occur then, in that case, it depicts the capital loss and capital gains then this amount can be realised for the tax purposes (Artsand Fleming, 2018).
As per the fact of the case, there is a loss of around $400000 that can bear by the husband that is Joseph and that balance can be carry forward in the present year(Meidner, et. al,. 2017). If there is any capital gain then it could be adjusted in respect of losses and the remaining amount can be recognised as the tax. In respect of the case, the entire amount is not the loss that is $40,000 some amount can be recognised for the purpose of the tax. For example, if the Jane and Joseph have the revenue of $100000 then that value can be adjusted for the loss that can be occurred in the last year. They adjusted the amount in a respective manner such as $2000 and that can be reduced from the $40,000 and $38, 0000 can be recognised as for the purpose of tax (Huizinga, et. al,. 2018). If capital gain is incurred and it could be adjusted in any terms of loss and remaining value would be identified as a tax then Jane and Joseph has chance to occur in a previous and they could adjust their profit and loss into 280:30 ratio. In all cases, capital gain can be reduced in the purpose to adjust and value the loss occurred in previous year. In the respective amount of taxable income, around $2000 value of reduced value would be identified as mean of taxable income (Meidner, et. al., 2017).
The Ramsay Principle and Anti-Avoidance Provisions
Along with this share, the amount of profit that is $8000 of Jane can be recognised for the purpose of the tax. In the given scenario, it can be stated that Joseph can set off the amount of $40000 as the loss and that can be for the next 8 years and it was against the capital gain that can be earned in the next coming future. By this analysis, it can be asserted that the amount of $5000 can be set off against the capital loss and that can be extended for the period f 8 years. When the parties decide to sell the properties then it can be stated that capital gain can be realised and the Joseph has the right of 20% of the profits. In this respect there is loss and that can be allocated for the purpose of tax and they can incur the capital loss and capital gain. As per the fact of the case, there is a loss of around $400000 that can bear by the husband that is Joseph and that balance can be carry forward in the present year. If there is any capital gain then it could be adjusted in respect of losses and the remaining amount can be recognised as the tax.
Conclusion
From the above report, it can be determined that taxation plays a crucial role in the organisations. They also identify that the taxable income of Corner pharmacy is $170000 that can be obtained by reducing the expenditures from the revenue that can be earned by the corporations. Long with this, there is a case of IRC V Duke of Westminster [1936] in which they establish the principle of tax avoidance but now this concept is not relevant in today’s world. It can also be noted that they replaced the principle of tax evasion and that is the principle of Ramsay principle. They also set off the rental property against the capital gain and that can be for the time of 8 years and due to that the Joseph can set the amount of $5000 and that can recover the loss of $40000 for tax. In the overall conclusion, it is observed that tax avoidance would be replaced the facts and principles of tax avoidance which covers real bodies of tax evasion and principle Ramsay becomes irrelevant. This report has covered all principle and adjustments related to capital gain, arrangements of taxable income and reduced the value of expenses from the revenue in any company.
References
Arts, S. and Fleming, L., (2018) Paradise of Novelty—Or Loss of Human Capital? Exploring New Fields and Inventive Output. Organization Science.
Bankman, J., Shaviro, D.N., Stark, K.J. and Kleinbard, E.D., (2017) Federal Income Taxation. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Cai, J., Chen, X. and Dai, M., (2017) Portfolio selection with capital gains tax, recursive utility, and regime switching. Management Science, 64(5), pp.2308-2324.
Huizinga, H., Voget, J. and Wagner, W., (2018) Capital gains taxation and the cost of capital: Evidence from unanticipated cross-border transfers of tax base. Journal of Financial Economics.
La Torre, M., Dumay, J. and Rea, M.A., (2018) Breaching intellectual capital: critical reflections on Big Data security. Meditari Accountancy Research.
Meidner, R., Hedborg, A. and Fond, G., (2017) Employee investment funds: An approach to collective capital formation. Germany: Routledge.
Miles, J.J., (2017) Solving the problem of capital loss distribution upon dissolution of a service partnership.
Oishi, S., Kushlev, K. and Schimmack, U., (2018) Progressive taxation, income inequality, and happiness. American Psychologist, 73(2), pp.157.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
