Significance of Identifying Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Discuss about the Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on CVD Outcomes.
The following report is developed by considering the clothing retail organization of Club 21 which is leading purveyor in Asia dealing with luxury fashion. They have been established in 1972 and since then they had been using the their experience in market for forming brand value, sourcing, wholesale distribution, and vertical retails operating across 400 stores in Asia and proving products of over 250 brands (club21global.com 2017). Club 21 has the core mission for unlocking and spotting the potential present in current market related to designs, customers, and brands with the sense of mutual partnerships across the globe. The organization had considered the loyal audiences and customers from the community so that they can be successful in forming long term customer-company relationship by providing excellent services and forming trust.
Currently the company of Club 21 had deployed integrated solution for meeting the needs of customers and technology demands (club21global.com 2017). The ever changing needs of the customers, brands, and designers are met by implication of a specialized team at Club 21 for integrating the functions and ensuring customer services and optimal performance functions. The assessment of the activities would result in forming the improvement of the functions so that the formation of the activities and assessment of the operation improvement. The assessment of the functions would be helpful for the deployment of the activities and forming the major improvement of improved functional assessment. The inclusion of the activities would be aligned for the deployment of the improved activities and formation of the improved operation improvement.
The possible changes incurred in the project are based for the improvement of the improved functions in the organization of Club 21 and they are online cloud storage for data and information backup, CRM implementation, and assessment of the encryption technology for security of the data. The proposed changes that are required for the completion of the project activities are aligned for the deployment of the successive employment of the improved functional functions (Sriraj et al. 2017). The followings section would provide an analysis of the changes and deployment of the functions for detailing the functions and assessment of the successive improvement.
The integration of the functions would allow the formation of the improved operation improvement. The training plan improvement is helpful for overcoming the deployment of the successive implementation model (Tuzkaya and Yolver 2015). The training plan developed would allow the formation of the successive deployment of the functions for Club 21. The Club 21 are in need of several training plans that can be helpful for overcoming the functions and assessment of the improved operation improvement. The training plan would be helpful for forming the swift assessment of the functions that are capable for the management of the successive integration of the functions. The implementation of CRM, deployment of Cloud computing and utilization of encryption key for storage of the data would require the effective training plan that would serve the purpose of improved operational improvement.
Discussion on Cardiovascular Risk Factors
The improvement of the functions would result in deploying improved cloud computing functions and it would also help in easing the flow of information effectively along with the improvement of the improved assessment of the improved operation improvement (Costantino, Di Gravio and Nonino 2015). The inclusion of the cloud computing process would be formed for the management of the data access and the management of the successive improvement. The Club 21 had been using the existing management information system for developing the improved operational improvement. The organization of Club 21 would require the management of the successful assessment and improvement of the successive improvement of the improved operational assessment. The encryption and CRM implementation would also help in easing the flow of the activities for Club 21. The inclusion of the functions would align with the management of the successive and profitability analysis of the effective operation improvement.
The managers for the organization play a crucial role for the assessment of the improved operation functions. The improvement of the functions would also help in forming the successive deployment of the functions (Barrios, Jimenez and Isaza 2014). It would also help in capturing the opportunity for the assessment of the improved operation assessment. The improvement of the functions would also help in forming the deployment of the activities for forming the shift in overcoming the assessment of the profound improvement of the activities. The contract managers of the project would tend to support the management of the project activity improvement. The KPIs for Club 21 would be based for the assessment of the activities of sales and number of customers and the target set by the managers would help in supporting the assessment of the activities.
The major changes that had been implied in the project are online cloud storage for data and information backup, CRM implementation, and assessment of the encryption technology for security of the data. The selection of the project is based for the assessment of the improved functional improvement (Ghorabaee et al. 2015). The selection of the project would be based on the technology improvement, improved operation improvement, and it would allow the formation of the functions so that justification of the project can be carried on successfully. The selection of the project is based for the assessment of the improved operation improvement for the organizations. The integration of the project improvement would also help in easing the deployment of the effective assessment of the functions. The selection of the project would also help in forming the management of the activities and formation of the improved activity improvement (Serban 2015). The assessment of the activities would also help in easing the process of the system improvement and aligning project in terms of align to goals, sales, market share, new market, price, investment, cost, technology, ROI, HRM impact, public impact, competitor impact, time, risk, benefits, realism, capability, flexibility, ease of use, scope, profit, value added, and skills.
