Assessment of Coles’ Strategy
Discuss About The Competitiveness Assessment Of The Biomass.
The primary aim of the given report is to check and analyze the strategic positioning of the Australian supermarket brand which is the Coles group. The Coles Group is under the Wesfarmers group of companies and is one of the largest supermarket brands in the given country (Hill, Jones and Schilling 2014). The Coles Group Limited is an Australian public limited company which has various retail stores around the country. The given retail chain store has its head office in Melbourne. The first Coles group had opened in Melbourne in the year 1914. The given stores were under the acquisition of different company groups but had been acquired by Wesfarmers in 2007. However recently in the year 2017 the given acquisition had been given away and the company functions independently at present. The two huge brands, Woolworths and Coles tend to have the major share of the Australian market. Although world wide it has been observed that the Supermarket industry is not a very strong one, but the Australian supermarket is a relatively profitable industry and has been the major target of a majority of international companies.
The given report will be throwing light on the strategic positioning of Coles in the Australian Supermarket (Wheelen, et al. 2017). The strategy of Cole’s group will be analyzed in the first section followed by the Industrial Context and the Environmental Analysis of Coles.
The Coles Group of Retail stores has come forward in the given industry by using a particular strategy in order to expand the business case and in order to compete with its primary competitor which is the Woolworths (Lasserre 2017). Hence, this section will be analyzing the strategy used by Coles using the Porter`s generic strategies tool and also the related internal as well as external fir is examined.
The primary vision of Cole’s group is to provide premium quality products at affordable prices. Cole’s group understands the value of money and for this reason, its primary objective is to perform better than its competitors and for this purpose it has vowed to provide good quality products with comparatively low prices (Lasserre 2017). After analyzing and comparing the actual performance of the brand with that of the stated mission statement it could be analyzed that although the prices of the Coles group were quite low as compared to its competitors, the same could not be stated for the quality. The brand rather provides normal produces same like its competitors and nothing of a premium category.
Mission statement of Coles Group
According to Michael Porter, there are three primary strategies which a company follows in order to gain success in the business environment. These strategies are as follows:
- Cost Leadership- In the cost leadership strategy, the company aims to become a leader in the given market using a low cost strategy. In the given strategy the company follows a policy whereby it tends to offer low prices better than its competitors which then leads to better competition and larger market share (Ginter 2018).
- Differentiation- In the given strategy the company tends to offer better products to its customers which are quite different than that of its competitors and may be premium in nature. Hence, these strategies tend to work for those customers who are looking out for a premium product. When companies follow this strategy then they may charge prices, higher than its competitors.
- Focus-The focus strategy aims to concentrate on a particular niche market so that the company can specialize in the given domain (Moutinho and Vargas-Sanchez 2018). The given category is further divided into Cost and Differentiation focus.
The strategy which is followed by Coles us the cost leadership strategy. As the primary aim of the company lies in offering the customers a good quality product, it does so at affordable prices. As stated earlier, the given company has value for money and for this reason it wants to ensure that it offers the lowest price possible in the Australian market.
Figure 1: The Strategy adopted by the Coles (As created by the author)
The Business Model can be described as a synopsis of what a business does and how a business needs to operate in the given domain (Barney 2014). It determines, whom the company is working for, who are its partners and the procedure using which it carries out its operations. The Business Model is basically concerned with What, How and Who.
In the following section, the different components of the Business Model of Coles will be given.
WHO
The WHO component refers to that component of the business domain which looks after the markets which the company seeks to serve. In the case of the Coles group, the company aims to serve all the customers in the retail segment who want to receive good products at reasonable prices (Eden and Ackermann 2013). The price conscious buyers who tend to have a value for money can successfully shop at Coles. The company has a loyalty program for its buyers whereby the get special discount s and related offers if they shop at Coles.
WHAT
The WHAT Component describes the system through which a company functions. In the case of the Coles Group, the company is primarily based in Australia and has spread its operations to New Zealand as well. The company offers almost all brands of food products to its customers and prices them at reasonable values (Rothaermel 2015). The company aims to make an offer which is rather generalized in nature. For this reason, it stocks all items like food products, skin care, baby care, vegetables and other daily requirements. The company aims to offer no frill services which aim offer hassle free buying procedures for the customers (Slack 2015). If the given is compared with the actual performance of the firm, it still has a long way to go and improve its services.
