Calculation of Overhead Rate – Traditional Costing
PART A
a) |
Overhead Rate |
= |
Total Overheads |
|
(As per Traditional Costing) |
Total Direct Labor Costs |
|||
= |
$ 960,000 |
($ 640000 + $ 320000) |
||
$ 600,000 |
($ 180000 + $ 420000) |
|||
Overhead Rate per $ |
= |
1.6 |
per $ of labor costs |
|
Allocation of Overhead Costs |
||||
(As per Traditional Costing) |
Vegie Grow |
Flower Food |
||
Director Labour Costs |
(Given) |
$ 180,000 |
$ 420,000 |
|
Overhead Rate per $ |
(Calculated Above) |
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
Allocated Overheads |
|
$ 288,000 |
$ 672,000 |
PART B
b) |
Overhead Rate for Processing |
= |
Total Overheads of Processing |
|
(As per ABC Approach) |
Total No of Kilograms |
|||
= |
$ 640,000 |
(Given) |
||
$ 512,000 |
kg |
|||
Overhead Rate per kg |
= |
1.25 |
per kg |
|
Overhead Rate for Packaging |
= |
Total Overheads of Packaging |
||
(As per ABC Approach) |
Total No of units Packaged |
|||
= |
$ 320,000 |
(Given) |
||
$ 200,000 |
units |
|||
Overhead Rate per unit |
= |
1.6 |
per units |
|
Allocation of Overhead Costs |
||||
(As per ABC Approach) |
Vegie Grow |
Flower Food |
||
Kilograms Processed |
(Given) |
192000 kg |
320000 kg |
|
Overhead Rate per kg |
(Calculated Above) |
1.25 |
1.25 |
|
Allocated Overheads of Processing |
$ 240,000 |
$ 400,000 |
||
Units Packaged |
(Given) |
90000 units |
110000 units |
|
Overhead Rate per kg |
(Calculated Above) |
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
Allocated Overheads of Packaged |
$ 144,000 |
$ 176,000 |
||
Total Allocated Overheads |
|
$ 384,000 |
$ 576,000 |
PART C
Cost driver for activity polls will selected on the discretion of the management of the company. The appropriate cost driver will be selected on the basis of associated variables relating to the manufacturing overheads incurred. The appropriate cost driver selection can be done with appropriate parameters which are identification of cost object, identified and investigate potential cost driver with associate expense, calculation correlation of cost driver with overheads, measurement of cost with use of cost driver and effect on management control over cost driver and overheads.
QUESTION 2
a) |
Overhead Rate for Scheduling and Travel |
= |
Total Overheads of Scheduling and Travel |
|
Total Hours of Travel |
||||
= |
$ 85,000 |
(Given) |
||
1250 |
hours |
|||
Overhead Rate per hour |
= |
68 |
per hour |
|
Overhead Rate for Setup time |
= |
Total Overheads of Setup time |
||
Total No of setups |
||||
= |
$ 90,000 |
(Given) |
||
600 |
hours |
|||
Overhead Rate per hour |
= |
150 |
per hour |
|
Overhead Rate for Supervision |
= |
Total Overheads of Supervision |
||
Total Direct Labor Costs |
||||
= |
$ 60,000 |
(Given) |
||
$ 400,000 |
($ 100000 + $ 300000) |
|||
Overhead Rate per $ |
= |
0.15 |
per $ of labor costs |
|
Allocation of Overhead Costs |
||||
Commercial |
Residential |
|||
Scheduling and Travel Hours |
(Given) |
750 hours |
500 hours |
|
Overhead Rate per hour |
(Calculated Above) |
68 |
68 |
|
Allocated Overheads of Scheduling and Travel |
$ 51,000 |
$ 34,000 |
||
Setup time |
(Given) |
350 hours |
250 Hours |
|
Overhead Rate per hour |
(Calculated Above) |
150 |
150 |
|
Allocated Overheads of Setup Time |
$ 52,500 |
$ 37,500 |
||
Director Labor Costs |
(Given) |
$ 100,000 |
$ 300,000 |
|
Overhead Rate per $ |
(Calculated Above) |
0.15 |
0.15 |
|
Allocated Overheads of Supervision |
$ 15,000 |
$ 45,000 |
||
Total Allocated Overheads |
|
$ 118,500 |
$ 116,500 |
PART B
b) |
OPERATING INCOME TUDOR DESIGNS |
||||
Commercial |
Residential |
||||
Revenues |
$ 300,000 |
$ 480,000 |
|||
Less: |
|||||
Direct Material Costs |
$ 30,000 |
$ 50,000 |
|||
Direct Labor Costs |
$ 100,000 |
$ 300,000 |
|||
Overheads Costs as per ABC approach |
$ 118,500 |
$ 248,500 |
$ 116,500 |
$ 466,500 |
|
Operating Income |
|
$ 51,500 |
|
$ 13,500 |
PART C
The controller of the company should allocate the overheads costs on the basis of ABC approach where she should allocate the cost of indirect manufacturing overheads according to their cost drivers so that both the product line will show the accurate results in terms of profitability.
