Project Purpose or Justification
The project charter is prepared for approval from Sunshine Coast Council; this charter document is essential for comprising overall activities, milestones, and major deliverables. The project charter is aimed to achieve scope of prosperity, natural assets and lifestyle into near future. Project charter is aligned with further investigation from route of Maroochydore to Caloundra. For coastal corridor, costing and development is prepared alongside planning strategies along with business case and feasibility analysis. Project purpose is stated to incorporate proper justification with creating opportunities to employment and other economic aspects[ A Line In The Sand: The Sunshine Coast Light Rail Project Pre-Feasibility And Rapid Economic Appraisal Report Version 4.2 – August 2012 (Sunshine Coast Council 2012)]. The charter shows how this new light rail network would bolster other key local tasks, for example, the airplane terminal extension, doctor’s facility, college, tradition focus and the Maroochydore Principal Activity Center and would be equipped for initiating behavioral change where explorers depend more on open transport and less on their autos; reinvigorating business advancement; and connecting essential work, wellbeing, tourism and training center points.
Project Purpose or Justification:
The Sunshine Coast is relied upon to encounter significant populace development in the coming decades. In considering where and how we oblige this future development we additionally need to deliberately consider how we will move around[ Burke, Matthew, and Graham Currie. “Light rail in Australia-Performance and prospects.” (2013).].
Choices with respect to transport decisions for the Sunshine Coast won’t just impact our neighborhood economy, yet will shape how the Sunshine Coast develops and will impact our future way of life.
Light rail has been recognized as a vehicle choice that can possibly profit our neighborhood economy, our condition and, critically, our future way of life. Around the world, light rail is perceived as a method of transport that gives much more to groups than essentially a method for moving around.
Project Description:
The capacity of the Sunshine Coast to adequately oversee development and keep up its personal satisfaction will to a limited extent rely on the foundation of a more maintainable development arrange. As the region develops from now to 2031, it is expected to approach a populace of 424,000 – the likeness more than 51% development.
By a long shot the best extent of new occupants and occupations will be situated in the zone bound by the Maroochy River, Bells Creek and the Bruce Highway[ Burke, Matthew. “Problems and prospects for public transport planning in Australian cities.” Built Environment 42, no. 1 (2016): 37-54.]. We have the chance to make this an awesome place to live, work and visit – however to do this we need to overhaul our vehicle framework so individuals have more transport decisions. The day by day number of trips around the Sunshine Coast is projected to increment by 60% by 2031[ Caldwell, David, and Les Chandra. “Identification of capacity improving options for South East Queensland passenger rail.” CORE 2014: Rail Transport For A Vital Economy (2014): 636.]. Without light rail or a comparative interest in broad daylight transport, the north-south street system should suit more than twofold the current activity volume. Blockage will bring about progressively bigger measures of time spent in activity as opposed to doing the things individuals love to do[ Currie, Graham, Matthew Burke, and Alexa Delbosc. “Performance of Australian light rail and comparison with US trends.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2419 (2014): 11-22.]. Past the individual cost in time lost to travel, clog will make getting to and from built up focuses progressively troublesome and could trade off the intensity of these vital regions later on.
