The Oz-Car Company: An Overview
One of the basic problems of the modern world is the tremendous amount of pollution level that is affecting the level of the world and its people. This increase in pollution by the transport system has led to the innovation of the pollution less cars that would be run on electric means and will be driverless in nature. According to Bunghez (2015 p 447-454), this kind of cars will not only benefit the new innovative vehicle trend that will be useful for the generation next but will also help to protect the environment from the harmful effects of pollution. However, the development of these cars and their use in the daily lives need the funding and support of the government which has been discussed in the report. The following paragraphs highlights the brief about the Oz-car company with the emphasis on the benefits and potential issues of the development of these cars with their probable recommendations. The report also analyses the reasons for the government to sponsor these car manufacturing for the betterment of the society.
Oz-Car is one of the principle trust or company which was established by the Australian government with an aim to sponsor loans and advances for the cars and vehicles. The company or the trust is involved in the Australian politics by providing car loans and finance to the government innovations as well in terms of automated transports. The company though was established on 2nd January 2009 on legal grounds, it started operation on 1st September 2009 (Ozcar.com.au. 2018). The solution is an alternative to the GE Money motors Solution which ceased operation due to a financial crisis in the Australian market.
The government of any country is primarily involved in the matters relating to the society and its welfare as it is entitled to do so according to the norms set by it. According to Kirkpatrick (2015 p 19-20), the government of any country, weather national or local is selected to make sure that the common people of the country are getting all the benefits of the country as well as are trying to invent or innovate newer measures for the benefit of the society in the prolonged time span. The investment and encouragement by the government of Australia for the benefit of the society is there for certain reasons which are mentioned as under –
- Public Safety – One of the prime reasons for the encouragement of the government for the automated cars is the reason of public safety. Due to automated cars, there are less chances of accidents due to the human negligence which as a result will impose more safety to the public in the course of time (Henderson & Spencer 2016 p 14). Due to the automated machinery in the cars, the cars will be able to control as well as maintain a safety line and would not speed up or cross the signals in an unethical manner. The major aim for any government organization is public safety which can be done by using the automated cars and this is one of the primary reasons to why the government will encourage the investment in Oz Car Company.
- Economy of the country – The second reason for the government to invest in the automated cars of Oz Car Company is the improvement of the economy of the country. According to Somers and Weeratunga (2015 p 665-668), the country is directed by industries and so if an industry is set to innovate the automated cars which will be driverless and will cause less pollution to the society, it will be associated with a number of other industries which will simultaneously increase the economy of the country in an effective manner.
- Technological advancement – The third reason for the federal government to invest in the automated cars is the technological advancement that will be caused by the car in the global sphere which will simultaneously make the country one of the most advanced and developed economies (Mladenovic & Abbas 2013 p 20176-2081). The technological advancement of the cars will make sure to attract potential industrialists from all parts of the globe which is positive for the country.
- Less labour cost – Due to the driverless function of the car, there will be less labour cost that will be borne by the government which will simultaneously make sure to reduce the expense of the government sector. In addition, for the employment purpose there is a particular human resource cost that is to be borne (Piuo et al. 2016 p 2168-2177). The less amount of labour cost with additional cost of human resource is one of the major reasons as to why the government will be interested in funding or promoting the driverless cars.
- Sustainability – One of the major reasons for the sponsorship of the automated cars by the government is the amount of environmental and social sustainability that is being achieved by the members of the society (Burns 2013 p 181). The driverless cars will be run by batteries which will make sure that there is less pollution as well as more availability of the cars. These will promote the rate of sustainability of the government in the concerned time span.
There are a number of benefits for the innovation of automated cars for the society due to which the government should sponsor their manufacturing and innovation which are as follows –
- Less number of accidents – One of the major benefits of the automated cars due to which the government should sponsor the automated car version is the less number of accidents. Due to the automated machines that is there in the car, there are comparatively less number of accidents on the front (Truong et al. 2017 p 1279-1292).
- Less amount of traffic – The lesser amount of traffic is another reason which leads to the benefit of the automated car innovation for the society. The automated car can run at a constant speed without stopping which can make the traffic flow better.
- Less pollution – One of the major advantages of the automated cars is the less amount of pollution that is caused by the normal cars and vehicles (Englund et al. 2016 p 146-152). The less amount of pollution is surely one of the biggest affirmative points of automated cars.
- More fuel saving – The automated cars are designed to run on batteries which means that they do not use fuel which in turn saves the non-renewable fuel energy. The fuel saving form of the automated cars is definitely a benefit for which the government should behave positively.
- No human error – According to Goodall (2014 p 93-102) the lack of human error in the automated cars is one of the major reasons for the government to be involved in the innovation of the matter. The human error is less which means less chances of blunder.
- Access to traffic rules – The access to the traffic rules is one of the major advantages of the automated cars. The traffic rules are purely maintained by the automated cars which in turn maintains the traffic rules in the concerned matter.
- Reduction in time and cost – The reduction of time and cost of travelling for the customers is one of the major reasons for the government to sponsor the innovation of the driverless cars. The customers will be happy which will positively impact the government.
- More effective driving speed and way – According to Nordhoff, Van Arem and Happee (2016 p 60-67) the speed will be controlled by automated means which will make sure that there are no cases of rash driving or any other illegal road activities which will lead to the accidents and other problematic matters of the road. The effective driving speed and way of good driving will seriously make the government wanting to invest.
Reasons for the Government to Sponsor Driverless Cars
However, there are a number of issues that can be aroused due to the driverless cars which are mentioned as follows –
- Cost issues – One of the biggest issues that is there for the automated cars is the cost of the cars. The automated cars are relatively higher in cost which is beyond the reach for most of the people leading to the less amount of private use (Schoettle & Sivak 2014 p 255). The government will also have to bear more cost for the purchase which will ultimately lead to an increasing travelling and maintenance cost.
