Role Of Manager In Risk Management Of Workplace Stress In Supply Chain Industries

Supply Chain Risk in Industries

Discuss about the Role of Manager in the Risk Management of Workplace Stress in Supply Chain Industries.

In the current competitive business marketplaces, there are increased operational demands to curb cases of risk in the management of workplace stress in supply chain organizations. Globalization, multiple channels of operations to the marketplace, the pressure of managers to run leap supply chain industries existed beyond traditional boundaries of the organization, and the need to embrace external partners. These partners include contract manufacturers along with logistics service provider that has left the cutting edge production network progressively helpless against hazard and conceivable instances of disturbance of business operations (Banai & Reisel, 1993). The risk in managing stress in chain of supply in industries has the strong influence on how managers and employees cope with and manage their demands during operations. Management of companies has found that there are contextual factors that tend to exert the strong influence on the wellbeing of outcomes of staff when directly compared with the full range of operational stress risk factors. Additionally, workplace stress in supply chain industries remains to be the health as well as the safety issue and come under the act of OHS. This means that operations of the organization through their managers along with supervisors need to prevent and address workplace stress by the use of management risk framework (Chopra & Sodhi, 2004). The need to apply appropriate risk framework by managers remains to be an essential factor to welcome that both hierarchical together with singular level intercessions to address the reasons for hazard in the working environment that are for the most part more successful than approaches that exclusively focuses on the staff members. Therefore, principal target of this research paperwork is to explore literature review on the essential function of manager in the risk management of workplace stress in supply chain industries.

The workplace risk in supply chain industries results due to several factors that comprise of economic disruption such as fluctuations of currency, commodity price volatility, along with the sudden downturn in demands. The other causes of workplace risk include ownership or restrictions of investment imposed by governments that have remained more frequent along with more visible since the economic crisis that occurred globally in 2008 (Firth et al., 2004). Despite the significant progress in global business operations, cases of cross-border movements remain to be vulnerable to regimes of customs, tariff, non-tariff barriers, security concerns, quota systems, together with infrastructure bottlenecks. All these management risks of workplace stress can be clubbed into macroeconomic, extend the chain of value, operational activities, and functional risks. Therefore, managers have the responsibility of reviewing different appropriate practices that they can use to manage cases of risk management of workplace stress in supply chain industries as they pertain to both lasting strategies along with the short-term tactical process of making decisions. The managers have the role of reviewing their risk exposure against aim, transparent criteria, with cost-balanced against the benefits of possible techniques essential for mitigating risk in operations of supply chain industries (Quinlan, Mayhew, & Bohle, 2001). Therefore, risk in activities of supply chain industries remains to be the threat, the probability of damage, loss, liability, or any adverse occurrence that can result due to internal along with external vulnerabilities and it can be avoided through pre-emptive action.

Managers and Workplace Stress Management

Supply chain risk managers have the role of concentrates on different sides of supply chain risk in their function of management. The managers concentrate on ideas that deal with assessment and mitigation of risk as well as responding to supply chain disruption as a way of managing risk in the business operations (Schlegel & Trent, 2016).  There are various ways that managers’ uses in the workplace in managing of danger in workplace stress in industries. Some of these ways comprise of the effective way of encouraging the change of culture and dealing with the causes of presenteeism. Besides, cases of risk management in workplace stress in some cases are typical. Excessive stress in supply chain industries can always interfere with the productivity of every stakeholder in operation. It also interferes with the performance, its impacts physical along with the emotional health of employees, and it influence relationship of managers with their home life (Whitener et al., 1998). Besides, if the risk in operations is not well managed in every process of supply chain industries, it can them mean to be variation that exists amid achievement together with disappointment in duties of managers. Therefore, in most cases, supply chain risk managers cannot be capable of controlling every operation in their work setting, but this does not mean they remain to be weak even when they are trapped in the desperate condition (Zsidisin, 2003). Whatever objectives of managers or demands of their operations in management of risk of workplace stress in the supply chain organizations, there are various steps managers need to take with the ambition of protecting their services from harmful influences of stress along with improving their job pleasure. The organizational managers also have to bolster their well being in as well as out of the workplace when dealing with management of stress.