Project Description
Risk Id Risk Statement Probability Impact Score Strategy Response
1 Suitability of preferred route Likely Project viability & and community support Low Conducting feasibility analysis over routes Comprehensive pre-feasibility phase
2 Forecast patronage too low Less certain Project viability Medium Assuming with conservative planning approach Conservative planning assumptions
3 Suitability of procurement model adopted Almost likely Level of market interest and pricing competition Medium Identification of lessons from experience Lessons learnt from other projects (e.g. GCRT)
4 Poor management of impacts on adjoining properties (access, parking, construction noise, safety, services disruptions) Likely Increased costs/delays/poor publicity Medium Rigorous selection process of contractor and team Selection is performed as per experience, skills, adequate resourcing
5 Inadequate client management of procurement process Certain Increased Costs/delays Medium Establishment of competent and resourced team Team development
6 Safety with road interfaces Less certain Injuries, impacts on services, poor publicity, impacts on future patronage Medium Adequacy of design/signage, maintenance and public awareness campaigns Maintenance of public awareness
7 Inadequate operating establishment, with inadequate training Likely Impacts on services, poor publicity, impact on future patronage, potential safety risks Low Rigorous selection process for O & M contractor Selection of O & M contractor
8 Inadequate maintenance practices Almost likely Impacts on services, reliability Low Effective contract management of O & M contract (by Owner and Contractor) Contract management with contract
9 Poor timetable reliability Certain Poor publicity, impact on future patronage Medium Utilize proven equipment, design solutions Equipment and design solution is utilized
10 Inadequacy of bridge design solutions (scope definition) Likely Increased costs/delays Low Provide adequate contingency (budget/schedule) Contingency plan preparation
Stakeholders are roughly identified as per project and business requirements:
Name Interest Impact Strategies
Project manager High High Managing each activity with team members
Financial manager Medium High Managing additional funding within timeline
Planning team Medium Medium Prepares charter and maintains scheduled timeline approach for achieving each deliverable
Construction team Medium High Conducts each construction activity with all management processes
Project Deliverables:
Sunshine Coast Light Rail Project is segmented within four individual phases along with their specific milestones. The deliverables of the project is proposed under first phase; this phase determines to connect Maroochydore with Kawana Town Centre and Sunshine Coast University Hospital. Assumed timeline for first stage is up to 2020[ Dedekorkut-Howes, Ay??n, and Severine Mayere. “Planning the unplanned City: The story of the gold coast.” (2015).]. Construction of further stages is subjected to further additional funding; however, further proceeding with project is estimated to take 2020 decade not exceeding 2030s. This stage is divided under four individual phases and each phase includes separate deliverables with planning.
In the pre-feasibility phase, Sunshine Coast Light Rail Project authority should consider whether the fully functional feasibility activity should be conducted or not. This phase offers reasonable success factors that should contribute while conducting the project. Pre-feasibility phase shows clear indication to costs and benefits. In rapid economic appraisal phase, the primary business information is shared about accurate pre-feasibility study[ Ellis, Ben, and Neil Douglas. “The economics of financing and funding public transport projects.” In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 37th, 2015, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2015.]. Furthermore, in second phase, feasibility study should be conducted regarding estimated costs, engagement of stakeholders, and functionalities. Once, the business case is prepared with feasibility study; the phase three is started. In third phase, planning and tendering is conducted. Primary planning tool is identified as preparation of project charter; charter document should include purpose, description, risks, stakeholders, milestones, budget, and other key points[ Langley, Joe. “Capturing value: new funding strategies for transport infrastructure.” In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 37th, 2015, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2015.]. Once, charter is prepared; the charter will be sent to Sunshine Coast Council for approval. As soon as the charter document is approved; first stage of construction is to be initiated.
Risk Management
In this study, major components are identified based on the Sunshine Light Rail Project could be successfully conducted. Furthermore, the major feasibility factors are identified as following:
Justification of operating Costs: Estimated figure of $1.3 million in stage 1 and $540 million in stage 2 depicts justified reasons and options including property acquisition, civil and related costs, and rail systems, stations, service relocations, rolling stock, Depot, Owners costs and contingencies[ Lenné, Michael G., Paul M. Salmon, Vanessa Beanland, Neville A. Stanton, and Ashleigh Filtness. “On-road driving studies to understand why drivers behave as they do at regional rail level crossings.” In Proceedings of the 2013 Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing & Education Conference. Australasian College of Road Safety (ACRS), 2013.]. Furthermore, the details have not yet suggested proper measure with passengers considered in operating cost estimation. Projected costs for electricity and diesel in future (2020s) are considered in the pre-feasibility cost estimation[ Miller, Nadya. “The impact of a new light rail network upon walkability in a central business district.” (2014).]. Longer service life and lower maintenance cost is taken aside from this estimation as well.
