Alcohol Abuse And Its Consequences On Health And Productivity

The Link between Alcohol Use and Work Impairment

Title: Impact of Excessive Alcohol Consumption on health among the working age in England and Effectiveness of brief Intervention

Background 

Alcohol abuse and the consequences it has on people’s health are a major public health issue, and figuring out what factors cause people to consume large amounts of alcohol is essential to deciding where to focus intervention efforts aimed at reducing their use. In 2009–2010, the UK’s economy lost £9.2 billion as a result of workers who were unable to perform their jobs due to alcohol-related impairment (Thompson and Pirmohamed, 2021). In the United Kingdom, increasing productivity is considered to be one of the most important concerns, and it is a fundamental component of the country’s Industrial Strategy. Health promotion programmes that are based on actual evidence of need may be made more effective and cost-effective by better understanding the link between work and alcohol consumption.

Damage to both physical and mental health may have a negative impact on one’s health and may lead to job loss, injury, or even job termination (Böckerman, Hyytinen, and Maczulskij, 2017). Job loss may also result in worse results in terms of alcohol intake, as shown by higher consumption and an increased risk of illness and mortality (Eliason, 2014). When it comes to business, alcohol has indeed been linked to a decrease in productivity, a lack of attention to the safety of other employees, and antisocial workplace behaviour (French et al., 2011). Those who drink at a higher risk are 22 times more likely than those who drink at a lower risk to miss work because of their drinking (Samokhvalov et al., 2010. A major share of the severe financial penalties associated with alcohol abuse falls on employers, and the burden is disproportionately severe for small enterprises (Roche et al., 2008). Workplace impairment caused by alcohol use affects 15% of US workers, according to data collected from 2805 people in different professions in the United States (Frone, 2006). That’s not all: A research in the UK discovered that working when hungover or inebriated damages the country’s economy an extra $900 million per year than previously believed (Bhattacharya, 2019).

There have been several studies that have used data gathered at a national level to study the link between occupational type and alcohol-related outcomes. Craft, construction, and service workers were the most likely to be hospitalised or die as a result of alcohol use, according to statistics from the Finnish care registry (Kaila-Kangas et al., 2016). According to household survey data, there was a correlation between the incidence of alcohol use disorder in the United States and employment in the transportation and construction industries (Mandell et al., 1992). A number of physically demanding occupations were shown to be associated with an elevated risk of alcohol use disorder diagnosis and death (Hemmingsson and Weitoft, 2001). There has been a lot of research into the effects of alcohol on morbidity and mortality, but not much research into how different types of jobs affect alcohol consumption itself, notably in the United Kingdom, where a lot of the research has focused on mortality consequences (Romeri, Baker and Griffiths, 2007). In order to do so, we must realise that alcohol is a contributing factor to a wide range of ailments, not only those that are directly connected to its use (e.g. alcohol-related liver disease). The study of phenotypes related to alcohol intake is of great interest to the profession since it offers the possibility of preventing alcohol abuse in some groups of individuals.

Negative Impact on Health and Productivity

Alcohol can be part of a healthy lifestyle if it was drunk in moderation with physical regular exercise and a good diet, but when it is consumed in excess it can have short–term or long-term health effects, both physically and mentally healthy. The short-term health effects are accidental injury, self-injury or causing injury to others, sexual assault, lack of judgement and loss of coordination and the long–term health effects are brain damage, liver diseases and so on (Healthdirect, 2021). Excessive alcohol consumption has led to increased risk for various health problems which has contributed to the burden of diseases globally. It has been identified as a cause of more than 30 conditions and contributed to many common diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, pancreas diseases, cancer, diabetes, and unintentional and intentional injury (Rehm, 2011).

Drinking behaviour among many age groups, but especially among young people in England is a cause for alarm, and it seems many features of young people’s drinking are context or culture-dependent. While parents’ opinions regarding alcohol may influence their children, additional direct mechanisms, like access to pocket money and engagement in diversionary activity (or not), might even play a role in determining if, when, or how much young children drink. As a result, it is still unclear to parents what the long-term consequences of their children’s drinking habits will be for them. Many parents believe that introducing their children to alcohol at an early age is better than letting them experience it on their own. It’s presently unable to make informed conclusions based on the available knowledge. Alcohol intake has certain health and social advantages for adults. As a result, the health advantages of low to moderate alcohol use have been associated with cardiovascular-protective effects in older persons, such as males over 40 as well as post-menopausal women (Unit, 2003). There is a lot of evidence that drinking may have beneficial social impacts, although these effects are seldom addressed in terms of study. It’s unclear if consuming alcohol in adolescence has any positive effects on health in this age group. Drinking is likely to have a favourable impact on the social lives of young people (Plant and Plant, 2001). Some may argue that these benefits may be offset by the negative repercussions of drinking before it is legal to do so. An important concern for public health in England’s alcohol harm reduction policy is the prevalence of underage drinking, which has been linked to a variety of negative health outcomes (Safe, 2007).

More than two-thirds of people in England and Scotland drink at amounts that put them at an increased risk of illness (increasing risk or higher risk drinkers) on a regular basis (Alcohol Change UK, 2021). A 2018 national survey in England found that men were more than twice as likely as women to consume alcohol at risky levels in a typical week (25 percent as opposed to 11 percent); and, similarly, men were more likely than women to consume alcohol at higher risk levels (5 percent as opposed to 3 percent). 27 per cent of adults living in the least impoverished regions compared to 18 per cent of those living in the poorest areas drank more than 14 units of alcohol in a typical week (Scholes and Gebert, 2019). Drinking is less common among young adults compared to older ones; nevertheless, when they do drink, it seems to be more than older folks’ highest drinking day. New research suggests that those who abstain from alcohol for a month like “Dry January” are less likely to drink again (Field et al., 2020).

The Effects of Alcohol on Workplace Behaviour

Consistent or long-term drinking may lead to alcohol dependency, which is characterised by an inability to control one’s alcohol consumption. One of the most distinguishing characteristics is a strong internal drive to drink alcohol, which is indicated by a reduced ability to moderate consumption, an increased importance placed on drinking over other activities, and a willingness to continue drinking despite the damage or bad consequences. It’s usual to have a strong desire or need to drink during these episodes. Those who are dependent on alcohol and other substances may also have resistance to the effects of drinking, symptoms of withdrawal following cessation or reduction in the use of alcohol, and recurring use of alcohol or pharmacologically comparable medicines to alleviate withdrawal symptoms. For a diagnosis of alcohol dependency to be established, at least one month of continuous (daily or near-daily) usage of alcohol must be observed (Lesch et al., 2020). Adults who are classified as alcohol abusers include those who drink beyond the legal limit but are not dependent, as well as those who have a mild, moderate, and severe alcohol dependency.

This research is novel because most of that drink alcoholic beverages are at the risk of developing more than 200 diseases and injuries conditions (Rosario, 2019). Most research only writes about one of two diseases that can arise or be triggered by the effect of alcohol consumption. This research is novel as it seeks to sort out and consolidate different health effects of excessive alcohol consumption and focus on discovering a new health issue that arises from drinking alcohol, the possible benefit of alcohol consumption. From health promotion to more extensive and specialised therapy for those with severe alcohol dependence, a variety of treatments are available for the prevention and treatment of alcohol-related risk and damage. screening and quick intervention have emerged as cost-effective ways to help individuals cut down on drinking (Donnell et. al., 2013). Efficacy of short treatments to assist individuals decrease their alcohol use and other interventions that may help a person reduce their alcohol consumption will be the subject of this study.

The rationale behind the research is that despite several types of research showing the effectiveness of the brief intervention in reducing hazardous and harmful consumption, alcohol is still identified as one of the leading factors for the global burden of disease and causes of premature death. The study will research the environment where the intervention is delivered, time allocated and length of intervention, and if people only change their behaviour towards alcohol as a result of health issues arising from harmful use of alcohol.

The study will be aimed at determining and analysing how excessive alcohol consumption has affected the health of age 18 to 64 years old either mentally or resulting in different diseases such as high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, cancer of the mouth, throat and oesophagus and mental health problems (CDC, 2020). To also analyse if the brief intervention has been able to reduce alcohol consumption among the age group.

Occupational Type and Alcohol-Related Outcomes

Assessment of factors associated with excessive alcohol consumption, assessment of how excessive alcohol consumption contributes to or triggers health issues, and evaluation of screening and brief intervention in working-age groups to reduce excessive alcohol consumption are all part of this study’s research objectives.

