Discussion
Sustainable tourism is considered to be one of the major perceptions nowadays. It can be defined as an ideology that connotes a suitable balance between the environment, economy and the socio cultural aspects of tourism development. Sustainable tourism is responsible to ensure wide participation of the relevant stakeholders in order to achieve tourist satisfaction as well as the covers up the environmental sustainability. In case of Australia, diversity in the ecology is one of the main attractions for the tourists. It can be argued that 80% of the tourists are attracted by the dynamic natural verities of Australian ecology. Henceforth, the purpose of this report is to focus on the practice of sustainable tourism that is prevalent in Australia. During the discussion, the report incorporates two tourism related discussion papers and develops a critical evaluation by comparing the two papers based on policy planning cycle.
The first article is associated with the tropical Australian tourism and the initiatives. The tropical Australia stretches from in the north of the Tropic of Capricorn with numbers of world heritage sites and multi faceted cultural diversities. Through the discussion the author put emphasis on the regional initiatives for the future of the Australian tropical tourism industry. In fact the report on the tropical tourism industry in Australia also divides the discussion into several stages. For an instance, the first theme depicts a connection between the development of the tourism and the community well being. In addition to this, factors like cross industry opportunities and reinforcing natural brands are also key aspects that the discussion paper is addressed. Moreover, the slow tourism approach is also been taken into consideration and putting emphasis on the indigenous opportunities can be identified as an important part of the report. In this regard, the major discussion of the article is circled around the tourism industry in northern Australia and its responsibility towards establishing sustainable tourism. Therefore, the article argued that community well being and taking adequate measures in order to balance the environmental sustainability are the primary concern for the Australian tourism industry. However, high exposure can lead to ecological threat because the visitors do not have adequate understanding of the adverse impact on environment due to their discrepancies. In response to this, a tropic environment management has to be implemented.
The next article has placed its argument on the backdrop of the national heritage tourism summit in Australia. It can be argued that heritage tourism is considered to be the most popular and effective strategy to attract maximum number of visitors. As per the government report, in 2017 the percentage of international visitors in the Australian heritage sites is amounted 33.9% (National Heritage Tourism Summit Discussion Paper. 2018). It is coupled with the growth in the cultural and heritage segments at a rate of 7.5% and 11.2% respectively over the past four years. In this context, projecting the economic and social significances of the heritage sites along with developing a national heritage tourism strategy is highly important to sustain in the global market. However, the report shows that there are some challenges that the Australian heritage tourism industry is facing nowadays. For an instance, reduction in the funds for conservation and development is considered to be a pivotal threat coupled with the lack of integration and coordination in national, state and regional level tourism marketing (Tra.gov.au 2018). It requires a pro-active approach from the government and takes initiatives to develop the heritage tourism industry of Australia on a sound basis.
Identifying the Issues
It can be mentioned that some opportunities overtly in order to develop the sustainable tourism in Tropical Australia. The argument in this regard is that there are high possibilities to develop the north Australian tourism by following the national pathways including socio-cultural assimilation (Pearce 2013). On the contrary, the article on Australian heritage tourism addressed directly the opportunities of development through the vision national trust and the guiding principles of the Australian heritage tourism sectors.
Both the articles advocated the purpose of strengthening the future of the sustainable tourism in Australia. The aims are intertwined with the objective of safeguarding the environment and the local socio-cultural atmosphere. Moreover, the tourist satisfaction is also enlisted in the aims.
As far as the article of Pearce (2013) is concerned, it focused on the academic researches and theories in order to meet the aims. On the other hand, the article on Australian national heritage summit relied on the government initiatives to achieve the objectives.
In order to develop a better sustainable tourism Pearce (2013) argued that community well being and reinforcing the well managed natural brand are the principle factors. However, the article on National Heritage Tourism expressed its inclination towards demonstrating the socio-economic significance of the heritage tourism and the partnership between national, state and regional organisations.
The study on the tropic tourism in Australia puts emphasis on ten steps to reach sustainable tourism. For an instance, incorporating slow tourism approach and boosting the indigenous opportunities (Pearce 2013). However, based on the government initiatives the article on national heritage tourism endorsed the development of a national heritage strategy led by the government.
Both the strategies are able to serve the purpose of developing a better framework for the sustainable tourism. However, it can be argued that both the articles put their explanation either on government or the non government measures. In fact, it will be beneficial if a hybrid strategic plan associated with both the governmental initiatives and the non-governmental activities be followed.
In case of the plan proposed by Pearce (2013) the plan has effectively been implemented in the tropical tourism of Australia and it provides better facilities to the customers and succeeded to protect the environment. On the contrary, the article on the national heritage tourism will be followed up to 2020 for a better understanding of the effectiveness of the project (National Heritage Tourism Summit Discussion Paper. 2018).
Both the projects are still ongoing and will be completed by 2020. Therefore, it is not the right time to review the projects. However, both the projects do well in their individual context. Henceforth, it can be stated that they are successful so far.
There are a number of stakeholders responsible to attain the sustainable tourism in Australia. In this regard, the role of the government is very important. It is the responsibility of the government to implement necessary steps in order to maintain sustainable tourism. Moreover, the role of the visitors is also significant in this regard. It can be argued that the visitors must cooperate with the government norms and take care of the environment as well (National Heritage Tourism Summit Discussion Paper. 2018). The next stakeholders are the local communities and the aboriginals resided near the tourist spots. It is essential for the local people to make a friendly atmosphere so that it will be beneficial for not only development of the local tourism but also ensure sustainability in tourism. In addition to this, the responsible travel agencies also have a responsibility to continue sustainable tourism in Australia (Pearce 2013). They must share their concern and transcended it to their customers so that the visitors also get influence to protect the environment.
As far as the article of Pearce (2013) is concerned, it is a detailed analysis of the steps that must be followed in order to foster sustainable tourism in tropical Australia. From that perspective the article justified its arguments. However, from the perspective of the policy planning cycle the article did not follow proper structure (National Heritage Tourism Summit Discussion Paper. 2018). There should be a clear mentioning of the aims and objectives that the next article on national heritage tourism incorporated. Moreover, the national heritage tourism article was followed a clear structure based on the policy planning cycle. From that point of view it is more structures and well analysed. Besides this, on the question of quality both the articles have proved their excellence as per the requirement. However, the national heritage article encompassed more detailed and well versed article in compare to the article of Pearce (2013) Therefore, it can be argued that the article on national heritage tourism is more effective and accurate to understand the process of sustainable development.
It can be stated that both the articles have done great work on developing my understanding in attaining sustainable tourism. For an instance, the article on tropical Australian tourism described the non-governmental attempts to safeguard sustainable tourism on the other hand the national heritage tourism article put more focus on the role of government and government agencies to retain sustainability in tourism. As a result of that, I get every aspects of achieving sustainable tourism in Australia and able to deliver a better report based on this theme.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that sustainable tourism is an essential part in retaining the market capitalisation globally. In this regard, the report envisages a clear understanding of the sustainable tourism framework and the authenticity of the articles that are used for further research. Moreover, the role of the policy planning cycle is also played a pivotal part to evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies and able to create a hybrid network both governmentally and privately in order to establish sustainability in Australian tourism market.
Reference
National Heritage Tourism Summit: Discussion Paper., 2018. National Trust. [online] Available at: https://www.nationaltrust.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/National-Heritage-Tourism-Discussion-Paper-for-Summit-3.pdf [Accessed 16 Aug. 2018].
Pearce, P., 2013. Initiatives for the Development of Tourism in Tropical Australia. James cook university.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
