Aspects of communication that relate to sustainability
Most organizations in the world have realized the effects of unsustainable activities in their institutions. The realization has led to the establishment of sustainable practices and corporate social responsibility activities to mitigate the effects on the environment (Hitchcock & Willard, 2015). The main aim of the activities is to monitor the carbon footprint for their institutions. To meet the demands of sustainability, organizations need to make communications of their efforts which is mostly done through their available communication channel. The communication of sustainability efforts, however, encompasses different individual factors which need to be included for the program to be successful (Dupont, et al., 2013). There is a need to, therefore, develop an understanding of the effective communication strategy to use for the carbon footprint project.
In the performance of corporate social responsibility, CSR communication one needs to have the right channel and an understanding of the CSR program. The audience is important in the choice of medium and the content to share (Closon, et al., 2015). For instance in communication with the relevant stakeholders to prompt them into undertaking the carbon footprint program needs a careful choice of content that will appeal to the stakeholders to bring them into conviction (McElroy & Engelen, 2012). The main method to use in this case is to utilize the normal communication channel in the organization to reach to the stakeholders. For instance, the communication can be done in the subsequent annual general meetings and strategies proposed to the stakeholders.
CSR refers to the activities that the organization involves itself to gain acceptance in the environment in which it operates (Guadamillas-Go´mez & Donate-Manzanares, 2011). In this regard, the activities are seen to drain some amount from the organization. Despite this, the organization needs to invest in the activities to ensure a better relationship with the community members. From this perspective therefore when communicating the CSR program to the organization’s stakeholders. There is a need to inform them about the significance of the investment in sustainability activity to the organization and the benefits that will be accrued from their participation (Bass & Dalal-Clayton, 2012). The communication needs to be properly informed using the right channel to establish a perfect understanding of the sustainability effort (Sheth, 2016). Most organizations communicate this through conferences and workshops which involve all the stakeholders and are effective in ensuring that the organization’s management has an interest in sustainability.
Effective communication of the sustainability strategy needs to be all involving and has to gain the respect of property rights (Natas?a, et al., 2015). The community members in which the CSR activities are to be conducted need to be involved to ensure that the action meets their concerns. From this perspective, the communication process needs to be extended to the communities such that they will be aware that the program being conducted is for their benefit and not for the interest of the organization (Lerner Media Group, 2017). The communication channel used in this scenario, therefore, is different from the one used for internal communication. Some organizations prefer to use the training and community awareness programs as well as extend some services to the members (Sherwani, 2016). The resultant effect is that the members of the community take part in the initiatives and sensitize the rest of the community members about the effort leading to a positive effect in the sustainability efforts.
Criteria for successful communication of sustainability efforts
The effect of telecommunication and globalization on the issue of carbon footprint also has contributed positively to the sustainability efforts. Organizations are becoming more involved in the practices having realized the effects the pose on other factors of production if not consumed sustainably (Gole, et al., 2016). The flow of information from one entity to another in the global scale is important in the realization of the benefits of the program. Most institutions, therefore, have established strategies, and they share it on the global scale using the telecommunication advanced devices which help strike a balance in the efforts. The carbon footprint is a global concern since the effects have no respect for the borders, for instance, the spread of the effects of global warming as a result of emission of greenhouse gases leads to the change in life support systems for all people in the world. The destruction of the ozone layer leading to the release of ultraviolet radiation to the earth as a result of poor practices spreads the effect to all states regardless of their level of involvement. Communication of the sustainability strategy at an international level, therefore, becomes necessary. The emergence of the telecommunication devices that can send information to every part of the world has enhanced the efforts by ensuring uniformity in sustainability services amongst all stakeholders.
A CSR program should be developed in the vicinity of the organization which works together with the relevant stakeholders surrounding, the organization. In most cases, the communication involves the area administration and the members of the community with an influence. The development of the program, however, needs to show respect to the authorities found in the region the projections should be communicated to the authorities involved to seek the consent. Failure to seek the consent of the members of the community will result in resistance from the people, and in most cases, the organization ends up having negative publicity which has detrimental effects on the organization’s performance.
The program’s development also needs to be evaluated based on different criteria to inform changes that will enable the organization’s efforts to survive in the society. For instance, there are legal requirements which the organizations need to comply with and ensure that they are followed to the later. The program established should ensure that there are communication and update of all the legal documents before the start of a project. Additionally, other organizations take the aspect of communication to a higher level through research on the needs of the people and how the program is to influence the people economically socially and environmentally. According to McElroy & Engelen (2012), there is no human use or change of use that has no impact on the environment and the people around the region. Communication is therefore important in this case to identify the concerns of individuals and their perspectives on the project and address all the concerns of the people to avoid conflict.
Communication of CSR program to relevant stakeholders
The communication of CSR report by most organizations is done through the publications that are done at a defined interval (Valentine & Fleischman, 2008). Others communicate through the internet and posts the report on their websites. The involvement level is defined in the reports as well as the number of activities undertaken during the period. The successful programs undergo a series of evaluation and implementation to incorporate the concerns of the community and the organization to align it with the goals. The success is however based on the method of communication employed and the communities understanding of the importance of the program to their wellbeing.
Conclusion
Overall, the CSR programs are important in fostering positive relations between the organization and its publics. The development of a CSR program affects a number of stakeholders who are affected in different ways. The program development process needs to include the communication of all stakeholders in the project to ensure that they understand the importance of the sustainability effort. Lack of involvement of all the stakeholders’ leads to resistance to the program. Community involvement is therefore necessary to reduce the tendency of resistance. Communication of sustainability takes different fashions and is directed to different members. The communication effort therefore needs to be adjusted depending on the organization and the direction of the communication for the program to be implemented successfully.
Bass, S. & Dalal-Clayton, D. B., 2012. Sustainable Development Strategies : a Resource Book.. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis,.
Closon, C., Leys, C. & Hellemans, C., 2015. Perceptions of corporate social responsibility, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 13(1), pp. 31-54.
Dupont, C., Ferauge, P. & Giuliano, R., 2013. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Human Resource Management: GDF SUEZ’s Case. International Business Research, 6(12), pp. 145-156.
Gole, P. A., Ritonija, N. & Vukasovic?, T., 2016. The importance of professional skills for professional development in the fields of innovative management, leadership, and communication. ICSD, 3(1), pp. 113-119.
Guadamillas-Go´mez, F. & Donate-Manzanares, M. J., 2011. Ethics and corporate social responsibility intergrated into knowledge management and innovation technology. Journal of Management Development, 30(6), pp. 569-581.
Hitchcock, D. E. & Willard, M. L., 2015. The business guide to sustainability : practical strategies and tools for organizations. New York: Routledge.
Lerner Media Group, 2017. Principles of sustainability. 2nd ed. Ipswich, Massachusetts: Grey House Publishing.
McElroy, M. W. & Engelen, J. v., 2012. Corporate sustainability management : the art and science of managing non-financial performance. London ; New York: Earthscan.
Natas?a, R. et al., 2015. Professional skills in management and leadership, entrepreneurship and communication – The e-PROFMAN project. Re-imagining learning scenarios, 5(3), p. 97.
Sherwani, M. K., 2016. communication. The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 2(12), pp. 99-100.
Sheth, J. N., 2016. Corporate social responsibility.. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Valentine, S. & Fleischman, G., 2008. Ethics Programs, Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(1), p. 159–172.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
