Introduction and Research Questions
The article elucidates in detail about the way choice of format for financial declaration necessarily act together with voluntary declaration regarding information on sustainability and the manner it affects cognitive bias in decision making process of professional investors. The study at hand presents an investigational evaluation in the experimental form on the impact of integration, assurance of sustainability as well as financial information on essentially the judgements related to investments. Basically, the current study assesses the way professional investors use sustainability information and analyses the things that exert impact on these uses. In this regard, two different factors of reporting are taken into consideration, namely the integration of sustainability information with specific financial information (that is to say, integrated reporting) and the factor of voluntary external assurance of specifically sustainability information. The paper develops two different hypotheses for the study that are examined in detail later on in the study. The first hypotheses states that the professional financiers who acquire an integrated account are essentially more probable to store up as well as recollect information on sustainability that the financiers who obtain disconnected pecuniary reports and sustainability information declarations (Reimsbach et al. 2018). Again, the second hypotheses developed for the study states that the impact of assurance of particularly information on sustainability on essentially specialized sponsors (that is to say, analysis and weighting of this specific information together with investment associated judgements is particularly weak in case of this integrated reporting in comparison to system of separate reporting. The research paper reflects the fact that interdisciplinary research is gradually becoming more widespread and it is quite probable that greater association between finance and sociology can develop in the upcoming period.
The research questions formulated in the current paper based on problem identified include the following:
Do the professional financiers receiving integrated report are more probable to store as well as recall sustainability information than the ones who receive separate financial reports and sustainability declarations?
– Is the impact of assurance of different sustainability information on professional financiers weak for mostly integrated pecuniary reporting in comparison to separate or disconnected reporting?
For the purpose of analysing the research questions developed for the study, the researcher has conducted an online experiment where invitation for participation was necessarily sent to 778 respondents. The study received a response rate of around 13.4% (Reimsbach et al. 2018). Therefore, the sample size stands at 104 and consists of professional analysts as well as fund managers who work as proxies for different professional financiers. This study examined outcomes for particularly non-reaction/non-reaction bias utilizing late reactions as a proxy/substitute for particularly non-reactions/responses.
Methodology and Sample Characteristics
In essence, a chi-square test was conducted and was found that there exist no significant variances between mainly early as well as late respondents. Analysis of demographics of sample shows that the mean age of the selected participants was mainly 40.2 years approximately and average time occupied in specialized function was necessarily 11.8 years. Again, analysis of demographics of the data also shows that 12.5% were Ph.D holders and 24% were Chartered Financial Analysts (Reimsbach et al. 2018). Also, majority of the participants were operating in Germany owing to the German based list selected for mailing adopted for the online experiment.
The first hypotheses developed are tested by taking into consideration two different factors. In the experiment conducted for the study, information acquired is presented in two different panels. In essence, for the first premise of the study, roughly one section of the respondents who obtained separate/disconnected declarations did not receive detached declaration on sustainability. However, for the purpose of testing the second premise of the study, the researcher has used a post experimental questionnaire available online in order to discover whether the respondents could recall both the contents as well as format of numerous pieces of sustainability associated information (Reimsbach et al. 2018). A chi-square test is conducted for examination and to identify whether any statistically significant variance existed in the overall fraction of accurate sustainability associated responses between sets that obtained incorporated reports and ones with detached declarations.
Analysis of 90 participants accessing sustainability information reveals that there exists no statistically significant variance between two different sets of participants, ones with separate reports (41 participants) and the ones with integrated reports (49 participants) (Reimsbach et al. 2018). For this is evident from the p value that is over and above1 for two different measures out of three measures of information on sustainability except for the question associated to CO2 emissions where results of chi-square test indicate marginally significant variance. Thus, the results of the findings do not uphold the first hypothesis of the current study.
The independent variable indicated in this study is “integration” and the dependent variable is the “assurance”. Moving further, the current study uses the statistical tool (ANOVA) for information weighting. Essentially, this includes two different panels that entail descriptive statistics and results of ANOVA. The findings of the ANOVA refers towards the fact that the influence of reassurance of sustainability assertions on sustainability performance perceptions of different partakers on weighting of sustainability information of different participants on essentially the corresponding investment associated judgements were statistically significant (as evident from the p value that is less than 0.1) (Reimsbach et al. 2018).