Stress in the workplace within the supply chain in industries is not always severe. A little bit of stress can assist employers and employees to stay focused, energetic, and capable of meeting the new challenges in their operations in the workplace. Stress in most cases is what keep managers and employees on their ability in process of management or alert to put off occurrences of disasters in operations or expensive errors within the supply chain industries (Sodhi, Son, & Tang, 2011). In the present hectic business environment, the workplace always appears similar to exciting breaker coaster. Extended hours, tight limits, as well as the ever-increasing demands, can still leave managers and workers within supply chain industries to feel drained, worried, as well as overwhelming (Midgley, 2017). Therefore, if workplace stress is intrusive with the work presentation of employees, their fitness, or individual lifestyle, it always presents the appropriate time for managers to take a stunt action to manage such risks in supply chain industries. No matter what employer and employees do for existing, or how demanding their job is in sectors, there exist ample of things that supply chain risk managers always do to manage the risk of workplace stress (Hood & Nawaz, 2014). The management of risk is essential in helping workers to regain their sense of control at work within supply chain industries.

Managing Workplace Stress in Supply Chain Industries

Some of the causes of workplace stress that managers have to manage in the supply chain industries are diverse. Some of these cases include dread of being laid off and all the more extra minutes because of staff reductions. Different causes incorporate absence of control over how an individual function, strain to work at ideal levels constantly, alongside strain to perform to meet instances of rising desires but with no increase in satisfaction of job (Blos et al., 2009). All these stress in workplace comprise of different warning signs that managers have to deal with in order to ensure that it regain confidence in workers. Stress makes workers lose confidence and may later become irritable, angry, or withdraw their services from a specified supply chain industry (Chi, Han, & Kim, 2013). Therefore, managers have the role of reaching out to every worker in order to ensure that every employee remains to be effective in their operations. Sometimes the best way that managers manage the risk of workplace stress in supply chain industries is through sharing of cases of stress occurrences with somebody near their tasks. The demonstration of taking the worry and getting support and in addition sensitivity particularly eye to eye can be exceptionally powerful approach by the manager towards blowing off steam while regaining their sense of calm. Most managers do not fix the problems of employees, but they act as good listeners.

Some of the causes of stress that managers have to deal with incorporate hierarchical variables, singular components, work concerning elements, and additional authoritative elements. Different factors that lead to stress among individual refer to the stressor (Antony et al., 2016). For instance manager deal with organizational elements that deals with growth in organizational stress along with complexity leading to increased regulatory factors. Some of the factors that managers aim to manage operations of supply chain include cases of discrimination that arises in pay or salary structure. Managers have responsibilities of moderating salary given to different workers as the effective way of ensuring cohesion among employees (Diabat, Khodaverdi, & Olfat, 2013). Besides, managers set the ideal guidelines for the operations to help in improving the strict rules and regulations within processes of supply chain industries. The focus by managers to control cases of strict guidelines helps most workers to remain active in their actions as they improve every sector to achieve its operational strategies. Besides, managers deal with the process of ineffective communication that adversely affects well being of workers resulting in stress in their operations (Micheli, Davis, & Schoorman, 1995). Managers concentrate on developing ideal channels that can be applicable by most employees to address or report their grievances to the concerned authorities. Such creation of channels helps supply chain industries to attain information from every employee regarding its operations efficiently. Such collected data from employees are vital as it allows managers in understanding some of the factors that affect their actions and conducting the appropriate survey on the best approaches they can utilize to address such cases.

Common causes of Workplace Stress

There are various approaches that managers use in managing the risk of workplace stress in supply chain industries. Some of these ways of dealing or managing multiple cases of uncertainty in the management of business operations are diverse.  Any identified risk in activities of supply chain industries by managers should always e accepted, transferred, reduced, or eliminated. The concentration of managers in risk transfer in the management of supply chain industries is ever dealt with throughout insurance commonly for dangers that rarely happen, although it can cause the significant impact of financial status. Supply chain risk managers focus on taking protection so that the industries can concentrate on bearing with the loss incurred during the occurrence of the risk within supply chain industries (Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty n.d). Therefore, managers always have the role of adopting the transfer process of any danger that can happen and can then have the significant impact on financial operations on the business activities. The focus on risk management is attainable since managers have the role of adopting different strategies that can help in reducing probability of event of danger (Zou & Couani, 2012). Besides, supply chain risk managers can then put in place necessary steps such as safety measures that can reduce the risk of workplace stress in supply chain industries from occurring or preventing the occurrence of business operational risks.

Managers also focus on eliminating cases of workplace stress by involving in the process of the complete removal or changing the manner of operations of supply chain industries in the competitive business sector. The method used by managers to address risk within workplace depends on the different type of risk, the type of business operations, the level of services of supply chain industries, along with the financial status of the corporation (Ritchie, 2005). For instance, managers concentrate on adopting the transfer as the solution to the possible conflicts the enterprises face during their operations.  In most case managers control case of per influence by ensuring that workers learn best ways of activities from different processes (Thornton, Esper, & Autry, 2016). The management focus on increasing the promotional opportunities that are less in nature so that the administration can have adequate opportunities to support their activities. Besides, the manager has the role of ensuring that all employees participate within procedure of creating operational choices within operations of supply chain industries (Punjaisri & Wilson, 2007). The idea help in managing risks since every employee gets an ideal chance to have an input in activities of an organization. It also helps the management to ensure that they establish the perfect plan that most employees are familiar with in increasing revenue from supply chain industries.

