Psychological factors that influence the health of an individual
Psychosocial factors remain to be the social conditions in which individual lives as well as the social surrounding on health along with well-being. It always covers health and mediating roles that affect relationships between other risk factors and health. Psychological factors that influence the health of an individual include social, cultural, and environmental influence that affect mental health and behavior of a person or group of people (Ailliet et al., 2016, p. 1182). In different operations, psychosocial factors influence well being and could be influential risk factors for poor health together with outcomes that relate to economic activities. Therefore, effective management of these factors could impact the retention as well as recruitment of healthcare professionals. The influence of psychosocial variables on the experiences of different health complications among patients continues to be underestimated by various healthcare professionals (Main and George 2011, p. 833). Psychosocial factors, for instance, have the vital influence on the perception of pain. Both in the clinic along with experimental settings, distraction have been shown to reduce cases of depression. Therefore, the principal target of this research paperwork is to explore some of the influences of psychosocial factors on understanding results inside clinical practice in light of current research.
Impact of psychosocial factors on persistent results inside clinical practice in view of current research
In clinical practice, psychosocial factors incorporate diverse classes of factors that incorporate mental properties, for example, misery, antagonistic vibe, and sadness among other factors that exist at the individual level and are probably to be the outcomes of the process of socialization. The other category of psychosocial factors that influence health remains to be more structural such as working conditions within the healthcare setting (Turner 2015, p. 367). These two categories effectively work at the individual level as it is evident from social support at work that remains to be the function of both conditions of employment and personal skills for social interactions. Psychosocial factors on patient outcomes within the clinical practice that deal with pain management are vital. Pain in most cases remains to be the most frequently cited reason for visits of people to general practitioners and the application of auxiliary services of healthcare. The conflicting views that result to the management of different psychosocial factors in health care settings often lead to frustrations on the part of the physician and the temptation to describe the difficulties of different patients to psychological dysfunction (Zimmerman et al., 2010, p. 982). Much of such failures are rooted in the conceptualization that medical science has long held various health complications such as pain as purely somatosensory phenomena. The approach that concentrates on the influence of psychological conditions may be the significant factor that makes individuals experience more pain when they are unwell. Psychological factors in the healthcare setting are often overlooked at risk factors for pressure sore progress. It has been recorded that depression remains as the risk factor in individuals with damage of spinal cord (Barlow et al., 2011, p. 84). Besides, psychosocial factors continue to be essential modifiers of progression of disease along with treatment response and the basic psychosocial history with or without the help of pre-prepared forms that are vital for health operations.
Psychosocial factors that impact patient outcomes within clinical practice
There are increasing interests and acceptances in psychosocial factors and their correlations to the onset along with outcomes of different health complications such as acute pain episodes. In most cases, psychological factors help in improving the process of integration of science, theory, as well as clinical understanding to prevent, knowledge, and relieving psychological-based distress or dysfunction of an individual (Meier et al., 2015, p. 531). These factors also promote subjective well-being and personal development. It helps different psychosociologists to engage in productive processes of conducting research, teaching, forensic testimony, consultation, and development of program and administration (Stegbauer et al., 2013, p. 674). In most nations globally, clinical psycho-sociology continues to be regulated mental health profession. Therefore, some kinds of psychosocial factors that impact persistent results inside clinical practice in view of the ebb and flow inquire about include prognostic, treatment mediator, and treatment effect modifier or moderator.
These are psychosocial factors that help in estimation the patient’s likely result independent of the administration process chosen to correct their health complications. For instance, depression remains to be a substantial prognostic factor. It is, therefore, meaning that individuals that are more discouraged are more likely to encounter relentless instances of back agony indications than people whose states of mind are not generally influenced at all (Brown-Lannuzzi et al., 2014, p. 743). Moreover, prognostic as psychosocial factors should be recognized from the single gathering, longitudinal, accomplice considers that ordinarily look to wipe out contrasts of treatment among people either by plan or by alteration of measurements in the examination. For the point by point prognostic research on low back pain, vast arrays of psychosocial traits have been evaluated as potentially relevant prognostic elements.
