Understanding Victorian Curriculum F-10

Overview of Victorian Curriculum F-10

Discuss about the Leadership for professional development learning.

The Victorian Curriculum F-10 does portray a set of complete logical content description along with achievement standards. The core purpose behind this curriculum is to enable the teachers with the ability to plan, supervise, evaluate and then finally report over the academic progress of every student. As far as the fundamental outline is concerned, there is a major similarity among the “Australian Curriculum F-10” and the “Victorian Curriculum F-10”;however, the Vic Curriculum does differ in certain respects. The most important element is, “the curriculum has been represented as the range of structural and learning design”, which is planned for ensuring continuous growth with effective monitoring of the learners.

To prepare the Australian future generations with solid foundation, the Victorian government came up with the idea to introduce a new Curriculum, during late 2015 (September) (Bailey 2014). This isn’t the first time the state is being responsive to the educational requirements of the future generation. The state officials have always been enthusiastic towards making innovation to the state curriculum (Ambrosetti 2014). The summary underneath makes a clear projection of the commitment that the state showed towards continuous reformation to enhance the learning experience for the learners/students.

The video link for the Victorian Curriculum is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZARZjPsilI

There are eight different learning areas of Victorian curriculum that are mentioned underneath:

Science does have a unique way for providing solution to every possible query that learners can come up with regarding technological, physical and biological world (Savery 2015). The world has witnessed and is still witnessing some major scientific inventions that helped the mankind to refine its knowledge (Jasanoff 2015). Students being at the doorstep to explore the unexplored or gain knowledge about various aspects of interest or facets of knowledge can utilize science to design definitions with new perspective.Students will be introduced to the different levels and achievement standards to help the teachers understand the degree of effort students must give. For example: “Foundation to Level 2”- The emphasis would entirely be upon self-awareness along with the local world. Students would be introduced to different changes irrespective of the size; they would explore different properties of such changes and be familiar with it.

The aim of the curriculum is to equip students with:

Knowledge to explore every corner of their curiosity about things they aren’t familiar with. They would be able to ask questions and provide answer as well. Once familiar with the scientific knowledge and understanding, students would be able to build their own perspective about things they haven’t come across so far. They would as well be able to discover facts and information about different facets of nature, the entire globe, its position and many more.

Learning Areas of Victorian Curriculum F-10

The scope and sequence are a form of chart that has been designed to assist the teachers with their professional obligation of being aware about student progress. Teachers are expected to follow the scope and sequence to design and develop the teaching and learning programs, which would ultimately help in meeting the diverse requirements of students.

Strands include- rationale and aims, structure, learning in science, scope and sequence, resources and glossary. While going through the curriculum, the strand would help the students to familiarize with the content they can view simultaneously (Foster 2018).

The Australian professional standards for teachers as defined by the “AITSL” involve seven fundamental standards, which outline the professionalobligation for the teachers along with their fundamental duty (Clarke and Moore 2013). All these seven standards are interdependent, overlapping and interconnected with one another (Mockler 2012). The professional standards have been sorted into three different domains of coaching including- “Professional knowledge”, “Professional practice” and “Professional engagement”.

As far as the videos are concerned, the below section would incorporate a discussion over two different videos. The teachers and their teaching style would be discussed of these videos:

In the first video, the teacher Annalise McCoy is very profound in terms of connecting with each one of the students in her classroom. I liked the manner she prefers selecting the visual language for communicating with the students. I think it helps her in maintaining the classroom with communicating with students even if there is a disability factor among some of the students. I also found that she emphasizes over using pictorial signs to convey or communicate with her students. She also believes in using the ICT (information and communication technology), to expand learning opportunities for the students. She also uses “Interactive Black Board” that is often helpful for engaging with students that are interested in using such technologies. With the same, in the video, there are some students that do not find the “interactive black board” to be interesting enough or hard to understand, and therefore, they are learning using models or stories. Miss Annalise is also effectively paying individual attention to every student. There is a girl child who struggles academically; therefore Annalise understands the need to pay extra attention to this girl child. According to Schleicher (2012), the most preferable way for teaching such children is by learning their abilities to catch content being thrown away at them and then planning about teaching strategies. It is important to establish a connection with the students to make them confident for engaging in learning process. In the video, the major emphasis is over combining physical activities along with learning to create the ideal environment for the students to learn (Simoncini et.al, 2014).