Managers remain to be the professional dedication of the management of risk of workplace stress in supply chain industries to efficiently manage its operations. Managers have the role of covering the management of services of sectors needed for the delivery of quality operations for the marketplace. Supply chain risk managers perform the critical function in the proper along with the successful implementation of management and records of operation ns of supply chain industries globally (Micheli, Cagno, & Zorzini, 2008). Therefore, manager guarantees the maintenance of the improved standards of confidentiality of data of operations, integrity, along with the security of transactions. Therefore, since various people spend the significant part of the day at their jobs, it is not shocking that work in different supply chain industries can remain to be the significant sources of stress. Managers have the role of conducting the adequate evaluation of the performance of employees’ engagement as a way of managing the risk of workplace risk (Azad et al., 2014). Managers have purposes of maintaining the risk of stress along workplace by improving the relationship of customers, boosting standards of the job, promoting well being of co-workers, and more all serve as stressors for most employees. For instance, when workers are stressed up during their operations, it can lead to the unfortunate effect on their job performance that will later cause them to remain less productive as well as potentially create a lot of mistakes during their operation in supply chain industries. Therefore, managers have different roles that they perform or take to help in reducing employee stress levels (Christina, 2011). Some of these steps taken by managers include the idea of encouraging physical activity, assisting employees to move in the office, offer different operational benefits, getting employees out of the office, make their employees feel valued, as well as communicating about costs of operations.

Abundance investigations have been in place that showcases exercise by the manager to be an essential factor in reducing and managing occurrences of the risk of workplace stress in operations of different industries. For instance, the manager has the role of establishing the ideal time that workers can use to exercise after long enjoyment in operations of supply chain industries. The activities and events of exercise remain n to be essential for the process of maintaining mental fitness among workers (Babin & Boles, 1996). The role of encouraging all employees to engage in physical exercise is vital in operation of supply chain organizations by reducing fatigue. Here managers help in managing the risk of workplace stress by improving alertness along with concentration, and it also enhances general cognition of different workers involved in operations of supply chain industries. The managers also have the role of developing the appropriate environment that make it possible for workers to have regular exercised that can help in reducing the risk of workplace stress. Managers consider following up of different guidelines that assist in encouraging workers to get outside as well as walks during meal breaks as a way of breaking the monotony of being in one place for an extended duration (Cuccheilla & Gastaldi, 2006). Conversely, managers always have the capacities of offering discounted gym to its members or other incentives to assist in the promotion of wellness among workers as they work to attain the objectives of supply chain industries.

Current research works have measured the detrimental impacts of sitting at the desk for the extended period during the day. Therefore, to help workers move more throughout their daily operations in supply chain industries, managers have the roles of trying to install different desks that can easily be converted to the standing desk (Gupta et al., 2014). The managers also have the responsibility of encouraging workers that sit for long hours during their operations to schedule small minutes for stretching during their operations as a way of controlling the risk that sitting can cause to their activeness during operations. For managers to help workers within industries to avoid the detrimental effects of sitting and having inappropriate devices for use during their operations in officers, managers have the purpose to buy and install the Sit60, Move three initiatives in the activities of supply chain industry (Hillson, 2014). The idea by managers to promote and purchase appropriate devices help in reducing cases of workplace stress by encouraging different employees to focus on the issue of taking a break every single hour. The break makes employees to be active in the entire day of their operations in the supply chain industries.

While most organizations always celebrate cases of perfect attendance, employees need to have operational breaks, or they might risk instances of burnout during their operations in supply chain industries. Managers have the responsibilities of creating as well as finding appropriate techniques and ways of encouraging their employees to apply their vacation time efficiently (Rich, 1997). It is evident that vacations in the workplace have enormous benefits as it helps in reducing instances of burnout and making workers to be actively involved in operations of supply chain industries globally. The manager has the responsibility of ensuring that every worker gets a break or a vocation as a way of improving their productivity as well as reducing workplace stress that can make them the risk of being unable to achieve organization’s objectives (Thornton, Esper, & Autry, 2016). Managers have the responsibility for boosting the productivity of workers and improving work of performance around the competitive marketplace (Zhang et al., 2014). Therefore, managers in most supply chain industries that encourage employees to use more vacation period remains to remain useful during operation. Managers ensure that every employed worker has adequate backup procedures in order to make employees feel non-obligated to stay in the activities (Ward, 2017). Additionally, managers try to attain them out of the habit of checking in while they are away during operations.

