Literature Review
The ISO 9000 series of quality management systems standard has been widely applied all over the world since its introduction in 1987. By the end of 2013, ISO 9000 had been adopted by over 1,129,000 facilities in 189 countries. Both academics and practitioners are interested in understanding the relationship between adoption of ISO 9000, and other factors (Christmann & Taylor, 2006; Du, Yin, & Zhang, 2016; Fikru, 2014a, 2014b, 2016; Nakamura, Takahashi, & Vertinsky, 2001; Pekovic, 2010; Wu, Chu, & Liu, 2007).
In 2008, the National Bureau of Statistics of China conducted an Economic Census of the service firms. The descriptions of variables, the coding are shown in the table. The data is available in Moodle.
As an indication of universal quality framework, ISO9000 certification has been embraced by an ever increasing number of business enterprises. In the last few years, there have been over half a million certified companies in both America and Europe, and China has had an excess of 390,000 certified companies. It has pulled in attention of many scholars as to whether certification has positive or negative impact on the performance of the companies.
This paper examines the ISO9000 certification impact on company’s market performance basing on the Chinese companies. Considering ISO9000 affirmation as an occasion, a confirmation impact model will be set up by methods for the occasion ponder strategy, which takes irregular return rate as a fundamental marker to gauge the ISO9000 accreditation impact on Chinese market execution in various occasion times.
Literature Review
Motivations for Adoption of ISO Standards
Immediately after introduction of the ISO 9000 series sometime back in 1987, an number of studies touching on motivational factors related to acquiring of ISO certification have been published, yet the prevalent research approach has taken a gander at these components from the alleged double perspective, or at the end of the day from the inward/outer inspirations point of view. In view of this examination approach, the internal factors include desire to make more profits, improve productivity, reduce on operation costs, and of course to improve on the quality. The external factors on the other hand include enhanced image, pressure from the suppliers and clients
(Santos & Millán, Motivation And Benefits Of Implementation And Certification According ISO 9001–The Portuguese Experience, 2013; Santos, Costa, & Leal, Motivation and benefits of implementation and certification according ISO 9001: The Portuguese experience, 2014)
In general, the ISO 9000 group of principles has turned into a primary necessity for entering the worldwide market (Sun, 2000; Abraham, Crawford, Carter, & Mazotta, 2000; Almeida, Caten, & Gutterres, 2009), subsequently some of the past research takes a shot at the reasons behind getting ISO certification argue that the external factors are better than the internal factors (Casadesús & Karapetrovic, 2005; Dongmo & Onojaefe, 2013; Heras-Saizarbitoria, Arana, & San , 2010).
Motivations for Adoption of ISO Standards
The instance of Japan gives solid proof to the in advance of specified articulation: in the 90s, ISO 9001 accreditation turned into a necessity for exports to Europe. Henceforth, Japan was compelled to acquire ISO accreditation keeping in mind the end goal to keep up and proceed with the development of its piece of the overall industry abroad (Heras-Saizarbitoria, Arana, & San , 2010; Kostagiolas & Kitsiou, 2008; Kumar & Balakrishnan, 2011).
Absolutely, there are likewise those (Abraham, Crawford, Carter, & Mazotta, 2000; Llopis & Tarí, 2003) who contend that the appropriation of gauges, for example, the ISO 9000 series is driven internally. For this situation, as upheld by Heras-Saizarbitoria et al. (2010), the adoption would regularly rely upon the organization’s particular hierarchical assets. For instance, on account of organizations which go for TQM usage, ISO 9001 certification is a great beginning towards reducing cost and quality change (Martínez-Costa, Martínez-Lorente, & Choi, 2008).
As Sun (2000) affirms, ISO 9001 accreditation can be helpful in the event that it is viewed as a route towards TQM. In any case, for ISO execution requires a generous budgetary asset, which can change from as meagre as ten thousand dollars to as much as three hundred thousand dollars (Martínez-Lorente & Martínez-Costa, 2004) and on the grounds that the enhancements yielded by such accreditation are easy to refute (Almeida, Caten, & Gutterres, 2009).
Research Questions
This study sought to answer the following research questions.
- Is there is significant difference in the profit made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies?
- Is there is significant difference in the profit made by the companies with overseas investment and those without overseas investment?
- Is there is significant difference in the sales made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies?
- Is there is significant difference in the sales made by the companies with overseas investment and those without overseas investment?
- What factors affect the company profits?
- Research Hypothesis
From the above research questions, the following hypothesis were generated and were to be tested so answer to answer the research questions.
H0: There is no significant difference in the average profit made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies.
HA: There is no significant difference in the average profit made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies.
