Policy Cycle as a tool for developing new policies
Question:
Discuss about the Introduction to Health for Policy, Planning and Financing.
Policy cycle is an appropriate tool for new policy development. The policy cycle help organize public demands and turn them to actionable activities (Abel-Smith, 2016). Policy cycle creates a structured framework that policy makers can use when developing new policies. The policy cycle has stages that outline what is to be done in the process of developing a new policy. First, the policy cycle is descriptive. The policy cycle simplifies the complex process of developing policy to systematic steps that can be easily followed (Baum, 2016). The outline of the stages to be followed enables consistency in developing of new policies. This also allows standardization and acceptability of the new policies. The new policies developed meet required standards that meet public demands. The new policy is generally accepted, supported, and agreed that increase the effectiveness of the policy. Secondly, the policy cycle is prescriptive. The policy cycle prescribes how policy makers can formulate a policy that translates demands into actions. The policy cycle details what is to be considered in every stage and align demands to actions. The policy cycle seeks to prescriptively remove ambiguity in the process of developing new policies. Thirdly, policy cycle is appropriate for accurately identifying a problem. The policy cycle framework ensures that the problem causing public demand is clearly identified when developing new policies (Evans, 2017). Policy cycle is also appropriate for identifying alternative policies when developing a new policy. The new policy developed outlines other alternatives policies that can be used in case the policy developed does not meet the public demands. Lastly, policy cycle lead to rational decision in the process of developing new policies. The policy cycle guides policy makers to make decisions only based on reason and the best interest to public demands. The policy cycle is therefore an appropriate tool for developing new policies because of it systematic framework work and it ability to offer guidelines to effective policies development.
Sociological factors refer to physical and social conditions that an individual is born, learn, live, work, play, and age. Sociological factors influence lifestyle that determines the health status of an individual. One of the key sociological factors that determine the health status of a person health is income and social status. The level of income determines the lifestyle of a person in term of affordability of goods and services. People with high income are able to live in good houses, neighborhood, have balanced diet and access health care as compared to people will little or no income (Stoddart, & Evans, 2017). Poor people on the other side live in poor conditions and are not able to access medical health or even pay for health insurance cover that deteriorate their health status. Therefore, the higher the social status and income the better the health and the wider the gap between poor and rich people in a country the greater the difference in health. Another sociological factor that determines health status is education. Education provides knowledge and skill that improve an individual’s standards of living. Educated people eat healthier food, get descent jobs, and lead healthy lifestyle as compared to people with low levels of education (Barer, 2017). Low level of education is correlated to poor health, low self confidence and more stress. Social norms also determine a person’s health status. People who have social norms such as drug and alcohol abuse are linked to poor health. These social norms influence a person to indulge in abuse that causes illness. Therefore, sociological factors determine the health status of a person
Sociological factors and health status
Power is the ability to influence an outcome by influencing the human behavior. In policy development, power means capacity to influence development, adoption, and implementation of a new policy. Policy maker develop new policies that require government support to be adopted and implemented. The governments are politically formed and therefore decisions are highly influenced by politics (Brownson, Colditz, & Proctor, 2017). This entails that policy makers have to influence the legislators and executive for a policy to be supported by the government. Politics involve sharing of power or strive to influence distribution of resources that constrain purity of analysis in policy adoption and implementation. Politicians therefore aim to achieve their desires by exerting influence and power. Policies are developed to change the current situation that meet the current public demand. Politics can lead to irrational opposition of a good policy. Human being in all level resist and fear change because it changes what they are used to (Béland, & Ridde, 2016). Other people fear change because of job insecurity. Policy makers have to understand the political and the decision making process to influence policy adoption. This will enable the policy makes to acknowledge the political process and find out events that can positively influence the policy adoption and support. For instance policy makers should make policy proposals before government budgets are prepared in order to get allocations. Policy makers should also recognize conflicts when developing policies and use political actions to influence support, adoption, and implementation of policy (Blank, Burau, & Kuhlmann, 2017). Therefore, power means influence in making decisions on policy development and policy makers should understand the political process for policy adoption and implementation by the legislators, executives in the government and other stakeholders.
