Integrating Reward Strategies with Other HR Practices
- Reward refers to the returns for good and evil received from an individual. In accordance to organizational perspective, reward refers to the amount an organization is ready to pay to an employee to accomplish the objectives that are either tangible such as salary appraisal or intangible such as job promotion (Irshal & Afridi 2011, p.320). Reward strategy refers to the payment design for the good by the organization to an employee, to motivate for further improvement (Haider et al 2015, p.346). Human resource management refers to the planned approach of managing people for improved performance. Human resource practices such recruitment and firing, compensation and benefits, training and developments, rewards and motivation, and employees support and services (Shrama & Shrama 2015, p.118). Reward strategy is related and is part of the human resource practices that entails of sourcing for employees, the motivation of the new employees and rewards that eventually affect the performance of the organization.
Efficient management of reward strategy has numerous beneficial effects on the performance. For example: Instill the sense of ownership among the employee. The sense of ownership helps in facilitating a long-term relationship with the employee with the organization and makes employees feel valued as their efforts get noticed and appreciated through a proper reward system.
Human resource department main work is to source and retains the available workforce. With a better reward strategy, the turnover rate of an organization tends to reduce as the existing employees lack enough reason for looking for another opportunity with better pay (Fatima et al.2015, p.423). With high employee retention, the workforce skills of an organization get retained hence providing a better opportunity in competing with the competitors.
Secondly, efficient reward strategy enhance employee’s interest on the financial performance of the organization, as the motivated employee knows that a positive financial reflection on the organization will lead to a positive financial gain of the best employee or all employees(Dagne,Beyene & Berhana 2015,p.238). The expectancy of financial gain enhances the efforts of the human capital of the organization, making the human resource department easy time and no reason for sourcing for more productive workers.
Thirdly, reward strategy affects the rate of job offer acceptance of the company. In organizations that have reduced reward strategies such as low salary and lack of bonuses on the breakthroughs, job offer acceptance rate is always meager as many employees see small benefits on offer(Ishrad 2011). While organizations with robust reward strategies such as performance bonuses and right salary scale, job offer acceptance rate are always high as employees relate the presented opportunity comes with enough and desirable benefits that will improve their living standards.
- Overseas assignments by companies are always considered as a promotion opportunity, since there is always an expected increase in income. However, the salary increment does not always reflect the hardships being faced by such expatriates in international countries most so the hostile ones(Fechter $& Walsh 2010,p.1203). Therefore, as the Human Resource Director, proper reward packages should always be identified and evaluated according to the task, region or areas of posting, exchange rate, housing cost, family benefits, cost of living and many others.
In determining the expatriate package, I will use two basic models: the basic home model and the foreign country basic model, to determine the amount and benefits the expatriate is supposed to receive while working in the home country as compared to the foreign country(Tan 2016,p.58). The basic needs allowances always difference in countries and therefore these two models will help in determining the basic salary, the benefit that the expatriate is supposed to receive in Dubai.
Salary-A lot of people work to gain salary that is capable of maintains their needs. Expatriation always brings about salary increment to employees and the amount is always determined by the foreign country salary rate(Haider et al 2015,p.346). Dubai salary and pay scale depend on the negotiation and qualifications since UAE Federal Labor Law has no provisions for wages. Therefore the rating for salary increment for our expatriate employee will be upon the company rating scale. The salary will also be calculated with Dubai taxes taken into account but will not be more than $ 40,300 per month.
Designing Reward Package for Expatriate Employee
House allowance-The housing allowance must be an amount that will guarantee our expatriate a good and safe house in Dubai. Within the house allowance, there will be the inclusion of basic utilities and domestic help. Other allowances such as medical, education among others will be calculated depending on the number of the expatriate household and whether the expatriate is capable of taking the family to Dubai or living the family back home. All the packages will depend on the Dubai’s taxation plan so as the expatriate is not left with a minimal amount of money to make the life harder while executing duties in Dubai.
- Every organization adopted different payments models such as differed payments, seniority-based payments, team-based payments, knowledge and experienced-based payments. These payments are always determined by conditions.
Differed payments occurs in different conditions such as in salary reduction arrangement, bonus deferral plans, supplement executive retirement plans, excess benefits plans(Diab & Hazer 2012,p.360). The salary reduction arrangement plan happens when an employee decides to postponed part of the salary to a different year, for example, an employee who earns $80,000 may decide to defer $ 30,000 to a later year hence will only receive $ 50,000 and pay taxes on this amount.