Managing Cardiovascular Risk Factors
The study of various literature reviews would be helpful for analysing the formation of the successive improvement of the functions and the multiple factors have been considered for ascertaining the role in formation of the improved functional assessment and operation improvement. The following table would show the role of the factors for the project completion as studied from the literature of the various authors,
Author |
Sriraj et al. 2017 |
Tuzkaya. and Yolver 2015 |
Costantino, Di Gravio and Nonino 2015 |
Barrios, Jiménez and Isaza 2014 |
Ghorabaee et al. 2015 |
Totals (/5) |
Align to goals |
X |
|||||
Sales |
X |
X |
||||
Market Share |
X |
X |
X |
|||
New Market |
X |
X |
X |
|||
Price |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||
Investment |
X |
X |
||||
Cost |
X |
X |
||||
Technology |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||
ROI |
X |
X |
X |
|||
HRM Impact |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||
Public Impact |
X |
|||||
C’petitor Impact |
X |
|||||
Time |
X |
X |
||||
Risk |
X |
X |
||||
Benefit |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||
Realism |
X |
|||||
Capability |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Flexibility |
X |
X |
X |
|||
Ease of use |
X |
X |
X |
|||
Scope |
X |
X |
||||
Profit |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||
Value Added |
X |
X |
X |
|||
Skills |
X |
X |
Table 1: Project Selection Matrix
The study has shown that the five most important factors of project selection from the Table 1: Project Selection Matrix is,
- Price
- Technology
- Capability
- Profit
- HRM
Using the study of the table it was evident that the capability of the system to be developed would play a crucial role in aligning the management of the activities suitable for the assessment of the project selection. Moreover, the project of technology improvement would also require the consideration of all the above factors. The most important factor of the project is the capability as Club 21 is in large requirement for the deployment of the functions and assessment of the activities for deployment of the improved operation improvement.
The selection of the project would be done by assessment of the five key factors and calculating the influence of the factors on the projects (Sarkis and Sundarraj 2015). The impact rating is done by considering 1-3 values depending upon the extent of the impact. The highest value would result in easing the flow of the functions and the formation of the successive improvement of the activities. The highest impact value and the most crucial value would be multiplied by 2. The results of the justification would be shown below,
Key:
3 – Represents the highest benefit, the quickest ROI, the most efficient use of time / timescale, the lowest risk, the lowest cost.
1 – Represents the lowest benefit, the slowest ROI, ineffective time management, the highest risk, the highest cost.
Project |
Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup |
Encryption for information safety |
CRM implementation |
Capability (x2) |
6 |
2 |
4 |
Price |
2 |
2 |
1 |
Profit |
1 |
1 |
3 |
HRM |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Technology (x2) |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Totals (/15) |
15 |
12 |
14 |
Table 2: Project Selection Justification
The results have shown that the project of Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup would be the most effective for the deployment of the activities. The formation of the project functions would also help in easing the processes of the storage modification and the assessment of the specific functions. The project posses some risk in terms of improvement, implication, and assessment. However, the benefits of the project would posses more value for the organization due to the implication of the effective functions and improvement.
Conclusion
According to scholars like Esbenshade, Vidal, Fascilla and Ono (2016), the business process re-engineering and continuous improvement would help in aligning the improvement of the activities and form the alliance of the successive allocation of the functions. The two approaches are aligned for the formation of the successive improvement of the activities and assessment of activities that are suitable for the improvement of the improved activities. The process of re-engineering of the project would result in the assessment of the successful deployment model.
According to Serban (2015), the Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) is developed for forming the assessment of the improved functional improvement and assessment of the functions suitable for the formation of the improved operation improvement. The innovation of the functions would tend to resolve the implication of the successive deployment of the activities favourable for the resolution of the improved operation improvement.
Authors like Hutchins (2016) have depicted that the assessment of the successive functions had been supported by the modification of the functions and the assessment of the successive improvement models. The assessment of the functions had been helpful for forming the analysis of the improved functional improvement. The short term innovative goals would also be helpful for considering the assessment of the improved data analysis. The successive assessment of the functions had resulted in forming the major assessment of the improvement of the operation improvement.
According to Fryer, Antony and Douglas (2015), the Continuous Improvement Plan (CIP) is helpful for considering the deployment of the successive integration of the activities for forming the assessment of the improved operation improvement. The quality improvement would help in listing the management of the cohesive improvement and assessment of the operation improvement.