In operations of most supply chain industries, money remains to be the significant cause of stress for many individuals, health concerns, and operations issues remain to be the strain of financial resources. There exist various considerations concerning the selection of a health plan for employees. It continues to be a good idea to solicit the feedback of employees by managers as a way of risk management of workplace stress in supply chain industries (Berry, 2017). Managers have responsibilities of offering different options to workers and the number of wellness programs of worksite and resources so there may be more flexibility. Managers have the mandate of providing adequate health coverage along with other advantages benefits also provides peace of mind to esteemed employees that can assist in reducing cases of occurrence of workplace stress (Gold, Kunz, & Reiner, 2017). Therefore, managers work by offering different benefits to employees such as health covers as a way of reducing the burdens that worker always go through when they have to use the considerable sum of money to cover for their treatments. The health covers for instance offered by managers can help in treating health related issues in the early stage without an employee waiting for monthly pay before they access quality health services. Therefore, the idea of offering benefits by managers to workers help in risk management of workplace stress as workers will be able to save money, time, and improving their well being in operations of supply chain industries.

When most employees in supply chain industries feel as though they are disposable in their operations, it can help in preparing for the stressful working setting. For this reason, managers perform vital function in communicating to their workers making them valued at operations of a given supply chain industry. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the manager to ensure that they make their employees feel assessed by communicating to them during their engagements with industrial operations (Bartlett & Sumantra, 2002). The more managers are capable of recognizing their workers in every supply chain industry, the more they will be capable of understanding specific contributions of every worker by learning their daily routines. Making employees feel valued by managers the more workers always feel irreplaceable in their operations. Managers need to become personal while offering different duties or assignments to workers help in managing any occurrence of risk within the stress workplaces around activities of the industry (Burns, 2017). Therefore, manager plays the role of taking an interest in their workers makes most of the employees to feel like part as well as the parcel of team operations around supply chain industries.

The manager must communicate to their employees concerning different values of decompressing to help in risk management of workplace stress in supply chain industry. The need to show an excellent example to other workers is an essential role that managers have to give a good illustration of how different issues that affect operations need to be tackled around the supply chain. For the need of showing the significance of downtime, exercise after long days works or stretching during breaks (Gustavsson, 2008). Managers always have the role of incorporating these practices to help in demonstrating to other workers how they are essential for their operations along with the elimination of stresses in operations. The manager has the role of allowing themselves together with employees to reduce their stress making them probable to communicate with workers more efficiently. Hence, the improved communication between workers and managers help in ensuring that managers do not fail to schedule their stretch breaks along with the use of their vacation periods (Finch, 2004). Moreover, it is evident that stress of employees during their involvement in operations in supply chain industries leads to fatigue, the poor performance of assigned tasks, burnout among other effects that negatively affects their outputs during their operations within sectors. Managers are thus having the role of finding the ineffective technique of fostering the environment to encourage their workers to relax a little (Antony et al., 2016). Therefore, reducing stress within the workplace can lead to a more productive together with the energized workforce. Besides, involvement of managers in managing risk of workplace stress in industry can also be applicable as the recruitment device for attracting qualified, talented, and skilful employees (Bredell & Walters, 2007). All these roles by manager aim at making workers happy during their operations that in return help in ensuring that the organization along with their management are capable of controlling or managing the risk of workforce stresses within different supply chain organizations.

There are numerous steps that supply chain managers can set in place as well as resources that they can use to alleviate different pressures as well as promoting the health place of work. The preventive measures and guidelines set by supply chain managers remain to have a more significant impact when they are implemented. The managers are responsible for encouraging staff to access health along with well-being opportunities in their operations (Haraburda, 2017). Besides, they are responsible for empowering different staff to control their workload. The idea of one to one together with team meetings offer an ideal chance for the staff of supply chain industry to share essential data that can e useful in gauging perception of their workload along with how they are managing peaks in their workload. Additionally, under laws that deal with health as well as the safety of workers, supply chain managers must identify as well as manage cases of stress around the place of work (Mak & Shen, 2012). They are also responsible for addressing areas of poor design operations that include the load of work, control of the employee, together with the provision of appropriate support along with resources for services. Therefore, supply chain managers’ remains to be the fundamental factor that helps in reducing cases of workplace stress and thus managers help in increasing examples of productivity among workers.