Treatment effect moderators or modifiers as psychological factors are qualities estimated at standard that impact relations amid the particular outcome along with intervention. For instance, in case of back pain, spinal control may comprise of appropriate results among patients with fewer anxiety shirking conduct. Therefore, conduct of avoidance conduct among people estimated at gauge has the altering impact on result that deals with manipulation (Bell et al., 2017, p. 185). In most cases, these factors are always identified by demonstrating that a given type on the off chance that mediation is altogether more powerful than the other in patients with determined gauge qualities. Treatment impact modifiers as psychological factors have the extended history of informing attempts to change behavior along with improving emotional wellbeing of patients.
Different types of psychosocial factors and their influence on treatment response
These types of psychosocial factors in health management remain to be the most treatments designed to change particular elements. In most cases, treatment mediators help in identification of intermediary step in the connection between the interventions along with the desired outcome. For instance, offering grade exercise might seek to improve the function of an individual suffering from different illnesses (Wilson et al., 2014, p. 964). Such results might be accomplished by reducing the fear of movement among patients. Therefore, understanding the impact of various mediators might be useful as it helps clinicians to understand which component of treatment to strengthen in request to enhance wanted outcomes and how treatment impacts may happen. It is theorized that instances of dejection continue to be eliminated through treatment mediators. The process aims at modifying how people exercise leading to better outcomes in some patients. The influence of several overlapping psychosocial indicators of different health complications such as low back pain related incapacity is built up, and current endeavors are trying to make custom fitted mediations to increase physical advisor rehearses (Murray et al., 2014, p. 183). These practices depend on central free prognostic develops that incorporate dread evasion convictions.
The physical and mental conditions of an individual depend on the myriad of factors. These psychosocial factors are always split between social determinants that include social, economic, together with the physical environment like social rejection, neighborhood conditions, pay, mental determinants that basically focuses on inner elements identified with discernment and feeling, for example, confidence, stress, and prosperity. Social determinants, for example, the unfriendly early encounters dependably affect the advancement of the mind and prompt emotional wellness issues over the expanded term (Hill and Fritz 2011, p. 718). For the moment, the overview on sexual manhandle survivors has recorded that littler hippocampus volume among adulthoods with post-awful trouble issue, marginal identity issue, alongside melancholy. Youth stressors that incorporate mishandle and seeing abusive behavior at home can likewise prompt long haul issues, for example, suicide endeavors and substance manhandle. Furthermore, after some time social, monetary components like financial status estimated through training, pay, and occupation begin to have the significant effect on wellbeing. Social imbalances inside training can prompt disparities in wellbeing; in that poorer instruction dependably prompts poorer wellbeing and danger of sickness. For example, Bell and McKenzie (2013, p. 1741) expressed that better taught people had bring down bleakness rates from the most widely recognized intense and ceaseless ailments. Numerous examiners trust that instruction plays out an essential reason in the strength of a person as it can be improved through changes in strategies of training.
The impact of social determinants on health and well-being
Other psychosocial factors that influence patient outcome remain to be socioeconomic factors such as income and occupation. These factors affect individual health in the number of ways that include the individual’s income, the gross national product of different nations, along with income inequalities among countries together with geographical sections. Demmelmaier et al., (2012, p. 365) recorded a negative correlation between rates of mortality along with income, whereby the increase in the frequency of death is related to the decline in revenue. Other surveyors recorded that kids from families that earn low income remain to be more likely to experience more frequent cases of stomach-aches as well as headaches. Besides, parents living in areas that are deprived are always expected to record child rearing worry than those at all denied districts. Different examiners likewise propose that the significant decrease in the rate of newborn child mortality might be conceivable by lessening disparity on salary (Riches et al., 2016, p. 13). For instance, countries around the world with the most unfortunate household have remained to have highest rates of child mortality.