The following table would provide the comparison of the BPR and Kaizen’s continuous improvement for the chosen project
Change Factor |
Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) |
Continuous Improvement (Kaizen) |
Authors |
Most Appropriate for Club 21 Project |
Effect |
Change in Data Storage to Cloud |
Modification of the storage |
Serban 2015 |
BPR |
Pace |
Fast |
Slow |
Sarkis and Sundarraj 2015 |
BPR |
Timeframe |
3-4 months |
Over 6 months |
Esbenshade et al. 2016 |
BPR |
Change |
Use of Innovation Technology |
Existing Technology is utilized |
Sarkis and Sundarraj 2015 |
BPR |
Involvement |
Cloud Vendor |
NA |
Hutchins 2016 |
CIP |
Risk |
Security Risk |
Delay in Operations |
Fryer, Antony and Douglas 2015 |
CIP |
Effort Orientation |
Equipments |
Strategic |
Hutchins 2016 |
BPR |
Technology dependent / Stimulus |
Primary |
Secondary |
Serban 2015 |
BPR |
Practical Requirements |
Large Investment |
Small Investment |
Fryer, Antony and Douglas 2015 |
CIP |
Total / Result (/9) |
6 |
3 |
BPR |
Table 3: BPR and Continuous Improvement Comparison
The table 3: BPR and Continuous Improvement Comparison had shown the comparison of the BPR and CIP for the Club 21 project of Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup. The assessment of the functions would be done for the assessment of the successive improvement of the effective functions improvement. The assessment of the data representation would also be helpful for the deployment of the improved operational improvement. The BPR technology would be most suitable for the assessment of the project of Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup.
The Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup is an IT based project applied for the deployment of the improved operation improvement and the assessment of the improved operational improvement. The implementation of the functions had been helpful for the improvement of the improved functional improvement (Patil and Khandare 2017). The implementation of the project would tend to align with the improvement of the successful cloud improvement.
The use of Ms-Project is helpful for the improvement of the project plan and it would also help in easing the management of the functions so that the activities can be aligned and scheduled effectively. The project plan would be drafted in a table and the timeline would be shown in the project Gantt chart. The following image would show the project plan for the project of Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup,
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
2 |
Planning Phase |
12 days |
Wed 5/9/18 |
Thu 5/24/18 |
3.1 |
Vendor Selection |
7 days |
Fri 5/25/18 |
Mon 6/4/18 |
3.3 |
Cloud Network Development |
12 days |
Fri 6/22/18 |
Mon 7/9/18 |
3.4 |
Cloud Network Deployment |
12 days |
Tue 7/10/18 |
Wed 7/25/18 |
Table 4: Project Plan Draft
The scope of the project is based on the factors and elements that are required for the completion of the project functions. The assessment of the activities would also help in sorting out the management of the successive improvement model. The project is formed for the formation of the improved operation improvement and it would be helpful for the assessment of the improved functional improvement. The project plan, selection of cloud vendor, improvement of the activities, and cloud vendor deployment of Club 21 are the in scope items of the project. The transportation cost, agreement improvement, and risk management are the not a part of the project.
Project Scope Statement |
Name of the Project: Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup |
Scope Item: 1- Project Plan The project plan would serve as the initial deliverable scope for the project. The project plan would help in forming the assessment of the operations that could be sorted for the management of the improved operation development. |
Scope Item: 2- Selection of Cloud Vendor The selection of the cloud vendor is a major scope of the project and it would be required for the assessment of the operations and deployment of the assessment for the integration of the improved functions. |
Scope Item: 3- Cloud Development of the Activities The activities are aligned for the management of the cloud computing development and the formation of the improved operational development. The entrapping of the operations would be helpful for the formation of the successive assessment operations. |
Scope Item: 4- Cloud Vendor Deployment The selection of cloud vendor would help in forming the analysis of the details of the various vendors of the project and successfully assessment of the operations. |
The project plan costing would consider the various resources and align the standard rates of the resources favourable for the project completion. The cost plan budget is developed for the assessment of the improved analysis of the project costs. The plan costing would also help in easing the management of the successive deployment of the resource analysis. The following table would show the cost budget draft for the Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup project,
Risk Analysis is done for considering the assessment of the identification and analysis of the factors of risk favourable for the deployment of the activities (Kaming 2017). The various factors of the risk would help in forming the Quantitative Risk Assessment that can be helpful for forming the mitigation of the risk factors for the project of Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup.