• What are the causes or factors contributing to the harmful consumption of alcohol?
• What are the short and long-term health effects of excessive alcohol consumption?
• How effective are the interventions in trying to reduce excessive alcohol consumption?

The research work will be structured into five chapters, the first chapter of the introduction, sets the background, aim of the study, which helps in proper analysis of the research question as laid down. The second chapter contains a review of existing research studies on the effects of excessive alcohol consumption on health problems. Excessive alcohol consumption has led to increased risk for various health issues which has contributed to the burden of disease in the United Kingdom and globally. It is attributed to over 200 diseases and injuries and mortality rates. The short- and long-term health issues caused by excessive alcohol such as brain damage, cardiovascular diseases, pancreas diseases, cancer, and liver diseases. The third chapter will detail information about the methodology used in the research paper, The fourth chapter, will state the results and findings, The fifth chapter, the Discussion and the fifth chapter, will be the conclusion.

An estimated 2.5 million people die each year as a result of alcohol-related disorders over the world (Addolorato et al., 2013). As a result, excessive alcohol use and its detrimental effects on public health are major issues. Global alcohol consumption is predicted to rise in over half of the world’s countries by 2025, a trend that can only be reversed via the deployment of “effective policy solutions” according to WHO projections (World Health Organization, 2019). Approximately 22% of the earth’s population will be 60 years old or older by 2050, with a large percentage of this group engaging in “a pattern or degree of drinking that puts them at hazard” (Wadd and Galvani, 2014). Compared to younger individuals, older adults have a reduced tolerance for alcohol, which makes them more vulnerable to its harmful consequences. A consequence of this is that older persons are more likely than younger ones to utilise prescription medicines, which may have a harmful influence on their health when used in conjunction with alcohol (Wadd et al., 2011). 

Alcohol and its metabolites may induce stem cell differentiation errors and enhance inflammatory damage, which can lead to inflammation and carcinogenesis in a number of organs, as well as a greater prevalence of cancer in individuals with diabetes. Human carcinogens are defined as substances that have been shown to cause cancers of the liver, oral cavity, digestive system, pancreatic, prostate and female breast when consumed in large quantities over an extended period of time. Alcohol misuse and diabetes are linked to an increased risk of cancer, according to a research by Lam et al. (2021).

Genetics

Family history studies have shown that alcoholics are more likely to pass on their disease to future generations. Studies of adoptions, family tree analysis, and identical twin research all show that genetics, not blood relations, are the primary cause of alcoholism (Carlson et al. 2002). Even if they are not raised by an alcoholic parent, children of alcoholics are four times more likely than those without a history of alcoholism to become alcoholics, according to various estimates (Russell, 1990). Initially, the bulk of research were conducted on the offspring of male drinkers, which was a mistake. This constraint led to the initial conclusion that males were more likely than females to struggle from the inherited pattern of the condition, whereas females were more likely than males to suffer from a reactive variant associated with mental comorbidities, empty-nest syndrome, or any other relevant facts, respectively.

Short-Term and Long-Term Health Effects of Alcohol Consumption

The vast majority of what we know about alcohol and genetics is based on studies of adult alcohol consumption. For example, adoption studies by Hawkins et al. (1992) were used to examine genetic impacts. Even when reared by adoptive parents, boys of alcoholic biological parents were more likely to acquire alcoholism than their non-alcoholic counterparts, according to the available research at the time. Study after study has demonstrated that environmental and genetic variables play an important role in determining a person’s lifelong risk of alcoholism. However, Rose (1998) said that twin studies show that cultural and shared environmental factors (like parental abstinence) play a bigger role in the ages at which people start drinking and stop. Because of this, identical twins were more likely than non-identical twins to drink on a regular basis and these disparities amongst genetically identical or non-identical twins worsened with alcohol exposure (Hawkins, Catalano, and Miller, 1992).

“Substantial shared genetic liability” exists between the age at which an individual first began drinking as well as the subsequent development of alcoholism, as stated by Rutter (2007). While impacts are bound to have an impact, the age at which an individual first began drinking is primarily a marker of vulnerability or perhaps an explanation for alcohol problems (Agrawal and Lynskey, 2008). Researchers examined two acetaldehyde dehydrogenase gene variations in Korean neonates adopted by Caucasian US parents, one of which is more frequent among East Asians and causes unpleasant flushing when exposed to alcohol. Those with a flushing reaction have a reduced rate of alcoholism. Antisocial behaviour and drug usage were not significantly different across groups, even among individuals with the variance. Addiction to drugs and alcohol are linked in this research because of “a shared general tendency for problem behaviour and its not the causal impact of early drinking” (Crabbe, 2002). Sibling drinking was the primary cause of a family’s environmental impact, rather than parental drinking, since adoptive parents’ drunkenness had little effect on their adopted children’s alcohol use.

Alcohol abuse among adolescents is seen from the viewpoint of the growth of young people, who want more independence from their parents as they get older, therefore increasing their integration with (and the impact of) their peers. Settertobulte et al. (2001) and Newbury-Birch (2009) imply that teenagers who engage in more social activities are more likely to drink. As a result, even at an unspecified degree of use, alcohol consumption may have a favourable effect on relationships among peers. Males are more likely to be associated with this correlation than women, whereas university students are more likely to be associated with it (Borsari and Carey, 2006). A review of research on 16 to 20-year-olds found that alcohol usage may have some positive effects on developmental tasks including “identity exploration” and peer bonding, according to Brown et al. (2008). Involvement in social activities such as drinking and going to the bar helps youngsters develop better emotional functioning, while avoiding these activities may lead to low self-esteem and feelings of hopelessness. As a result, it is impossible to tell whether drinking causes a better social network, or if a better social network causes more drinking.

Drinking Behaviour among Young People in England

Gender as a Risk Factor for Alcohol Dependence

For many decades, researchers have studied the causes and consequences of female drinking behaviour (Sullivan et al. 2002). Data from this study reveal that men and women may advance to problematic drinking at different rates and face distinct risks of alcohol-related problems as a result. Men have historically started drinking alcohol at a younger age than women (Gomberg 1993). These results were reinforced by a major national research (Project MATCH) of adults seeking treatment for addiction (Randall et al. 2001), which also revealed that males exhibited signs of problematic drinking habits (i.e., frequent drunkenness, lack of control over drinking) sooner than women.

Studies show that men and women start drinking regularly at different ages, but this isn’t universally true. At least among those who seek treatment, the beginning ages of men and women’s alcohol consumption may be becoming closer together. According to Hernandez-Avila and others (2004), men and women to current alcohol addiction diagnoses have strikingly similar ages at which they first began regularly using substances, with no discernible differences in the ages at which they first became intoxicated by alcohol on a regular basis. There was a difference, however, is the rate at which women transitioned from regular usage to diagnosis. According to previous research, women seem to go through the phases of frequent drunkenness, drinking difficulties, and loss of control of drinking more rapidly than males. This latest conclusion supports these findings. Because of this “telescoping” of disease development, women are more likely to suffer more severe repercussions sooner (Diehl et al. 2007).

People with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) sometimes meet the diagnostic criteria for other mental illnesses as well. Comorbidity between drunkenness and serious psychotic disease was found in the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiological Catchment Area Project, for example. If you’ve ever been diagnosed with alcoholism, 3.8 percent of you are eligible for a serious psychotic condition (Regier et al. 1990). There were 15.15 percent and 17.75 percent of people who were addicted to alcohol who also had depression or anxiety disorders, according to the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) (Grant et al., 2004). They are also more prone to have personality issues than the overall population. Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is, for example, 21 times more likely to be diagnosed among alcoholics than non-alcoholics in the general population (Reiger et al. 1990). An ASPD diagnosis is associated with higher rates of alcohol abuse and dependency (i.e., more criterion for lifetime abuse/dependence fulfilled, a higher frequency of heavy drinking days) as compared to persons with a conduct disorder or those who matched the conditions for ASPD but did not display any behavioural disorders before the age of 15 (Goldstein et al., 2007). They found that, contrary to popular assumption, there is an association between ASPD and AUDs in both men and women, according to these findings.