Cases of unemployment and job insecurity as a psychosocial factor could also put the people at health risk. The unemployed individual’s persons or individuals that are not getting unemployment benefits remain to be at higher risk of report n depression. However, other surveyors have recorded that cases of unemployment’s have more effect on the psychological well-being of men when contrasted with ladies (Mesner et al., 2016, p. 12). Such discoveries comes about because of contrasts in sexual orientation among family duties amongst people, especially those from foundations of common laborers where the male are constantly depicted as the male-provider and the female as the tyke conveyor. Also, work instability may prompt worry as various individuals would ruminate and stress concerning their frail posts and conceivable loss of occupations (Zimmerman et al., 2010, p. 985). In conclusion job, instability among individuals could impact patient outcome emotionally, and this could in most cases in the end show into long haul unfavorable results for the psychological together with physical soundness of a man.
It can bring about maladaptive conduct that incorporates undesirable eating and in this manner future wellbeing complications that include cases of obesity. Main and George (2011, p. 822) reported that stress among individuals is always associated with the destructive pattern of dietary and emotions eating behavior among patients. For instance, it is recorded that female students in different learning sectors who receive the unsolvable anagrams to solve remains to be likely to consume sweet together with fatty foods than foods with low fats. Similarly, Ailliet et al (2016, p. 1183) illustrated that the association between higher cortical levels along with the consumption of sweet meals that supports the view that stress impacts unhealthy snacking. The impact arises because cortical from saliva sample remains to be the practical method for estimating worry in various social mental investigations and in this way the biomarker of stress. Plus, worry among people can prompt unfortunate instances of eating, and it can conceivably turn out to be more serious medical issues in future, for example, instances of diabetes, heftiness, together with cardiovascular diseases.
The role of socioeconomic factors in shaping health outcomes
Conclusion
The matter on whether psychosocial factors influence on the patient outcome would be excessively oversimplified. The quantifiable proof examined above confirmation demonstrates that it would stay indiscreet to disconnect social determinants from psychosocial factors as they interface with each other to impact wellbeing and also disease. Distinctive analysts regularly represent psychosocial determinants speaking with social determinants, here and there through physiological pathways, to change wellbeing practices and the other way around. Furthermore, to focus on single social determinants of mental factors on persistent results without representing related frustrating factors would likewise be the farfetched approach of clarifying its effect on wellbeing. Therefore, different health behaviors cannot be well described by psychological factors to show how they influence patient outcomes. Impact of psychosocial factors on patient issues remains to be negative when people deny the significance or severity of the symptom, negating the need for treatment, not following the prescribed plan for treatment, and not attaining the recommended tests for the condition. Besides, psychological factors in medical setting also affect other medical conditions. It affects health if the process of diagnosis affects how the disorder progresses and the treatment involve the method of teaching different people about severe impacts of psychological factors or behaviors among patient conditions.
List of References
Ailliet, L, Rubinstein, SM, Hoekstra, T, van Tulder, MW, & de Vet, HW. 2016. ‘Adding Psychosocial Factors Does Not Improve Predictive Models for People With Spinal Pain Enough to Warrant Extensive Screening for Them at Baseline’, Physical Therapy, 96(8)pp. 1179-1189. Available from: 10.2522/ptj.20150304. [14 May 2018].
Barlow, F, Scott, C, Coghlan, B, Lee, P, White, P, Lewith, GT, & Bishop, FL. 2011. ‘How the psychosocial context of clinical trials differs from usual care: A qualitative study of acupuncture patients’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), pp. 79-86. Available from: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-79. [14 May 2018].
Bell, JF, Whitney, RL, Reed, SC, Poghosyan, H, Lash, RS, Kim, KK, Davis, A, Bold, RJ, & Joseph, JG. 2017. ‘Systematic Review of Hospital Readmissions Among Patients With Cancer in the United States’, Oncology Nursing Forum44(2), pp. 176-191. Available from: 10.1011/17.ONF.176-191. [14 May 2018].
