Overview of soil carbon storage in Australia
The following study highlightsthe significance of proposed methodologies like “Applications of organic amendments”. The process of earning carbon credits by either storing carbon and reducing greenhouse gas GHG) has been discussed in the following study (Environment.gov.au, 2018). Apart from this, the significance of imputation the organic amendments for soil carbon storage have been discussed in this study. The contribution of greenhouse gas emission has been discussed here. The following study includes the cost as well as the benefit of the implementation of fertilizer and compost (Climatechangeauthority.gov.au, 2018). Furthermore, the contribution to those strategies or methodologies has been discussed in the following study.
The Imputation of organic amendments fertilizer, a substance to soil has very fruitful outcomes. As per the ideas of Agegnehu et al. (2015), it can be clearly said that the imposition of organic amendments helps in order to enhance environmentally favourable waste management strategy. The enhancement of favourable waste management strategy gives a workable result that is improved soil organic matter content in low fecundity soils. In order to improve protection for water quality and to support crop production, proper management strategy is required. It can be said that this appropriate management strategy can be found through the insertion of fertilizer, compost to the soil. Based on the opinion of Sommer & Bossio (2014), it can clearly say that the federal department of agriculture is presently applying the production of soil amendments. In order to gain a better understanding of the influence of organic amendments fertilizer and substance on the soil N cycle, minimization of C and N from a range of organic amendment is necessary.
In terrestrial carbon cycling, the soil organic carbon plays an important role. According to the opinion of Sandeman et al. (2010), it can be clearly stated that Soil organic carbon is effective in order to preserve the quality of the soil. It can be said that to get protection or security in food and environment in agro ecosystem soil organic carbon is essential.
In addition to the opinion of Sandeman et al. (2010), it can be clearly stated that as a sole treatment, on average the highest soil organic carbon content in the 0-20 cm layer is recorded in a filter cake (6.5 t·ha-1) and MSW (5.9 t·ha-1). The federal department of agriculture identified that the impact of organic amendments as well as N fertilization is not appropriate (p > .05) for soil pH (Climatechangeauthority.gov.au, 2018). In addition to this, the department also identified that organic amendment is not suitable for relevant cations. However, it helps in order to increase CEC, besides, decrease the pH level of the soil. Based on the opinion of Teh et al. (2017), it can be generally stated that on basal respiration there are no significant outcomes of using organic amendment fertilizer and compost.
Know about Emissions Reduction Fund
The consultant of the federal department of agriculture in Australia identified that the long-term insertion of organic amendment to soil has an extreme power of improves influence on soil carbon storage. Based on the opinion of Sandeman et al. (2016), it can be clearly stated that it is useful in order to reduce soil erosions by water and wind. Soil tilth can be improved with the help of organic amendment exact and compost to soil.
The result from the balance in between plant residue and microbiological mineralisation and decomposition the amount of organic amendment can be calculated. As per the ideas of Teh et al. (2017), it can be clearly stated that when the soil infraction or pools, the organic carbon can be found. Due to land conservation agriculture with approx 29 Pg C has been lost from the global soil pool. The POC, particulate organic carbon is used in soil carbon storage (Chan et al. 2009). Particulate organic carbon is associated with particles larger than approx 0.04 millimetres (Environment.gov.au, 2018).
It can be said that particular organic carbon is increased in the soil very easily beside, it breaks down so quickly. It can be said that Hums organic carbon is used for soil carbon storage. The hums organic carbon is associated with the particles that are smaller than approx 0.04 millimetres. The resistant organic carbon can be found in soil particles. As per the opinion of Xia et al. (2017), it can be clearly said that in soil particle the resistant organic carbon is found and that are smaller than approx 1.5 millimetres. Resistant organic carbon has an exact chemical structure like charcoal that is used for soil carbon storage (Climatechangeauthority.gov.au, 2018). Approximately 1500-1700 pg of carbons in the top meter of soil is required. The amount of carbon contained in the terrestrial vegetation. The top approx 0-25 centimetre layer of soil is 25.10 pg (Callesen et al. 2016).
From the above discussion, it is observed that organic amendments are crucial in countering the overbearing effect of GHG on the climate. It is found that soil degradation has become a massive issue in the agricultural domain for last few years. As commented by Bass et al. (2016), composted materials often play crucial role in improving the quality of soils along with the output of the agriculture. Henceforth, contemporary literature identified the significance of compost and co-composted biochar (COMBI) in improving water content in the agriculture soil. It is also observed that carbon contents like K, Ca, NO3 and NH4 are flourished due to proper application of such organic materials in the agriculture. Focusing on the methodology of this biochar and compost production, role of pyrolysis plants has been observed. As identified by Bass et al. (2016), pyrolysis plants can consume the load of 550 degree centigrade while producing such composites for countering GHG. In order to assess the measurement of GHG, organisations of Australia applies INNOVA 1412i field portable photocaustic gas analyser. Based on this measurement, researchers perform crop performance analysis for the betterment of production. From the research on the Hu trial, no affection on the plants has been observed. Therefore, it can be analysed that through a detailed methodology, farmers and organisations can omit the massive influence of N2O.