The analysis of the risk factors would be based on the consideration of the improved operation improvement for the project of Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup. According to Kaming (2017), the risk analysis is largely based on the formation of the successive improvement model. The drafting of the risk factor would also help in forming the deployment of the risk factors based on the methods of FMEA, Ishikawa Fishbone, Fault Trees, Risk Log, and Risk Severity Matrix. The following table would show the risk analysis method evaluation for the project,
Author |
FMEA |
Ishikawa Fishbone |
Fault Trees |
Risk Log |
Risk Severity Matrix |
Patil and Khandare 2017 |
X |
X |
X |
||
Kaming 2017 |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Regan, Love and Smith 2016 |
X |
X |
X |
||
Total / Result (/3) |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Table 5 – Risk Analysis Method Evaluation
The Risk Analysis Method Evaluation would help in depicting the methods and their evaluation for determining the final deliverable for the project. It can be seen that the Risk Severity Matrix would be most suitable for the assessment of the final project risk analysis method.
The identification of the risk factors would be helpful for the consideration of the possible issues that can happen in a project and it would tend to form the resulting issues for the project activities. The analysis of the risk factors would also be based on the assessment of the successive management of the functions and assessment of the activities that are favourable for the management of the functions. The following table would show the highest risk factors analysis for the project of Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup,
Author |
Uchiyama et al. 2016 |
Hirst et al. 2016 |
Sorocco et al. 2015 |
Reed et al. 2016 |
Jaakkola et al. 2017 |
Allen et al. 2018 |
Bonner et al. 2018 |
Ashuri et al. 2015 |
Totals (/8) |
Budget |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
5 |
|||
Communication issues |
X |
X |
X |
X |
4 |
||||
Cost |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
6 |
||
Culture & Economy Environment |
X |
X |
X |
3 |
|||||
Environmental |
X |
X |
2 |
||||||
H&S |
X |
X |
2 |
||||||
Legal |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
5 |
|||
Management Changes |
X |
X |
X |
3 |
|||||
Management Support |
X |
X |
X |
3 |
|||||
Organisational |
X |
X |
X |
3 |
|||||
Performance |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
5 |
|||
Personnel or Resource Allocation |
X |
X |
X |
X |
4 |
||||
Political |
X |
X |
2 |
||||||
Quality |
X |
X |
X |
3 |
|||||
Scope |
X |
X |
2 |
||||||
Security |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
5 |
|||
Staffing |
X |
X |
2 |
||||||
Technology |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
8 |
Time |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
5 |
|||
User Acceptance |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
7 |
Table 6: Highest Risk Factors Analysis
The table of Highest Risk Factors Analysis had shown that the problems of Technology, User Acceptance, and Cost would act as the major factor of risk for the project and it would also tend to form the issues in the development of the final project operations. The implementation would help in forming the assessment of the activities for mitigation the factors of risk.
Basic Key for SRA:
S = Severity of risk,
L = Likelihood of risk occurring,
D = Detection of risk
Scale of risk = 1 – 5
5 = high severity, 1 = Low severity
5 =high likelihood of risk occurring, 1 = Low likelihood of risk occurring
5 = most likely of the risk being detected, 1 = Low likely of the risk being detected
Risk Priority Number (RPN) = S*L*D
Identified Risk |
Risk Event |
Effect |
Cause |
S |
L |
D |
RPN |
Control Measure / Mitigation |
After Control Measure |
|||
S |
L |
D |
RPN |
|||||||||
Technology |
Migration of data issue |
The data would be lost |
The data to be migrated would be incompatible for the new cloud server |
5 |
4 |
3 |
60 |
Compatibility testing before implementation would be helpful |
3 |
2 |
3 |
18 |
User Acceptance |
Absence of vendor approval |
The implementation of the cloud would be delayed |
Vendor approval would be present resulting in problem of application of the cloud |
