Comparison Of Rational Unified Process And Scrum For Software Development

Advantages of Rational Unified Process

In staying viable in the current market and advance market share, software development corporations need to supply high-quality yields that meet or exceed clients’ expectations within budget and programme. For this purpose, Innovative Solutions are continually looking for conducts to improve their software development course. The purpose of the report is identifying the best methodology recommended applying. The report gives information about various software development methodologies that should be of great advantage to small and large businesses. Presently, there are many software methodologies from which to choose, but in our case, we will look just two of them; Rational Unified Process and Scrum. Both have strengths and faintness because they focus on diverse facets of the software development life cycle (SDLC). As a result, some academics and consultants have proposed several hybrid approaches combining two or more software procedures with the resolution of leveraging relevant strengths thereby enlightening the entire development progression (Acosta, Espinosa & Espinosa 2018, p98).

Rational Unified Process (RUP) is a software development procedure from Rational, an IBM detachment that splits the development process into four different phases where each involves occupational modeling, analysis and design, execution, testing, and utilization. RUP is an iterative software development course framework generated by the Rational Software Company, an IBM dissection since the year 2003. RUP is not a single concrete unbending process, but relatively an adaptable procedure framework, envisioned to be tailored by the expansion organizations and software project players that will choose the basics of the process that are suitable for their requirements. According to (Kruchten 2004, p98) RUP is a detailed implementation of the Incorporated Process. The four segments are:

•    Inception – This where the project idea is specified. The development squad determines if the development is worth tailing and what assets/capitals are needed.
•    Elaboration – The project’s style and required resources are extra evaluated in this phase. Developers consider likely applications of the software and prices associated with the expansion.
•    Construction – The scheme is developed and accomplished where the software is designed, transcribed, and verified.
•    Transition – The phase where software is unconfined to the public and final modifications or updates are made grounded to the end users feedback.

The RUP growth methodology provides an organized way for companies to envisage create software programs. Since it delivers a specific plan for each phase of the development progression, it aids in preventing resources from being misused and reduces unanticipated development costs (Kuhlen & Speck 2017, p87).

•    Permits for the adaptive competence to deal with varying requirements throughout the lifecycle (development), whether they arise from clients or from within the venture itself.
•    Emphasizes the necessity (and proper enactment of) accurate certification.

•    Comprehensively relies on capable and expert team associates, since the task of deeds to individual workers requires the production of tangible, pre-planned outcomes in the form of relics.
•    Given the importance on integration through the development procedure, this can also be disadvantageous during testing or other stages, where incorporations are conflicting and getting in the technique of other, more important activities (Usman et al. 2014).

Scrum is an agile outline for managing exertion with prominence in software development. It is intended for development players from three to nine affiliates breaking their tasks into actions that can be finalized within time sparred restatements and track growth and re-plan in 15-minute stand-up conferences, referred to as daily scrums. Scrum is an incremental and iterative context for handling product development. It describes a supple, holistic product development approach where an expansion team works as a component to reach a mutual goal. With its segmental, incremental, concerted approach, scrum is quick and extremely adaptive to varying needs and competitive contests that is why it has so several advocates (Aljawarneh, Alawneh, & Jaradat 2017, p45).

•    Scrum procedure allows projects where the occupational requirements certification is hard to enumerate to be successfully established.
•    Fast stirring, cutting-edge growths can be rapidly coded and tested using the scrum where arising mistakes can be easily remedied.
•    It is an informally controlled technique that insists on recurrent updating of the growth in work through regular assemblies. Thus there is pure visibility of the scheme development.

•    Scrum is one of the foremost causes of scope sidle since unless there is a specific end date, the scheme management shareholders will be attracted to keep demanding that fresh functionality is distributed (Stoica, Mircea & Ghilic-Micu 2013, p17).
•    If a mission is not well demarcated, estimating venture costs and time tends to be incorrect. In such a case, the duty can be spread over numerous dashes.
•    If the squad members are not dedicated, the project will either not ever complete or will flop.

