Background
The project would involve the use of the project management principles and the alignment of the strategies for developing the effective alignment of the project integration and development. The deployment of the project activities would be supported by the analysis of the operations for listing the management of the Farm management system for Stud Farm.
The Stud farm deals with the breeding and livestock trading of horses in New South Wales of Australia. The development of the improved information system would be eased for the implication is deployed for manually deploying the information system development for the Stud farm. It would allow the utilization of the effective operations for online booking and payments processes.
MOV – Measurable Organisational Value
|
Area of Impact |
Rank (1 to 5) |
|
Operational |
1 |
|
Strategy |
2 |
|
Customer |
3 |
|
Social |
4 |
|
Financial |
5 |
Value
Better: The implementation of the Farm Management System would help in offering online services to the clients for their booking and data management system
Faster: Activities of stud farm would be faster after the implementation of the Farm Management System in compare to traditional activities.
Cheaper: The overall cost of the activities of Stud Farm would be decreased by the implication of the Farm Management System
Do More: The Farm Management System would ease the access of information, form the single platform for managing activities
Measurable Metrics for MOV
|
Rank |
Impact |
Metrics |
Timeframe |
|
1 |
Operational |
Successful completion of project |
4 months |
|
2 |
Strategy |
Implementation model for the strategies |
2 months |
|
3 |
Customer |
Increment of number of customers |
5 months |
|
4 |
Social |
Followers and subscriber of website |
12 months |
|
5 |
Financial |
Net income from the project |
3 months |
Scope
Formation of the Prototype for Farm Management System
Improvement of the operations at Stud Farm
Identification of the system development requirements
Facilitation of the Stallion and Mare owner’s database
Breed Checking register development
Out of Scope
Transportation requirements for the project is not included in this project
Supplier Procurement has been pre-fixed and no changes have been considered in this project
Completion of the project in the estimated time duration of 92 working days from the start date
All resources have been set for working at a standard rate and the calculation of the project budget is being done
Customers would readily accept the implication of the online farm management system
Approval for the project plan and budget is constraint for the project
Timeframe and estimated budget is a constraint for the activities of the project
Security considerations for the project is another major consideration for the project
The scope management plan forms the utilization of activities and knowledge for management of the project scope. The following are the considerations for the project scope management,
Understanding the scope of the project is a crucial factor for the alignment of the scope management plan
Consuming the time required for the development of knowledge and skill is another major factor for the project
Communicating the requirements to the project team members and avoid the scope creep
People
Technology
|
Hardware |
Desktop, RAM, NIC, Equipments |
|
Software |
Programming platform, OS |
|
Network |
Server network, Firewall |
Facilities
The workstation for the project would be offsite. However, the implication and the testing would be done at the onsite of the Stud Farm
Other
|
Travel Requirements |
Na |
|
Training Requirements |
Proper Training of staff for dealing with the effective and improved utilization of the Farm Management System |
Milestones
|
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
|
M1 |
Milestone 1 completed |
0 days |
Wed 2/14/18 |
Wed 2/14/18 |
|
M2 |
Milestone 2 completed |
0 days |
Tue 2/27/18 |
Tue 2/27/18 |
|
M3 |
Milestone 3 completed |
0 days |
Thu 3/15/18 |
Thu 3/15/18 |
|
M4 |
Milestone 4 completed |
0 days |
Thu 5/3/18 |
Thu 5/3/18 |
|
M5 |
Milestone 5 completed |
0 days |
Fri 5/25/18 |
Fri 5/25/18 |
|
M6 |
Project Closure |
0 days |
Fri 5/25/18 |
Fri 5/25/18 |