It is recommended by the Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) of the United Kingdom that adults limit their weekly alcohol consumption to no more than 14 units in order to minimise the risk of developing an alcohol-related illness. There are several harmful consequences of alcohol on health, and there is no clearly defined “safe” level of frequent alcohol use. No quantity of alcohol is good to one’s health on a regular basis. Those who use alcohol have a greatly higher chance of developing oral cancer, which is exacerbated when paired with smoking or other forms of tobacco use. It is vital to recognise that consuming alcohol while attempting to quit smoking might possibly diminish the likelihood of successfully stopping and that this should be taken into consideration carefully before attempting to quit (ELFH, 2021). Among the many negative health effects of alcohol include cardiovascular disease and cancer (breast, bowel, throat and mouth), as well as the possibility of long-term damage to the unborn child if used during pregnancy (Weishaar et al., 2016).

The Prevalence of Alcohol Use in England and Scotland

Heavy alcohol consumption is associated with liver disease, which is responsible for a meaningful percentage of alcohol-related death worldwide. There is no other treatment for alcohol-related liver cancer other than to reduce or stop drinking alcohol (Yates, et al., 2020).

Alcohol liver diseases are damages caused to the liver because of excessive intake of alcohol. The damages caused to the liver are classified into three different stages based on the related symptoms. The first stage is the fatty liver which is reversible the person stops drinking harmfully, the second stage is alcoholic hepatitis, it can be reversed if the affected person stops alcohol consumption completely and people can die from severe alcoholic hepatitis. The third stages are cirrhosis, which is irreversible and required immediate disconnection from alcohol to increase life expectancy (NHS, 2021). The liver is the major ethanol-metabolising organ in the body (Herreros-Villanueva, 2013).

The pancreas is one of the most essential organs in the body, and excessive alcohol use may have a negative impact on its ability to operate properly. Heavy alcohol consumption has been linked to an increased risk of pancreatitis; approximately 70% of cases of pancreatitis are associated with chronic heavy alcohol consumption; and there is a link between the amount of alcohol doses (80 to 150g/d) consumed and the likelihood of developing pancreatitis (see Figure 1). (Herreros-Villanueva, 2013). heavy alcohol intake has been shown to lower a person’s folate status, and a low folate status may make the pancreas more susceptible to carcinogenesis, according to the research. Among those who have a poor total folate intake, it has been shown that there is a positive relationship between their alcohol use and their chance of getting pancreatic cancer. A lack of folate may impair DNA synthesis, repair, and maintenance due to alcohol’s potential to reduce folate’s bioavailability and disturb other key biological processes that depend on folate (Lam, 2021)

Several studies have been carried on the effect of alcohol on cardiovascular diseases (CVD). A cohort Study shown that there is heterogeneous relationship alcohol consumption level and CVD, excessive drinking increases the risk of cardiac arrest, ischaemic stroke, heart failure, coronary death but reduced the risk of myocardial infarction or stable angina (Bell, et al., 2017). A systematic reviewed study examined the relationship between alcohol drinking, pattens of drinking and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) comparing total abstainer from alcohol showed that people with heavy or chronic drinking or alcohol disorder have an increase chance of developing IHD, average consumption of alcohol without episode of heavy drinking had lowest chance of developing IHD, heavy drinking of alcohol occasionally had same risk level as life time abstainers (Roerecke and Rehm, 2014). Alcohol intake was shown to be fairly linearly related with a greater risk of stroke in a combined study of individual participant data from three large-scale data sources in 19 high-income nations studies, according to the findings (Wood and Danesh 2018).

A neurotransmitter called glutamate, an excitatory neurotransmitter that affects memory and learning, is one of several whose receptors are affected by variations in brain volume. Gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) is a significant inhibitory neurotransmitter mostly in human brain that is potentiated by alcohol and inhibits glutamate’s effect. As a result, elevated GABA levels have a depressive impact on cognitive function. Until the age of 20, the brain undergoes structural and functional changes (Zeigler et al., 2005). Due to the fact that the adolescent brain is going through a lot of changes, it is more prone to damage by bad things than the more mature person brain (Spear, 2002). It’s easy for alcohol to breach the blood-brain barrier because it’s water and fat soluble, making it rapidly absorbed from the stomach or intestines. Amount of alcohol in blood is directly related to amount in brain. About 98 percent of ingested alcohol was metabolised by stomach or liver enzymes and excreted by the kidneys under normal conditions. As a general rule, the rate of metabolism is roughly 30 millilitres (1 ounce) per three hours. Blood alcohol concentration will grow if alcohol is taken at a pace that exceeds the rate at which it is excreted from the body (Zeigler et al., 2005).

The topic of alcohol usage and its consequences on the brain in children and teenagers cannot be studied in the future because of ethical concerns. According to current observational evidence, adolescents are more vulnerable than adults to both minor brain injury and long-term cognitive deficits after excessive alcohol use (Zeigler et al., 2005).

It has been well established by various studies the relationship between chronic alcohol consumption on liver, pancreas, brain, and heart. Based on the results of several studies, chronic, heavy and binge drinking of alcohol is a risk factor to several health conditions and as a public health issue to achieve sustainability of global health, urgent attention needs to identify appropriate intervention to prevent the impact of heavy alcohol on health and protect people wellbeing. This study will continue further to review effectiveness of brief intervention to control alcohol abuse. When it comes to reducing excessive alcohol use, brief intervention has been shown to be helpful. Initial screening of people is necessary before providing organised short guidance to those identified as high risk, and those identified as high-risk dependant are directed for professional treatment, as Tanner (2015) has shown (BJRP, 2016). According to a new evaluation of seven systematic studies, 15 minutes of short intervention is more beneficial than routine care or lengthier input and increasing the number of brief intervention sessions is better than one session (Alverez-Bueno, 2015). Aquasi-experimental between ages 19 to 65years also evidenced that tailored goal-oriented community brief intervention demonstrated that brief intervention associated with significant reduction in alcohol consumption in days and 6months after intervention (Areesantichai et al., 2013).

Conclusion

This literature study looked at whether or not alcohol drinking by adolescents and the elderly in the United Kingdom is a short-term activity with no long-term effects for adult health and well-being. It is evident that the evidence base for long-term impacts is not as wide or persuasive as it might be. Despite the lack of high-quality data, the results of this study allow us to draw causal conclusions about the long-term health and social repercussions of late teenage drinking.

Males who drank heavily in late adolescence were more likely to be involved in an automobile accident or commit suicide than those who did not. Many research show that late teenage drinking has a long-term effect on adult drinking, but their designs make causal conclusions difficult to substantiate. Alcohol abuse seems to have long-lasting impacts beyond 18 years, according to one national cohort. Consequences on the development of alcohol-related health issues such as dependency are more complicated than the effects of alcohol usage on its own. Several well-designed cohort studies have shown evidence that other risk variables for increased psychological well-being are also at issue.

The proposed study will be carried out using a qualitative technique, with data being gathered using an integrative review as the method of collection. The results of existing literature are analysed and synthesised in order to develop meaningful conclusions that are relevant to the research issue, which is known as an integrative review. An integrated review is thus advantageous in that it allows the researcher to acquire a large number of secondary data in a short period of time and at a low cost (Ngozwana, 2018). An integrated review would be beneficial for the proposed study in order to obtain substantial secondary data on the criminological characteristics of juvenile and adult offenders since it will not be feasible for the researcher to collect primary data directly from such participants otherwise (Mohajan, 2018). Additionally, as compared to a systematic review, an integrative review is preferable because, whilst the latter contains just experimental data, the former includes both experimental and non-experimental data, which is more comprehensive (Munn et al. 2018). A systematic review was selected for this study as well because it would allow the researcher to gather a diverse range of scientific and grey literature, including news items as well as governmental or public documents on excessive alcohol consumption and its impact on the adults in the United Kingdom, among other things. The proposed research will not need the collection of a sample and thus no primary data will be gathered and rather we are relying on the secondary research.

The purpose of this study was to conduct research on the health consequences of excessive alcohol use as well as the efficacy of short interventions in reducing alcohol consumption. The information will be gathered from peer-reviewed publications and journals from reputable sources. There will be no volunteers in this research since there will be none. A review of previous studies that are relevant to the research objectives, aims scope and area of research will be conducted for the purpose of determining and analysing how excessive alcohol consumption has negatively impacted the health of people aged 18 to 64 years old, either mentally or physically, and whether or not this has resulted in different diseases.

