Definition of GVT
What Is The Impact Of Cultural Diversification Management?
The research work of Daim et al. (2012) had shown that the cultural diversity plays a major role in the development of the acute information processing in the organization. The organizations have been facing issues due to the diversified culture of the employees and team members. The effective and smart control of operations had been deployed for the formation of the integration within the culture.
The report had been made for the development of the system management and cultural diversification in the organization. The report would define the concept of GVT for the project operations and it would highlight problems of cultural diversity in the team members of a project.
The major hindrance that had been resulted due to the cultural diversification is the issues in communication process. The organization had been facing issues due to the gap in transferring of the ideas among the team members. The cultural diversification would result in developing the hardcore development procedure for the business organization.
GVT is an abbreviation of global virtual team and it is a new concept for the business organization and team projects (Pinjani & Palvia, 2013). The main motive of the GVT concept is for delivering the activities of the project by using the team members scattered all over.
There is no requirement of the team members of GVT to be physically in contact with each other. As per opined by Daim et al. (2012), the ICT tools would allow them to communicate and deliver the appropriate solution to each other. The project activities occur as distribution of project operations is done virtually and each of the team members is assigned a definite set of task.
The cultural diversity has the primary benefit of getting accustomed to various culture and factor for the development of the operations of the organizational project. However, the problems faced by the cultural diversity are barrier to communication, slackness to social factors, and unable to adapt (Banks 2015). The influence of the differentiate culture had been deployed for forming the support to the cultural integrations. On the contrary, these issues have caused serious hindrance for the development of the operations of the organization and development of the negating factors for the organizational development. The proper explanation of these factors had been given below,
The organizations have been facing systematic issue of unable to communicate with each other due to the barriers of communication. From the works of Trax, Brunow and Suedekum (2015), it is evident that the cultural diversification had been highly cohesive and acts as a negative reactant for developing the operations of the organization. The team members would be unable to convey the messages and ideas due to the lack of communication method. The communication barrier would be resulted due to the gap in ideals and thoughts among the team members. The communication methods had been developed for supporting the factors of analysis for the team members and there are several platforms that can act as the communication method (Bellini et al., 2013). However, the absence of the mutual understanding of the cultural diversification might end up resulting the fall of the systematic operations.
Characteristics of GVT
The research study of Suedekum, Wolf and Blien (2014), had been largely helpful for forming the analysis of the role played by the cultural diversity in raising the issue of social slackness. The cultural difference results in developing the major difference between the social factors of the team members. The social factors had been deferring due to the difference in the cultural diversity. The options of the system lagging for the development had been forming for hindrances in the development of the operations. The slackness in the social factors had been caused due to the impact of the varied social factors. According to research done by Wood and Wilberger (2015), it is evident that the factors of the social development had been tarnished due to the negative impact of the cultural diversities.
The factor of non adaptability or the team members unable to accept the changes is major flaw in the development of the operations (Bellini et al., 2013). There are several reasons for explaining the rejection of any prospect by the team members. The overall commitment of the ongoing facilities had been causing severe damage to the development functions of the organization. The major role played by the development factor is for developing the system modulation in the organization. The hopes of underlying facilities had been rejected by many members. It has been seen that many people are unable to cope with changes in the operations. They resist the changes because they have become comfortable with the existing operation and changes would result in slowing their operations.
There have been several studies done on the impact of the cultural issues that had been resulted due to the growing cultural diversification. However, the most suitable study had been done by Pieterse, Van Knippenberg and Van Dierendonck (2013) and they have realized that the impact of the cultural issues on the operations of the organization had been severely affected. The cultural issues had formed the barriers to the development of the schematic operations of the organization. The various role of the development model had been formed for developing the operations of the organization. The formation of the development model had been helpful for the increment of the existing operations. On the contrary Troster, Mehra and van Knippenberg (2014), have pointed that the cultural issues had been causing havoc for the development of the effective and smart operations in the organization and some of them are delay in operation and documentation flaws.
Problems and Impact of Cultural Diversity
The team operations of GVT are based on the function of effective and smart transmitting of information and data. However, due to the cultural diversities causing cultural issues in the organization, the transmission of the information had been severely hampered (Troster, Mehra & van Knippenberg, 2014). The development of the operations had made all the activities based on the information processing and detailing. The cultural hindrance had caused the difference between the ongoing facilities of the organization and formation of the effective and smart tools for the data processing and modification. The role of the system development had been helpful for forming the assurance of the ongoing facilities of the organization. However, the disturbances of the operations had caused the major setback for the development functions.
The flaws in documentation had been a major result due to the cultural issues of cultural diversification. There are several factors that cause the deployment of the documentation flaws and one of them in cultural issues (Majchrzak et al., 2014). The flaws of the documents had caused the team built impact on the follow up of the project operations. The influence of the cultural diversities had caused the formation of the explicit impact for the development factor of the organization. The lack of stipulated operations had resulted in forming the implementation model of the organization. The improper documentation had caused the major hindrance in the development model for the organizational difference. The lack of proper documents would serve the issues of the illicit technological hindrances.
The GVT or global virtual team had been developed for the modification of the difference in the cultural perspective of the organization (Majchrzak et al., 2014). The team members had to form the effective management operations for developing the compact influence of the development models. The major increase in the demand of the operations had resulted in developing the influential operations of the organization. The strategies that had been developed for the development of the cultural modification of the improvement facilities. According to Ruppel, Gong and Tworoger (2013), the strategies that had been developed for the improvement of the operational set of the cultural influence are impact management of cultural activities, focusing on the common interest of culture and operation, and knowledge management.