Supply chain managers work to a great extent to perform a vital role in managing cases of workplace stress in the supply chain industries. The managers are always the first port of call for workers at times of distress. It remains vital for managers develop much-needed competencies to enable them to support their direct reports efficiently (Kiel, 2015). The supply chain managers efficiently work on controlling cases of stress in place of work by having necessary skills and behaviours that include the ability to assess and identify stressors at workplace and ability to establish the excellent rapport. Besides, other skills and practices that these managers have to efficiently manage the risk that arises from workplace stress in supply chain industries include the need of awareness of signs as well as symptoms of stress that look at what remains to be the current demands in every organization setting (Pellegrino, Costantino, & Tauro, 2018). The ability of the supply chain managers to access as well as identify stressors at workplace help in ensuring that all design for workplace works appropriately. The idea allows management to remember that changes to the open plan environment or lighting for operations can help in triggering of stress for some individuals (Niehoff et al., 2001). Furthermore, capacity of managers to develop good rapport help in promoting the open together with the honest environment so the workers can be capable of feeling able to air out their concerns. The workers can then use the created rapport to air out their concerns such as conflict issues that affect their operations at the workplace or personal items at the homestead.

The practical scope of chain of supply managers relies on compatibility with the business strategy of an organization along with mission statement, families of offered products, market partners, together with production network accomplices. For example, store network supervisors should dependably adjust their tasks to the general system of the association or else the production network operations can result in the generation of risk for the entire functioning of the corporation (Kumar, 2007). For the different producer of low-margin commodities with stable, demands that are predictable, an extended or cheap chain of supply may reduce cases of operational risks that result from workplace stress when compared to the short, expensive, and ready supply chain. Therefore, supply chain managers operate by covering the perspectives of both known and unknown operational risks. For instance of known supply chain risks that result due to management, stress comprises of process breakdowns, failure of suppliers, poor material as well as component quality along with inadequate logistics in operations and capability of distribution. Another example of risk management of workplace stress by supply chain managers includes excessive demands instability, criminal action, and natural disaster occurrences during operations (Linnander et al., 2017). While the known risk of workplace stress remains to be too many to list, perceived risk in the activities of supply chain industries are identifiable ahead of time of their event and for the most part can be averted or dispensed with various hazard moderation factors employed by supply chain managers.  Therefore man, supply chain agers must focus their work on addressing the unknown risk that affects operations of workers around the place of work full of stress. Ideal preparation remains to be the critical factor towards improved responsiveness to what is unknown.

The research questions were established on the basis that there had been the need for every manager to take all reasonable steps and actions in ensuring that they do not lead to unnecessary stress to other people during operations in supply chain industries. The hypothesis was formed to help in understanding how managers can have the responsibility for their well being along with health by putting the operations of enterprises on their minds (Platt et al., 2016). The research aimed at illustrating how managers can cooperate with others around supply chain industries to concentrate on appropriate measures to reduce their occupational stress. Besides, the research question was attained with the objective of making managers to be aware of their reactions to stressful situations during their operations in various organizations. It focuses on the need of making most managers in industries to be mindful of ideal methods that they can use to cope with workplace stresses by efficiently managing such risks so that it can have no or very little influence on operations of supply chain industries (Kousky & Kunreuther, 2018). Therefore, by forming these research objectives, the study aimed to illustrate to any member or staff of supply chain industries who consider that they are suffering from any harmful influences of stress in their operations or if they are anticipating the stressful moment in future to know how they can raise such matters with their managers. Therefore, by analysing the hypothesis for the study, the investigators noted that the use of outcome of the investigation could help workers to know precise duties of managers in managing danger of workplace stress in supply chain industries around marketplaces.

In the fast-paced organization in rapidly shifting business settings in which organization growth, profitability, and productivity are critical, the primary concern of every supply chain agers remains to be how they can impact the longevity and loyalty of their employees to continue to work in the organization. Supply chain agers aim to achieve this concern by improving the involvement of the employee in different operations and processes of making operational decisions. The association helps the company to give the workers stake in the various process of making the decision that has the direct influence on operations of organizations (Purcell & Hutchinson, 2007). Besides, supply chain agers also concentrate on the means of empowering employees so that they can feel values as a way of ensuring that they stay for an extended period in operations. The idea of enabling employees by the supply chain agers focuses on the activities that allow all non-managerial employees to have the chance of making autonomous decisions. Therefore, idea of empowerment and involvement of employees in operations of organization helps in making every employee to engage well in operations of an industry (Sadiq & Graham, 2016). Therefore, the significant benefit of supply chain agers involving in the process of involvement of employees and empowering them during the operations remains to is the enhancement of morale, making employees more productive, forming healthy relationships among co-workers, as well as improving the process of critical; thinking essential in operations.