Policy considerations are important to increasing new policy effectiveness to solve a problem or meet a public demand. Policy considerations in health campaigns ensure appropriateness to policy development, adoption, and implementation. The national obesity health campaign policy should consider the following when developing and implement the policy; first, the national obesity campaign policy should consider the obesity problem in the country. The policy should consider the current data on the levels of obesity. Data show the magnitude of the problem and set objective that measure success of the health campaign. Data also informs long term planning of the health campaign and create sustainable solution to the problem (Thokala et al., 2016). Secondly, the national obesity health campaign should consider the sustainability of the policy results. The policy should consider how the health campaign results will be sustained in the country. This means that the health campaign should focus on long term impact of low levels of obesity in the country. Failure to consider sustainability for the result achieved by the campaign will lead cases of obesity increasing to the high levels that led to development of the policy meaning the policy will not have achieved it objective. Thirdly, the national obesity campaign should consider the appropriateness of interventions. Interventions should be easy to implement and get adopted in the society. The interventions should also be practical and effective to solve the problem (Stoddart, & Evans, 2017). Another consideration for a national obesity campaign is an adequate budget. Budget is important for ensuring the campaign intended interventions reaches the target people in the country. An adequate budget is important for the health campaign meeting it predetermined objectives. Lastly, national obesity campaign should consider engaging key stakeholders. Engaging and collaboration with the stakeholder in different levels enhances policy support. Engaging stakeholders also incorporates multiple perspectives that enhance the sustainability of the interventions developed by the policy (Huss, & MacLachlan, 2016).
Power and its influence in policy development
If I was to create a new policy to develop smoke free environment in the university, I will include the following factor; First, I will clearly set the objective of the policy. The objective will be specific and time bound that will create direction and focus of the policy (Evans, 2017). The objective will also outline the problem that will be solved by the policy in creating a free smoke environment for the university. Secondly, I will include interventions to developing a free smoke environment. The interventions will involve outlining activities that will be undertaken towards a free environment. The interventions can either be laws or regulations that will prohibit activities that produce smoke in the university environment. Interventions will indicate solutions that will ensure a free smoke environment. The interventions will be included because they state what has to be done to meet the policy objectives. Thirdly, the policy will include stakeholders’ section. The stakeholders in the university will include the administration, teaching and non teaching staff, and students. Stakeholders will be allowed to give their opinion on the policy and give feedback. The feedback will be incorporate their perspective on the policy and add solution that they propose where applicable. Engaging stakeholders in the development of the policy will enhance the policy support (Ståhl, 2018). The policy will also have little or no resistance in the implementation phase. Lastly, the policy will include a monitoring and evaluation framework. Monitoring will ensure the policy activities are in line with the objectives set. Evaluation in the policy will indicate how the whole process will be evaluated. Evaluation will show how effective the policy is to achieving it objectives.
References
Abel-Smith, B. (2016). An introduction to health: policy, planning and financing. Routledge.
Baum, F. (2016). The new public health (No. Ed. 4). Oxford University Press.
Barer, M. (Ed.). (2017). Why are some people healthy and others not?. Routledge.
Béland, D., & Ridde, V. (2016). Ideas and Policy Implementation: Understanding the Resistance against Free Health Care in Africa. Global Health Governance, 10(3).
Blank, R., Burau, V., & Kuhlmann, E. (2017). Comparative health policy. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (Eds.). (2017). Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Oxford University Press.
Evans, M. (2017). Understanding policy transfer. In Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 10-42). Routledge.
Huss, T., & MacLachlan, M. (2016). Equity and Inclusion in Policy Processes: A Framework to Support Inclusive Policy Development, Implementation and Evaluation.
Stoddart, G. L., & Evans, R. G. (2017). Producing health, consuming health care. In Why are some people healthy and others not? (pp. 27-64). Routledge.
Ståhl, T. (2018). Health in All Policies: From rhetoric to implementation and evaluation–the Finnish experience. Scandinavian journal of public health, 46(20_suppl), 38-46.
Thokala, P., Devlin, N., Marsh, K., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kalo, Z., … & Ijzerman, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—an introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value in health, 19(1), 1-13.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