H0: There is no significant difference in the average profit made by the companies with overseas investment and those without overseas investment.
HA: There is significant difference in the average profit made by the companies with overseas investment and those without overseas investment.
H0: There is no significant difference in the average sales made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies.
HA: There is no significant difference in the average sales made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies.
H0: There is no significant difference in the average sales made by the companies with overseas investment and those without overseas investment.
Research Questions
HA: There is significant difference in the average sales made by the companies with overseas investment and those without overseas investment.
H0: There are no factors that significantly affect the profits of a company
HA: There are factors that significantly affect the profits of a compan
Description of the methodology
In 2008, the National Bureau of Statistics of China conducted an Economic Census of the service firms. A total of 5717 companies were selected for this study. The sampling and data collection was based on the records from the registrar of companies.
For analysis, both descriptive and inferential analysis were employed to analyse the data.We begin by looking at the descriptive statistics.
Statistics |
||||
sales |
profit |
age of company in years |
||
N |
Valid |
5717 |
5717 |
5717 |
Missing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mean |
11698.57 |
2067.97 |
7.62 |
|
Median |
4205.00 |
692.00 |
6.00 |
|
Mode |
1500 |
300 |
2 |
|
Std. Deviation |
32873.609 |
7158.417 |
7.074 |
|
Skewness |
11.328 |
19.254 |
3.540 |
|
Std. Error of Skewness |
.032 |
.032 |
.032 |
|
Kurtosis |
188.002 |
602.738 |
17.849 |
|
Std. Error of Kurtosis |
.065 |
.065 |
.065 |
|
Minimum |
1000 |
17 |
2 |
|
Maximum |
869176 |
296176 |
61 |
|
Percentiles |
25 |
2273.50 |
313.00 |
3.00 |
50 |
4205.00 |
692.00 |
6.00 |
|
75 |
8953.50 |
1542.00 |
9.00 |
As can be seen, the average sales for all the companies in the sample was found to be 11698.57 while the average profit was 2067.97. The maximum profit made by the companies was 296176 while the minimum profit was 17. In terms of company age, the average age of the companies was found to be 7.62 years with the oldest company being 61 years old and the youngest company being 2 years old.
Frequency Tables
certification dummy |
|||||
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
||
Valid |
not certified |
5257 |
92.0 |
92.0 |
92.0 |
certified |
460 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
5717 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Only 8% (n = 460) of the companies in the sample were ISO9000 certified. The remaining 92% (n = 5257) were not yet certified.
industry code 2 |
|||||
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
||
Valid |
storage and transportation |
392 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
Telecommunication |
184 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
10.1 |
|
computer services |
365 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
16.5 |
|
software |
390 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
23.3 |
|
Business services |
2722 |
47.6 |
47.6 |
70.9 |
|
Research and Development |
222 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
74.8 |
|
Specialized technology services |
1200 |
21.0 |
21.0 |
95.8 |
|
Technology exchange and promotion |
242 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
5717 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
In terms of the industry, business services were leading with almost half the companies sampled being in the business services (48%, n = 2722). Specialized technology services came second with 21% (n = 1200) while the rest of the sectors had less than 10% shares.
Results further showed that only 3% (n = 171) of the companies had overseas investment while the rest (97%, n = 5546) did not have overseas investments.
FDI dummy |
|||||
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
||
Valid |
NO FDI |
5546 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
with FDI |
171 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
5717 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Inferential Analysis
Hypothesis Tests
Hypothesis 1:
H0: There is no significant difference in the average profit made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies.
HA: There is no significant difference in the average profit made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies.
Group Statistics |
|||||
certification dummy |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
|
profit |
not certified |
5257 |
1865.26 |
6911.274 |
95.321 |
certified |
460 |
4384.67 |
9237.036 |
430.679 |
Independent Samples Test |
|||||||||||
Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances |
t-test for Equality of Means |
||||||||||
F |
Sig. |
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Mean Difference |
Std. Error Difference |
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
||||
Lower |
Upper |
||||||||||
profit |
Equal variances assumed |
82.963 |
.000 |
-7.271 |
5715 |
.000 |
-2519.4 |
346.491 |
-3198.7 |
-1840.2 |
|
Equal variances not assumed |
-5.712 |
504.965 |
.000 |
-2519.4 |
441.101 |
-3386.0 |
-1652.8 |
We performed an independent t-test in order to compare the average profits for ISO9000 certified companies and non-ISO9000 certified companies. Results showed that the average profits for ISO9000 certified companies (M = 4384.67, SD = 9237.04, N = 460) was significantly different from the average profits for the non-ISO9000 certified companies (M = 1865.26, SD = 6911.27, N = 5257), t (5715) = -7.271, p < .05, two-tailed. Essentially the results showed that the average profits made by the ISO9000 certified companies was significantly higher than that of the non-ISO9000 certified companies.