Supplemental executive retirement plans allow the company to contribute key employee’s nonqualified plan so that on their retirement they will be able to access the accrued funds if certain conditions were fulfilled such as vesting schedules( Haayashi & Keeton 2012,p.20). Excess benefit plans allow employees to contribute more than their normal contribution limitations, such as the retirement plan for employees. The plan ensures that the amount contributed in the present will only be paid in future and respect to the conditions. Finally, the bonus deferral plan allows the employee to defer the amount they are supposed to pay as a bonus to a different year or until they will be financially stable.
Seniority refers to the periods an individual works for a company; thus seniority-based payments is the monetary or other benefits an employee receives in regards to the time that he/she has worked for the organization (Angrian, Foster & Hitczenki 2010,p.120). Those individuals that have taken quite long time in a company tend to get promotions and salary increment than those with fewer days in the company. Seniority-based payments might be adopted when an organization wants to retain the best-skilled employees by ensuring that they stay quite long time in the company. Through seniority payment, those skilled employees will receive quite more benefits than those that have no experience. Another condition for the seniority-based benefit is when an organization always higher employees on wages that are less than the value of their marginal product at the beginning and enter into an agreement to increase the amount of salary of benefit with time in the company. This makes workers stay quite longer time s as to reach the pay-back period of the bond.
- Policies refer to set plans used as the decision-making basis. Therefore pay policies Pay policies refers to the strategies used by an organization to compete with targets labor market in recruiting employees. The policies are always critical in assisting the managers in making the right decisions regarding the company human capital allocation (Ascari, Colciago & Rossi 2017, p.880). The pay policies are determined by organizational internal or external factors. Internal factors include the ability to pay, business strategy, employee, and job evaluation and performance appraisal.
Offering Deferred Pay and Time-Based Benefits
The organization ability to pay determines the amount of salary an employee receives, for example, big organizations tend to have strong financial base hence pay more salary than the smaller organizations. The business strategy of an organization determines the amount of salary paid to employees for example if a business wants to outdo the competitors, then it must contract skilled employees who require higher salaries, and if the company is contented with the performance then, it will accommodate the available employees with the minimum salary cut(Block et al 2017,p.1113). Job evaluation and performance appraisal tend to create a differential of jobs stating minimum and maximum salary an employee is supposed to receive. The performance of an employee also tends to affect the salary as the best performing always request more salary than the poor performing employees. Employees too affect the pay policy through the accrued level of experience, performance, and potentiality.
The external factors such as the cost of living, labor laws, labor unions, productivity also affect the pay policy and compensations in an organization. Labor unions are always powerful in championing for the employees’ rights such as salaries. The non-unionized companies tend to enjoy more freedom concerning fixation of the compensation plan more than the unionized companies. The cost of living affect the prices of basic commodities such as food, shelter, and clothes; therefore any change in the consumer index affects the wage salary.
The labor laws developed by governments determine the minimum amount that all employees are supposed to receive, and organizations face the consequences of failure to adhere to such laws. The productivity of an organization affects the amount of salary received by employees. The increment of the productivity motivates the managers to increase the employee salaries and compensation, while a drop of productivity level forces the managers to reduce expenses by cutting down the salary. Finally, the prevailing going rate of competitors affects the pay policy of an organization of the same kind, as all are striving for the labor market.
- Pay impacts can be evaluated in some ways for example through performance, turnover rate, sustainability, evaluation survey(Fanrong & Jiannan 2017,p.1311). The performance evaluation method of the pay impacts such as short and long-term goals. When the objectives are achieved then the pay strategy is effective, and when the objective is not achieved, then the pay scheme is effective.
Turnover rate- most employees always work with the single aim of acquiring salary that is capable of sustaining their daily needs. Such employees tend to change job when a new greener pasture arises, hence organizations tend to use reward schemes to retain employees. The effectiveness of the reward system, therefore, can be evaluated by the effectiveness of reducing the employee turnover rate.
Level of Sustainability- the impact of the pay can be evaluated by defining the sustainability of the company. Some organizations enter into pay schemes that are financially heavy to the company, hence within a short time the company collapse. When the company is capable of sustaining the pay scheme, employees get motivated hence increases their production rate that is eventually translated into the company’s success.