Other ways that supply chain agers use to increase the longevity together with the loyalty of employees in operations of the industry include the practice of improving the morale of employees, increasing rate of productivity, improving team cohesion, and improving innovation techniques among workers. For instance, improvement of morale of employees by the supply chain agers helps in including workers in the process of making decisions and policy changes that directly influence their operations (Simba et al., 2017). While managers focus on empowering employees to be more autonomous, they greatly aim at improving the morale of workers at large. Therefore, when employees receive appropriate treatment as the asset along with their input is offered consideration, confidence in operation will increase among every member of the team, and the organization can significantly can in various facets that include loyalty and productivity in services. Besides, improved morale among employees by the supply chain agers can help in improving the longevity of employees with the organization (Villena et al., 2018). Therefore, the longer the worker associated with operations of the industry, the more experienced they always become, and this makes them to become mentors to recruited workers and indispensable to managerial staff. Additionally, supply chain agers can increase loyalty and longevity of employees in industries by increasing their productivity (Anthony et al., 2016). Ere, worker involvement along with empowerment translates directly into increased rates of production in operations of a given company. Workers with the investment in the best interest of company can improve their function in the company by the process of fostering the stronger ethics for work in their companies (Thomton, Esper, & Autry, 2016). The change of giving employee’s independence helps them in becoming productive. The independence allows workers to have time of figuring out how to explore their obligations to depend less on thoughts of administrators for directions to take while they operate. Such designs allow supply chain agers to have more time to attend to different responsibilities other than offering different assignments to subordinates while it also decreases micromanagement that retards productivity.

Every supply chain manager has its behaviours that they use in ensuring that the organization remains to be useful in managing risks of workplace stress among its stakeholders in the business community. Almost everything that affects the ability of the manager to compete as well as respond successfully to operational changes in the external along with internal settings will ultimately result in failure or success of supply chain manager (Wilson & Barbat, 2015). The internal factors that affect behaviours of managers tend to determine how the operations of an individual can move forward both as the self-driven entity and in response to its external environment. Some of the factors that trigger the managerial behaviour include the mission of supply chain industry, leadership, channels of communication, the structure of an organization, and learning process. Other external factors that trigger behaviours of managers in operations comprise of political issues, the economic status of an organization, social, or advancement in technological usage (Yuelu, Raimob, & Humfrey, 2016). Therefore, supply chain makes managers understand people that they need to deal with while focusing on appropriate measures that can boost their businesses incorrect manner.

There are several gaps that need to be looked at in regard to manager’s roles in the risk management of workplace stress in supply chain industries. The paper only highlights roles played by managers in the management of risk that result due to risk in the workplace, but much investigation remains to be conducted, notably on the managerial levers that might always consolidate or enhance the performance of the organization in the business setting. Besides, one potential section for the future survey comprises of creating the appropriate understanding of the barriers that are present and always stand between the supply chain manager’s willingness to accept several uncertainties in their interactions, need to attain greater heights of maturity of risk management along with prospect moderators (Purcell & Hutchinson, 2007). The need for the future investigation on this subject may also need to compare respondent membership of clusters based on different factors such as years of experiences of manager in managing the risk of workplace stress in supply chain industries as they influence maturity. The need of future investigation may comprise of both attributes of managerial behaviour towards crucial supply chain partners workers but also barriers, opportunities, and chances for partnering that result to the improved approaches of managing risk for the supply chain industries by managers.  

Conclusion

From this literature examination of roles of the manager in the risk management of workplace stress in supply chain industries, it is clear that managers have vital roles in ensuring that every organization work as per the set objective in the present competitive business environment. Managers need to increase their attention on how they addressee and eliminate cases of risks resulting to stress due to increase cases of financial crisis. The management of supply chain management has to raise their awareness to be reflected in the more formal approach to the management of risk of the organization. The managers have the responsibility of having strong emphasizes on people that support the operations of the company rather than the board of directors as employees are the people in activities that are always affected by such occurrences of risks.

References

Anthony Swaim, J., Maloni, M., Henley, A., & Campbell, S. (2016). Motivational influences on supply manager environmental sustainability behavior. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(3), 305-320. doi: 10.1108/scm-07-2015-0283

Azad, N., Davoudpour, H., Saharidis, G., & Shiripour, M. (2014). A new model to mitigating random disruption risks of facility and transportation in supply chain network design. International Journal Of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70(9-12), 1757-1774. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5404-0

Babin, B., & Boles, J. (1996). The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction. Journal Of Retailing, 72(1), 57-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4359(96)90005-6

Banai, M., &Reisel, W. (1993). Expatriate Managers’ Loyalty to the MNC: Myth or Reality? An Exploratory Study. Journal Of International Business Studies, 24(2), 233-248. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490231

Bartlett, A., and Sumantra, G.(2002). “Building competitive advantage through people: Human, not financial, capital must be the starting point and ongoing foundation of a successful strategy.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 34+. Academic OneFile, Retrieved from https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A82742111/AONE?u=james_cook&sid=AONE&xid=f5aa107b.