Generic strategy
HOW
The value which has been offered by the Coles Group aims to create sustainability and affordability among the different customers. The company fulfils its missions by offering goods and services which are easily available in other supermarkets but the price is not the same as others. The range of products is wide and almost every important item a customer may need is present in the given stores.
The company is the second largest retail store in Australia after Woolworths which clearly shows how the customers perceive value in Cole`s offerings. Although the competition in the Industry has increased considerably with more companies trying to offer reasonable goods to the different customers at reasonable prices, Coles is trying its best to cope (Rothaermel 2015). However, they cannot match up to the level of Coles who has created a brand name of offering the lowest priced products. The company has recently come out of the control of Wesfarmers and the different investors have started doubting the different operational plans of the supermarket that will be required to function on its own. However, if it analyses its market holistically and ensures that it is fulfilling its mission objectives, it will be able to perform well.
The entire supermarket chain in Australia is in their lifecycle stage and it is well-serviced in nature. The entire growth of the supermarket has been dependent on increased spending power of the unlike customers along with aggressive competition against different players along with dissimilar major supermarkets that is expanding the range of products in the entire business (Armstrong et al. 2015).
The entire market could be described as the red ocean; however, Coles has entered the entire market place with the blue ocean strategy with the help of focusing more on the private label products in the sector that is dominated traditionally dominated by the branding of big name. Coles has tried to keep up to the expectation of the customer preferences by not compromising in the quality of the products and services among the other major players in the market(Coles.com.au, 2018).
Coles has tried to determine the profitable kind of model to deliver the proper quality products and services by reducing the prices of the goods. The company has tried to create expectations by reducing the different prices of the products and through this, the company has tried to gain geographical presence. The assessment of the value curves of Coles along with other supermarket chains such as Woolworths and Wesfarmers. Coles is trying to work in the competitive market with differentiating kind of strategy that is included in the diagram:
Business Model
Figure 2: Values curves of Coles vs. Aldi
(Source: Created by author)
Coles has entered into the market of Australian retail market with a cost leadership strategy. The supermarket tries to offer their customers with offering them with lower prices of goods and services along with providing them with high quality branded goods and services to the customers as well (Chaffey and Ellis-Chadwick 2016). Coles is trying to lowers the cost of the products whereas the cost of living of the individuals staying in Australia remains high and this helps them in gaining the competitive advantage (Song, Sunand Jin 2017).
With the help of the such process, Coles has tried to increase the share in the market and this has increased the revenues in the market over the last six years and the households are saving up to $640 a year by shopping the necessary goods from the respective supermarket. The business strategy that has been applied by Coles is successful in nature and this has been executed appropriately to capture the value in competitive market and gain the attention of the customers as well (Dockalikovaand Klozikova, 2014).
Coles is dominating the entire retail market in Australia along with Woolworths wherein the share of the market is more than 35% and 45%. The entire retail sector in Australia is generating more than $5.67 billion of profit and Coles is targeting more than 3.5% of the entire market share in the Australian retail sector (Zhao et al. 2016). The Porter’s Five Forces Analysis has illustrated the dominating factor of the two main players such as Coles and Woolworths in the market along with the intense rivalry between the firms. The entry of Coles in the market has increased the competitive prospective in the retail sector of Australia and this has increased the entire focus of the customers (Makos 2015).
Political |
There are different kind of government regulations and laws that has been enforced by the Australian government against the entire misuse of the power of the market by the different market leaders (Yunna and Yisheng 2014) |
Economic |
There is huge rate of change in the habits of the different consumers in the retail market of Australia and the consumers are trying to adjust with such economic changes that are taking place in the organizations (Jaworski 2018) |
Social |
The entire growth of the population is more than 1.5% and the population in the Australian market are educated and diverse culture individuals are present in the society as well |
Technological |
There is huge upgradation of the technology in the entire Australian Supermarket and the infrastructure is unique in nature as well |
Legal |
There are different kind of legal actions in relation to the safety of the different products and in relation to the price wars |
Environmental |
Different usage of the sustainable practices and products along with change in climate as well |
The entire external kind of trading environment is applied to all the companies that are players in the competitive Australian market. All the retail supermarkets are being subjected to different kind of standards related to food and safety that is required to be followed by them effectively. The external fit of Coles in the competitive environment is similar to the different other players in the market in different aspects and in comparison, to the geographic presence as well. The positioning strategy of Coles is cost leadership strategy wherein the supermarket provides huge number of discounts to the customers and offer quality products to the customers as well.