Description of the Methodology
Hypothesis 2:
H0: There is no significant difference in the average sales made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies.
HA: There is no significant difference in the average sales made by the ISO certified companies and the non-ISO certified companies.
Group Statistics |
|||||
certification dummy |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
|
sales |
not certified |
5257 |
10132.88 |
29617.093 |
408.482 |
certified |
460 |
29591.67 |
55356.924 |
2581.030 |
Independent Samples Test |
||||||||||
Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances |
t-test for Equality of Means |
|||||||||
F |
Sig. |
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Mean Difference |
Std. Error Difference |
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
|||
Lower |
Upper |
|||||||||
sales |
Equal variances assumed |
203.848 |
.000 |
-12.334 |
5715 |
.000 |
-19458.8 |
1577.673 |
-22551.6 |
-16366.0 |
Equal variances not assumed |
-7.446 |
482.255 |
.000 |
-19458.8 |
2613.154 |
-24593.4 |
-14324.2 |
We performed an independent t-test in order to compare the average sales for ISO9000 certified companies and non-ISO9000 certified companies. Results showed that the average profits for ISO9000 certified companies (M = 29591.67, SD = 55356.92, N = 460) was significantly different from the average sales for the non-ISO9000 certified companies (M = 10132.88, SD = 29617.09, N = 5257), t (5715) = -12.334, p < .05, two-tailed. Essentially the results showed that the average sales made by the ISO9000 certified companies was significantly higher than that of the non-ISO9000 certified companies.
Hypothesis 3:
H0: There is no significant difference in the average profit made by the companies with FDI and the companies with no FDI
HA: There is no significant difference in the average profit made by the companies with FDI and the companies with no FDI.
Group Statistics |
|||||
FDI dummy |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
|
profit |
NO FDI |
5546 |
1972.15 |
6795.467 |
91.249 |
with FDI |
171 |
5175.64 |
14377.919 |
1099.507 |
Independent Samples Test |
|||||||||||
Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances |
t-test for Equality of Means |
||||||||||
F |
Sig. |
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Mean Difference |
Std. Error Difference |
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
||||
Lower |
Upper |
||||||||||
profit |
Equal variances assumed |
61.417 |
.000 |
-5.780 |
5715 |
.000 |
-3203.5 |
554.2 |
-4290.0 |
-2117.0 |
|
Equal variances not assumed |
-2.904 |
172.350 |
.004 |
-3203.5 |
1103.3 |
-5381.2 |
-1025.8 |
We performed an independent t-test in order to compare the average profits for Companies foreign direct investments (FDI) and those that don’t have FDI. Results showed that the average profits for Companies with FDI (M = 5175.64, SD = 14377.92, N = 171) was significantly different from the average profits for the Companies with no FDI (M = 1972.15, SD = 67.9547, N = 5546), t (5715) = -5.780, p < .05, two-tailed. Essentially the results showed that the average profit made by Companies with foreign direct investments was significantly higher than that of the Companies with no foreign direct investments.
Hypothesis 4:
H0: There is no significant difference in the average sales made by the companies with FDI and the companies with no FDI
HA: There is no significant difference in the average sales made by the companies with FDI and the companies with no FDI.
Group Statistics |
|||||
FDI dummy |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
|
sales |
NO FDI |
5546 |
11102.08 |
31260.733 |
419.768 |
with FDI |
171 |
31044.36 |
63819.717 |
4880.416 |
Independent Samples Test |
||||||||||
Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances |
t-test for Equality of Means |
|||||||||
F |
Sig. |
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Mean Difference |
Std. Error Difference |
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
|||
Lower |
Upper |
|||||||||
sales |
Equal variances assumed |
88.329 |
.000 |
-7.855 |
5715 |
.000 |
-19942.3 |
2538.9 |
-24919.5 |
-14965.0 |
Equal variances not assumed |
-4.071 |
172.52 |
.000 |
-19942.3 |
4898.4 |
-29610.9 |
-10273.7 |
We performed an independent t-test in order to compare the average profits for Companies with foreign direct investments (FDI) and those that don’t have FDI. Results showed that the average sales for Companies with FDI (M = 31044.36, SD = 63819.72, N = 171) was significantly different from the average sales for the Companies with no FDI (M = 11102.08, SD = 31260.73, N = 5546), t (5715) = -5.780, p < .05, two-tailed. Essentially the results showed that the average sales made by Companies with foreign direct investments was significantly higher than that of the Companies with no foreign direct investments.
