Mixed Method Research: Qualitative Data
Discuss about the Briefing Document – Mixed Methods Research.
Mixed method research is the process where qualitative data along with the quantitative data is being used for gathering as well as analyzing the information (Maxwell, Chmiel, and Rogers, 2015). The scenario is based on CERF department and their issues in the limited research experience for understanding the global need for funds and this is the primary focus of working function in CERF. The primary purpose of this paper is to focus on the mixed method research as well as on its usage. Detail discussion on the type of design along with the strength and limitations of the method is being provided. Moreover, discussion on the principle of fieldwork, then analysis along with the reporting is also provided in the briefing document for CERF to establish their work in the field and to gather suitable data for analysis.
This kind of data consists of the open-ended information which is generally gathered by the researchers with the help of interview as well as observation (Palinkas et al., 2015). The analysis of this kind of information usually maintains the path of aggregating in the primary categories of information along with that the presentation of diversity in the idea is being gathered at the time of data collection.
Quantitative data generally involves the close-end information and it is found top measures the behaviors, attitudes as well as the performance instruments (Guest, and Fleming, 2014). In the analysis of this kind of information usually, consist of the statistical data that is being collected in the instruments or else on the checklist for answering the research question as well as the test hypothesis.
Mixed method research is the kind of methodology for leading research which involves the collection along with the analysis and the integrating qualitative as well as the quantitative research (Morse, 2016). By using the mixed method of research the users have the ability to gain in depth as well as breadth understanding of the situation and the information. It can be seen that one of the most beneficial aspects of this method is triangulation (Malfait, Eeckloo, Lust, Van Biesen, and Van Hecke, 2017). In this process, several methods are used for the examination of the same phenomenon. This process is much suitable for CERF in the scenario to gather effective and suitable information regarding the situation.
The mixed method research is done when the examiner wants to corroborate or validate the result that is being obtained from another method. It can be also seen that this method is being used when the researcher needs to utilize one method for informing another technique. It is beneficial for the researcher to continuously look at the research questions from the numerous angle which helps to clarify the unexpected findings as well as the potential contradiction (McCusker, and Gunaydin, 2015). Moreover, it can be seen that this method is used when the researcher efficiently develops a theory that is related to the phenomenon of interest as well as tests them. This method is quite effective for gathering information and analyzing them in the different way which in future will help CERF to maintain their activity.
Quantitative Data
The type of method design that could be utilized by CERF in the scenario is as follow:
In this, the collection, as well as the analysis of both the qualitative and the quantitative data, is followed. The primary priority is provided to the quantitative data and for that, it helps to understand the data in the most effective way (Hussein, 2015). This is quite easy for the researcher of CERF to implement as it falls in the clear separate stages. This kind of research required a substantial length of time for the completion of data collection for the two different phases. This is quite effective for the researcher to get more detail on the issue with suitable data collection.
The sequential exploratory design is the collection along with an analysis of qualitative data followed by the quantitative data (Maxwell, 2016). In this, the priority is provided to the qualitative characteristic of the study and it is used to explore the phenomenon as well as to expand on the qualitative findings. This is also quite easy for the researchers to implement for the collection of data. It can be seen that with the help of this design the examiners can effectively develop as well as test the new instruments. Moreover, it can be said that this design is very much essential for the researcher to conduct analysis with the help of gathered information.
In this design, only one data collection phase is used where the quantitative along with the qualitative data collection as well as analysis are generally conducted separately but concurrently (Molina-Azorín, and Font, 2016). In this, the findings are integrated at the time of interpretation phase. It is used for development of critical understanding on the research facts. In this time taken for the collection of data is quite less as compared to sequential design. In this great effort as well as expertise is required to analyze the two different data in the most effective way. For the mixed method research, this design is very much effective.
In this design also only one method of data collection is being used where the predominant method it can be qualitative or quantitative nest the other less priority method that also can be qualitative or quantitative (Bentahar, and Cameron, 2015). It helps to get a broader as well as in-depth view on the research topic and also have the ability to offset the possible weakness that can be found in the predominant method. In this two kind of data are collected simultaneously which help to reduce the resources as well as time is taken to conduct the research.