Assumptions and beliefs are always present in every kind of study, regardless of the subject matter. Qualitative researchers recognise the significance of the views and theories that influence their work, and they actively write about these beliefs and theories throughout their study. “Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design,” a book written by John Creswell, discusses these assumptions and organises them into interpretative frameworks so that we may comprehend the importance of these assumptions to our own research projects. With the objective of producing a feature-complete software solution, I am investigating the viability of establishing a structured approach to curriculum mapping for my research paper.

Inclusion Criteria

Any form of empirical research that has been peer reviewed and published in English is acceptable. Those under the age of 18 and younger than 65 years, as well as treatments that examined alcohol-related outcomes versus a control group, were eligible to participate in this study.. Definitions of what characterises a “adult” individual differ from one another. Unless otherwise noted, we will be concentrating on people who are 18 years old or older for the purposes of this evaluation. This age range was chosen in order to gather as much information as possible, from retirement to the elderly. In order to understand the current status of the research and to synthesise therapies that have been adopted over the last 30 years, studies must have been performed within that time span. Literature produced between 1990 and 2021 and with a publication date of 1990 or later was eligible for inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria

This analysis eliminated studies that involved pharmacological therapy, as well as studies that specifically examined comorbidities or the use of other medicines. The researchers also excluded studies that sought to forecast the outcomes of future therapies or analyses of previous research and reviews since they did not give any unique findings or information relevant to the study issue. Since translation services were not available, we deleted peer-reviewed articles and empirical research that had not been peer-reviewed.

Validity

This is a method of demonstrating that the study findings correspond to reality, and that the findings may be regarded to be legitimate if they accurately measure the phenomena that was claimed to be measured in the research (Collis and Hussey, 2014). The data collected for the purpose of this study is highly likely to be suitable for measuring the phenomenon that the research claims to measure because the method of data collection and analysis appears to be appropriate for meeting the findings. The data collected for the purpose of this study is highly likely to be suitable for measuring the phenomenon that the research claims to measure.

Reliability

Reliability refers to the degree to which the same answers may be obtained by using the same instruments several times (or repeatability). A study’s reliability is often linked to the capacity of other researchers to replicate the results and conduct the same research in the same way that you did. According to one theory, “problems with dependability may appear in a number of ways” (Taherdoost, 2016).”

We are concerned about reliability whenever a single observer provides data since we have no way of knowing whether or not that observer’s subjectivity will have an influence on the data (Babbie, 2010). A subjective approach to the study is used by the researcher, and the degree of trustworthiness of the work will be impaired as a result, according to Wilson (2010). During the process of creating research results, validity of research may be defined as the amount to which the criteria of scientific research technique have been followed to the letter.

In order for the results to be trustworthy, the research must stick to the primary goals of the study in order to prevent possible bias from being introduced into the findings throughout the investigation (Zukauskas, Vveinhardt, and Andriukaitien? 2018). This research has a high likelihood of being declared legitimate based on the adequacy of the data collecting and analysis methods that were selected for this investigation.

A secondary research approach will be used in order to gather the material essential to answer the study’s research questions. A variety of research studies with a variety of methods, procedures, and lengths will be included to evaluate the effects of alcohol intake on health and the efficacy of short interventions to lessen the damage caused by alcohol consumption. The systematic reviews will cover researches that have been published in electronic databases such as PubMed, Scholar Google, and Cochrane that have been published in the previous 10 years or more. An alcohol screening and short intervention study will be included in the systematic review, as will any research that have provided information on alcohol dependency, alcohol abuse, alcohol misuse, and excessive alcohol use, binge drinking, and the relationship between alcohol and health. Study titles and abstracts will be reviewed first, and studies will be eliminated unless the title or abstract mentions the impact of alcohol intake on health and a short intervention. After that, the complete text of the publications will be reviewed, and relevant data will be retrieved.

An insight into the range of techniques and processes that are available, as well as particular instances of how they are applied in practise, has been offered by the Special Issue on this Research. However, it should not be overlooked that, in addition to the importance of selecting appropriate research methodology and processes, the significance of ethical considerations in the context of carrying out the study should not be understated. This Special Issue contains an article by Fleming (2018) that explores numerous ethical challenges that might occur while doing research as a “insider researcher,” such as the power disparity and sustaining ongoing connections with participants throughout the study process. It is necessary, however, to examine the fundamentals of ethical research with human beings in more depth. depth.

After the dissertation tittle was approved, the completed proposal and ethical form were submitted for approval and scrutiny of the form. The study followed the Arden University dissertation approval procedures; the chosen dissertation tittle was initially submitted for approval, after which the completed proposal and ethical form were submitted for approval and scrutiny of the form. The Arden University ethics review committee gave its approval for the research paper.

All of the publications included in this review have some aspect of self-reporting, if not all of them. In addition, one of the limitations of the publications included in this review is that the therapies seem to be targeted at various amounts of alcohol use in different people. A total of five of the included treatments focused on “at risk” or “hazardous” drinkers, while the other two were aimed at those who drank regularly. As a consequence, there may be discrepancies in the outcomes since it is not clear which components of the treatments are effective and for whom they are effective.

Alcohol abuse and its negative effects on health among the working-age population in England, particularly those aged 18 to 64, have not previously been examined in a systematic study. Alcohol intake decreased in at least one region of each of the strategies studied. Hansen et al. (1990) as well as Gordon et al. (2018) observed that while treatments showed considerable decreases over time, they did not exhibit significant changes in comparison to the control group persons who got conventional care. Lowering frequency and intake as well as reducing seven-day alcohol usage were some of the gains. The frequency of binge drinking and overindulgence was also shown to be reduced in other research, as were the rates of harmful and hazardous alcohol consumption and visits to doctors and emergency rooms.

The effectiveness of psychological therapy for older persons who are struggling with drug abuse was previously shown in a comprehensive evaluation of interventions. Even though participants reported positive outcomes from present therapies, Bhatia et al. (2018) recommend additional investigation into a broader variety of interventions that might be given and may better fit older people. Psychological therapies including counselling and behaviour coaching, together with instructional materials, individualised risk assessment reports, and the use of diaries, are all being investigated in this new research. The results so far show that people seem to benefit from psychological treatments.

Alcohol abuse has a devastating impact on society and the economy across the globe, and if the policy is not altered, this burden will continue to grow. Developed countries like Europe and the United States have the greatest levels of alcohol usage; the Pacific and African areas have moderate levels of consumption; as well as the Eastern Mediterranean has the lowest levels of consumption.

Both the onset of alcoholism and its long-term repercussions may be attributed to a wide range of risk factors. As a result, therapy and intervention activities are likely to be more difficult to implement as a result of this complexity (Gilbertson, Prather, and Nixon, 2008). The scope of this article does not allow for a complete examination of the risk factors for alcoholism. Instead of focusing on one or two significant risk factors, the next sections will concentrate on four important risk variables: genetics, peer groups, gender, and mental comorbidity. For this study, we will also explore how these characteristics interact with alcoholism to affect neurocognitive performance after detoxification. Note that the emphasis of this article is mostly on neurocognitive performance in people who are clean, have completed their detoxification, and are not currently taking any medication that might alter their neurocognitive function. In spite of the limitations imposed by this condition, it gives a more comprehensive examination of the neurocognitive effects of alcohol dependency.

The ever-increasing use of alcohol nowadays due to industrialization and globalisation also increases the negative consequences linked with its intake, which is a pervasive element of the culture. For both individuals and the whole public, excessive alcohol intake may have both societal and personal implications. Accidents involving motor vehicles, domestic violence, and illnesses including alcoholic liver disease, alcohol-induced pancreatitis, and cancer are all more likely when people are intoxicated (Haseeb et al., 2017).  Frequent drinking is more significant than long-term exposure to alcohol for oral cancer risk, while long-term exposure is still relevant for other chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease. Depending on the location, there is some evidence that drinking years are related to a higher incidence of pharyngeal/oral cavity site cancer than laryngeal cancer in head and neck cancer (Lubin et al., 2009).

Increasingly, it is assumed that young people may choose to connect with classmates who share their values rather than being swayed by peer pressure. Children who are genetically prone to deviant behaviour are more likely to be associated with deviant peers if they are reared amid adversity and have experienced “deficits in parenting”. Stacey and Davies (1970) found a strong correlation between adolescent alienation, a lack of social norms, and a sense of powerlessness, as well as positive views about underage drinking. As a result of early family hardships, these social groups were formed to provide a sense of belonging (Schmidt and Hankoff, 1979).