Statistics
Factors that affect profit
Model Summary |
||||
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
1 |
.163a |
.027 |
.026 |
7064.375 |
a. Predictors: (Constant), age of company in years, FDI dummy, certification dummy |
ANOVAa |
||||||
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
1 |
Regression |
7795143201.202 |
3 |
2598381067.067 |
52.066 |
.000b |
Residual |
285109503948.541 |
5713 |
49905391.904 |
|||
Total |
292904647149.743 |
5716 |
||||
a. Dependent Variable: profit |
||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), age of company in years, FDI dummy, certification dummy |
Coefficientsa |
||||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
952.390 |
139.672 |
6.819 |
.000 |
|
certification dummy |
2190.952 |
345.642 |
.083 |
6.339 |
.000 |
|
FDI dummy |
3324.092 |
548.755 |
.079 |
6.058 |
.000 |
|
age of company in years |
110.203 |
13.297 |
.109 |
8.288 |
.000 |
|
a. Dependent Variable: profit |
A regression analysis model was constructed to see how the various factors influence the profit of a company. Results showed that only 2.7% of the variation in the profit is explained by the three variables (dummy for ISO9000 certification, dummy for FDI and age of the company.
Discussion and managerial advises
In this study we sought to analyse the relationship between Adoption of ISO9000 with other factor players in China’s service industry. The analysis was based on the data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China gave the following main results;
- The profit made by the ISO9000 certified companies was higher than that of the non-ISO9000 certified companies
- The sales made by the ISO9000 certified companies was higher than that of the non-ISO9000 certified companies
- Only a very small proportion (8%, n = 460) of the companies studied have so far undergone ISO9000 certification.
Based on the above key findings, the following recommendations are made;
- There is need for an intensive national drive and sensitization of various companies to undergo ISO9000 certification.
- The government to put strict and adequate measures for companies being registered to ensure they are ISO9000 certified so as to ensure quality of service offered to the citizens
Limitations and directions for future research
This study is limited to the fact that the study only based itself on the companies in China alone. Future study should focus having a varied sample from different countries. The sample could be stratified into low income countries and developed and countries. This will help ooze out any bias that might arise as a result of heterogeneity of the data from different countries.
References
Abraham, M., Crawford, J., Carter, D., & Mazotta, F. (2000). Management decisions for effective ISO 9000 accreditation. Management Decision, 38(3), 182-193.
Almeida, M., Caten, C., & Gutterres, M. (2009). Evaluating ISO 9001:2000 Certified and NonCertified Organizations in Brazilian Leather-Footwear Chain. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 6(2), 51-73.
Casadesús, M., & Karapetrovic, S. (2005). Has ISO 9000 lost some of its luster? A longitudinal impact study. International journal of operations & production management, 25(6), 580-596.
Dongmo, C., & Onojaefe, D. (2013). Using customer satisfaction to understand implementation benefits of the ISO 9001 quality management system. Business Management Dynamics, 3(3), 1-9.
Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Arana, G., & San , M. (2010). An Analysis of the Main Drivers for ISO 9001 and other Isomorphic Metastandards. Review of International Comparative Management, 11(4), 562-574.
Kostagiolas, P., & Kitsiou, M. (2008). Issues and perceptions for ISO 9000 implementation in Greek academic libraries. Library Management, 6(7), 57-64.
Kumar, D., & Balakrishnan, V. (2011). A Study on ISO 9001 Quality Management System Certifications–Reasons behind the Failure of ISO Certified Organizations. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(9).
Llopis, J., & Tarí, J. (2003). The importance of internal aspects in quality improvement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(3), 304-324.
Martínez-Costa, M., Martínez-Lorente, A., & Choi, T. (2008). Simultaneous consideration of TQM and ISO 9000 on performance and motivation: An empirical study of Spanish companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 23-39.
Martínez-Lorente, A. R., & Martínez-Costa, M. (2004). ISO 9000 and TQM: Substitutes or complementaries? An empirical study in industrial companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(3), 260-276.
Santos, G., & Millán, A. (2013). Motivation And Benefits Of Implementation And Certification According ISO 9001–The Portuguese Experience. International Journal for Quality Research, 7(1), 71-86.
Santos, G., & Millán, A. (n.d.). Motivation And Benefits Of Implementation And Certification According ISO 9001–The Portuguese Experience. International Journal for Quality Research, 7(1), 71-86.
Santos, G., Costa, B., & Leal, A. (2014). Motivation and benefits of implementation and certification according ISO 9001: The Portuguese experience. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 6(5), 1-12.
Sun, H. (2000). Total Quality Management, ISO 9000 Certification and Performance Improvement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(2), 168-179.