Berry, D. (2017). Keys to stellar supply chain management: Innovation, technology, the environment and regulatory compliance all play a role. Industrial Engineer: IE, 49(8), 42-46.

Blos, M., Quaddus, M., Wee, H., & Watanabe, K. (2009). Supply chain risk management (SCRM): a case study on the automotive and electronic industries in Brazil. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(4), 247-252. doi: 10.1108/13598540910970072

Bredell, R., & Walters, J. (2007). Integrated supply chain risk management. Journal Of Transport And Supply Chain Management, 1(1). doi: 10.4102/jtscm.v1i1.3

Burns, L. (2017). An extended framework for supply chain risk management: incorporating the complexities of emerging industries and large-scale systems. International Journal Of Manufacturing Technology And Management, 31(1/2/3), 217. doi: 10.1504/ijmtm.2017.10002919

Chi, S., Han, S., & Kim, D. Y. (2013). Relationship between Unsafe Working Conditions and Workers’ Behavior and Impact of Working Conditions on Injury Severity in U.S. Construction Industry. Journal Of Construction Engineering & Management, 139(7), 826-838. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000657

Chopra, S., &Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown.MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53-61. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/224964486?accountid=16285

Christina, N. (2011). The Multifaceted Roles of A Manager – Need of the Hour. Indian Journal Of Applied Research, 4(4), 126-127. doi: 10.15373/2249555x/apr2014/223

Cucchiella, F., &Gastaldi, M. (2006). Risk management in supply chain: a real option approach. Journal Of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(6), 700-720. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410380610678756

Diabat, A., Khodaverdi, R., & Olfat, L. (2013). An exploration of green supply chain practices and performances in an automotive industry. International Journal Of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68(1-4), 949-961. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-4955-4

Finch, P. (2004). Supply chain risk management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 183-196. doi: 10.1108/13598540410527079

Firth, L., Mellor, D., Moore, K., &Loquet, C. (2004). How can managers reduce employee intention to quit?. Journal Of Managerial Psychology, 19(2), 170-187. doi: 10.1108/02683940410526127

Gold, S., Kunz, N., & Reiner, G. (2017). Sustainable Global Agrifood Supply Chains: Exploring the Barriers. Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 21(2), 249-260. doi:10.1111/jiec.12440

Gupta, S., Goh, M., De-Souza, R., Meng, F., & Garg, M. (2014). Supply Chain Risk Management. International Journal Of Information Systems And Supply Chain Management, 7(2), 80-101. doi: 10.4018/ijisscm.2014040105

Gustavsson, T. (2018). Liminal roles in construction project practice: exploring change through the roles of partnering manager, building logistic specialist and BIM coordinator. Construction Management And Economics, 1-12. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2018.1464197

Haraburda, S. S. (2017). Supply Chain Management Maturity Level Assessment. Defense Acquisition Research Journal: A Publication Of The Defense Acquisition University, 24(4), 656-681. doi:10.22594/dau.16-772.24.04

Hillson, D. (2014). Caratteristiche di un Enterprise Risk management efficace. PROJECT MANAGER (IL), (18), 24-25. doi: 10.3280/pm2014-018008

Hood, J., & Nawaz, M. (2014). Political Risk Exposure and Management in Multi-national Companies: Is There a Role for the Corporate Risk Manager?. Risk Management, 6(1), 7-18. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240169

Kiel, J. (2015). An Analysis of the Management and Leadership Roles of Nurses Relative to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Health Care Manager, 34(1), 75-80. doi: 10.1097/hcm.0000000000000040

Klastorin, T., & Mitchell, G. (2013). Optimal project planning under the threat of a disruptive event. IIE Transactions, 45(1), 68-80. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2012.682700

Kousky, C., & Kunreuther, H. (2018). Risk Management Roles of the Public and Private Sector. Risk Management And Insurance Review, 21(1), 181-204. doi: 10.1111/rmir.12096

Kumar, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility (Triple Bottam line); A Technology serves the company and Society. International Journal Of Recent Research Aspects, 4(3), 118-125.