- Technical glitches – Sometimes the automated cars have technical glitches which will make the cars dangerous to be operated on the roads (Zhang et al. 2015 p 2487-2500). The lack of technical up gradation will lead to the severe accidents.
- Software hacking – According to Petit and Shladover (2015 p 546-556) sometimes the software of the automated cars can be hacked by the hackers which is one of the major issues that can be raised by the innovation as well as the introduction of the automated cars which can make the government go wrong with the introduction.
- Fixed route – There are a number of the buses who moves along a same route and if automated in nature, it would not have the option to go on a different route even if required. This will make the automated buses one of the problems of the country on which the government would not be ready to invest.
- Emergency dealing – Sometimes in the transportation industry, there are emergencies which need human touch and help to proceed. The emergency help and dealing is not possible by the automated bus which is one of the many reasons why the government would not be interested (Schaefer & Straub 2016 p 159-165).
- Reading road signs – The reading of road signs is one of the major problems that can be faced by the automated buses. This will also make the government less interested as this can lead to severe accidents by the robots.
- Police issues – The police issues is one of the major issues that can be faced by the automated buses which is one of the reason that the government would not be interested.
- Labour reduction – Another problem of the automated bus is the reduction in the amount of job employment. There are a number of bus drivers that are dependent on the buses and driverless bus will make them jobless.
There are a number of issues that can be used by the government as well as the managers and authorities to resolve the issues and also get the working of the matter which are as follows –
- The first recommendation is to develop the buses in the most technologically advanced manner which can benefit not only the environment but also the normal daily activities in an effective manner.
- The second recommendation is to make sure that the buses do not operate in very congested areas but in spaces where there is possibility for the busses to run without any hassles.
- The third recommendation for tacking the issue is to make sure that more number of buses are there which can improve the overall traffic system of the firm.
- The fourth recommendation is to have a stable traffic system with road signs that can be read and deciphered by the robots.
- The fifth recommendation is to enable each and every police authority to have a training on how to control the robot buses.
- The buses should be enabled with system that can handle human emergencies and can connect to the authorised system in times of need.
- The final recommendation is to analyse the automated buses and develop some of the normal buses and run them so that the scene of the automated buses and their compatibility to the modern world can be analysed.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be stated that though driverless bus will be a great addition to the modern set up of the government and it will enable the people of the government to have a better outlook of the matter, still in the modern times where there is lack of employment and congestion on roads, it becomes way difficult for it to operate. The buses though are technologically upgraded need lot more efforts to be needed to make them work. However, there are ample amount of recommendations that need to be implemented to have the required drive of the buses. The technological advancement is a good option for a country like Australia and therefore the government should invest in these buses for the growth of the country as well as making the country technologically advanced. Every new innovation needs time to settle which does not imply shying away from it and this applies to the driverless buses as well.
References
Bunghez, C.L., 2015, The Future of Transportation-Autonomous Vehicles. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 5(5), pp.447-454.
Burns, L.D., 2013, Sustainable mobility: a vision of our transport future. Nature, 497(7448), p.181.
Englund, C., Chen, L., Ploeg, J., Semsar-Kazerooni, E., Voronov, A., Bengtsson, H.H. & Didoff, J., 2016, The grand cooperative driving challenge 2016: boosting the introduction of cooperative automated vehicles. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(4), pp.146-152.
Goodall, N.J., 2014, Machine ethics and automated vehicles. In Road vehicle automation (pp. 93-102). Springer, Cham.
Henderson, J. & Spencer, J., 2016, Autonomous vehicles and commercial real estate. Cornell Real Estate Review, 14(1), p.14.
Kirkpatrick, K., 2015, The moral challenges of driverless cars. Communications of the ACM, 58(8), pp.19-20.
Mladenovic, M.N. & Abbas, M.M., 2013, October. Self-organizing control framework for driverless vehicles. In Intelligent Transportation Systems-(ITSC), 2013 16th International IEEE Conference on (pp. 2076-2081). IEEE.
Nordhoff, S., Van Arem, B. & Happee, R., 2016, Conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless podlike vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2602), pp.60-67.
Ozcar.com.au. 2018, Home Page | Ozcar. [online] Available at: https://www.ozcar.com.au/ [Accessed 8 Sep. 2018].
Petit, J. & Shladover, S.E., 2015, Potential cyberattacks on automated vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(2), pp.546-556.
Piao, J., McDonald, M., Hounsell, N., Graindorge, M., Graindorge, T. & Malhene, N., 2016, Public views towards implementation of automated vehicles in urban areas. Transportation research procedia, 14, pp.2168-2177.
Schaefer, K.E. & Straub, E.R., 2016, March. Will passengers trust driverless vehicles? Removing the steering wheel and pedals. In Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), 2016 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on (pp. 159-165). IEEE.
Schoettle, B. & Sivak, M., 2014, A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia.
Somers, A. & Weeratunga, K., 2015, Automated vehicles: are we ready? Internal report on potential implications for Main Roads WA.
Truong, L.T., De Gruyter, C., Currie, G. & Delbosc, A., 2017, Estimating the trip generation impacts of autonomous vehicles on car travel in Victoria, Australia. Transportation, 44(6), pp.1279-1292.
Zhang, K., Zhang, D., de La Fortelle, A., Wu, X. & Gregoire, J., 2015, State-Driven Priority Scheduling Mechanisms for Driverless Vehicles Approaching Intersections. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(5), pp.2487-2500.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