Value Curves
The value chain of the industry is similar in nature with the other competitors in the market and there is huge scope of the different kind of internal approaches by the major competitors is differentiating in nature. Coles has focused on different kind of branded products and the quality is appreciated by all the customers in the market as well. The entire value chain analysis is system through which Coles has tried to separate the activities of value creation. The supplier and company relationship are competitive in nature and the payment is made easier in nature and more stable in nature (Mathooko and Ogutu 2014). The value chain of Coles has included the different HRM activities along with technology development and procurement of the goods and services in the market. Coles has tried to gain profit in the market with the help of different kind of usage of buy lead and improvement of the transportation processes in an effectual manner. The development of the technology has been provided with huge importance that has helped them in maintaining and introducing new methods to gain success.
Figure 3: Value Chain Analysis of Coles
Source:
Conclusion
Therefore, it can be concluded that the entry of Coles in the year 1914 has been of huge success in the entire retail market of Australia. The market share of the company has been around 11.45% and they have been successful in an effective manner in terms of revenue in the entire market. Coles is trying to use the quality, low cost branded products kind of business model to fit in the Australian retail market. The entire company has managed the program of expanding their entire geographical presence with more than 125 stores all over the country within a few years. The main mission of the company is to provide the customers with premium quality of goods at affordable prices and this has helped them in attracting huge number of customers in the entire economy as well.
Furthermore, the cost leadership strategy adopted by Coles has assisted them in increasing the range of goods and services provided by them to the customers. The company has tried to increase the presence in overall market by fulfilling the demands of the customers in the market and gaining competitive advantage as well. Coles is trying to provide the customers with different branded goods and services in comparison to the Woolworths and Aldi to satisfy the requirements and solve their grievances of the customers. With the cost-leadership strategy, Coles has been successful in the competitive market and adopted a large portion in the market as well.
Coles needs to work on the quality of goods and services that are provided by them to the customers. In comparison to Aldi and Woolworths in the market, Coles need to focus more on delivering quality and branded goods and services to the customers to gain more geographical presence in the competitive market
Lastly, Coles needs to increase the different services and diversify the segments in their company by training the staffs to deal with the different situations in the market and create proper customer company relationship effectively to meet the different expectations of the customers effectually in competitive market.
References
Armstrong, G., Kotler, P., Harker, M. and Brennan, R., 2015. Marketing: an introduction. Pearson Education.
Barney, J.B., 2014. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Pearson higher ed.
Chaffey, D. and Ellis-Chadwick, F., 2016. Digital marketing. Prentice Hall.
Coles.com.au. (2018). Coles Supermarkets. [online] Available at: https://www.coles.com.au/ [Accessed 6 May 2018].
Dockalikova, I. and Klozikova, J., 2014, November. MCDM Methods in Practice: Determining the Significance of PESTEL Analysis Criteria. In European Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance (p. 418). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Eden, C. and Ackermann, F., 2013. Making strategy: The journey of strategic management. Sage.
Ginter, P.M., 2018. The strategic management of health care organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R. and Schilling, M.A., 2014. Strategic management: theory: an integrated approach. Cengage Learning.
Jaworski, B.J., 2018. Commentary: Advancing marketing strategy in the marketing discipline and beyond. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(1-2), pp.63-70.
Lasserre, P., 2017. Global strategic management. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Makos, J., 2015. An Overview of the PESTEL Framework. PESTLE Analysis, 18.
Mathooko, F.M. and Ogutu, M., 2015. Porter’s five competitive forces framework and other factors that influence the choice of response strategies adopted by public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(3), pp.334-354.
Moutinho, L. and Vargas-Sanchez, A. eds., 2018. Strategic Management in Tourism, CABI Tourism Texts. Cabi.
Rothaermel, F.T., 2015. Strategic management. McGraw-Hill Education.
Slack, N., 2015. Operations strategy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Song, J., Sun, Y. and Jin, L., 2017. PESTEL analysis of the development of the waste-to-energy incineration industry in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, pp.276-289.
Wheelen, T.L., Hunger, J.D., Hoffman, A.N. and Bamford, C.E., 2017. Strategic management and business policy. pearson.
Yunna, W. and Yisheng, Y., 2014. The competition situation analysis of shale gas industry in China: Applying Porter’s five forces and scenario model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, pp.798-805.
Zhao, Z.Y., Zuo, J., Wu, P.H., Yan, H. and Zillante, G., 2016. Competitiveness assessment of the biomass power generation industry in China: A five forces model study. Renewable Energy, 89, pp.144-153.