The behaviour of instructors and classmates might help identify adolescents who are more prone to misuse alcohol in the middle and later stages of adolescence, according to Rose (1998), who found that adolescent risk-taking behaviours are ‘familial and partially heritable’ as early as kindergarten and elementary school. “High novelty seeking” and “low harm avoidance” were two behavioural variables that were deduced from this grading system in Swedish longitudinal research. Boys with these two early behavioural aspects had 20 times increased chance of alcoholism, according to the research. There was also more persistent antagonism and hyperactivity in the sons of alcoholic dads than in comparable controls. An in-depth study found that a child’s risk of alcoholism was not dependent on his father’s alcohol use status, but rather on his own (disruptive) behavioural inclinations (Rutter, 2007).

Alcohol may have some positive effects on young people’s friendships and sociability, according to research. Adolescents and college students may benefit from it in terms of forming closer relationships with their classmates and being more outgoing. Studies, on the other hand, have demonstrated that excessive alcohol use might harm relationships with others. It’s important to do further research to find out at what intake levels these adverse effects occur.

Having telescoping effects is more common among women who drink alcohol. To begin with, studies reveal that women are more likely than men to suffer mental, physiological, and professional consequences as a result of excessive drinking, suggesting that the immediate emotional and professional costs to women may be greater. Another explanation is that men and women’s physiologies differ enough to cause telescoping. As the amount of alcohol consumed per kilogramme of body weight differs between men and women, so do the levels of blood alcohol concentrations (Mann et al. 2005). (see Baraona et al., 2001). Non-alcoholic males are less likely to attain and sustain higher blood alcohol concentrations than alcoholic women when given the same amount of alcohol, regardless of gender.

According to these data’ robustness, many research on women have ignored the metabolic (pharmacokinetic) differences between men and women. Due to these differences, even if women consume the same quantity of alcohol as men, their livers and brains are subjected to more alcohol (Dettling et al., 2007). In other words: Even though women may not be more sensitive to alcohol, they may be more prone to having a lot of alcohol in their blood even at low doses.

When considering comorbidity rates, it is critical to evaluate the degree to which alcohol use disorder (AUD) might well be causally associated with other disorders. For instance, do they drink since they are depressed or do they drink since they are depressed? In a similar vein, do those who suffer from social anxiety and alcoholism lessen their drinking when their anxiety is treated? However, even though AUDs are often linked to other mental diseases, it is apparent that the onset of alcohol dependence is unrelated to the presence of any mental health issue. People who do not have any other medical conditions may become addicted to alcohol, while those who do have medical conditions are not necessarily at risk of acquiring AUDs. As a consequence of shared genetic and environmental characteristics, as well as gene-environment interaction, people with alcohol issues may be at greater risk for psychiatric diseases than those without these comorbidities. Thomas and his colleagues recently investigated this complication (2008). Anxiety symptoms reduced, but alcohol intake did not decrease among those who had both a social anxiety condition and a problem with alcohol use. In the end, it did assist to reduce anxiety-relieving drinking by a third among study participants. Even among those who said they drank to “reduce social anxieties,” the researchers found a link between social anxiety and alcohol consumption that was detrimental for this particular group.

Statistical Data

Men are more prone than women to engage in excessive alcohol consumption. Excessive alcohol use is connected with severe hazards to men’s health and safety, and the risks grow in direct proportion to the quantity of alcohol ingested. When paired with alcohol, males are more prone than women to take additional risks (such as abusing other drugs, having several sexual partners, or not wearing a seat belt), which increases their risk of sickness, injury, or death (Pinkhasov et al., 2010).

Due to inherent differences in a woman’s physical structure as well as her chemistry, she absorbs and metabolises alcohol more slowly than her male counterparts, who drink more often. Female blood alcohol levels are greater than those of males when the same quantity of booze is consumed; the early effects of alcohol are felt and stay longer in women. Because of these differences, women are more at risk than males for the long-term harmful health impacts of excessive alcohol use (Erol and Karpyak, 2015)

Adult males consume more alcohol than adult women.

• Adult males are more likely than adult women to report having consumed alcoholic beverages in the previous 30 days, with 59 percent reporting having done so (CDC, 2020).
• About 22% of males report binge drinking, and they do so on average 5 times a month, ingesting an average of 8 drinks during each binge session.
• In 2019, 7% of men and 4% of women had an alcohol use problem, according to the NIAAA (CDC, 2020).

Alcohol is linked to injury, violence, and other negative consequences

• Men are more likely than women to be hospitalised as a result of an alcohol-related illness. More than 68,000 people in the United States die each year as a result of excessive drinking. 
• Men are 50% more likely to be inebriated (i.e., have a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or above) than women when it comes to fatal car accidents. 
• Increased hostility and the danger of physical attack may be attributed to excessive alcohol drinking (Crane, 2016).
• Drinking alcohol increases one’s chances of being a victim of sexual assault. Suicide is much more common among men than women, and they are more likely to have been drinking before taking their own life. 
• Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the United States. Cancers of the mouth, throat, oesophagus, liver, and colon are more likely in males who drink alcohol (Rehm et al., 2020).
• Alcohol use raises the chance of developing prostate cancer (Zhao et al., 2016).

• Erectile dysfunction and infertility may occur as a consequence of excessive alcohol use since it interferes with testicular function and the generation of male hormones. 
• A man’s increased risk of dangerous sexual behaviour, such as unprotected sex, sexual relations with several partners or relationships rife with sexually transmitted diseases, might be attributed to his alcohol use (Billioux et al., 2012).

 

Source: (Statista, 2022)

Drinking in UK

There is no such thing as “British drinking culture,” despite what some people believe. Here are a few of the most important facts that show how people’s drinking habits vary. One-fifth of individuals aged 16 and older in Great Britain said in 2017 that they do not consume alcohol. Only 18 percent of individuals aged 16 here and in England reported having never drank alcohol or claiming to be a non-drinker in 2017. Non-drinkers were more prevalent in the younger (16-24) and older (75+) demographics (ONS, 2017).

In a survey conducted in 2017, 57% of British adults (those 16 and older) admitted to drinking alcohol at least once a week. Men’s alcohol consumption dropped from 72 percent in 2005 to 62 percent in 2017, while women’s consumption dropped from 57 percent in 2005 to 52 percent in 2017 (ONS, 2018).  

More than two-thirds of people who had used alcohol in Great Britain in 2017 were classified as binge drinkers depending on the most heavy drinking day of the week prior to the interview (28.7 percent of men and 25.6 percent of women). This was considered as eight units or more for males and six units or more for women during their heaviest drinking day. When it comes to the amount of alcohol that males in Great Britain drink on their busiest drinking days, 51% consumed between 4-8 units and another 29% consumed more than 8 units during their heaviest drinking days in the past week in 2017. On their heaviest drinking day, 52 percent of British women who drank alcohol in the previous week of 2017 consumed between three and six units, and 26 percent drank more than six units (ONS, 2018). 

In contrast to younger individuals, those 65 and older drink far more than any other age group, but they also consume more units each occasion. People over the age of 65 in the United Kingdom have a higher rate of alcohol abuse than those between the ages of 16 and 24. (21 percent of men and 13 percent of women). In the previous week, 48% of those aged 16-24 admitted to drinking alcohol, compared to 55% of those aged 65 and above. 16 Men and women in the United Kingdom consumed more than 12 and 9 units of alcohol, respectively, on their most significant drinking days in the previous week. In all, 14% of the participants were abstainers. Six percent of men and three percent of women over 65 who had drank in the prior week consumed more than 12 and 9 units of alcohol on their heaviest drinking day, respectively. There were just 2% of people in this age group who had consumed that much alcohol. Household spending on alcohol consumption in the home is expected to reach £8.70 per week in 2018, whilst spending on alcohol consumption outside the home is expected to reach £8.00 per week in 2018. It increased by 2.8 percent from £6.26 to £6.44.24 per person per week between 2013 and 2016/17. Consumption outside the home has grown by 1.7% to £3.07 per person per week, whilst consumption within the home has increased by 40% to £3.02. All of these improvements, however, were not statistically noteworthy (Government, 2021). Overall, alcoholic beverages in the United Kingdom have been more inexpensive since 1987, with an increase of roughly 64% since 2008, and 3.2 percent since 2008 (NHS, 2019). Adults’ discretionary income and the cost of alcohol are considered ‘affordability’ (base year 1987).