Organic amendments and their contribution
On another hand, Schimmelpfennig et al. (2014) identified that emissions of GHG and carbon sequestration play critical roles in eliminating negative issues from the climate. Considering this cited work, it can be stated that biochar is capable of eliminating CO2 from the atmosphere through the carbon sequestration procedure. Henceforth, three major methods can be discussed in this context. The laboratory incubation methods have helped the researchers to conceptualise the significance of the biochar in the field of the agriculture. Nevertheless, researchers have been able to mix the biochar with the hydro char to generate a positive result. From the results of such experiment, it is observed that researchers have been able retain the N content for the growth of the plants in such situation. Simultaneously, as Schimmelpfennig et al. (2014) observed that through the field experiment, plants in the GHG plots have been grown by 10cm. From the research, it can be proposed that a proper mixture of biochars with the pig slurry is important in eliminating GHG. Discussions from the NH3 emission experiment highlight the significance of carbon substrates, which have helped researchers to eliminate the effect of NH3 from the plants. Henceforth, from the above discussion, it can be said that biochar is highly important in isolating the influence of GHG. In this context, Scotti et al. (2015) recommended the significance of intensive agriculture to improve the feasibility of the organic amendments. Henceforth, application of sheep manure and cow manure plays critical role in developing the soil bulk density. Besides this, chemical fertility can also be nullified through the proper usage of organic amendments. It is observed that through a proper implication of organic amendments, C content from the soil can be eradicated. In this context, C/N ratio can be interpreted as another methodology that can be implied while assessing the proportion of such GHG in agricultural plot. In addition, it is observed that organic materials release the N content in a slow rate, while high rate of such release has been observed in case chemical materials (Scotti et al. 2015).
Cost of Soil Sequestration is not that much as it mainly related to decomposition and stabilisation of properties at the fields. Sequestration of soil in Australian agricultural fields requires agricultural workers to form decomposed manure from organic materials. These materials include Glycoprotein-like substance, which is known as Glomalin. According to Zimmermannet al. (2014), these materials are prepared by AMF Hyphae, commonly found in almost every kind of soils. In this respect, procedures of sequestration are cost effective. In spite of this fact, it needs to be mentioned that usage of this process to reduce GHG quantities in soil is limited. This is because; it takes considerable time to decompose and to stabilise.
The role of compost for carbon storage
Soil carbon storage takes time to be able to store carbon as while plants in fields are alive they keep transferring carbon to the soil (Luo et al. 2016). This increases pool of carbon in the soil. After the plant dies and starts decomposing by itself, the carbon composition in plant tissues and leaves starts assimilating in soil. This procedure significantly increases amount of carbon in the soil. Implementation of soil management methodology actually increases ability of soil to absorb carbon from plant tissues as well as from the atmosphere.
Overall procedure of increasing carbon in soil actually does much good to develop quality of soil. For example, it increases integrity of soil particles. Because of this, soil becomes more resistant to soil erosion. Decreased rate of soil-erosion reduces requirements of extra cares from farmers to place them around each plant during rain. It also decreases use of irrigation in fields as the soil can retain more water in it for growth and survival of plants.
As per the study of Wiederet al. (2015), as soil becomes resistant to erosion, its power to hold water also increases significantly. This may result in less usage of water in agricultural procedures. As soil can retain more water than before, it becomes able to provide more nutrients to the plants. That reduces use of inorganic manures and pesticides in agricultural soil.
Cost of fixing extra amount of carbon in soil is done in a complete organic manner. This process does not require usage of any external materials. That is why; it provides a natural way to increase potentiality of soil without added benefit of cost reduction.
Soil carbon sequestration can affect use of land and soil as it takes time to formulate carbon in the soil after plants die. Norms of Kyoto protocol currently focuses on a forestation and reforestation of agricultural fields. This process requires fields that are high in crop density. This is because it uses remnants of crop plants as source of reserved carbon. Organisms of decomposition then assimilate that carbon in the soil. This process would only become feasible if it is applied in agricultural fields.
On the other hand, this process cannot help if farmer wants to increase carbon amount in open patches. If gap in crop cover is significantly large, it can reduce input of soil carbon in an organic way.
As per study of Pikaaret al. (2018), this process also requires to prepare a soil map of respective field to judge various requirements of carbon in the soil. After the map is, prepared people need to collect different sample of soils that would be tested by scientists. These steps required a large amount of money as each session covers a large portion of agricultural grounds. In that perspectives it feasibility of this process may seem far reached.
Biochar and its impact on carbon sequestration
Conclusion:
In spite of all limitations of soil carbon fixation, it is profitable for agriculturists and farmers in the end. Once sample of each soil is tested and its carbon requirement is determined, farmers need to invest a reduced amount of manure, and other inorganic materials in each crop cycle. Therefore, introduction of Soil-Carbon storage procedures can actually reduce carbon emission from agricultural fields.