4 |
3 |
2 |
24 |
Proper agreement should be made |
2 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
Cost |
High Maintenance Cost |
The organization’s yearly cost expenditure would be increased |
Maintenance of virtual storage would be high |
5 |
3 |
5 |
75 |
Acceptance of the maintenance cost and development of contingency budget should be used |
4 |
2 |
5 |
40 |
Table 7: Quantitative Risk Assessment
The final updated costs of the Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup project is given below,
Resource Name |
Work |
Standard Rate |
Cost |
Analyst |
64 hrs |
£70.00/hr |
£4,480.00 |
Documenter |
120 hrs |
£80.00/hr |
£9,600.00 |
Planner |
80 hrs |
£90.00/hr |
£7,200.00 |
Project Manager |
72 hrs |
£150.00/hr |
£10,800.00 |
Vendor |
304 hrs |
£100.00/hr |
£30,400.00 |
Database Admin |
80 hrs |
£90.00/hr |
£7,200.00 |
IT Engineer |
256 hrs |
£120.00/hr |
£30,720.00 |
documents |
3 |
£100.00 |
£300.00 |
Database |
0 |
£2,500.00 |
£0.00 |
Cloud Price |
1 |
£7,300.00 |
£7,300.00 |
Security Programs |
1 |
£2,000.00 |
£2,000.00 |
Total Budget |
£110,000.00 |
Some assumptions are required for calculation of the payback period for the project such as,
Time= 3year
Yearly Income= £45000, £65000, and £85,000
Project Budget= £110,000
Monthly Expense= £1000 (=£12000 yearly)
Discount rate= 5%
Cost benefit analysis |
||||
Year 0 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
|
Net economic benefit |
£ – |
£ 45,000.00 |
£ 65,000.00 |
£ 85,000.00 |
One time cost |
-£ 110,000.00 |
£ – |
£ – |
£ – |
Recurring cost |
£ – |
-£ 12,000.00 |
-£ 12,000.00 |
-£ 12,000.00 |
Net cash flow |
-£ 110,000.00 |
£ 33,000.00 |
£ 53,000.00 |
£ 73,000.00 |
Discount factors |
||||
Discount rate |
5% |
|||
Year Index |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Discount factor |
1 |
0.95 |
0.91 |
0.86 |
Discounted flows |
||||
Cost |
-£ 110,000.00 |
-£ 11,428.57 |
-£ 10,884.35 |
-£ 10,366.05 |
Benefit |
£ – |
£ 42,857.14 |
£ 58,956.92 |
£ 73,426.20 |
Net |
-£ 110,000.00 |
£ 31,428.57 |
£ 48,072.56 |
£ 63,060.14 |
Cumulative |
-£ 110,000.00 |
-£ 78,571.43 |
-£ 30,498.87 |
£ 32,561.28 |
Net present value |
£ 32,561.28 |
|||
ROI |
18% |
|||
Payback Analysis |
||||
Months |
||||
30 |
||||
Payback Period in Years |
2 years and 6 months |
Conclusion
It can be concluded from the report that the project of Online Cloud Storage for data and information backup that the implication of risk analysis, requirements study, and benefits gained for Club 21 would favour the completion of the project. The use of risk assessment and priority matrix would help in easing the development of the risk mitigation strategies for the project. It had also helped in forming the support and development of the improved activities in project.
References
Allen, N.B., Ning, H., Zhao, L., Wilkins, J. and Lloyd-Jones, D., 2018. Abstract P179: Lifetime Variation in the Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on CVD Outcomes and Mortality: Lifetime Risk Pooling Project.
Ashuri, B., Kingsley, G., Rogers, J., Gahrooei, M.R., Ilbeigi, M., Sung, E.J.Y. and Toroghi, S.S.H., 2015. Streamlining Project Delivery through Risk Analysis (No. FHWA-GA-15-1305).
Barrios, M.O., Jiménez, H.F. and Isaza, S.N., 2014, December. Comparative analysis between ANP and ANP-DEMATEL for six sigma project selection process in a healthcare provider. In International Workshop on Ambient Assisted Living (pp. 413-416). Springer, Cham.
Bonner, L.M., Hanson, A., Robinson, G., Lowy, E. and Craft, S., 2018. Care Management to Promote Treatment Adherence in Patients with Cognitive Impairment and Vascular Risk Factors: A Demonstration Project. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer’s disease, 5(1), pp.36-41.
Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G. and Nonino, F., 2015. Project selection in project portfolio management: An artificial neural network model based on critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), pp.1744-1754.
club21global.com. (2018). About Us – Club 21. [online] Available at: https://sg.club21global.com/club21/corporate_profile/ [Accessed 9 Apr. 2018].
club21global.com. (2017). Corporate Citizenship – Club 21. [online] Available at: https://sg.club21global.com/club21/corporate_citizenship/ [Accessed 9 Apr. 2018].