Understanding Science in Victorian Curriculum F-10

I also realized that Miss McCoy prefers using visuals instead verbal language and this is really good. As stated by Geurin-Eagleman and Burch (2016), Visuals or pictorial presentations are helpful to communicate in a better manner.

In the second video, the teacher “Rebecca Cramp” is accountable for teaching juniors. I like the manner she emphasizes over paying individual attention to every student with learning problem/disability. Rebecca also mentioned that it is necessary for the children to be allowed with substantial time to understand the content/question they have been asked with. The teaching process in this scenario has also been over visuals; students are being given with English alphabets that are big enough to read clearly. As it is said by Van and Berry (2012), the use of interactive board has also been emphasized in this video, which is a better way for connecting and helping students. Students are also provided with the iPads so that they can learn about technology and curriculum studies.

Like Miss McCoy, Miss Cramp has also been emphasizing over using visuals than being verbal for communicating anything. Also, there are students that have short memory conditions; Rebecca involves with these students frequently helping them remember things for a longer period.

However, I think if Cramp also focuses in reducing the amount of the routine information that the child suffering from short memory problem must remember, it could help them. She can also provide the class with checklist for the steps that they are required to complete.

The “Australian professional standards for teachers” have been approved and acknowledged by the “New South Wales” Ministry of Education during mid-2012. The application or implementation of these standards began under “Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs” during 2009. One of the major professional obligations of teachers is to be familiar with the manner students tend to capture whatever is being taught (Santoro et.al, 2012). It also is the quality of a great teacher to be aware about every student individually.

Feedback is of paramount importance; students and their parents have to be aware about the child’s growth, providing feedback is the best solution for this (Schleicher, 2012). Similarly, being professional with colleagues, parents and community would certainly be as much effective for the teacher to extract best possible result.

In the week 5 video 3 video that includes “Jamie Humphrey” the foundation teacher that is accountable for teaching students that belong to culturally diverse backgrounds. Jamie tries to connect with every student in her class with visuals in order to keep any probable confusion. She has also been respectful to the diverse cultural backgrounds; every Wednesday Jamie conducts story telling from different cultural background. Recently the class was told about a story from Afghani cultural story. They have also been effective in terms of portraying stories about indigenous stories in the class; the basic idea is to make the children aware of different cultural backgrounds and making them tolerant about the need of different students from different cultural background. Jamie also emphasize over teaching with verbal and non-verbal way to communicate with the children. For example: there is a “get-ready song” and a “pack-up song”, which allows students to prepare their mindset with the manner they are supposed to respond.

Australian Professional Standards for Teachers

Jamie has been enthusiastic towards helping children learn about the cultural diversity. Every Wednesday Jamie engages with the children with a story belonging to different cultural background. One of the latest stories that Jamie mentioned was about Afghani culture and religion. Jamie has also been engaged with the parents to help their child learn their cultural language and customs.

Example: This has led the student respect each other cultural diversity. Students playfully take part in the activities together though belonging from different background and they collaboratively do each and every task in the class room.

Teachers often engage in the process of assessing the growth of their students, which might either be summative or formative. Both of these terms have different meaning,

Formative assessment: Formative Assessment can be defined as a tool that can be used for continuous assessment of the students. Teachers engage in formative assessment in order to evaluate “how effective the students have been throughout an entire year. Assessing students at the end of the curriculum or course can draw extra effort; teachers might have to pay extra attention at the end period (Van Driel& Berry, 2012). Assessing students during their learning period would help the teacher to gather the information about students and particular points at the lesson that need immediate consideration.Teachers are expected to engage with the students on a more personal level in order to assess if they are being effective with learning process. The process of “formative assessment” is the best possible way to elevate the student’s knowledge and skills (Tomlinson, 2014).

Example: Miss McCoy has been engaged with Jordan, a child that is partially disabled and experiencing autism (less concentration, isolation, less social). She has been engaged with Jordan continuously to help him remember things and objects that he just learnt about. Miss McCoy comes along with Jordan multiple times and ask him questions about the lesson. This clearly is the formative assessment technique, where Jordan clearly showed improvement.

