The Process of Inflammation and Wound Healing
- Physiological basis of the wound observations
As the wound had become red and swollen and it appeared warm when touched. From the wound a swab of the culture was taken and the sensitivity was tested. The test showed that it was contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. This was because most of the skin infections are caused by strains of Staphylococcus (Tran, 2017). The inflammation that was present near the wound confirmed that there was immune system working in the infected area. Additionally the purulent discharge was able to indicate that the severity of the wound had increased. The discharge generally contains white blood cells along with dead tissues and microorganisms.
For Mary the wound was infected as the site of the wound was open. In addition to it, Mary tied a handkerchief on it which accelerated the infection since the cloth was not sterilised. There was pus formation and laceration which should have been cleaned in order to avoid infection. The remnants of the glass pieces also increased her risk of infection as they were not properly removed from the site of the wound.
After the wound has occurred there are several stages of inflammatory responses that are seen to occur. The first step is the release of histamine and prostaglandins, this is followed by the dilation of the capillaries and the beginning of clotting. The third step is the chemotactic factors that help in attracting the phagocytic cell. The fourth and final step is the consumption of the phagocytes by the pathogens along with the cell debris. Some of the primary inflammatory mediators involve histamines, serotonin, prostaglandins, platelet activating factor and others. The action of these cells involve vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, endothelial activity and other such actions (Lee & Bishop, 2016).
- Possible sources of contamination and modes of transmission
Endogenous infections tends to occur when the source of the pathogen is the human host itself. Therefore the diseases that are caused by normal microbiota are endogenous sources of infection. Most of times infection is caused by these organisms when they are usually displaced from their normal habitat to a body site that is susceptible in nature. Like for example, in case of the skin bacteria such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, which are a major cause of infection in surgical wounds and intravenous lines. The nasal carriers of S. aureus are able to transfer bacteria from the nose to an open wound or sore. Additionally the cells of Escherichia coli might be carried from the colon to the bladder and cause a urinary tract infection. Latent viral infections may be reactivated when the host immune defences are reduced (Lee & Bishop, 2016).
- Name one exogenous source of contamination and discuss the mode of transmission from the source to the new host
In case of the exogenous infections, these are caused by organisms from the external environment. These are mostly acquired by cross-infection from patients in the hospital environment, or from people in the wider community. Most of the time, the infectious diseases are acquired in the community. The mode of transmission occurs from person to person through various routes. In cases where the infectious disease is treated at home, most of the time the pathogen remains in the community. Sometimes the disease requires hospitalisation, and so the pathogen is introduced into the hospital environment, where it may spread, thus causing transmission (Lee & Bishop, 2016)..
- Rationale for choices of antibiotics
Understanding Endogenous and Exogenous Infections
Ceftriaxone is another parental cephalosporin with draw out half-life and primarily repress the development of gram negative microscopic organisms (Bullock & Manias, 2017). For this given situation, the main medication of decision was ceftriaxone in the context of it a cephalosporin tranquilize which is successful against any skin microorganisms. It represents a wide range of medication, with mild contamination of the foot or any skin disease can be viably treated by Ceftriaxone. The intravenous organization conceivably diminishes the odds of other related diseases in patients. Ceftriaxone is another parental cephalosporin with delay half-life and for the most part repress the development of gram-negative microorganisms. However, the adequacy of treating disease by ceftriaxone likewise saw if there should be an occurrence of gram-positive also (Smith, Overland & Greenwood, 2015). In some patients the absorption of antibiotics from the gastrointestinal system and thus the effect of oral administration can be unpredictable. In such case administration of the antibiotics through the intravenous method provides a better choice.
- Rationale for theoral cephalexin.
Cephalexin has a place with the cephalosporin anti-microbials which is like the penicillin. It kills the gram-positive and some gram-negative contamination by disturbing the bacterial cell wall. Cephalexin for the most part used to treat those patients who are sensitive to penicillin measurement (Database of prescription and generic drugs, clinical guidelines | MIMS online. (2018). In this given situation, the 21 years of age young girl was injured by broken glass and was presented at the emergency ward (Powers et al., 2016). Cephalexin was administered to control the skin contaminations and other related disease caused by Staphylococcus, Streptococcus or some other skin organisms. It likewise possibly keeps the purulent release from the contaminated injury.