Alcohol represented an average of 8.4% of the calorie intake for people aged 19 to 64 in the UK who maintained a diary of meals and drinks consumption over four consecutive days (ONS, 2018). More than 80% of UK individuals surveyed in 2014 by the Royal Society for Public Health didn’t know or underestimated the amount of calories in a big glass of wine, while over 60% didn’t know or overestimated the number of calories in a pint of beer, according to the results of the poll (ONS, 2018).

Alcohol use disorders and other mental illnesses have a high degree of comorbidity. Overlapping symptoms, individual differences in the timing of onset, and reporting methods that are not uniform across studies and groups make it difficult to determine how much one symptom precedes or follows the other. From a therapeutic standpoint, it is evident that numerous diseases, regardless of the sequence in which they manifest themselves, must be treated individually and collaboratively (McGovern and McLellan 2008). It is doubtful that treating simply one of the illnesses would result in successful mental recovery (Grant et al. 2004).

Finding out which components of the interventions were beneficial was difficult since studies typically lacked a precise description of the intervention. Psychological therapies, such as counselling and advice on behaviour, instructional materials, personalised risk reports, and diaries, were all important components that worked. There wasn’t enough information on these instruments to tell whether parts of the treatments were beneficial in particular. There was a lack of information on the control groups that got standard treatment.

Individuals may be able to rely on the support of those who are not close to them. Drinking behaviours may be linked to an individual’s social networks and groups that they belong to, as well as their workplace and age group. People’s attitudes and behaviours toward alcohol are influenced by their social context, and as a result, interventions and public health messaging may have an impact. Future studies might examine the role of family and social networks in a successful intervention for older adults.

Conclusion 

Humans have been using alcohol for thousands of years, and many individuals do so in a responsible manner and without experiencing any substantial negative consequences. Furthermore, it is a psychotropic chemical that may be addictive. ‘Alcohol intake is a contributing factor to more than 200 diseases and injury situations,’ according to the World Health Organization (WHO). ‘Drinking any quantity of alcohol raises the risk of a spectrum of malignancies,’ according to the UK governments updated recommendations for alcohol consumption, which were issued in January 2016. Drinking excessive amounts of alcohol can have immediate negative consequences like intoxication, intoxication-related deaths, and even death from alcohol poisoning, but chronic alcohol use can lead to a wide scope of physical and mental health problems, including organ damage. This is evident from the literature review discussed earlier.

The liver, which processes the majority of alcohol in the human body, is the most vulnerable organ to alcohol abuse. Heavy drinking may result in alcoholic fatty liver or liver inflammation, and the scarring that results from these conditions can progress to cirrhosis and prevent the organ from performing its functions effectively. However, due to the liver’s resilience, symptoms may not appear until the damage has progressed very far. Cirrhosis is a common co-factor in the majority of liver cancer cases. The pancreas may become inflamed as a result of heavy drinking, which is known as pancreatitis. Drinking excessive amounts of alcohol may result in both acute – short-term – as well as chronic pancreatitis, the latter of which is often induced by years of excessive alcohol intake (acute pancreatitis).

Alcohol use in excess is a contributing factor to hypertension (high blood pressure), which is a risk factor for cardiovascular events such as heart attacks, and/or heart failure, stroke, aneurysms, renal disease, and other health problems. Additionally, alcohol is linked to a variety of malignancies, including those of the digestive tract, breast, larynx or throat. Cells’ capacity to self-repair is hindered when they are damaged by acetaldehyde, which the body generates from drinking. Oestrogen (which has an influence on cell division) and the carcinogenic substances in cigarettes may be more easily absorbed into a person’s body if they drink alcohol.

As a depressant, alcohol may help alleviate tension and lower inhibitions in the short term, making it tempting to certain persons with social anxiety concerns. Regular drinking, on the other hand, may lead to an increase in anxiety and despair, which can lead to a cycle of self-medication. “Alcohol alters brain chemistry and increases the likelihood of depression,” says one study.

The physical changes that occur in older individuals, such as the loss of a loved one or the loss of a job or a home, suggest that alcohol may have a more negative impact on their health. Several members of the ‘baby boomer’ generation had grown up in a culture of excessive drinking in the United Kingdom, which has an ageing population. People between the ages of 40 and 64 are now the most prone to be drinking at “higher” or “increasing” risk levels, and they are also the most likely to keep up these practises as they become older. The majority of men (60-64 years old) and the majority of women (55-59 years old) died as a result of alcohol-related causes in the United Kingdom.

As individuals age, their systems become less able to break down alcohol, making them more susceptible to alcoholism. Retirement, boredom, grief, isolation and loneliness may all lead older people to adopt unhealthy drinking habits. As a result, the side effects may be more severe, and users may have a lesser tolerance for them. There is less water to dilute the alcohol eaten as individuals become older, as well as a drop in blood flow to the liver and a decrease in liver enzyme effectiveness as a result of the lower water to fat ratio in the body. Older persons are more prone to alcohol-related falls and other mishaps because of their slower response times. The statistical analysis in the literature review section above shows that 27% of males in the UK are classified as binge drinkers, which raises the chance of acquiring Alzheimer’s disease and other common kinds of dementia, such as vascular dementia.

There are many other elements that contribute to the likelihood that a person may develop an addiction to alcohol, in addition to the amount and frequency of alcohol consumption. There are several factors that may influence the development and prognosis of alcoholism. These include gender and family history, comorbid mental and drug abuse problems, and age. This aspect makes studying alcoholism much more difficult. To the best of our ability, we would want to create a simple layout demonstrating the interplay of these variables and outlining the many categories into which they could be categorised. This is impossible to convey in a comprehensible and meaningful way because of the intricacy of these relationships. Increased risk is often related with rising age, for example. Cohort studies, on the other hand, imply that growing older may no longer be as protective as it previously was. Social–cultural concerns may thereby counteract the previously established benefits of healthy ageing, as they interact with our existing attitudes about ageing. Furthermore, it is impossible to analyse psychiatric comorbidity in its whole without taking into account a person’s family history and gender. There are no “endless” circles of modulators addressed in this study, but rather a complicated system of interrelated elements that is difficult to depict.

No matter how tough it may be to navigate such a complicated system at times, there are several opportunities for intervention and therapy. Complexity indicates that there is no one moment at which such attempts may be successful. Treatment (in its broadest sense) may take place in a variety of settings and use a variety of approaches, including behavioural, sociocultural, and pharmaceutical. Programmatic hypothesis-driven research, on the other hand, must be used to find these intersections underlying treatment methods.

Research on treatments for older people’s alcohol use has indicated that, despite a growing body of data, there will be a need for more investigation into the topic, especially to determine which interventions are most effective for older people. Elderly persons are not the primary target of current treatments. Bereavement, social isolation, loneliness, and a lack of employment are all factors that may have an impact on alcohol intake in the elderly. This association between ageing and patterns of alcohol use needs to be explored more, as does how alcohol intake changes over time, paying particular attention to the various phases of old age and circumstances such as retirement.

Alcohol-related injuries and accidents, particularly those caused by drink-driving, may be included to this vast variety of physical and mental health issues. Almost half of the victims of violent crimes believe that the perpetrators were under the influence of alcohol when the event occurred, according to the Annual Crime Survey for England and Wales. Financial, career, and housing challenges, as well as problems in personal relationships and in parenting, are all possible outcomes of alcoholism. In England, an estimated two million children are now living with a parent who is a heavy drinker.

Alcohol is well-known to cause health issues, but the extent and scope of those damages are significantly greater than many of us anticipate. A number of major health hazards are associated with heavy drinking in general. Individual’s hazards are clearly and thoroughly explained in this special study, along with guidance for those who are likely to face them on a daily basis. Drinking too much may cause more than just liver damage, as this research has shown us. It has only recently been acknowledged that it has a negative influence on mental health, hypertension, or cancer risk. There is little doubt that many persons reading this supplement will be working with people who are drinking at amounts well beyond those set forth in the recommendations. A guidance like this is necessary since the indicators of danger are not always visible. This research shows that understanding and knowledge are the cornerstones. Because non-specialists aren’t expected to deliver precise diagnoses, this study’s most significant takeaway is that patients should make an appointment with their primary care physician (PCP). Although it’s important to know what some of the symptoms look like and what questions to ask, it’s even more important to know what to watch out for. Early involvement is critical in all situations in order to avert possibly terrible outcomes down the road. Anyone who works with people who face health consequences from their drinking, as well as those people themselves, can benefit much from the guidance provided here.