Factors Influencing Pay Policy
Use of evaluation question or survey- the company can use question evaluation method to determine the feelings of the employees after the implementation of the pay strategy. The short questions answered by the employees provide an overview of the motivational status of the employees and can be compared with previous motivational status. A more satisfactory report, therefore, is an indicator that the pay scheme as positive effects and a negative report shows that the pay scheme has no significance.
Workforce composition- the effectiveness of the pay scheme can be evaluated by the composition of the workforce. In situations where the pay scheme is ineffective, the workforce tends to be weak as the most skilled personnel shift job positions and companies, whereas an effective pay scheme ensures the retention of the skilled employees leading to the strong workforce.
Job offer refusal rate- the effectiveness of pay scheme can also be evaluated through analysis of the job offer refusal rate. In organizations that have a high rate of job refusal, as a result of small salary pay or increment regarding the assigned task, then the conclusion that should be made is that the pay scheme is ineffective. Whereas in an effective pay scheme, employees tend to welcome new job assignments since the incentives offered are appropriate in respect to the assigned task.
- Broadband refers to the practices by organizations in evaluating and constructing a job grading structure or salary band. Broadband tends to have 100 percent salary difference between maximum and minimum while a typical salary band has 40 percent salary difference. The process determines the amount of salary required paying a particular position and it has both positive and negative effects (Shrama & Rattan 2010, p.91). The following are the advantages of broadband.
Broadband helps to streamline organizational hierarchy. Organizations at times become too hierarchical for strategic direction resulting in slow responses and slow communication from both managers to staffs and from staffs to managers due to a large number of layers. At such situations, broad banding tends to reduce the layers within an organization, flattening the organizational structure and collapsing the salary range, thus reduces the hierarchy.
Broadband helps in facilitating the internal movement of an organization in situations where the job positions are lateral. In such organizations, employees always consider transfer as a demotion since the salary band always remains the same, while with broadband, internal movements are increased . Broadbanding increase trust on the management since with broadband, managers have great latitude to pay whatever they feel like to the employees, hence reducing the push and pull between the recruiting manager and the human resource department. Finally, broadband helps in facilitating workers to acquire more knowledge and skills to adapt to the new roles in the lateral organizational structure.
Broadbanding has disadvantages too, such as inequalities, lack of awareness of the external market rates lack of cost controls and reduction in promotion opportunities. Broadbanding reduces promotion opportunities by flattening the organizational structures. The fewer salary bands result into fewer climbing steps for job promotions that have wide negative effects such as job dissatisfaction, high rate of turnover.
Evaluating the Outcomes of Pay Systems
lack of cost controls in an organization on some incentives. The widening of the salary band tends to reduce bonuses that are received by employees since at times the company might not be in a position to handle the total salary.
broadband may lead to salary inequalities. The widening of the wages tends to weaken the linkage between the salary growth and skill development for higher job positions since the motivation effect is lost . Finally, broadband reduces the awareness of the external market rates as the midpoint are removed thus traditional salary can be related to the broadband salary. These make manager to be confused when wants to pay an employee at the market rate.
- Performance related pay is the organization’s compensation strategy that relates the employee’s rewards to the organization’s performance (Herst & Emmert 2017,p.9). The financial incentives always motivate employees by aligning their efforts in achieving the organization’s objectives, however, in some cases, the adoption of the performance related pay techniques resulted into poor performance or rater drop in the performance(Osborne 2014,p.14). The following is a feasibility discussion of the adoption of the pay scheme in public school teachers and bicycles couriers.
Performance related pay is advantageous to any organization and has always been applied in public schools too. The performance-related pay takes many forms, for example, many regions pay more to experienced teachers to mentor new teachers, some teachers are paid based on the ability to serve as a curriculum specialist and even to teach the inner city schools (Whitaker et al 2012,p.632). However, controversy always arises on the student’s performance basis payment. Students performance are the key determinants of the success of a school and are always as a result of the great effort pumped be the teachers (Knudsen 2016, p.1850). The good performance is always more observable in private schools than in public schools, thus leading to the discrediting of the effectiveness of the performance related pay in public schools. In most countries, the government remunerates the Public school’s teachers’ salary. Thus the salary tends to be averaged and be equal among teachers of the same structural level unlike in private schools that pay is on the level of performance.