Disadvantages of Rational Unified Process

Both procedures are pain staked to be Agile and method project activities in the iterative technique. Both the Rational Unified Process (RUP) and Scrum are software frameworks (development). They are considered to be responsive, which means that the necessities and resolutions of the project progress as a result of team association (Mousaei & Gandomani 2018, p43). They also together apply an iterative tactic, splitting the expansion process into idiosyncratic stages. Both outlines underline cross-functionality and partnership and promote self-management within the squad. And finally, there is an emphasis on product excellence within both contexts. Though RUP methodology calls for a proper definition of space and major project signposts are associated with exact dates, scrum methodology applies project surfeit instead of a scope and permits the backlog to be redefined at the close of each iteration (frequently about every four weeks). In accumulation, RUP segments the project lifespan into four major chapters as described in the report above. Even though it inspires concurrent workflows crosswise the entire cycle, the universal understanding is that certain deeds will top during certain stages. On the divergent, SCRUM decrees that the entire outmoded lifespan fits into one restatement. In other words, a capability for one iteration of a spell is recognized, and then the complete cycle happens within one iteration (Leau et al. 2012).

Both developments have their remunerations and drawbacks that go together with active development in several businesses. The business to have successful software development has been appreciative to both progressions in depth and yield the segments of each that are unsurpassed suited to the specific product and setting (Abrahamsson et al. 2017). As Innovative Solutions staffs, developers are recommended to apply the application of SCRUM methodology in presenting frequent prototypes and incremental components to the company’s product managers to ensure they are on the right path. The regularity and intensity of teamwork between product executives and developers actually depends on their adjacent proximity and company philosophy, whether these squads are used to such partnership. When topography is a problem, teamwork tools such as Web and video conferencing acts as the most vital aid to the entire team.

The equivalent blending of techniques in SCRUM methodologies tends application in a corporate situation outsourcing expansion overseas. In fact, with possible time and cultural detaches, it is significant to build in as numerous iterative and incremental ladders and as much ongoing interaction as is viable for the project and the company’s and it’s development partner’s ethos (Vijayasarathy & Butler 2016, p98).

Advantages of Scrum

Whether a particular individual wants to operate with self-organized crews or a more top-down administration approach certainly depends on the ability level and seasoning of the project developers. Many schemes require a leader who tends to add some insistence, guidance and risk administration to the project at the onset until team associates get accustomed to operating together. Then the management role can be ascended back as required with subsequent growths.

The fact is that there doubtless is no perfect process for all schemes and environment, or even for a sole one. That’s why corporations need to build in everyday lessons learned conferences to evaluate and review the process that may move more near one end of the scale or the other at different plugs in the development cycle. In short, when selecting between SCRUM and RUP Innovative Solutions recommends adopting the process according to the project needs, rather than adapting the project to the progression (Ahmad et al. 2014).

References

Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2017). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.08439.

Acosta, A. F., Espinosa, J. E., & Espinosa, J. (2018). Application of the SCRUM Software Methodology for Extending Simulation of Urban MObility (SUMO) Tools. In Simulating Urban Traffic Scenarios (pp. 3-15). Springer, Cham.

Ahmad, G., Soomro, T. R., & Brohi, M. N. (2014). XSR: Novel Hybrid Software Development Model (Integrating XP, Scrum & RUP). International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), 2(3), 126-130.

Aljawarneh, S. A., Alawneh, A., & Jaradat, R. (2017). Cloud security engineering: Early stages of SDLC. Future Generation Computer Systems, 74, 385-392.

Galvan, S., Mora, M., O’Connor, R. V., Acosta, F., & Alvarez, F. (2015). A compliance analysis of agile methodologies with the ISO/IEC 29110 project management process. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 188-195.

Kruchten, P. (2004). The rational unified process: an introduction. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Kuhlen, D., & Speck, A. (2017, July). Magnitude economic effects of requirements in the development process—A simulation study of workload behaviour. In Computing Conference, 2017 (pp. 953-960). IEEE.

Leau, Y. B., Loo, W. K., Tham, W. Y., & Tan, S. F. (2012). Software development life cycle AGILE vs traditional approaches. In International Conference on Information and Network Technology (Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 162-167).

Mousaei, M., & Gandomani, T. J. (2018). A New Project Risk Management Model based on Scrum Framework and Prince2 Methodology. development, 9(4).

Stoica, M., Mircea, M., & Ghilic-Micu, B. (2013). Software Development: Agile vs. Traditional. Informatica Economica, 17(4).

Usman, M., Soomro, T. R., & Brohi, M. N. (2014). Embedding project management into XP, SCRUM and RUP. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 10(15).

Vijayasarathy, L. R., & Butler, C. W. (2016). Choice of software development methodologies: Do organizational, project, and team characteristics matter?. IEEE software, 33(5), 86-94.

Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:

Turnitin Report

Formatting

Title Page

Citation

Outline

Place an Order