A large percentage of the general population who are in good health see the dentist on a regular basis. Research shows that providing patients with information about their alcohol health risks and suggestions for lowering their intake has a positive impact on their overall alcohol consumption.

In contrast to NICE guidelines, which advises that individuals who are dependent drinkers need behavioural counselling employing motivational interviewing or cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) as part of a package of treatment, IBA is useful for non-dependent drinkers in reducing risk. Adults who have been detected as alcohol misusers by screening in primary care settings may benefit from behavioural counselling, although the quality of the evidence supporting this claim is poor to low. Pregnant women’s behavioural treatments have inconsistent results, according to research. Compared to limited or no intervention, brief interventions may decrease alcohol use for those who are dangerous and destructive drinkers. Longer-term therapies are unlikely to provide any significant advantages.

The detrimental impacts of alcohol consumption on a community may lead to a variety of local initiatives and solutions. It’s possible for governments and other groups to let local communities use their local knowledge and expertise to come up with effective ways to stop and reduce harmful drinking. They can also be mindful of cultural norms, beliefs, or value systems or systems of values when doing this.

Policy ideas and initiatives in this area include the following:

• Facilitating community-level evaluations to identify gaps and priorities for action.
• developing suitable effective and cost-efficient solutions to the local determinants of hazardous use of alcoholic beverages and associated issues at the community level.
• Support and promote the establishment of municipal policies to prevent hazardous alcohol consumption, as well as their ability to expand relationships and networks with community institutions and non-profit groups.
• Establishing community ability to undertake effective community-based interventions and distributing information about them.
• Getting communities to work together to stop people under the age of 21 from buying alcohol and drinking alcohol, and to make alcohol-free places, especially for youth as well as other groups at risk, more common.
• Caring for and supporting people and their families in the community.
• Community-based programmes and policies for vulnerable groups such as youth, jobless people and indigenous communities; specialised challenges such as the manufacture and distribution of illegal or informal-alcohol drinks; and events at the community level like athletic competitions and town festivals.

Addolorato, G., Mirijello, A., Leggio, L., Ferrulli, A. and Landolfi, R., 2013. Management of alcohol dependence in patients with liver disease. CNS drugs, 27(4), pp.287-299.

Agrawal, A. and Lynskey, M.T., 2008. Are there genetic influences on addiction: evidence from family, adoption and twin studies. Addiction, 103(7), pp.1069-1081.

Alcohol Change UK, 2021. Alcohol statistics | Alcohol Change UK. [online] Alcohol Change UK. Available at: <https://alcoholchange.org.uk/alcohol-facts/fact-sheets/alcohol-statistics> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

Baer, J.S., 1991. Implications for early intervention from a biopsychosocial perspective on addiction. Behaviour Change, 8(2), pp.51-59.

Baraona, E., Abittan, C.S., Dohmen, K., Moretti, M., Pozzato, G., Chayes, Z.W., Schaefer, C. and Lieber, C.S., 2001. Gender differences in pharmacokinetics of alcohol. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25(4), pp.502-507.

Bhattacharya, A., 2019. Financial headache: the cost of workplace hangovers and intoxication to the UK economy.

Billioux, V.G., Chandra, A., Copen, C.E. and Sionean, C., 2012. HIV risk-related behaviors in the United States household population aged 15-44 years; data from the National survey of family growth, 2002 and 2006-2010.

Böckerman, P., Hyytinen, A. and Maczulskij, T., 2017. Alcohol consumption and long?term labor market outcomes. Health economics, 26(3), pp.275-291.

Borsari, B. and Carey, K.B., 2006. How the quality of peer relationships influences college alcohol use. Drug and alcohol review, 25(4), pp.361-370.

Brown, S.A., McGue, M., Maggs, J., Schulenberg, J., Hingson, R., Swartzwelder, S., Martin, C., Chung, T., Tapert, S.F., Sher, K. and Winters, K.C., 2008. A developmental perspective on alcohol and youths 16 to 20 years of age. Pediatrics, 121(Supplement_4), pp.S290-S310.

Carlson, S.R., Iacono, W.G. and McGue, M., 2002. P300 amplitude in adolescent twins discordant and concordant for alcohol use disorders. Biological Psychology, 61(1-2), pp.203-227.

CDC, 2020. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. [online] Cdc.gov. Available at: <https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

CDC, 2020. Chronic Disease Indicators (CDI) | DPH | CDC. [online] Cdc.gov. Available at: <https://www.cdc.gov/cdi/index.html> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

Centre for diseases and control prevention, 2020. Alcohol and Public Health. [Online]. Available from: www.cdc.gov. [Accessed on 30^th June 2021].

Committee on Substance Abuse, 1995. Alcohol use and abuse: a pediatric concern. Pediatrics, 95(3), pp.439-442.

Crabbe, J.C., 2002. Alcohol and genetics: new models. American journal of medical genetics, 114(8), pp.969-974.

Crane, C.A., Godleski, S.A., Przybyla, S.M., Schlauch, R.C. and Testa, M., 2016. The proximal effects of acute alcohol consumption on male-to-female aggression: A meta-analytic review of the experimental literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(5), pp.520-531.

Davies, J. and Stacey, B., 1972. Alcohol and health education in schools. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, pp.1-7.

Dettling, A., Fischer, F., Böhler, S., Ulrichs, F., Skopp, G., Graw, M. and Haffner, H.T., 2007. Ethanol elimination rates in men and women in consideration of the calculated liver weight. Alcohol, 41(6), pp.415-420.

Diehl, A., Croissant, B., Batra, A., Mundle, G., Nakovics, H. and Mann, K., 2007. Alcoholism in women: is it different in onset and outcome compared to men?. European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 257(6), pp.344-351.

ELFH, 2021. Alcohol and Tobacco Brief Interventions – elearning for healthcare. [online] elearning for healthcare. Available at: <https://www.e-lfh.org.uk/programmes/alcohol-and-tobacco-brief-interventions/> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

Eliason, M., 2014. Alcohol-related morbidity and mortality following involuntary job loss: Evidence from Swedish register data. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 75(1), pp.35-46.

Erol, A. and Karpyak, V.M., 2015. Sex and gender-related differences in alcohol use and its consequences: Contemporary knowledge and future research considerations. Drug and alcohol dependence, 156, pp.1-13.

Field, M., Puddephatt, J.A., Goodwin, L., Owens, L., Reaves, D. and Holmes, J., 2020. Benefits of temporary alcohol restriction: a feasibility randomized trial. Pilot and feasibility studies, 6(1), pp.1-15.

French, M.T., Maclean, J.C., Sindelar, J.L. and Fang, H., 2011. The morning after: alcohol misuse and employment problems. Applied economics, 43(21), pp.2705-2720.

Frone, M.R., 2006. Prevalence and distribution of alcohol use and impairment in the workplace: a US national survey. Journal of studies on alcohol, 67(1), pp.147-156.

Gilbertson, R., Prather, R. and Nixon, S.J., 2008. The role of selected factors in the development and consequences of alcohol dependence. Alcohol Research & Health, 31(4), p.389.

Gomberg, E.L., 1993. Women and alcohol: use and abuse. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

Government, 2012. Family food datasets. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: <https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/family-food-datasets> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

Hawkins, J.D., Catalano, R.F. and Miller, J.Y., 1992. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), p.64.

Health Direct, 2021. How Alcohol Affects your Health. [Online]. Available From: https://www.healthdirect.gov.au. [Accessed on 5^th July 2021].

Hemmingsson, T. and Weitoft, G.R., 2001. Alcohol-related hospital utilization and mortality in different occupations in Sweden in 1991-1995. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, pp.412-419.

Hernandez-Avila, C.A., Rounsaville, B.J. and Kranzler, H.R., 2004. Opioid-, cannabis-and alcohol-dependent women show more rapid progression to substance abuse treatment. Drug and alcohol dependence, 74(3), pp.265-272.