|
TEAM MEMBER |
Role in Project |
|
Loveleen Samra |
Project Manager |
|
Claire Cho |
Programmer |
|
David Alejandro |
Designer |
|
Jaswinder Singh |
Software Developer |
|
Mohammad Talha |
Database Administrator |
|
Jagjeet Singh |
Tester |
|
WBS |
Task Name |
Cost |
|
0 |
Farm Management System for Stud Farm |
$92,000.00 |
|
1 |
Kick off |
$12,110.00 |
|
1.1 |
Requirement Analysis |
$640.00 |
|
1.2 |
Resource Accumulation |
$8,270.00 |
|
1.3 |
Human Resource Employment |
$2,400.00 |
|
1.4 |
Holding Kick off meeting |
$800.00 |
|
M1 |
Milestone 1 completed |
$0.00 |
|
2 |
Project Plan |
$4,550.00 |
|
2.1 |
Activity Scheduling |
$950.00 |
|
2.2 |
Analysis |
$800.00 |
|
2.3 |
Formation of complete plan |
$1,600.00 |
|
2.4 |
Plan Review |
$1,200.00 |
|
M2 |
Milestone 2 completed |
$0.00 |
|
3 |
System Design |
$10,490.00 |
|
3.1 |
Design Platform |
$1,610.00 |
|
3.2 |
Design Outline |
$1,440.00 |
|
3.3 |
Design Review |
$1,440.00 |
|
3.4 |
Design Completion |
$6,000.00 |
|
M3 |
Milestone 3 completed |
$0.00 |
|
4 |
System Development |
$39,980.00 |
|
4.1 |
Interface Development |
$1,000.00 |
|
4.2 |
Testing of interface |
$2,580.00 |
|
4.3 |
Database Development |
$5,760.00 |
|
4.4 |
Testing of database |
$2,340.00 |
|
4.5 |
Data Migration |
$2,760.00 |
|
4.6 |
Function Integration |
$2,080.00 |
|
4.7 |
Functions Programming |
$8,780.00 |
|
4.8 |
Testing of Programs |
$2,580.00 |
|
4.9 |
System Development |
$9,280.00 |
|
4.10 |
System Prototyping |
$2,820.00 |
|
M4 |
Milestone 4 completed |
$0.00 |
|
5 |
System Deployment |
$24,870.00 |
|
5.1 |
Planning for deployment |
$5,800.00 |
|
5.2 |
Analysis of risk |
$2,280.00 |
|
5.3 |
Scope Change Management |
$4,800.00 |
|
5.4 |
System Integration |
$4,640.00 |
|
M5 |
Milestone 5 completed |
$0.00 |
|
5.6 |
Staff Training |
$7,350.00 |
|
5.6.1 |
Study Materials |
$1,350.00 |
|
5.6.2 |
Training Schedule |
$800.00 |
|
5.6.3 |
Training Class |
$4,000.00 |
|
5.6.4 |
Staff evaluation |
$1,200.00 |
|
M6 |
Project Closure |
$0.00 |
Assumptions
Completion of the project in the estimated time duration of 92 working days from the start date
All resources have been set for working at a standard rate and the calculation of the project budget is being done
Goal
Customers would readily accept the implication of the online farm management system
Risk Management Plan would be developed for the project
Scope of the project would be aligned successfully with the activities of the project
|
Risk ID |
Description |
Probability |
Impact |
Rate |
Assigned To |
Response Strategy |
Threat or Opportunity |
|
Upto 99% |
5 – for high 3 – for medium 1-for low |
Probability * Impact |
Should be a role not a name |
Mitigate or Accept or Transfer or Prevent |
Threat |
||
|
RF-1 |
Lack of resources result when there is not enough resources available for the project |
60 |
2 |
120 |
Financial manager |
Reduction in shortage of the resources by bringing some more resources |
Opportunity |
|
RF-2 |
Schedule distortion resulting in occurrence of the delay |
90 |
1 |
90 |
Project manager |
Exploit the delays by improving the quality of the deliverable |
Threat |
|
RF-3 |
Lack of skilled workers would result in causing issues in the management of the project activities |
70 |
3 |
210 |
Human resource manager |
Accept the flaw and provide training for improving their skills |
Threat |
|
RF-4 |
Flaws in management of the activities would result in forming issues in completion of the project effectively |
65 |
3 |
195 |
Human resource manager |
Transfer the flaws in management by bringing a new project manager for the project |
Threat |
|
RF-5 |
Technical issues like system failure, design flaws etc can occur resulting in problems for the project |
50 |
5 |
250 |
System analyst |
Avoid by implementing various tests and review processes |
Threat |
Statement of quality
The use of the online farm management system would allow the development of operations for testing the remote services of Stud Farm system aligning with the improvement of the activities favouring the deployment of the operations. The utilization of the activities would be helpful for forming the development of the successive integration of the activities and processes.