Therefore using the PRP will not change the salary level received by teachers on the same income structure as schools performance is not based on the teamwork of the teachers to foster the student’s academics development. Adoption of the PRP will tend increase competition among the teachers, with a few getting motivated while others lag behind, eventually breaking the teamwork among them leading to the poor performance of teachers(Giele,Kerkhofs & Van 2010,p.293). Secondly, the success of an individual is not based on the academic performance rather on many life basic skills such as music, art, and others: this makes the scheme more inappropriate in developing the academic performance of students.
Bicycle couriers are individually employed by courier companies tasked to deliver items such as a letter to the customer’s homes. Performance related pay is essential to the bicycle messengers since there work individualized, and salary calculation is based on the number of trips covered by an individual(Pupo & Nock 2014,p.340). The scheme is more appropriate with the bicycle messengers as one will make more trips to gain a lot of money at the end of the day(Georgantzis, Vasileiou, &Kotzaivazoglou 2017,p.15).
- Expectancy theory is a motivational theory that explains why individuals get agitated to perform when they feel that there is a reward at the end of the activity or their actions will lead to the anticipated results (Hsiu et al 2011, p.258). The theory proposed by Victor H. Vroom is on the assumption that behavior of an individual is as a result of the choices made concerning the alternative course of action that is connected to the psychological activities taking place simultaneously with the behavior.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Broad Banding
Vroom recognized that employee performance is established on personality aspects such as expertise, know-how, understanding, abilities, and personality. Vroom maintained that power; accomplishment and motivation of an individual are inter-related to individual’s motivation, and use three components that are expectancy, instrumentality, and valence to justify the stand (Soyoung & Sungchan 2017, p.78). Expectancy refers to the belief that increased effort leads to higher performance, hence affect acquisition of skills, and necessary support. Instrumentality is the belief that good performance leads to reception of high valued results, for example, the good results obtained in the first level leaders to good results in the second level.
Factors associated with instrumentality are trust in manager’s ability to control the reward system and the presence of well-tabled policies regarding the performance reward system. Valence refers to the importance individual places on the expected results. Valence is the expected satisfaction rather than the received satisfaction.
Reward system’s main objective is to increase the performance of the overall organization by motivation employees. Employee’s motivations are achieved through salary increment, promotion, and other incentives(Nakai et al 2017,p.19). The expectancy theory helps in developing the reward system of an organization first by establishing that the performance of the organization will improve only when the employees as convinced that their efforts will yield the choices of their needs. These in return create the first component which is expectancy. The expectant employee, therefore, creates interest t in doing the designated task, and the employee will place more efforts after the realization of the amount of the reward (Chan et at 2017, p.19). Small reward in respect to the task tend to reduce the expected satisfaction and trust of the employee, therefore however much an organization insist on the reward system, less outcome will be received if not a drop on the productivity. The theory suggests that employee’s motivation and efforts are inter-connected and relate to the reward aspect, and tend to reduce with the reduction of the reward system.
References
Angrisani, M, Foster, K, &Hitczenko, M 2013, ‘The 2010 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Technical Appendix’, Research Review, 20, pp. 118-121, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Ascari, G, Colciago, A, & Rossi, L 2017, ‘Limited Asset Market Participation, Sticky Wages, and Monetary Policy’, Economic Inquiry, 55, 2, pp. 878-897, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Bock, J, Hajek, A, Brenner, H, Saum, K, Matschinger, H, Haefeli, W, Schöttker, B, Quinzler, R, Heider, D, König, H, Hajek, A, Schöttker, B, &König, H 2017, ‘A Longitudinal Investigation of Willingness to Pay for Health Insurance in Germany’, Health Services Research, 52, 3, pp. 1099-1117, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Feasibility of Performance-Related Pay Systems
Chang, Y, Hsu, P, & Wu, Z 2015, ‘Exploring managers’ intention to use business intelligence: the role of motivations’, Behaviour& Information Technology, 34, 3, pp. 273-285, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Dagne, T, Beyene, W, &Berhanu, N 2015, ‘Motivation and Factors Affecting It among Health Professionals in the Public Hospitals, Central Ethiopia’, Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 231-242. Available from: 10.4314/ejhs.v25i3.6. [1 May 2018].