Kaila-Kangas, L., Koskinen, A., Pensola, T., Mäkelä, P. and Leino-Arjas, P., 2016. Alcohol-induced morbidity and mortality by occupation: a population-based follow-up study of working Finns. The European Journal of Public Health, 26(1), pp.116-122.

Kully?Martens, K., Denys, K., Treit, S., Tamana, S. and Rasmussen, C., 2012. A review of social skills deficits in individuals with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and prenatal alcohol exposure: profiles, mechanisms, and interventions. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(4), pp.568-576.

Lesch, O.M., Walter, H., Wetschka, C., Hesselbrock, M.N., Hesselbrock, V. and Pombo, S., 2020. Diagnosis of abuse and addiction. In Alcohol and Tobacco (pp. 61-84). Springer, Cham.

Lubin, J.H., Purdue, M., Kelsey, K., Zhang, Z.F., Winn, D., Wei, Q., Talamini, R., Szeszenia-Dabrowska, N., Sturgis, E.M., Smith, E. and Shangina, O., 2009. Total exposure and exposure rate effects for alcohol and smoking and risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. American journal of epidemiology, 170(8), pp.937-947.

Lucas, P., Fleming, J. and Bhosale, J., 2018. The utility of case study as a methodology for work-integrated learning research. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), pp.215-222.

Mandell, W., Eaton, W.W., Anthony, J.C. and Garrison, R., 1992. Alcoholism and occupations: a review and analysis of 104 occupations. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 16(4), pp.734-746.

Mann, K., Ackermann, K., Croissant, B., Mundle, G., Nakovics, H. and Diehl, A., 2005. Neuroimaging of gender differences in alcohol dependence: are women more vulnerable?. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(5), pp.896-901.

McGovern, M.P., Lambert-Harris, C., Gotham, H.J., Claus, R.E. and Xie, H., 2014. Dual diagnosis capability in mental health and addiction treatment services: an assessment of programs across multiple state systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(2), pp.205-214.

Mohajan, H.K., 2018. Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), pp.23-48.

Munn, Z., Peters, M.D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. and Aromataris, E., 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), pp.1-7.

Newbury-Birch, D., 2009. Impact of alcohol consumption on young people: A systematic review of published reviews.

Ngozwana, N., 2018. Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research methodology: Researcher’s reflections. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(1), pp.19-28.

NHS, 2019. Statistics on Alcohol, England, 2019. [online] Files.digital.nhs.uk. Available at: <https://files.digital.nhs.uk/12/E3B2A2/alc-eng-2019-app.pdf> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M. and White, D. B. 2017. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. [Online]. Available From: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1609406917733847. [Accessed on 7^th January, 2022].

ONS, 2017. Health Survey for England 2017 [NS] – NHS Digital. [online] NHS Digital. Available at: <https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2017> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

ONS, 2018. Adult drinking habits in Great Britain. [online] Ons.gov.uk. Available at: <https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/drugusealcoholandsmoking/datasets/adultdrinkinghabits> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

ONS, 2018. NDNS: results from years 7 and 8 (combined). [online] GOV.UK. Available at: <https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ndns-results-from-years-7-and-8-combined> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

Pinkhasov, R.M., Wong, J., Kashanian, J., Lee, M., Samadi, D.B., Pinkhasov, M.M. and Shabsigh, R., 2010. Are men shortchanged on health? Perspective on health care utilization and health risk behavior in men and women in the United States. International journal of clinical practice, 64(4), pp.475-487.

Plant, M. and Plant, M., 2001. Young people and alcohol. NT Research, 6(6), pp.887-897.

Randall, C.L., Johnson, M.R., Thevos, A.K., Sonne, S.C., Thomas, S.E., Willard, S.L., Brady, K.T. and MD, J.R.D., 2001. Paroxetine for social anxiety and alcohol use in dual?diagnosed patients. Depression and anxiety, 14(4), pp.255-262.

Regier, D.A., Farmer, M.E., Rae, D.S., Locke, B.Z., Keith, S.J., Judd, L.L. and Goodwin, F.K., 1990. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study. Jama, 264(19), pp.2511-2518.

Rehm, J. 2011. The Risks Associated with Alcohol Use and Alcoholism. [Online]. Available From: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. [Accessed on 30^th June 2021].

Rehm, J., Shield, K.D. and Weiderpass, E., 2020. Alcohol consumption. A leading risk factor for cancer. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 331, p.109280.

Roche, A.M., Pidd, K., Berry, J.G. and Harrison, J.E., 2008. Workers’ drinking patterns: the impact on absenteeism in the Australian work?place. Addiction, 103(5), pp.738-748.

Romeri, E., Baker, A. and Griffiths, C., 2007. Alcohol-related deaths by occupation, England and Wales, 2001-05. Health Stat Q, 35, pp.6-12.

Rosario, F. M. 2019. Implementation Screening and Brief Interventions for Alcohol Consumption to Primary in Primary Health Care. [Online]. Available From: https://scholargoo,gle.co.uk. [Accessed on 6^th January, 2022].

Rose, R.J., 1998. A developmental behavior-genetic perspective on alcoholism risk. Alcohol Health and Research World, 22(2), p.131.

Russell, M., Windle, M. and Searles, J.S., 1990. Children of alcoholics: critical perspectives.

Rutter, M., 2007. Proceeding from observed correlation to causal inference: The use of natural experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), pp.377-395.

Safe, S., 2007. Social: The next steps in the National Alcohol Strategy. Department of Health, Home Office, Department for Education and Skills, Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

Samokhvalov, A.V., Popova, S., Room, R., Ramonas, M. and Rehm, J., 2010. Disability associated with alcohol abuse and dependence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(11), pp.1871-1878.

Schmidt, M.T. and Hankoff, L.D., 1979. ADOLESCENT ALCOHOL-ABUSE AND ITS PREVENTION. Public Health Reviews, 8(2), pp.107-153.

Scholes, S. and Gebert, S., 2019. Health Survey for England 2018: Adults’ Health. Health and Social Care Information Centre.

Settertobulte, W., Bruun Jensen, B., Hurrelmann, K. and World Health Organization, 2001. Drinking among young Europeans (No. EUR/ICP/IVST 06 03 05 (C)). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Spear, L.P., 2002. The adolescent brain and the college drinker: biological basis of propensity to use and misuse alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, (14), pp.71-81.

Statista, 2022. Alcohol units consumed in England by gender & age 2019 | Statista. [online] Statista. Available at: <https://www.statista.com/statistics/369808/alcohol-units-consumed-by-gender-and-age-in-england/> [Accessed 10 March 2022].

Sullivan, E.V., Fama, R., Rosenbloom, M.J. and Pfefferbaum, A., 2002. A profile of neuropsychological deficits in alcoholic women. Neuropsychology, 16(1), p.74.

Taherdoost, H., 2016. Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research (August 10, 2016).

Thompson, A. and Pirmohamed, M., 2021. Associations between occupation and heavy alcohol consumption in UK adults aged 40–69 years: a cross-sectional study using the UK Biobank. BMC public health, 21(1), pp.1-12.

Unit, S., 2003. Alcohol harm reduction project: Interim analytical report. Crown copyright. London.

Wadd, S. and Galvani, S., 2014. Working with older people with alcohol problems: insight from specialist substance misuse professionals and their service users. Social work education, 33(5), pp.656-669.

Wadd, S., Lapworth, K., Sullivan, M.P., Forrester, D. and Galvani, S., 2011. Working with older drinkers. University of Bedfordshire.

Weishaar, H., Dorfman, L., Freudenberg, N., Hawkins, B., Smith, K., Razum, O. and Hilton, S., 2016. Why media representations of corporations matter for public health policy: a scoping review. BMC public health, 16(1), pp.1-11.

World Health Organization, 2019. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. World Health Organization.

Zeigler, D.W., Wang, C.C., Yoast, R.A., Dickinson, B.D., McCaffree, M.A., Robinowitz, C.B. and Sterling, M.L., 2005. The neurocognitive effects of alcohol on adolescents and college students. Preventive medicine, 40(1), pp.23-32.

Zhao, J., Stockwell, T., Roemer, A. and Chikritzhs, T., 2016. Is alcohol consumption a risk factor for prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta–analysis. BMC cancer, 16(1), pp.1-13.

Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J. and Andriukaitien?, R., 2018. Philosophy and paradigm of scientific research. Management culture and corporate social responsibility, 121.