Overview of ESMA’s declarations on specific extracts
The news article “ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report” has been selected for the current report. This article is taken from the official website of IAS plus. An image of the chosen professional article is presented herein the appendix segment for reference.
The report takes into consideration the article pronounced “ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report” on April 30, 2018. Fundamentally, the chosen article considers the “European Securities and Markets Authority” and presents declaration on specific extracts that are derived from varied databases associated to specific enforcements. These enforcements are in particular carried out by different European decision enforcers. There are certain groups who are in charge of management of diverse decisions associated to varied standards and regulations of accounting that are necessarily inclusive of diverse directives.
The primary concern that is emphasized in the current report includes pronouncement of ESMA related to diverse information that is obtainable from diverse sources of data that are necessarily private in nature (“ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report”, 2018). The data presented in pronouncements are associated to enforcements on financial assertions. In itself, there are certain specific issues associated to the acquaintance and awareness regarding the degree of fortification of convergences of particular management and issuers related to the ones who utilizes financial data for implementation of regulations stipulated under International Financial Reporting Standard (abbreviated as IFRS). In addition to this, the professional news article has been selected for addressing specific disclosures of decisions associated to particular enforcements. This can address different respondents in the market and the treatment and systems of accounting associated to European enforcements. In essence, this might potentially take into consideration compliance with accounting standards prescribed by IFRS. Essentially, there are diverse categories of standards and regulations of accounting that is within the purview and range and are the ones that are approved by IFRS. Thus, the important issues can be considered to be inclusive of complete understanding of illustrations as well as standards of IFRS illustrated in EEA (“ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report”, 2018). The current report elucidated in detail regarding the European enforcers of financial assertions analysis and consequently addresses pecuniary assertions. However, it can be hereby observed that assertions are explicated by varied issuers with specific securities that are normally traded in a specific market that is fortified and is positioned in Europe and distinctly the ones that can organize the financial assertions as per necessities of IFRS.
Importance of compliance with IFRS accounting standards
Furthermore, the article under deliberation intends to analyse overall extent and degree of compliance to IFRS standards linked to specific requirements that are implemented for reporting. Essentially, ESMA designed a confidential catalogue of information for distinct decision associated to enforcements by different enforcers. The enforcers make use of the database for the purpose of nurturing fitting integration of IFRS directives and standards (“ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report”, 2018). The chosen article under consideration also intends to address specific disclosures and specific decisions of enforcements that are formulated for addressing varied partakers associated to the current market taking into account accounting treatment. Basically, the article also focuses on analysis of whether different treatments used in system of accounting can be considered to be within the range recognized as well as permitted by the IFRS regulations. In addition to this, ESMA also considers pronouncements of particular decisions as per intentions of the same. Thus, this component can be considered to be supportive in the process of stable application of standards of IFRS particularly within EU (European Union) (“ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report”, 2018).
There are different topics that are covered under this segment and are discussed in detail in this article. The accounting standard that is covered under the purview of enforcement discussed in the chosen article include IFRS 5 reflecting to different non-current assets that are primarily preserved for sales as chiefly discontinued actions consisting of subjects on classification of asset (“ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report”, 2018). However, it can be hereby witnessed that particular information can be added in this piece of illustration that has been taken into account. In particular, this permits analysis of assets or else the batch/group that is at disposal and is maintained necessarily for sales and are not specifically depreciated. This is enumerated at a relatively smaller value of carrying as per fair value by deducting particular cost that is related to the market.
The article mentions that IAS 7 is also taken into consideration in this article. In essence, this orients around illustration along with disclosures regarding restricted as well as limited balance of cash. Essentially, this article also takes in IAS 32 that indicates towards financial instruments and emphasized on manner of presentation (“ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report”, 2018). The current article under deliberation hereby addresses various significant notes that can be elucidated as liabilities that are presented in the particular section. In addition to this, this article is also inclusive of the standard IAS 1 that discusses about prioritizing disclosures presented in financial statements. in addition to this, IAS 36 also mentions about asset impairment that in turn helps in illustrating in thoroughly about particular rough calculation that are linked to prices that carries significant risk and directs the way to material adjustments linked to particularly carrying. Again, IFRS 13 focuses in calculation of fair value and on the other hand IAS 38 focuses on intangible assets that illustrate purchase price intent of specific cluster of assets that are acquired. Furthermore, it can be observed that IFRS 17 expounds distribution of diverse sections to shareholders. Additionally, IAS 10 concentrates on financial statement consolidation. In particular, this segment concentrates on augmentation of power of control over specific issuer to specific offer provided to the tender (“ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report”, 2018).