Esbenshade, J., Vidal, M., Fascilla, G. and Ono, M., 2016. Customer-driven management models for choiceless clientele? Business process reengineering in a California welfare agency. Work, employment and society, 30(1), pp.77-96.
Fryer, K.J., Antony, J. and Douglas, A., 2015. Critical Success Factors of Continuous Improvement in the Public Sector: A review of literature and some key findings.
Ghorabaee, M.K., Amiri, M., Sadaghiani, J.S. and Zavadskas, E.K., 2015. Multi-criteria project selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14(05), pp.993-1016.
Hirst, J.E., Villar, J., Victora, C.G., Papageorghiou, A.T., Finkton, D., Barros, F.C., Gravett, M.G., Giuliani, F., Purwar, M., Frederick, I.O. and Pang, R., 2016. The antepartum stillbirth syndrome: risk factors and pregnancy conditions identified from the INTERGROWTH?21st Project. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
Hutchins, D., 2016. Hoshin Kanri: the strategic approach to continuous improvement. Routledge.
Jaakkola, J.M., Pahkala, K., Rönnemaa, T., Viikari, J., Niinikoski, H., Jokinen, E., Lagström, H., Jula, A. and Raitakari, O., 2017. Longitudinal child-oriented dietary intervention: Association with parental diet and cardio-metabolic risk factors. The Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project. European journal of preventive cardiology, 24(16), pp.1779-1787.
Kaming, P.F., 2017. Implementation of life cycle costing for a commercial building: case of a residential apartment at Yogyakarta. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 138, p. 05008). EDP Sciences.
Patil, S. and Khandare, M., 2017. Application of BIM for Scheduling and Costing of Construction Project.
Pérez-Uribe, R.I., Torres, D.A., Jurado, S.P.B. and Prada, D.M., 2018. Cloud Tools for the Development of Project Management in SMEs. In Handbook of Research on Intrapreneurship and Organizational Sustainability in SMEs (pp. 95-120). IGI Global.
Reed, S., Brown, L., Weijermars, W., Bos, N., Boele, M., Korving, H., Jaensch, M., Johannsen, H., von der Geest, M., Perez, C. and Santamarina, E., 2018. Identification of key risk factors related to serious road injuries and their health impacts, deliverable 7.4 of the H2020 project SafetyCube.
Regan, M., Love, P. and Smith, J., 2016. Whole life costing of infrastructure investment: Economic and social infrastructure projects in Australia. In Transforming the Future of Infrastructure through Smarter Information-Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction, ICSIC (pp. 701-706).
Rittinghouse, J.W. and Ransome, J.F., 2016. Cloud computing: implementation, management, and security. CRC press.
Sarkis, J. and Sundarraj, R.P., 2015. ERP-enabled business process reengineering: implications from Texas Instruments. In Business process transformation (pp. 157-170). Routledge.
Serban, A.I., 2015. Managing Transformation: Business Process Reengineering or Total Quality Management. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(5), pp.81-86.
Sorocco, K.H., Carnes, N.C., Cohoon, A.J., Vincent, A.S. and Lovallo, W.R., 2015. Risk factors for alcoholism in the Oklahoma Family Health Patterns project: impact of early life adversity and family history on affect regulation and personality. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 150, pp.38-45.
Sriraj, P.S., Snow, J., Kane, J., Wilberding, J. and Ganesh, D., 2017. A Review of Capital Improvement Grant Program and the Need For a Uniform Project Selection Process (No. UIC 2117-9050-02-C).
Tuzkaya, U.R. and Yolver, E., 2015. R&D project selection by integrated grey analytic network process and grey relational analysis: an implementation for home appliances company. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 8(2), pp.35-41.
Uchiyama, S., Ishizuka, N., Shimada, K., Teramoto, T., Yamazaki, T., Oikawa, S., Sugawara, M., Ando, K., Murata, M., Yokoyama, K. and Minematsu, K., 2016. Aspirin for stroke prevention in elderly patients with vascular risk factors: Japanese primary prevention project. Stroke, 47(6), pp.1605-1611.
Willcocks, L.P. and Lacity, M.C. eds., 2016. The new IT outsourcing landscape: from innovation to cloud services. Springer.