Mixed Method
The advantages or the strength of mixed method research for CERF in the scenario are as follows:
- It helps to get strength of both the data collection method and offset their weakness for the betterment of job (Mayoh, and Onwuegbuzie, 2015). It utilize both the strength as well as the weakness of qualitative and quantitative method that creates the process of two way thinking
- It helps to get complete as well as comprehensive understanding of the examine problem with the help of qualitative as well as the quantitative data (Adams, 2017)
- It also help the researcher to develop more specific as well as better instrument for understanding the collected data and to analyze them
- It also helps to maintain the finding as well as the work process in the most casual way
- With the help of this method the researcher has the ability to tackle larger as well as a more complete range of the research question
- In this the researcher have the efficient permission for using all the tools that is being used for the data collection in both the separate method of qualitative and quantitative
- This method is practical as it allow the researcher to use various method and tools for gathering as well as analyzing the data in the most effective way
The challenges and the limitation that is being faced by the mixed method research for the usage of CERF in the scenario are as follows:
- The primary challenge and limitation of this method is that it is not so easy to perform practically and also it is quite a time consuming process (Turner, Cardinal, and Burton, 2017)
- The process is quite expensive and this is one of the vital reason that most of the researcher did not have the chance to use them
- Another limitation of this research method is that it is quite difficult for the firm to find a person who have experience in both the qualitative as well as the quantitative research method
- To use this method the researcher have to learn numerous methods as well as they have to gain the ability for understanding the process of mixing the methods in the right way
- Another limitation is that the collection as well as the analysis of both the qualitative along with the quantitative data is quite confusing and this due to the amount of data that need to be analyzed (Cajal, Santolaria, Samper, and Garrido, 2015)
- It also requires the clear presentation for performing effective research on the study and to get suitable information
- The research design that is used in this process might be complex for the examiner to get suitable and effective result on the facts
- Another limitation that is being faced by the researcher is that it is quite difficult to plan as well as implement one method with the help of finding of another method
Fieldwork is effective for the researcher to gather suitable information regarding the issues that is being faced by people in the world. In the Central Emergency Response Fund department the most essential part is to gather effective data from the market regarding the fund and other issues. This could be efficiently performed with the help of fieldwork where the researcher gather information by performing survey and interview to various organizations and people. In the scenario it can be seen that fieldwork is essential to perform various activity and to conduct it in the better way it is also essential to follow numerous principles regarding the completion of fieldwork. The design that is being utilized within the performance of effective fieldwork in CERF is to get new technology, then theories, access to the field site and also other equal opportunities for the researchers.
The primary principle of the fieldwork is to take interview of various people and gather data that is equivalent to the research topic (Katz, 2015). It allow to gather qualitative as well as quantitative data from the field with the help of proper survey and other methods. A suitable and effective fieldwork required project planning as well as preparation technique to develop effective working process of the researcher. The core principle of fieldwork required effective partnership with the local people as well as the organization for gathering numerous data on the various activity of the field (Wimmer, and Powell, 2016). From the scenario it can be seen that effective fieldwork is required to gather data and analyze them to get valuable information for the global funds that is required in the resource of humanitarian operations all over the world. The global social research program required fieldwork as this is effective to gather any kind of data from the people regarding their issues within the market.
The analysis of selected data for global social research program for CERF in the scenario is essential to understand the end result of the entire process. The primary principle for the analysis of data in the research is that they need to perform averaging, then comparing along with that difference, squaring, proportion as well as ratio to figure out the original result (Houchati et al., 2018). It is quite essential for CERF to improve their working function and to get valuable result on the activity. All the information along with the collected qualitative and the quantitative data is being analyzed with the help of suitable method and this help in the formation of effective result for the firm. It can be seen that organization like CERF who work for the betterment of the country and the community and people need to take effective steps for performing valuable analysis.
When and Why it is Used?
Comparing helps to set the difference in two or more major issues that is faced by the people and also their response on that issues. The facts is clear that critical analysis of the data with the help of effective and mixed method allow to perform suitable activity in the field and this is essential for CERF in the scenario. Performing the difference principle in the analysis might lead to the negative as well as positive number that eventually cancelled each other (Leuz, and Wysocki, 2016). In this process the most effective way for performing the analysis is with the help of squaring principle. It is effective for providing suitable view on the research topic. Moreover, it can be also seen that for analyzing the CERF department have the ability to use proportion which is the actual number that is divided by total for gaining effective and appropriate result. It is also essential to perform various activity in the field with the help of suitable proportion. Furthermore, the organization can effectively use this process of analysis for gaining suitable result.