- Rationale for the change to oral dicloxacillin.
Dicloxacillin is a narrow range of antibiotic which is utilized for treating contamination caused by gram-positive microorganisms. It works against gram-positive microscopic organisms, particularly Staphylococcus aureus. It is utilized to treat mild staphylococcus diseases which are generally resistant to the penicillin drugs. It acts by repressing the synthesis of peptidoglycan cell mass of gram-positive microscopic organisms (Stenger et al., 2015).
- State two adverse reactions to dicloxacillin.
The most widely recognized antagonistic impact by the related with the organization of dicloxacillin is vomiting and nausea because of repeated utilization of the dicloxacillin. In uncommon cases, it offers ascend to cholestatic jaundice. It might happen following half a month after treatment has halted (Craft & Gordon, 2015).
- Process by which Mary’s wound will heal
The process of wound healing will take place by the following of the three phases of wound healing which are namely: inflammation, proliferation and maturation. The inflammatory phase of wound healing begins after there is leak of transudate from the injured blood vessels. The process of inflammation helps to control both bleeding as well as infection. During the process there is fluid engorgement that allows the repair of the cells along with its healing in the site of the wound.
The next phase which is the proliferative phase occurs right after the wound site is rebuilt using the new tissues that are made of extracellular matrix and collagen. The myofibroblasts allow the wound to contract by bringing about a gripping action and pulling the smooth muscles together. There is formation of dark granulation tissue during the process.
The maturation phase which is also called the remodelling stage of wound healing begins when the collagen is remodelled from type III to type I and thus finally the wound closes. During this phase, the collagen forms an alignment along the tension lines so that these collagen fibres and cross link and lie together.
In this given case, since the wound was jaggered therefore in this case the wound closure or healing will occur through the process of secondary intention. According to secondary intention, wound healing implies that the wound edges cannot be approximated. Secondary intention is important or rather necessary in case of surgical wounds or open wounds as is the case of Mary. Here the healing process will occur by visible granulation tissue. Wound healing by second intention will be open for longer and will have a high risk of infection.
References
Bullock, S., & Manias, E. (2017). Fundamentals of pharmacology (8th ed.). Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson Australia.
Craft, J., & Gordon, C. (Eds.). (2015). Understanding pathophysiology (2nd Australian and New Zealand ed.). Chatswood, Australia: Elsevier. Available Online
Database of prescription and generic drugs, clinical guidelines | MIMS online. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.mims.co.uk/.
Imran, M. K., Sreeramulu, P. N., Shashirekha, C. A., & Dave, P. (2018). Efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy using suction drain in the management of chronic wounds. International Surgery Journal, 5(6), 2256-2263.
Lee G., & Bishop, P. (2016). Microbiology and infection control for health professionals (6th ed.). Melbourne, Victoria: Pearson Australia.
Marieb, E.N., & Hoehn, K. (2016). Human anatomy& physiology (10th global ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Powers, J. G., Higham, C., Broussard, K., & Phillips, T. J. (2016). Wound healing and treating wounds: Chronic wound care and management. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 74(4), 607-625.
Smith, N., Overland, J., & Greenwood, J. (2015). Local management of deep cavity wounds—current and emerging therapies. Dove Press, 2015(2), 159-70.
Stenger, M., Hendel, K., Bollen, P., Licht, P. B., Kolmos, H. J., & Klitgaard, J. K. (2015). Assessments of thioridazine as a helper compound to dicloxacillin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: in Vivo trials in a mouse peritonitis model. PloS one, 10(8), e0135571.
Tran, V. L. (2017). Can a layer of antimicrobial agents be placed around breast implants to prevent staph infections from occurring?.
van den Berg, S., Bonarius, H. P., van Kessel, K. P., Elsinga, G. S., Kooi, N., Westra, H., … & van Dijl, J. M. (2015). A human monoclonal antibody targeting the conserved staphylococcal antigen IsaA protects mice against Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 305(1), 55-64.