Bell, ML, & McKenzie, JE. 2013. ‘Designing psycho-oncology randomised trials and cluster randomised trials: variance components and intra-cluster correlation of commonly used psychosocial measures’, Psycho-Oncology, 22(8), pp. 1738-1747. Available from: 10.1002/pon.3205. [14 May 2018].
Brown-Iannuzzi, JL, Payne, BK, Rini, C, DuHamel, KN, & Redd, WH. 2014. ‘Objective and subjective socioeconomic status and health symptoms in patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation’, Psycho-Oncology, 23(7), pp. 740-748. Available from: 10.1002/pon.3473. [14 May 2018].
Demmelmaier, I, Denison, E, Lindberg, P, & Åsenlöf, P. 2012. ‘Tailored skills training for practitioners to enhance assessment of prognostic factors for persistent and disabling back pain: Four quasi-experimental single-subject studies’, Physiotherapy Theory & Practice, 28(5), pp. 359-372. Available from: 10.3109/09593985.2011.629022. [14 May 2018].
Hill, JC, & Fritz, JM. 2011. ‘Psychosocial Influences on Low Back Pain, Disability, and Response to Treatment’, Physical Therapy, 91(5), pp. 712-721. Available from: 10.2522/ptj.20100280. [14 May 2018].
Main, CJ, & George, SZ. 2011. ‘Psychologically Informed Practice for Management of Low Back Pain: Future Directions in Practice and Research’, Physical Therapy, 91(5), pp. 820-824. Available from: 10.2522/ptj.20110060. [14 May 2018].
Meier, A, McGovern, MP, Lambert-Harris, C, McLeman, B, Franklin, A, Saunders, EC, & Xie, H. 2015. ‘Adherence and competence in two manual-guided therapies for co-occurring substance use and posttraumatic stress disorders: clinician factors and patient outcomes’, American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 41(6), pp. 527-534. Available from: 10.3109/00952990.2015.1062894. [14 May 2018].
Mesner, SA, Foster, NE, & French, SD. 2016. ‘Implementation interventions to improve the management of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review’, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17(1), pp. 1-20. Available from: 10.1186/s12891-016-1110-z. [14 May 2018].
Murray, C, Anderson, D, & Hurrell, R. 2014. ‘Considering the Psychosocial Aspects of Sexual Health for People with Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex: A Critical Narrative Review’, Sexuality & Disability, 32(2) pp. 175-188. Available from: 10.1007/s11195-014-9346-8. [14 May 2018].
Riches, N, Panagioti, M, Alam, R, Cheraghi-Sohi, S, Campbell, S, Esmail, A, & Bower, P. 2016. ‘The Effectiveness of Electronic Differential Diagnoses (DDX) Generators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis’, PLoS ONE, 11(3), pp. 1-26. Available from: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148991. [14 May 2018].
Stegbauer, C, Goetz, K, Bauer, E, Bestmann, B, Ruprecht, T, Szecsenyi, J, & Bramesfeld, A. 2013. ‘What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis’, BMC Psychiatry, 13(1), pp. 668-678. Available from: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-283. [14 May 2018].
Turner, Jane. 2015. “The changing landscape of cancer care – the impact of psychosocial clinical practice guidelines.” Psycho-Oncology, April. 365-370. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed May 14, 2018).
Wilson, SM, Sikkema, KJ, & Ranby, KW2014. ‘Gender moderates the influence of psychosocial factors and 26(8). 26, no. 8, pp. 959-967. Available from: 10.1080/09540121.2013.873765. [14 May 2018].
Zimmerman, M, Galione, JN, Chelminski, I, Young, D, Dalrymple, K, & Witt, CF. 2010. ‘Validity of a simpler definition of major depressive disorder’, Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), 27(10). 10, pp. 977-981.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