Discussion of specific disclosures and decisions of enforcements
As rightly indicated by Conner (2016), positive theory refers to particular rules as well as directives that emphasizes about modifications, processes of elimination along with development as per institutional integration of varied directions that are specifically related to the sector. In essence, this is said to influence corporation and consumer interests plus self interests of varied controlling agencies are taken into account for addressing regulatory approach. In essence, there are various interest groups of predominantly customers as well as makers who might even engage in clashes with each other for getting political advantages. Fundamentally, this specific model can be associated to the current professional article under deliberation since this document regarding enforcement that is inclusive of different regulations necessarily exerts influence on corporations, interests of clients as well as varied regulators. The article by ESMA links to positive theory of regulation as this help to analyse the emergence, modification along with abolishment together with institutional execution of industry specific directives. Also, this positive theory can be associated to this specific article as this notion of positive theory can assess why the specific regulation happens. Particularly, these notions of regulation comprises of theories of power of market, different theories on interest groups that illustrate interests of shareholders in regulation.
Again, it can also be hereby witnessed that public theory can be also associated to the present article under consideration. As rightly indicated by Conner (2016), public theory refers to perception regarding well being. Essentially, this helps in explanation of empirical validations that are available for the specific directive under consideration. Also this theory indicates towards the market with specific features, that might possibly become unproductive and might undergo failure is not rectified with specific regulations.
In addition to this, the theory has instituted an important assumption related to features of diverse regulators, use of complete data and fitting enforcement. In essence, this notion even relates to enforcements of the schemes that are obligatory for enhancement of welfare. Thus, this article that has been elucidated can be appropriately comprehended by way of implementation of theory on public interest and as per rules of positive theory (Birkland, 2015).
In this regard, it can be said that an important issue of the public interest notion is that analysing, the normative notion of economic welfare is utilizing positive explanatory notion of regulation.
Conclusion
The above mentioned report based on the article helps in gaining comprehensive understanding regarding decisions of enforcement that is pronounced by ESMA. In this context, it can be said that this theory can aid in carrying out analysis of decisions regarding enforcements associated to particular declarations with the intention of developing convergence of particularly management and illustrating varied issuers with relatable data on appropriate integration of standards and directives of IFRS.
Accounting standards covered under the purview of enforcement discussed in the article
Specific comment letters presented by the firms are taken into consideration for the current report and an image of the same is attached in the appendix. The current proposal is prepared as well as presented in relation to particular suggestions on standards/directives of accounting and consequently generates the base of augmentation of income statement as well as system of reporting of comprehensive earnings.
The draft prepared stresses on particular updates that can be carried out in the pronouncements for income and the report that can be designed for the comprehensive earnings. In essence, this can subsequently aid in generating a superior income assertion and in this way all the transactions within the income assertion can be analysed in an effectual manner. In essence, this development is necessary for eradicating all the errors present as well as intricacies involved in the process of developing and at the same time comprehending the declaration of income. As such, this can prove to be supportive in development of a process of effectual designing an income pronouncement and thereby help in better disclosure of comprehensive earnings of businesses.
This report concentrates on the comments of four different firms and their opinions presented regarding the exposure draft under consideration pronounced by the FASB. Essentially, this report has aided in generation of idea regarding analytical appraisal of the feedback of the companies presented in the comment letters. The feedback or in other words the comments can necessarily help in designing a precise solution that can be obtained by means of appraisal of the accounting regulations (Patten, 2014). Thus, this specific mechanism can prove to be supportive in responding to diverse issues. Moreover, this study also has the aim of presenting guiding principles associated to system of accounting that subsequently can assist in development of effectual standards for particularly accounting. Furthermore, this piece of writing also has intention to analyse diverse comments concerning agreement or disagreement of firms regarding the alterations proposed in the draft. This in turn can help in arriving at a conclusive outcome regarding efficacies of standard/regulation of accounting (Šodan & Aljinovi? Bara?, 2017).