Summative assessment: Unlike the formative assessment, this term deals with student assessment at the end of the curriculum to check on the preparation. The students are checked on their learning, the skills they have acquired during the course, their academic achievements by the semester or the school year end (Vivian et.al, 2014). It isn’t possible for every student to be brilliant; summative assessment for this type of students isn’t a better idea (Lederman et.al, 2014).

Teaching Methods of Annalise McCoy, Rebecca Cramp, and Jamie Humphrey

Example: The video titled “Diverse Abilities, Foundation Primary School” clearly makes a projection of how Miss Jamie has been involved with her students in order to help them learn. Miss Jamie prefers teaching completely and then assessing the students if they have been effective in learning.

Conclusion

The Victorian government has always been enthusiastic towards making continuous innovation to the curriculum, in order to enhance the quality of education for the learners. The study above has been focused over the Victorian Curriculum that has been introduced during late 2015. The core purpose behind the introduction of the curriculum was to enable the teachers to ensure students and learners are kept under continuous monitoring in order to ensure their effective learning.

References

AITSL 2011, Australian Professional Standards for Teachers, retrieved 3 March 2018 (or your date of retrieval) , <https://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list>

Ambrosetti, A. (2014). Are you ready to be a mentor? Preparing teachers for mentoring pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 3.

Bailey, P., 2014. Leisure and class in Victorian England: Rational recreation and the contest for control, 1830-1885. Routledge.

Clarke, M. and Moore, A., 2013. Professional standards, teacher identities and an ethics of singularity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), pp.487-500.

Evans, L. (2014). Leadership for professional development and learning: enhancing our understanding of how teachers develop. Cambridge journal of education, 44(2), 179-198.

Foster, C.R., 2018. Educating clergy: Teaching practices and the pastoral imagination.

Gannon, S. (2012). Changing lives and standardising teachers: The possibilities and limits of professional standards. English Teaching, 11(3), 59.

Geurin-Eagleman, A.N. and Burch, L.M., 2016. Communicating via photographs: A gendered analysis of Olympic athletes’ visual self-presentation on Instagram. Sport Management Review, 19(2), pp.133-145.

Hammond, J. (2014). An Australian Perspective on Standards?Based Education, Teacher Knowledge, and Students of English as an Additional Language. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 507-532.

Hunter, M. C. (1982). Mastery teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Jasanoff, S., 2015. Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, pp.1-47.

Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H. L., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and teacher education, 43, 154-164.

Lederman, J.S., Lederman, N.G., Bartos, S.A., Bartels, S.L., Meyer, A.A. and Schwartz, R.S., 2014. Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), pp.65-83.

Leonard, S. N. (2012). Professional conversations: mentor teachers’ theories-in-use using the australian National professional standards for teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 37(12), 78.

Mayer, D. (2014). Forty years of teacher education in Australia: 1974–2014. Journal of education for teaching, 40(5), 461-473.

Moats, L. (2014). What teachers don’t know and why they aren’t learning it: addressing the need for content and pedagogy in teacher education. Australian Journal of learning difficulties, 19(2), 75-91.

Mockler, N. (2012). Teacher Professional Learning in a Neoliberal Age: Audit, Professionalism and Identity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(10), n10.

Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: Lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 36-50.

Santoro, N., Reid, J. A., Mayer, D., & Singh, M. (2012). Producing ‘quality’teachers: the role of teacher professional standards.

Savery, J.R., 2015. Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9, pp.5-15.

Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the World. OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France.

Simoncini, K. M., Lasen, M., & Rocco, S. (2014). Professional dialogue, reflective practice and teacher research: Engaging early childhood pre-service teachers in collegial dialogue about curriculum innovation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 39(1), 27.

Tomlinson, C.A., 2014. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.

Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational researcher, 41(1), 26-28.

Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority 2017, Victorian Curriculum F-10, VCAA, retrieved 3 March 2018

Vivian, R., Falkner, K., & Falkner, N. (2014). Addressing the challenges of a new digital technologies curriculum: MOOCs as a scalable solution for teacher professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1), 24691.

Wang, K.H., Wang, T.H., Wang, W.L. and Huang, S.C., 2006. Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web?based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), pp.207-217.

Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:

Turnitin Report

Formatting

Title Page

Citation

Outline

Place an Order