PART 2
QUESTION 1
Oceania Limited |
|||||
a) |
Statement of Net Income |
||||
Spotter |
Snooker |
Stunner |
Total |
||
Sales |
$ 300,000 |
$ 500,000 |
$ 200,000 |
$ 1,000,000 |
|
Less: Variable Expenses |
$ 150,000 |
$ 200,000 |
$ 145,000 |
$ 495,000 |
|
Contribution |
$ 150,000 |
$ 300,000 |
$ 55,000 |
$ 505,000 |
|
Less: Separate Fixed Costs |
$ 30,000 |
$ 80,000 |
$ 35,000 |
$ 145,000 |
|
Income before common Fixed Costs |
$ 120,000 |
$ 220,000 |
$ 20,000 |
$ 360,000 |
|
Less: Common Fixed Costs |
$ 90,000 |
$ 150,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 300,000 |
|
Net Income |
$ 30,000 |
$ 70,000 |
$ (40,000) |
$ 60,000 |
PART B
b) |
Oceania Limited |
|||
Statement of Net Income in case Stunner Discontinue |
||||
Spotter |
Snooker |
Total |
||
Sales |
$ 300,000 |
$ 500,000 |
$ 800,000 |
|
Less: Variable Expenses |
$ 150,000 |
$ 200,000 |
$ 350,000 |
|
Contribution |
$ 150,000 |
$ 300,000 |
$ 450,000 |
|
Less: Separate Fixed Costs |
$ 30,000 |
$ 80,000 |
$ 110,000 |
|
Income before common Fixed Costs |
$ 120,000 |
$ 220,000 |
$ 340,000 |
|
Less: Allocated Common Fixed Costs |
$ 112,500 |
$ 187,500 |
$ 300,000 |
|
Net Income |
$ 7,500 |
$ 32,500 |
$ 40,000 |
|
Allocation of Common Fixed Costs on remaining Product Line |
||||
Fixed Cost rate per $ of sales |
= |
Total Common Fixed Costs |
||
Total Sales of Product Lines |
||||
= |
$ 300,000 |
|||
$ 800,000 |
||||
Fixed Cost rate per $ of sale |
= |
$ 0.38 |
||
Spotter |
Snooker |
|||
Sales |
$ 300,000 |
$ 500,000 |
||
Fixed Costs Rate |
$ 0.38 |
$ 0.38 |
||
Allocated Fixed Costs |
$ 112,500 |
$ 187,500 |
PART C
Oceania Ltd should not stop the Stunner Product Line. The running of Stunner Product Line will give additional $ 20000 ($ 60000 -$ 40000) of Net Income to the company.
QUESTION 2
PART A
a) 1) |
Equivalents units of Production – Tennis rackets |
|||||
Units |
Equivalents Units |
|||||
Material |
Conversion Costs |
|||||
% |
Units |
% |
Units |
|||
Work in Process units, July 1 |
500 |
0% |
0 |
40% |
200 |
|
Started during the month |
400 |
100% |
400 |
100% |
400 |
|
Work in Process units, July 31 |
600 |
100% |
600 |
40% |
240 |
|
Total Units |
1500 |
1000 |
840 |
|||
Units |
||||||
Opening Work in Process |
500 |
|||||
Units started in Production |
1000 |
|||||
Less: Closing Work in Process |
600 |
|||||
Completed Units / Units Transferred |
900 |
|||||
Completed units |
900 |
|||||
Less: Opening Work in Process |
500 |
|||||
Started and completed during month |
400 |
a) 2) |
Materials |
Conversion Costs |
||
Total Costs |
$ 3,150 |
$ 3,420 |
||
Equivalent Units |
1000 |
840 |
||
Per Unit Cost |
|
$ 3.15 |
$ 4.07 |
|
Cost per Equivalent Unit |
= |
$ 7.22 |
||
Opening Conversion Costs |
$ 600 |
|||
Direct Labor |
$ 1,580 |
|||
Manufacturing Overheads |
$ 1,240 |
|||
Total Conversion Costs |
$ 3,420 |
|||
Opening Material Cost |
$ 750 |
|||
Added during month |
$ 2,400 |
|||
Total Material Costs |
$ 3,150 |
a) 3) |
Units Transferred |
Process at the end |
||
Material Units |
400 |
600 |
||
Per unit Cost |
$ 3.15 |
$ 3.15 |
||
Material Cost |
$ 1,260 |
$ 1,890 |
||
Conversion Cost Equivalent Units |
600 |
240 |
||
Per unit Cost |
$ 4.07 |
$ 4.07 |
||
Conversion Costs |
$ 2,442.86 |
$ 977.14 |
||
Total Costs |
|
$ 3,702.86 |
$ 2,867.14 |
PART B
Tasman Company Limited |
|||||
Production cost Report |
|||||
for the month ended on July 31, 2017 |
|||||
Physical Units |
Equivalents Units |
||||
Quantities |
Material |
Conversion Costs |
|||
Units to be accounted for |
|||||
Work in Process, July 1 |
500 |
||||
Units started into production |
1000 |
||||
Total Units |
1500 |
||||
Units accounted for |
|||||
Transferred Out |
|||||
From Wok in Process, July 1 |
500 |
0 |
200 |
||
Started and Completed in July |
400 |
400 |
400 |
||
Units transferred out |
900 |
||||
Work in Process, July 31 |
600 |
600 |
240 |
||
Total Units |
1500 |
600 |
240 |
||
Costs |
|||||
Material |
Conversion Costs |
Total |
|||
Units Costs |
|||||
Costs in July |
$ 3,150 |
$ 3,420 |
$ 6,570 |
||
Equivalent Units |
1000 |
840 |
|||
Unit Cost |
$ 3.15 |
$ 4.07 |
$ 7.22 |