Essentially, this report can aid in elucidating updates and systems of reporting of income in the income assertions. Subsequently this can assist in shielding as well as protecting sentiments of business concerns and this in turn can help in augmentation of level of efficiency of different functionalities of the firm and preservation of stable bond between firms. As such, this can change the whole state of affairs of business. Thus, different sorts of enhancement and updates linked to development of disclosure policy of accounting can be illustrated in an effective way. Seyam & Brickman (2016) mentioned that regulations of accounting along with standards addressees knowledge, perception, thoughts and ideas and this aids companies belonging to different industries to come forward and put forth their views in the comment letter. Okamoto (2017) suggests that the comments presented in response to questions regarding the draft can act as a form of feedback. Therefore, this can be regarded as an effectual procedure that can help in analysing the pros and cons of the proposal from the viewpoint of corporations and in the course help in enrichment of public interests. The pertinent as well as relatable questions that are mentioned in the format pronounced by FAAB are expounded illustratively by means of comments expressed (Huber, 2015). Also, it can be hereby observed that business concerns face accountability of expressing their opinions in the form of comments on questions presented in the form and explicate reason behind their disagreement/agreement to the proposal. Essentially, responding to numerous questions presented in the draft can also help in protection of interests of particularly public.
Positive and public theory of regulation
Essentially, it can be hereby mentioned that comments acquired from the firms chosen for the study can help in developing notions, ideas and awareness regarding consent or disapproval concerning suggested changes in regulation/directive of accounting. It is in this way, the comments from the firm can be taken into consideration in this present study.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is an USA based transnational tire manufacturing firm established during the year1898. The company produces tires for particularly automobiles, industrial trucks, motorcycles, SUVs (sports utility vehicles), light trucks, airplanes, cars for racing, farm apparatus as well as heavy earth-mover equipment. Analysis of the comments presented by this company replicates the fact that the company is not in support of the proposal offered by FASB. They have cited the fact that reclassification of assets along with necessities of transition can show the way to larger tax balances that is stranded and can mar the very purpose of the alteration proposed. However, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company although disapproves the proposal, they are in favour of the system of backward tracing that is necessarily proposed in the present draft. This is because the company believes that the company can eliminate stranded amount of tax and their influences from the arrangers of statement of firm’s earnings (Deegan, 2014).
Chevron Corporation is an USA based transnational energy firm that engaged in delivering oil, geothermal energy sectors, natural gas counting exploration as well as production of hydrocarbon; marketing, refining, chemicals manufacturing, transport and distribution, sales; plus generation of power. Analysis of comment of the firm Chevron Corporation reveals the fact that this firm has necessarily replied to all the framed questions. Also, the comment letters reflects sanction of the company regarding reclassification of assets. The company has approved the premise of reclassification of assets along with proposition of early adoption. However, regarding proposed date, the company has expressed its nod in this regard as well. It can be mentioned hereby that as regards reclassification, the company sanctions the proposal however expresses its concern over tax alterations in different international subsidiaries that can necessarily be affected by stranded amount of tax (Deegan, 2014).
The American Bankers Association (also referred to as ABA) is a USA based association of trade for the entire banking industry of U.S. Established in the year 1875, this firm reflects banks of different sizes as well as charters, counting community banks, local along with money centers. In addition to this, this entity also reflects diverse savings associations, mutual savings as well as trust firms with the mean member bank possessing roughly assets worth $250 million. In essence, the principal activities of this entity is lobbying, expertise plus professional development for varied member institutions, preservation of best exercises along with industry standards, education of consumers and proper distribution of varied financial products/services. In essence, this particular entity has the intention to detect all the concerns as well as issues associated to banks functioning in the United States of America and processes of preservation of the effectual structure (Conner, 2016). As per the draft presented by the Financial Accounting Standards Board associated to the current topic, it can thus be asserted that the association has appreciated overall opportunity to deliver their comment on the draft. They have provided their opinion regarding the planned regulation or in other words directives of accounting along with present guidance on system of accounting and accounting practices. They are of the view that accounting practices can generate a worth in firm’s proceeds acquired along with the outcomes achieved. In essence, this can misdirect the financiers and impose heavy burden on firm’s administration. However, the modifications undertaken cannot aid banks in their functionalities as the amount of tax that is necessarily stranded can influence bank’s capital (Buchholz, 2015). Based on the viewpoints presented by the firm it can be hereby said that the company does not sanction the proposal mentioned in the draft as they are of the view that these kinds of challenges in standards of accounting and financial transactions of different business corporations or else banks can be adversely affected. Subsequently, operations of these entities can also get unfavourably affected.
