Insight one
Discuss about the Business Ethics And the Sustainability.
Aspects of sustainability are done include three important perspectives. These include; social, economic and environmental. The focus of global economic development in relation with changing societal trends. Ethics is intertwined with sustainability. The point at which an organization engages in CSR practices that addresses the social, economic and environmental challenges they engage in ethical practices.
Ethically these practices should be done more often than profit engaging activities. Profit engaging activities are prioritized than all the other ethical practices than the CSRs practices. It is preferable that a company engages in ethical activities voluntarily. Individuals should also engage in ethical practices for sustainability voluntarily.
The advantage of ethical sustainability is that it allows for improvement of customer base for any organization. Attracting customer is easier by adopting effective plans that reward the customer practice.
The image of the company is also risen to international standards if they perform in ethical sustainability programs. Therefore, the society nearby are likely to assume that the company doesn’t suffer any problematic situations. This is also supported by the fact that the organization are likely to suffer less pressure from cases bordering insurmountable profits or even losses accrued due to unethical practices. Unethical practices are likely to affect an organizations reputation.
It is difficult to be apparent about areas of knowledge on straight forward analysis of morality. There are multitude of complexities and that make it very difficult to define un ethical and ethical practices. Although judging from history some decisions can be apparent, it is difficult to understand whether judgment is good or bad.
Ethics seems fraught with difficulty. Whether a scientific evidence is provided. The scientific hypothesis can still receive a different ethical position from another different person.
The problem arises when there are so many different opinions on the same thing. There will be so many personal refutations of the general assumption. Personal ethics therefore tend to surpass general principle ethics especially when making critical decisions.
General principles focus on consensual agreement. They take two conflicting ideas of one person or even two. They therefore provide a standard that bridges the gap and arrive at an agreement over what seems to bridge the gap between the two difficult opinions. The general underlying factor for all the principles is that we are all interested in living the right way, without interfering with each other’s opinions or beliefs. However different persons have several opinions on one and the same thing.
Insight 2 personal ethics and professional ethics
Most people have values that they hold dearly but they are not sure whether they should air their values freely. It is so difficult to freely air our values especially if they conflict with ethical theories and principles. Considering airing our values freely without asking if they are in line with the actual conventional values is referred to as giving voice to them.
Most of our values if we really want to give them a voice, we should not try to appeal to others. We should not try to glorify the viewpoints of others to achieve commonality. Once we achieve commonality with people opinions we are achieving a theory which shall have in turn devoiced our values. Most people have beliefs in their choice of values. For every value there is a strong belief or faith attached to it. Therefore, this belief guides the actions of our values, it therefore becomes difficult to change someone’s opinion about situations if they already believe in them.
Rationalizations of our values helps us open our scope about our perspectives of the values. By allowing us to identify with not only other people but also their honest views about our values.
Sustainability is a process that is focused on achieving change. The change that is supposed to be achieved is focused on achieving human needs and aspirations. The three main domains involved in sustainability are environment, economic and social.
Achievement of healthy eco systems using technology is under environmental sustainability development. The process will therefore focus on reducing negative impacts that human cause on environmental habitats with focus based on making the world a better place for human. This can be achieved through all the going green projects. They include green computing, green industry and other essential activities.
Social activities involve considering leaving a lifestyle that help in solving social change. These include making another people lifestyle better. Ways of re organizing living conditions of others is importantly the best options of these ideas that can be achieved by an organization engaging in sustainability program.
The economic sustainability revolves around reappraising economic sectors. Engaging in work practices that develop the levels of security of the economy. Most companies might even engage sustainable agriculture as a way if developing their economy and improving the general economy of the environment.
Sustainability, is therefore as human target of making the world a place worth living.
Most sustainability project are based on strategies that are put in place by the various stakeholders of organizations. The strategic framework of this economic, environmental and social projects is depended on many other factors. These factors include; finance, human resources and other important frameworks. However, ethical factors are also very crucial. The strategy of a sustainable program is embedded within an ethical background.
Insight three; Giving Voice Value
The practices should be in line with ethical practices. The established ethical practices should be viably tested beforehand. The ethical strategy works as an operational instrument for performance and management. It is therefore easier to measure the strategic effect the plan is having on the society meant to receive the sustainability plan. This means that ethical strategies create a platform for measurement of effectiveness.
As a manager it could be appropriate to use ethical standards instead of economical standards for determining strategies of sustainability plans. The customers and other stakeholder reflect mostly on ethical behaviors they can see rather than economical standards. It is therefore effective to raise ethical measures to build trust between the organization and its customers. The consequences of giving back to the society can only be measured in ethical terms. Therefore, the best CSRs are backgrounded on strong ethical considerations.
Typical business ethics require certain expectations from leaders in the society. As anyone would expect leaders make decisions at various capacities for the people they lead. Various situations therefore provide a platform for leaders to give their opinions about issues. With so many people depending om that decision, it becomes difficult to jump into a decision. Ethical standards therefore will recommend that as a leader it is appropriate to consider the decisions of the people you lead. Through listening to decision, it is accurate to report that as a leader we need to give values to the decision and voices of the people who we lead.
The idea of giving values to people under us builds awareness on making employees recognize that one ethical approach towards an issue is insufficient. Therefore, building the team work approach towards issues. Every issue should receive a rather communal ethical approach. It is therefore recommendable to adapt a script and implementation plan in response to critical organizational decisions. The reasons can therefore be rationalized in questionable practices by following the area of the scripts strictly. The script shall have involved everyone’s voice of value.