||
Cost to be accounted for |
|||||
Work in Process, July 1 |
$ 750 |
$ 600 |
$ 1,350 |
||
Started into Production |
$ 2,400 |
$ 2,820 |
$ 5,220 |
||
Total Costs |
$ 6,570 |
||||
Cost Reconciliation Schedule |
|||||
Cost accounted for |
|||||
Transferred Out Units |
|||||
During the process |
|||||
Material |
(400 units X $ 3.15) |
$ 1,260.00 |
|||
Conversion Costs |
(600 units X $ 4.07) |
$ 2,442.86 |
$ 3,703 |
||
Work in Process, July 31 |
|||||
Material |
(600 units X $ 3.15) |
$ 1,890 |
|||
Conversion Costs |
(240 units X $ 4.07) |
$ 977 |
$ 2,867 |
||
Total Costs |
$ 6,570 |
PART C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Each user of the financial statements of the company has its own specifications and the expectations and it is the duty of the company to present their financial statements in such a manner that the users will be able to take their decision and the necessary action in due course of time. The presentation includes the financial reporting and the accounting information. The report has been framed with the three main aims. The first aim of the report is to understand as to what are the meaning of the accounting information and the financial reporting. The second main aim is to understand as to how both of the concepts are linked with detailing the results of the functions of the company. The last aim is to analyze how both of the concepts will help in enhancing the corporate governance of the company. With these aims and consideration, the report is being prepared having the appropriate headings and sub headings.
INTRODUCTION
Financial statements are the pillar of the organization of the basis of which many investors including the potential investors come for investing into the business of the company. If that particular pillar is weak then there will be the possibility that the company will in near future will be break down otherwise there will be the surety that the company will survive for future years to come. As the title suggests the report has been revolved around the two main concepts which are referred to as the accounting information and the financial reporting.
Allocation of Overhead Costs – Traditional Costing
The two quotations as mentioned in the question has been analysed in detail. The report has started with the meaning and the features of the accounting information. Then the meaning and the features of the financial reporting has been discussed. Thereafter the meaning of the corporate governance along with its significance in the company has been detailed and then the critical evaluation has been done as to how the two concepts of the accounting information and the financial reporting helps in the enhancing the corporate governance in the company. The report after the critical evaluation has been ended with the conclusion and recommendation. The data has been obtained from the reliable sources/
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION
MEANING
Accounting is the process whereby the following steps are taken:
- Recording of all the transactions that takes place
- Classifying the transactions with regard to the nature
- Summarizing the above in the prescribed manner
So as to interpret the results of the transactions so entered thereof. The transaction that has been so recorded, classified and summarized shall be of financial in nature. Non financial transactions are not recorded in any manner in the books of accounts. In other words, the accounting is the process of presenting the results of the transactions in the significant manner of the relevant period (Revsine, 2011).
FEATURES AND USES
The accounting information has the following features:
- It ensures the correct recording of all the transactions entered into by the company
- It ensures the inclusion of only the financial transactions in the books of accounts rather than the non financial transaction
- It caters the varying needs of the users of the accounting information and helps in bridging the gap between the information required by the users and information given by the accounting process.