Linnander, E., Yuan, C. T., Ahmed, S., Cherlin, E., Talbert-Slagle, K., & Curry, L. A. (2017). Process evaluation of knowledge transfer across industries: Leveraging Coca-Cola’s supply chain expertise for medicine availability in Tanzania. Plos ONE, 12(11), 1-16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186832

Mak, H., & Shen, Z. (. (2012). Risk diversification and risk pooling in supply chain design. IIE Transactions, 44(8), 603-621. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2011.635178

Mayer, R., Davis, J., &Schoorman, F. (1995). An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust. Academy Of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

Micheli, G., Cagno, E., & Zorzini, M. (2008). Supply risk management vs supplier selection to manage the supply risk in the EPC supply chain. Management Research News, 31(11), 846-866. doi: 10.1108/01409170810913042

Midgley, M. (2017). Risk manager formula for success: Influencing decision making. Journal Of Healthcare Risk Management, 37(2), 4-4. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21291

Niehoff, B., Moorman, R., Blakely, G., & Fuller, J. (2001). The Influence of Empowerment and Job Enrichment on Employee Loyalty in a Downsizing Environment. Group & Organization Management, 26(1), 93-113. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601101261006

Pellegrino, R., Costantino, N., & Tauro, D. (2018). Supply Chain Finance: A supply chain-oriented perspective to mitigate commodity risk and pricing volatility. Journal Of Purchasing And Supply Management. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2018.03.004

Platt, A., Outlay, C., Sarkar, P., & Karnes, S. (2016). Evaluating User Needs in Wellness Apps. International Journal Of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(2), 119-131. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1099803

Punjaisri, K., & Wilson, A. (2007). The role of internal branding in the delivery of employee brand promise. Journal Of Brand Management, 15(1), 57-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550110

Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(1), 3-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00022.x

Quinlan, M., Mayhew, C., & Bohle, P. (2001). The Global Expansion of Precarious Employment, Work Disorganization, and Consequences for Occupational Health: A Review of Recent Research. International Journal Of Health Services, 31(2), 335-414. https://dx.doi.org/10.2190/607h-ttv0-qcn6-ylt4

Rich, G. (1997). The Sales Manager as a Role Model: Effects on Trust, Job Satisfaction, and Performance of Salespeople. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 25(4), 319-328. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254004

Ritchie, B. (2005). Supply Chain Risk Management. The International Conference On Business & Technology Transfer, 2004.2(0), 8-23. doi: 10.1299/jsmeicbtt.2004.2.0_8

Sadiq, A., & Graham, J. D. (2016). Exploring the Relationship between Hazard Adjustments and Risk Managers in Organizations. Journal Of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 24(4), 209-220. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12114

Schlegel, G. L., & Trent, R. J. (2016). Supply chain risk management : an emerging discipline. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Simba, S., Niemann, W., Kotzé, T., & Agigi, A. (2017). Supply chain risk management processes for resilience: A study of South African grocery manufacturers. Journal Of Transport And Supply Chain Management, 11. doi: 10.4102/jtscm.v11i0.325

Sodhi, M., Son, B., & Tang, C. (2011). Researchers’ Perspectives on Supply Chain Risk Management. Production And Operations Management, 21(1), 1-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01251.x

Thornton, L., Esper, T., & Autry, C. (2016). Leader or Lobbyist? How Organizational Politics and Top Supply Chain Manager Political Skill Impacts Supply Chain Orientation and Internal Integration. Journal Of Supply Chain Management, 52(4), 42-62. doi: 10.1111/jscm.12119

Villena, V., Lu, G., Gomez-Mejia, L., & Revilla, E. (2018). Is top management team-supply chain manager interaction the missing link? An analysis of risk-bearing antecedents for supply chain managers. International Journal Of Operations & Production Management. doi: 10.1108/ijopm-05-2017-0258

Ward, M. (2017). Risky Business: Navigating a Complex World With Intelligent Risk Management. Professional Safety, 62(7), 28.

Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty. Issues In Business Ethics, 139-147. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4984-2_8

Whitener, E., Brodt, S., Korsgaard, M., & Werner, J. (1998). Managers As Initiators Of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework For Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior. Academy Of Management Review, 23(3), 513-530. https://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926624

Wilson, K., & Barbat, V. (2015). The supply chain manager as political-entrepreneur?. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.034

Yuelu Huanga, I., Raimob, V., & Humfreyc, C. (2016). Power and control: managing agents for international student recruitment in higher education. Studies In Higher Education, 41(8), 1333-1354. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.968543

Zhang, D., Sheng, Z., Du, J., & Jin, S. (2014). A study of emergency management of supply chain under supply disruption. Neural Computing & Applications, 24(1), 13-20. doi:10.1007/s00521-013-1511-y

Zou, P. W., & Couani, P. (2012). Managing risks in green building supply chain. Architectural Engineering & Design Management, 8(2), 143-158. doi:10.1080/17452007.2012.659507

Zsidisin, G. (2003). Managerial Perceptions of Supply Risk. The Journal Of Supply Chain Management, 39(1), 14-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493x.2003.tb00146.x