Diab, D, & Hazer, J 2012, ‘Effect of Rater Nationality on the Relationships among Ratee Task, Contextual, and Counterproductive Behaviors and Salary Estimates’, International Journal Of Selection & Assessment, 20, 3, pp. 359-375, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Fanrong, M, & Jiannan, W 2017, ‘Policy Expectation Moderates the Relationship Between Merit Pay Policy Effectiveness and Public Service Motivation’, Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 45, 8, pp. 1305-1318, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Fatima, M, Shafique, M, Qadeer, F, & Ahmad, R 2015, ‘HR Practices and Employee Performance Relationship in Higher Education: Mediating Role of Job Embeddedness, Perceived Organizational Support and Trust’, Pakistan Journal Of Statistics & Operation Research, 11, 3, pp. 421-439, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Fechter, A, & Walsh, K 2010, ‘Examining ‘Expatriate’ Continuities: Postcolonial Approaches to Mobile Professionals’, Journal Of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 36, 8, pp. 1197-1210, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Georgantzis, N, Vasileiou, E, &Kotzaivazoglou, I 2017, ‘Peer norm guesses and self-reported attitudes towards performance-related pay’, Plos One, 12, 4, pp. 1-15, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Gielen, A, Kerkhofs, M, & Van Ours, J 2010, ‘How performance related pay affects productivity and employment’, Journal Of Population Economics, 23, 1, pp. 291-301, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Gottfried, H 2014, ‘Precarious Work in Japan: Old Forms, New Risks?’, Journal Of Contemporary Asia, 44, 3, pp. 464-478, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Haider, M, Aamir, A, Abdul Hamid, A, &Hashim, M 2015, ‘A literature Analysis on the Importance of Non-Financial Rewards for Employees’ Job Satisfaction’, Abasyn University Journal Of Social Sciences, 8, 2, pp. 341-354, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Hayashi, F, & Keeton, W 2012, ‘Measuring the Costs of Retail Payment Methods’, Economic Review (01612387), 2, pp. 1-41, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Herbst, T, &Emmert, M 2017, ‘Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review’, BMC Health Services Research, 17, pp. 1-11, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Hsiu-Li, L, Su-Houn, L, & Shih-Ming, P 2011, ‘Modeling Motivations For Blogging: An Expectancy Theory Analysis’, Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 39, 2, pp. 251-264, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018
Irshad, M 2011, ‘Factors Affecting Employee Retention: Evidence from Literature Review’, Abasyn University Journal Of Social Sciences, 4, 1, pp. 84-102, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Irshad, M, &Afridi, F 2011, ‘Factors Affecting Employees Retention: Evidence From Literature’, Abasyn University Journal Of Social Sciences, 4, 2, pp. 307-339, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Knudsen, AT 2016, ‘Profession, “performance”, and policy: teachers, examinations, and the state in England and Wales, 1846-1862’, PaedagogicaHistorica, 52, 5, pp. 507-524, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Nakai, T, Nakatani, H, Hosoda, C, Nonaka, Y, &Okanoya, K 2017, ‘Sense of Accomplishment Is Modulated by a Proper Level of Instruction and Represented in the Brain Reward System’, Plos ONE, 12, 1, pp. 1-20, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Osborne, K 2014, ‘Employers welcome guidance on performance-related pay systems’, Nursing Standard, 28, 42, pp. 14-15, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Pupo, N, & Noack, A 2014, ‘Organizing Local Messengers: Working Conditions and Barriers To Unionization’, Canadian Journal Of Sociology, 39, 3, pp. 331-356, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Sharma, A, & Sharma, S 2015, ‘The Influence of Human Resource Practices on Productivity in Developing Countries- Review of Innovative HR Practices’, International Journal Of Multidisciplinary Approach & Studies, 2, 3, pp. 116-120, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Sharma, S, & Rattan, M 2010, ‘Analysis of Broad Banding and Minimization Techniques for Square Patch Antenna’, IETE Journal Of Research, 56, 2, pp. 88-93, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Soyoung, P, &Sungchan, K 2017, ‘The Linkage Between Work Unit Performance Perceptions Of U.S. Federal Employees And Their Job Satisfaction: An Expectancy Theory’, Transylvanian Review Of Administrative Sciences, 52E, pp. 77-93, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Tan, BS 2016, ‘On comparing cost of living of cities using expatriate price survey’, Policy Studies, 37, 1, pp. 53-71, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.
Whitaker, E, Herian, M, Larimer, C, & Lang, M 2012, ‘The Determinants of Policy Introduction and Bill Adoption: Examining Minimum Wage Increases in the American States, 1997-2006’, Policy Studies Journal, 40, 4, pp. 626-649, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 1 May 2018.