Reporting is one of the vital ways to represent all the gathered information in the systematic and the format way (Gibson, 2017). This also helps to achieve the transparency in the field of work to perform the various actions and to gather suitable working function. The principles for reporting that need to be followed by CERF in their activity is that they need to effectively share their information along with the reciprocal learning. It can be seen that the reporting on research needs to be focused as well as cover the entire working function that is being performed during the research study. It helps to understand the process and also the result that is being achieved after suitable analysis of the collected data (Levitt et al., 2018).
Furthermore, it can be seen that the reporting principle required effective motivation as well as suitable usage of technology to perform a various activity in the field. In this, the demonstration for the ongoing process is also performed effectively to implement suitable and valuable working function within the firm. This process also helps to focus on the respect for the human rights in the global context to maintain the activity of CERF for understanding the need of human and world to maintain humanitarian operations. The reporting is essential to have a clear view of the process and also monitor the limitations and the gap that might be formed in the research. With the help of reporting the analysis of research, the gap is established and that help to determine future research on the topic by understanding all the drawbacks and limitations in the research paper.
Type of Strategies and Design
Conclusion
The paper eventually concludes the facts that using the mixed method research is one of the best things for CERF department to maintain their research study. It will eventually help them to gather numerous data on the board area and also the analysis is performed effectively on the board area to receive effective results. Though mixed method research is having some of the limitations it is quite effective for the firm to perform their activity within the field. The facts are clear that effective analysis along with the fieldwork is also required for gathering suitable data that can be used for analysis. The strength of the mixed method is that it helps to get effective information on the issues and also provide an appropriate result for the facts. On the other hand, the limitation of this process is that it is quite complex to perform and also highly experienced researcher is required for performing this process. Consequently, this process is quite effective for CERF to gain suitable information from all over the world.
References
Adams, C.M., 2017. Assessing’readiness for change’in organizational culture: a descriptive study using a sequential explanatory mixed method design (Doctoral dissertation).
Bentahar, O. and Cameron, R., 2015. Design and Implementation of a Mixed Method Research Study in Project Management. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 13(1).
Cajal, C., Santolaria, J., Samper, D. and Garrido, A., 2015. Simulation of laser triangulation sensors scanning for design and evaluation purposes. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 14(2), pp.250-264.
Gibson, C.B., 2017. Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), pp.193-223.
Guest, G. and Fleming, P.J., 2014. Mixed methods research. Public Health Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.581-610.
Houchati, M., Ben-Brahim, L., Gastli, A. and Meskin, N., 2018, April. Fault detection in a modular multilevel converter using principal component analysis. In Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG), 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Hussein, A., 2015. The use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined?. Journal of comparative social work, 4(1).
Katz, J., 2015. A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic fieldwork. Méthod (e) s African Review of Social Sciences Methodology, 1(1-2), pp.131-146.
Leuz, C. and Wysocki, P.D., 2016. The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), pp.525-622.
Levitt, H.M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J.W., Frost, D.M., Josselson, R. and Suárez-Orozco, C., 2018. Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), p.26.
Malfait, S., Eeckloo, K., Lust, E., Van Biesen, W. and Van Hecke, A., 2017. Feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness, and effectiveness of patient participation in bedside shift reporting: mixed?method research protocol. Journal of advanced nursing, 73(2), pp.482-494.
Maxwell, J.A., 2016. Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), pp.12-27.
Maxwell, J.A., Chmiel, M. and Rogers, S.E., 2015. Designing integration in multimethod and mixed methods research. The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry.
Mayoh, J. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2015. Toward a conceptualization of mixed methods phenomenological research. Journal of mixed methods research, 9(1), pp.91-107.
McCusker, K. and Gunaydin, S., 2015. Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), pp.537-542.
Molina-Azorín, J.F. and Font, X., 2016. Mixed methods in sustainable tourism research: an analysis of prevalence, designs and application in JOST (2005–2014). Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(4), pp.549-573.
Morse, J.M., 2016. Mixed method design: Principles and procedures (Vol. 4). Routledge.
Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N. and Hoagwood, K., 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), pp.533-544.
Turner, S.F., Cardinal, L.B. and Burton, R.M., 2017. The research design for mixed methods: A triangulation-based framework and roadmap. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), pp.243-267.
Wimmer, H. and Powell, L., 2016. Principle Component Analysis for Feature Reduction and Data Preprocessing in Data Science. In Proceedings of the Conference on Information Systems Applied Research ISSN (Vol. 2167, p. 1508).
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