LRT benefits and Research: LRT benefits are properly grouped along with separate aspects such as productivity, transport, infrastructure costs, accidental cost savings, and residual value of system. Proper research is put into practice for detailed discussion of beneficial options and benefit cost ratio results[ Lodge, T. “Australia’s cities of tomorrow: light rail as an agent for change.” In AusRAIL PLUS 2016, Rail-Moving the Economy Forward, 21-23 November 2016, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 2016.]. Net present value of the project at-grade stage is estimated to be $3.6 billion along with 6% discount rate[ Martin, Scott, and Philip Laird. “Building a railway for the 21st century: Bringing high speed rail a step closer.” CORE 2014: Rail Transport For A Vital Economy (2014): 612.]. At implementation phase, involved cost is around $1.1 billion at 6% discount rate; net benefit is served to be around $2.4 billion (present value).
LRT offers superior services: LRT offers superior services to the passengers as per proposed project and as per benefits estimated.
Overhead Power Consumption: As per pre-feasibility report, “There would be specially designed stations spaced about one kilometer apart, with a platform height of 300 mm”. The LRT implementation requires more cost for elevated rail $3,580 M whereas, primarily, estimation cost was around $1,570 M.
Higher LRT implementation Cost due to elevation: For elevated rail LRT; required cost is higher for building bridges and elevated architecture[ Murray, Cameron K. “Light Rail, Land Values and Taxes.” Economic Record (2017).]. The capital cost for elevated structure is more due to keeping more spacing between stations. The LRT implementation and elevated trackage transmits noise.
Appropriate Economic Impact Analysis: As per economic impact analysis, the construction and operating options are considered with output, value added, and employment. Economic impact is analyzed in two forms as construction and operational impacts[ Watson-Brown, Elizabeth, Peter Skinner, Caroline Stalker, and Architectus Brisbane. “Gold Coast Cultural Precinct International Design Competition.” (2013).]. Total expenditure is expected to be $4-$5.2 billion in construction impacts.
No LRT Disadvantage Analysis: LRT disadvantages are addressed in the pre-feasibility report within specific points. However, the disadvantage impacts are not clearly mentioned.
References
A Line In The Sand: The Sunshine Coast Light Rail Project Pre-Feasibility And Rapid Economic Appraisal Report Version 4.2 – August 2012 (Sunshine Coast Council 2012)
Burke, Matthew, and Graham Currie. “Light rail in Australia-Performance and prospects.” (2013).
Burke, Matthew. “Problems and prospects for public transport planning in Australian cities.” Built Environment 42, no. 1 (2016): 37-54.
Caldwell, David, and Les Chandra. “Identification of capacity improving options for South East Queensland passenger rail.” CORE 2014: Rail Transport For A Vital Economy (2014): 636.
Currie, Graham, Matthew Burke, and Alexa Delbosc. “Performance of Australian light rail and comparison with US trends.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2419 (2014): 11-22.
Dedekorkut-Howes, Ay??n, and Severine Mayere. “Planning the unplanned City: The story of the gold coast.” (2015).
Ellis, Ben, and Neil Douglas. “The economics of financing and funding public transport projects.” In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 37th, 2015, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2015.
Langley, Joe. “Capturing value: new funding strategies for transport infrastructure.” In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 37th, 2015, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2015.
Lenné, Michael G., Paul M. Salmon, Vanessa Beanland, Neville A. Stanton, and Ashleigh Filtness. “On-road driving studies to understand why drivers behave as they do at regional rail level crossings.” In Proceedings of the 2013
Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing & Education Conference. Australasian College of Road Safety (ACRS), 2013.
Lodge, T. “Australia’s cities of tomorrow: light rail as an agent for change.” In AusRAIL PLUS 2016, Rail-Moving the Economy Forward, 21-23 November 2016, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 2016.
Martin, Scott, and Philip Laird. “Building a railway for the 21st century: Bringing high speed rail a step closer.” CORE 2014: Rail Transport For A Vital Economy (2014): 612.
Miller, Nadya. “The impact of a new light rail network upon walkability in a central business district.” (2014).
Murray, Cameron K. “Light Rail, Land Values and Taxes.” Economic Record (2017).
Watson-Brown, Elizabeth, Peter Skinner, Caroline Stalker, and Architectus Brisbane. “Gold Coast Cultural Precinct International Design Competition.” (2013).
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