The impact management of the cultural activities had been deployed for the improvement of the activities of the culture for the business operations. There are several factors that had resulted in the development of the management functions for the cultural activities. The management of any operation is very helpful for forming the accurate and required output for the organization (Ruppel, Gong & Tworoger, 2013). The management strategies had been developed for defining the proper functioning of the development functions. The issues of cultural hindrances due to the growth of diversities of the culture could be managed by the use of the systematic deployment of the development model. The management of the cultural activities would result in narrowing the negative impact of the cultural issues on the organization. The prospect of developing and integrating the models for the development function would be evaluated for forming the base of system integration. On the contrary the development of the explicit functions would be helpful for developing the system integration for the modulation of the cultural divergence (Bass et al., 2015). The management of the impact would be done for forming the accurate development model of operation in the organization.
Delay in Operations
According to Crisp and Jarvenpaa (2013), the development of the common interest of the culture and operation would serve the purpose for focusing on the development factor for the operations of the organization. The cultural diversities had caused the upholding of the issues and hindrances in the operations of the organization. There are more instances for the creation of the issues and errors in the organization. The systematic development of the functions would result in developing the influence of functions for the organization. The common interest of diverse culture could be focused for the development of proper operational functionality in the project organization of GVT. The study by Iorio and Taylor (2014) had developed the dominance of the common factors of interest for aligning the business activities of the organization in terms of the cultural influence. The influence of the development schemes had been developed for forming the scope of the development models for the organization. The social diversities had brought on the maintaining of the issues and preventions in the operations of the association. There are more occurrences for the making of the issues and mistakes in the association. The methodical advancement of the capacities would bring about building up the impact of capacities for the association.
The knowledge management plays a crucial role in development of the strategies of management for the cultural diversities. Carter et al. (2015) had stated that the knowledge management is a leading factor in the formation of the system integration of the development model. The development of knowledge management would employ the role of the development strategies for the modification of the functions of the organization. The development of the effective and smart development models had been largely helpful for developing the support to the organizational operations. The main motive of the knowledge management is for developing the effective and smart development schemes of the formation model. The learning administration assumes a significant part being developed of the methodologies of administration for the social diversities. Hosseini et al. (2013) had expressed that the learning administration is a main figure the arrangement of the framework combination of the advancement demonstrate. The improvement of learning administration would utilize the part of the advancement systems for the change of the elements of the association. The improvement of the successful and shrewd advancement models had been generally useful for building up the support to the hierarchical operations.
Documentation Flaws
Conclusion
It can be concluded from the report that the cultural diversification playsa crucial role in causing the hindrance to the development of the operations of the organization. The report had covered the definition and characteristics of GVT and the problems faced due to cultural diversity. The problems are barrier to communication, slackness to social factors, and unable to adapt changes. The impact of cultural issues caused by diversification is delay in operations and documentation flaws. Some management strategies for managing the diversities in culture are impact management of cultural activities, focusing on the common interest of culture and operation, and knowledge management.
References
Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education. Routledge.
Bass, J. M., McDermott, R., & Lalchandani, J. T. (2015, July). Virtual teams and employability in global software engineering education. In Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), 2015 IEEE 10th International Conference on (pp. 115-124). IEEE.
Bellini, E., Ottaviano, G. I., Pinelli, D., & Prarolo, G. (2013). Cultural diversity and economic performance: evidence from European regions. In Geography, institutions and regional economic performance (pp. 121-141). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Carter, D. R., Seely, P. W., Dagosta, J., DeChurch, L. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2015). Leadership for global virtual teams: Facilitating teamwork processes. In Leading Global Teams (pp. 225-252). Springer New York.
Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology.
Daim, T. U., Ha, A., Reutiman, S., Hughes, B., Pathak, U., Bynum, W., & Bhatla, A. (2012). Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.004
Hosseini, M. R., Chileshe, N., Ghoddousi, P., Jahanshahloo, G. R., & Katebi, A. (2013). Performance Evaluation for Global Virtual Teams (GVTs): Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
Iorio, J., & Taylor, J. E. (2014). Boundary object efficacy: The mediating role of boundary objects on task conflict in global virtual project networks. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 7-17.
Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., King, N., Malhotra, A., & Ba, S. (2014). Computer-mediated inter-organizational knowledge-sharing: Insights from a virtual team innovating using a collaborative tool.
Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2013). Cultural diversity and team performance: The role of team member goal orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 782-804.
Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information and Management, 50, 144-153. doi:10.1016/j.im2012.10.002
Ruppel, C. P., Gong, B., & Tworoger, L. C. (2013). Using communication choices as a boundary-management strategy: How choices of communication media affect the work–life balance of teleworkers in a global virtual team. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(4), 436-471.
Suedekum, J., Wolf, K., & Blien, U. (2014). Cultural diversity and local labour markets. Regional Studies, 48(1), 173-191.
Trax, M., Brunow, S., & Suedekum, J. (2015). Cultural diversity and plant-level productivity. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 53, 85-96.
Troster, C., Mehra, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Structuring for team success: The interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 245-255.
Wood, V. R., & Wilberger, J. S. (2015). Globalization, Cultural Diversity and Organizational Commitment: Theoretical Underpinnings. World, 6(2), 154-171.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