Analysis and Findings
Two different hypotheses examined in the study point towards that incorporation of sustainability information plus financial information did not lead the way towards an enhanced attainment of these sorts of information (indicating towards Hypothesis 1). Nonetheless, the integration enhanced potential of professional financiers’ admittance to information on sustainable factors, as users could essentially not avoid facing sustainability information during information processing (Reimsbach et al. 2018). The findings of the study reflect that the participants who accessed specific sustainability information represented good capability to store and evoke sustainability information, also in the disconnected reporting situation. It can be hereby assumed that professional financiers who keenly select to acquire and go through the stand-alone sustainability pronouncements considered sustainability information pertinent. This has consequence that they stored up and at the same time recalled the same, regardless of the advanced cognitive costs related to the low exhibit closeness of detached pronouncements (Thomson 2015). Again, greater demonstration diverse integrated reporting’s proximity was necessarily not observed to have a statistical significance and extra influence on the acquirement of sustainability information. In addition to this, as regards following stages of dealing and handling information, the findings reflect that the reassurance of particularly information on sustainable operations was associated to an enhancement in the seeming and apparent performance of firm’s sustainability. This also led to huge weighting of this particular information and directed towards higher investment associated judgements. Particularly, these outcomes are aligned with prior experimental work on the influence of reassurance as well as non-financial presentation and uphold the concept that sustainability declaration reflects a costly indication that augments integrity, trustworthiness and significance of declared information.
The primary findings of the current study help in understanding the fact that inadequacy of knowledge along with training on specific accounting system of accounting can be considered to be factors that exert impact on usefulness of pecuniary report for internal process of decision making. This study therefore helps in understanding different aspects of behavioural finance that is overcoming cognitive biases in decision making processes taking into consideration system of financial reporting. The cognitive bias is essentially the tendency to present decisions or else to undertake actions in an illogical manner. In order to avoid bias in decision making, there is need for reports (including financial as well as sustainability) (Dumay et al. 2017). However, this might not have contained specific information that financiers in actual fact confront while making decisions. This study helps in understanding different identical assurance levels for particularly sustainability as well as financial information. This can make certain comparability and avert weakening of manipulation in the process of decision making (Atkins et al. 2015). Even though it is not a regular and common guarantee exercises of assurance for firm’s information on sustainability, this specific exercise is on a regular basis implemented by huge business enterprises (Adams 2015). Basically, the assurance level is said to exert impact on judgements of financiers and can be subject matter for further research.
Adams, C.A., 2015. The international integrated reporting council: a call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, pp.23-28.
Atkins, J.F., Solomon, A., Norton, S. and Joseph, N.L., 2015. The emergence of integrated private reporting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(1), pp.28-61.
Barth, M.E., Cahan, S.F., Chen, L. and Venter, E.R., 2016. The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality: early evidence from a mandatory setting. University of Pretoria, unpublished working paper.
Brown, J. and Dillard, J., 2014. Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), pp.1120-1156.
Busch, T., Bauer, R. and Orlitzky, M., 2016. Sustainable development and financial markets: Old paths and new avenues. Business & Society, 55(3), pp.303-329.
Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J. and Demartini, P., 2016, September. Integrated reporting: a structured literature review. In Accounting Forum (Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 166-185). Elsevier.
Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J. and La Torre, M., 2017. Barriers to implementing the International Integrated Reporting Framework: A contemporary academic perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), pp.461-480.
Reimsbach, D., Hahn, R. and Gürtürk, A., 2018. Integrated reporting and assurance of sustainability information: An experimental study on professional investors’ information processing. European Accounting Review, 27(3), pp.559-581.
Reimsbach, D., Hahn, R. and Gürtürk, A., 2018. Integrated reporting and assurance of sustainability information: An experimental study on professional investors’ information processing. European Accounting Review, 27(3), pp.559-581.
Thomson, I., 2015. ‘But does sustainability need capitalism or an integrated report’a commentary on ‘The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure’by Flower, J. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, pp.18-22.
Velte, P. and Stawinoga, M., 2017. Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations and future research implications. Journal of Management Control, 28(3), pp.275-320.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