Comment letters presented by the firms for the current report
The Travellers Companies Inc that operates by offering causality and products or else services related to insurance of property to individuals as well as business presents their opinion in the comment letter. This company has supported the current draft as they are of the view that this guidelines mentioned in the draft can help in addressing distress of shareholders linked to current control of GAAP that talks about deferred tax (both tax assets as well as tax liabilities) (Birkland, 2015). In addition to this, this company also presents their approval regarding planned ASU that calls for the necessity of reclassification of assets particularly from gathered comprehensive earnings.
As mentioned by Anderson et al., (2016), Public interest theory of explains rules that in turn can protect the interests and deliver assistance and do good to public on the whole. Basically, this notions can be linked to welfare that certainly presents validation for explicit rules. In relation to the theories, regulations and policies of firms added to other economic facets show the way towards encouragement of interest of the community (Hoogervorst & Prada, 2015). Predominantly, in this circumstance, proposition for alteration has the plan to add to financial announcement and lessen stress and work pressure on essentially determined accountants. As a result, concept of public interest view can necessarily be considered to be on the whole effective in this circumstance because this specific proposal also intends to shields and defends interests as well as welfare of the community (Baudot et al., 2017). For that reason, the idea of Public interest is an economic theme linked to welfare that can help in theoretical validation for rules/regulation and can be regarded to be the most efficient theory in this context.
References
Anderson, U. L., Doxey, M. M., Geiger, M. A., Gist, W. E., Janvrin, D. J., & Polinski, P. W. (2016). Comments by the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on FASB Exposure Draft of Proposed Accounting Standard Update: Notes to Financial Statements (Topic 235): Assessing Whether Disclosures Are Material: Participating Committee Members. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(2), C1-C9.
Baudot, L., Roberts, R. W., & Wallace, D. M. (2017). An examination of the US public accounting profession’s public interest discourse and actions in federal policy making. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(2), 203-220.
Birkland, T. A. (2015). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Routledge.
Buchholz, A. K. (2015). A New Reporting Landscape on the Horizon. The CPA Journal, 85(6), 6.
Conner, B. (2016). FASB exposure draft highlights flexibility in financial statement presentation. Healthcare Financial Management, 70(3), 34-38.
Deegan, C. (2014). An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. Sustainability accounting and accountability, 248-272.
Deegan, C. (2014). Financial accounting theory (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill: Sydney.
Du, N. (2016). Why isn’t comprehensive income comprehensible?. Strategic Finance, 98(5), 46.
ESMA publishes 22nd enforcement decisions report. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.iasplus.com/en/news/2018/04/esma-enforcement-decisions
Fetterman, A. L. (2015). Commentary on FASB’s Proposed Changes to Nonprofit Financial Statements: Change Is Welcome, but Some Conclusions Should Be Revisited. The CPA Journal, 85(10), 13.
Hoogervorst, H. A. N. S., & Prada, M. I. C. H. E. L. (2015). Working in the public interest: The IFRS foundation and the IASB.
Huber, W. (2015). Public Accounting and the Myth of the Public Interest.
Okamoto, N. (2017). Norm entrepreneur lobbying and persuasion: A case study involving the IASB’s modification of an exposure draft. Research in Accounting Regulation, 29(2), 129-138.
Okamoto, N. (2017). Norm entrepreneur lobbying and persuasion: A case study involving the IASB’s modification of an exposure draft. Research in Accounting Regulation, 29(2), 129-138.
Patten, D. M. (2014). Environmental disclosure as legitimation: Is it in the public interest?. In Accounting for the public interest(pp. 201-215). Springer, Dordrecht.
Seyam, A. A., & Brickman, S. (2016). The new requirements relating to going concern evaluation and disclosure provide a critical improvement to the financial statements taken as a whole. International Journal of Business and Economic Development (IJBED), 4(1).
Šodan, S., & Aljinovi? Bara?, Ž. (2017). The role and current status of IFRS in the completion of national accounting rules–Evidence from Croatia. Accounting in Europe, 14(1-
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