The accounting information main use is that it helps the users of the information to take an informed decision and accordingly take the corrective action.
FINANCIAL REPORTING
MEANING
Financial reporting is defined as the step which starts from the end of the process of the accounting. It deals with the disclosure of the information in financial terms about the company to the various stakeholders of the company. The financial reporting is generated from the data obtained from the accounting process and if the data is reliable then the reporting will also be reliable otherwise the bad information will be provided to the users of the financial information which in turn will not be fruitful for the company.
Thus, financial reporting is the act which affects the decision making power of the various users of the financial report.
FEATURES AND USES
Following are the main feature of the financial reporting:
- The financial reporting is done in accordance with the defined accounting standards and accounting policies.
- The presentation of the financial reporting shall be made in the defined format as prescribed by the different statutes.
- It deals with the useful information and ensures in giving the information as required by the various stakeholders of the company (Aduda, 2013).
The main use of the financial reporting is that it helps the various stakeholders of the company to have the meaningful decision.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate means company and the governance means a mechanism through which the particular set of functions or the activities can be controlled. The term corporate governance is thus the mechanism whereby all the activities and functions of the company perform in the defined and the controlled manner. It is not related to the top level management of the company rather it consists of the members who have the power to form the policies and systems in the company and able to control the functioning of the company (Allen, 2012).
Calculation of Overhead Rate – ABC Approach
ENHANCEMENT WITH ACOUNTING INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL REPORTING
Each and every company is required to give the corporate governance statements. It details as to what is the composition of the board and how they are performing their functions and similar areas. Many companies in the last decade have been collapsed only because of the bad corporate governance due to which the severe accounting frauds have been committed by those companies. The major accounting frauds and the bad corporate governance has been highlighted in Lehman Brothers, HIH Insurance, ABC Learning, One Tel, Enron, Tyco and World Com and many more.
The case of the Enron has been widely known by the name of enronitis. This is has been named as the lethal virus only because of the fact that it has led wave of shock in the market and in the different industries due to which the other companies have started checking their own system as to whether their corporate governance is weak or strong. One failure on the part of the corporate governance is that then chief financial officer of the company has opened his own firms and has started doing the business with the company and also simultaneously has removed the amount which is required to be received from that firm by the company.
The extent of the power exercised by the chief financial officer is not good for the health of the company as this power is in excess. It is worth mentioning that in the year of 2002, it has been made clear that the Enron has fraudulently tried to manipulate the tricks in the places where the California has bought the electricity. It has also been said that the board composition of the company has been very bad as all the members does not have the good moral character and always engage themselves in the fraudulent activities (Dibra, 2016). The same has happened in the Lehman Brothers where the reverse repo transaction as against the accounting standard is being carried out and the same has been informed after 10 years. Thus, it shows that these like companies have the bad corporate governance in system.
If the financial reporting in these companies would have been good and represents the true and fair view of the financial position and the financial performance of the company then such corporate governance failure would not have happened in the accounting industry.
For enhancement of the financial reporting, the regulatory authorities have taken many measures including the introduction of the Auditing and Assurance Standard number 701 dealing with the communication of the key audit matters with the client in the independent auditor’s report.
If the financial reporting is good, then the chances of having the frauds in the accounting field will be very less and which in turn give the impression of having the sound and good corporate governance system in place.
In this manner, if the accounting information and the financial reporting is done in the manner as prescribed by the statutes and the financial performance and the position has been correctly stated then it will of course adds to the value of the corporate governance as present in the company.
The accounting information and the financial reporting are the two concepts which have been detail throughout the report. Many collapses have been occurred because of the error in the financial statements of the company which has been reported to the stakeholders for their reporting purposes. On analyzing the financial reporting, the importance of having the good corporate governance have been detailed and how the financial reporting helps in increasing the value of the corporate governance. The same has been evaluated critically with reference to the two quotations. At the end it has been concluded that the true and fair financial reporting along with the useful information enhances the corporate governance.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the companies shall have the system of having the good corporate governance and for that the financial reporting shall be done in accordance with the needs of the stakeholders of the company and the requirements of the applicable statutes including the accounting standards, auditing and assurance standards.
Aduda, (2013), “An empirical test of competiting corporate governance theories”, Accounting Review, 12(5), 54-59.
Allen, (2012). “A Comparative Theory of Corporate Governance”, Financial Institutional Journal, 51(6), 1-27.
Dibra R, (2016), “ Corporate Governance Failure: The case of Enron and Parmalat”,
Revsine, C., (2011), “Financial Reporting and Analysis”, Journal of Accounting, 25(6), 55-6