Ethical resources are developed from different sources whose aim is to make the world a better place. Their recommendations are to apply the representatives of the decisions from different places to reach a common ground for professional and individual ethical behavior.
The first resource therefore is the use of the ethical commission.
Ethical commission is a set up for council of representatives who approve a series of recommendations. These series of recommendations are considered the ethical formulas to be followed conventionally. The commission should be made up of people who are professionals. The professionals include lawyers, doctors, philosophers and others. The commission is also set up of psychologist that determine the human diverse nature of these ethical codes.
Sustainability
The efficiency changes to the rules of ethical codes are also passed through this committee. Minor changes may not require the full quorum of all members. Important and vital ethical views require several test and feedback proof before a defined decision is made. The dependency on science based evidence is considered biased and therefore it is preferable to use both science and opinion considerations as source for ethical decision.
Managerial assessment of ethical standards is done through the perspective of objectives of the management. The measure of who and when a decision should be measured in relation to ethical standards is only determined if the overall objectives of what the organization and the company are seeking to achieve. It is therefore unfair to assess using individual performance.
Development of employee framework in an organization as a way of determining the ethical standards is also important and critical. Performance of top level individual influence the objectives of the company thereby protecting the general bottom level performance.
Care should be taken so that the chosen framework should not interfere with culture and beliefs of the company. The framework that interferes with these codes will be breaking the ethical culture of the company.
Apart from objective measurement, behavioral standard scale can be used in assessing ethical standards of employees of an organization. These assessment method is dependent on other people’s opinion towards the individual under assessment.
The last method combines both behavioral and objective assessment. This assessment involves individual contribution towards what the company seeks to achieve and what other people will say you shall have contributed.
Stakeholders are important in all companies and organizations. All organizations should have an important place for all stakeholders. Through doing this, they shall be acting very ethically. However, there are ethics that might require sideline of important stakeholders.
These decisions of sidelining stakeholders, however, should be professional and left for the organizations manager. The managers at crucial points might decide to refrain stakeholders from important decisions or information’s. The intention of the manager is so that the stakeholder does not react to the company’s new development.
The process is allowed and ethical in two ways. As much it seems unethical, it is important that manager does this without abuse of authority or office. The manager can do this if the company will suffer a risk from the stakeholder having such an information. The manager should act in favor of the company and not the stakeholder. This will therefore be considered ethical.
Insight 5 connecting ethics to sustainability
Attributes of power is totally unethical. The case where just a few powerful stakeholders are involved in decisions of the company. All stakeholders are important and therefore should take part in the decision-making process of a company. However, much stakeholders contribute differently all they contribute lead to the overall development of the company; therefore, they should be involved in all decision making of the company.
Legitimacy theories seeks to maintain ethics by continually ensuring that two value systems that contradict are harmonized to a neutral perspective. Organizations operating under this ethical theory should seek to ensure they operate under the boundaries of the societal systems. The organization should therefore report on activities that the management perceive will consider the interest of all communal stakeholders.
The social contract of the legitimacy theory is quite hypothetical. The contract assumes that the society and the company agree not to cross each other’s ethical bounds. The adopting of this theory is rather biased. The company is forced in to voluntarily reporting of activities. They will report activities to the society of almost all the decisions they need to make. However, the society is never obliged to respond to the organization or the company. This is proof that however the theory seeks to maintain ethics, it is also based and lean towards the side of the society. The society is therefore awarded seniority in comparison to the company.
References
Carroll, A. and Buchholtz, A., 2014. Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education.
Crane, A. and Matten, D., 2016. Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Deegan, C., 2014. An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. Sustainability accounting and accountability, pp.248-272.
Garner, W., 2017, June. Teaching Assessment in an Online Environment: Ethical Conflicts, Concerns, and Solutions. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 783-789). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Herlihy, B. and Corey, G., 2014. ACA ethical standards casebook. John Wiley & Sons.
Ibrahim, I. and Jaafar, H.S., 2016. Adopting Environment Management Practices for Environment Sustainabilty: A Proposed Model for Logistics Companies. Asian Business Research, 1(1), p.70.
Jones, T.M., Harrison, J.S. and Felps, W., 2018. How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, (ja).
Knights, D. and Willmott, H. eds., 2016. Labour process theory. Springer.
Luger, J., Mammen, J. and Haleblian, J., 2015. Security Analaysts’ Influence on Acquisition Decisions: A Joint Agency and Legitimacy Theory Approach.
Macko, S.A. and O’Connell, M.T., 2016, February. A Field Course in Ocean Sciences that Emphasizes Sustainabilty. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
Mena, S., 2016. Book Review: Samuel F. Mansell Capitalism, Corporations and the Social Contract: A Critique of Stakeholder Theory.
Powell, S.K., 2018. Ethical Resources.
Romanenko, V. and Nikitina, G., 2016. Instructional Technology And Hidden Processes: Development Of Professional Skills And Professonal Ethics. In proceedings of the international scientific conference. Latvia University of Agriculture.
Rothrock, A., 2016. Colorado Considers ABA’s Ethics 20/20 Project and Amends Rules of Professional Conduct. Colo. Law., 45, p.41.
Silkoff, D., Guillemin, M., Chenhall, R. and McDougall, R., 2018. What ethical resources are available to Alcohol and Other Drug practitioners? A systematic review. Clinical Ethics, 13(1), pp.34-52.
Waldman, D. and Jensen, E., 2016. Industrial organization: theory and practice. Routledge.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