|
Verification Activity |
When? |
|
Simulation Testing |
After the design phase is completed |
|
Prototyping |
After development of the database |
|
Functional Testing |
After the system is developed |
|
Validation Activity |
When? |
|
NPV analysis |
During the initial phase |
|
Audit of the activities |
Planning phase of the project |
|
Procurement Review |
While making agreement with the Contractor |
Part Six
Annotated Bibliography
Article 1: Information technology project management
Summary: According to Schwalbe (2015), the information technology project management has seen considerable growth and development with the passage of time. The IT projects have been using effective project management principles and activities for aligning their work and forming the deployment of the successive integration of the activities. The role played by the project management is helpful for the development of the successive integration and development. The project management holds an integral role in defining the implication of the smart project management principles. The development of the project management principles would help in taking care of the activities in a more significant and better way.
Article 2: Project Management: The Managerial Process with MS Project
Summary: According to Larson and Grey (2013), the role of the project management has shifted with the implication of the effective project management activities and development of the smart processes. The utilization of the activities would also be helpful for forming the alignment of the improved project activities with the help of Ms-Project. Ms-Project is helpful for forming the successive alignment of the activities and development of the improved structure. The Ms-Project software is helpful for development of the complete project plan and shows it on a timeline. The resource usage can also be used for the alignment of the activities with the help of human and material resources. The various graphs and figures can be used for aligning the deployment of the operations.
Article: Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling.
Summary: According to Kerzner (2013), the IT projects have been using effective project management principles and activities for aligning their work and forming the deployment of the successive integration of the activities. The role of the project management has shifted with the implication of the effective project management activities and development of the smart processes. The role played by the project management is helpful for the development of the successive integration and development. The resource usage can also be used for the alignment of the activities with the help of human and material resources. The various graphs and figures can be used for aligning the deployment of the operations. The project management holds an integral role in defining the implication of the smart project management principles.
|
Was the plan Feasible while implementation? |
þ |
|
Are all documents developed and reviewed efficiently? |
þ |
|
Was Risk management implied for the project? |
þ |
|
Does the Project Manager has reviewed and signed all documents? |
þ |
|
Has training being completed? |
þ |
Improvement of the activities of Stud Farm has been implied with the Online Farm Management System
Timeline for the activities of the project is feasible for the project of system development being implemented
Proper and significant value of the system development has been achieved
System is online and it is being used by the development of the operations
Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques. New Jersey, USA.
Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellence.pearson.
Hegazy, T. (2013). Computer-Based Construction Project Management: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed.
Kendrick, T. (2015). Identifying and managing project risk: essential tools for failure-proofing your project. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Larson, E. W., &Gray, C. (2013). Project Management: The Managerial Process with MS Project. McGraw-Hill.
Mir, F. A., &Pinnington, A. H. (2014).Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International journal of project management, 32(2), 202-217.
Pritchard, C. L., & PMP, P. R. (2014). Risk management: concepts and guidance. CRC Press.
Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management.Cengage Learning.
Verburg, R. M., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., &Vartiainen, M. (2013).Getting it done: Critical success factors for project managers in virtual work settings.International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 68-79.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