Apart from this, further study is required to identify procedures to reduce cost of soil mapping. Advanced technology is also required to reduce cost of sample preparation. This can make soil sequestration more beneficial for farmers.
Reference:
Agegnehu, G., Bass, A. M., Nelson, P. N., Muirhead, B., Wright, G., & Bird, M. I. (2015). Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments: effects on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 213, 72-85. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/39019730/2015_Biochar_and_biochar-compost_as_soil_amendments__peanuts.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1534832596&Signature=3uNfdqnAglEP0rBVByvQuCDgBuQ%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DBiochar_and_biochar-compost_as_soil_amen.pdf
Bass, A. M., Bird, M. I., Kay, G., & Muirhead, B. (2016). Soil properties, greenhouse gas emissions and crop yield under compost, biochar and co-composted biochar in two tropical agronomic systems. Science of the Total Environment, 550, 459-470. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/41879476/2016_Soil_properties__GHG_emissions_and_crop_yield_under_B__C_and_COMBI.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1535005749&Signature=8NKzrIiaxOSDLylU253sUU%2Bqlsc%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DSoil_properties_greenhouse_gas_emissions.pdf
Callesen, I., Harrison, R., Stupak, I., Hatten, J., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Boyle, J., … & Zabowski, D. (2016). Carbon storage and nutrient mobilization from soil minerals by deep roots and rhizospheres. Forest Ecology and Management, 359, 322-331. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ingeborg_Callesen/publication/282397289_Carbon_storage_and_nutrient_mobilization_from_soil_minerals_by_deep_roots_and_rhizospheres/links/5a006dbbaca2725286d7cee9/Carbon-storage-and-nutrient-mobilization-from-soil-minerals-by-deep-roots-and-rhizospheres.pdf
Climatechangeauthority.gov.au. About. 2018. Retrieved from https://climatechangeauthority.gov.au/sites/prod.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/files/submissions/2014/tpr/Eastern%20Melbourne%20Climate%20Action%20Group.pdf
Environment.gov.au, (2018).About. Environment. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/9437fe27-64f4-4d16-b3f1-4e03c2f7b0d7/files/aust-emissions-projections-2016.pdf
Luo, Y., Ahlström, A., Allison, S. D., Batjes, N. H., Brovkin, V., Carvalhais, N., … & Georgiou, K. (2016). Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 30(1), 40-56. DOI: 10.1002/2015GB005239.
Pikaar, I., de Vrieze, J., Rabaey, K., Herrero, M., Smith, P., & Verstraete, W. (2018). Carbon emission avoidance and capture by producing in-reactor microbial biomass based food, feed and slow release fertilizer: Potentials and limitations. Science of the Total Environment, 644, 1525-1530. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ilje_Pikaar/publication/326571432_Carbon_emission_avoidance_and_capture_by_producing_in-reactor_microbial_biomass_based_food_feed_and_slow_release_fertilizer_Potentials_and_limitations/links/5b57cdbbaca272a2d66702a9/Carbon-emission-avoidance-and-capture-by-producing-in-reactor-microbial-biomass-based-food-feed-and-slow-release-fertilizer-Potentials-and-limitations.pdf
Sanderman, J., Farquharson, R., Baldock, J., (2010). Soil Carbon Sequestration Potential: A review for Australian Agriculture. CSIRO, Adelaide. Retrieved from https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/blocks/research-and-development/csiro-soil-c-review.pdf
Schimmelpfennig, S., Müller, C., Grünhage, L., Koch, C., & Kammann, C. (2014). Biochar, hydrochar and uncarbonized feedstock application to permanent grassland—Effects on greenhouse gas emissions and plant growth. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 191, 39-52.
Scotti, R., Bonanomi, G., Scelza, R., Zoina, A., & Rao, M. A. (2015). Organic amendments as sustainable tool to recovery fertility in intensive agricultural systems. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 15(2), 333-352. Retrieved from https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718 95162015000200005&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Sommer, R., & Bossio, D. (2014). Dynamics and climate change mitigation potential of soil organic carbon sequestration. Journal of environmental management, 144, 83-87. Retrieved from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/41896/Dynamics%20and%20climate%20change%20June%202016.pdf;sequence=4
Teh, S. H., Wiedmann, T., Castel, A., & de Burgh, J. (2017). Hybrid life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete and geopolymer concrete in Australia. Journal of cleaner production, 152, 312-320. Retrieved from https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:44648/bin49302b73-7bce-4225-bfc9-ed58f04735da?view=true
Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K., & Todd-Brown, K. (2015). Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nature Geoscience, 8(6), 441. DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2413.
Xia, L., Lam, S. K., Chen, D., Wang, J., Tang, Q., & Yan, X. (2017). Can knowledge?based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta?analysis. Global change biology, 23(5), 1917-1925. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13455.
Zimmermann, J., Styles, D., Hastings, A., Dauber, J., & Jones, M. B. (2014). Assessing the impact of within crop heterogeneity (‘patchiness’) in young Miscanthus× giganteus fields on economic feasibility and soil carbon sequestration. Gcb Bioenergy, 6(5), 566-576. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12084.