Discovery of PDE-4 Inhibitors
Discuss about the Management And Prevention Of Chronic Obstructive.
DALIRESP is therapeutic product which contains roflumilast. Roflumilast is a PDE4 inhibitor. It is a selective and long-acting inhibitor of enzyme phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) enzyme. In June 2010, it got approval from EU for severe (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) COPD associated with chronic bronchitis and in March 2011, it got approval from FDA in US for reducing COPD exacerbations. Roflumilast was developed as Daliresp by Nycomed and marketed by Forest Laboratories.
Basis of discovery: PDE 4 is one of the enzymes of the family of 11 enzymes. These enzymes catalyses the breakdown of signalling molecules cyclic AMP and/or cyclic GMP. PDE 4 is the most significant cAMP-metabolizing enzyme present in the inflammatory and immune cells. PDE4 inhibitors exhibit anti-inflammatory properties by inhibiting PDE4 and inhibit release of inflammatory mediators and also inhibit activation of immune cells (Lipworth, 2015).
Both roflumilast and its active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide are potent and selective PDE4 inhibitors. Both these compounds exhibited suppression of inflammatory mediators in vitro by simulation of human immune cells. Roflumilast also exhibited efficacy in animal models of airway inflammation. These models include chronic exposure to cigarette smoke and reduced the number of sputum neutrophils and eosinophils in patients with COPD (Martorana et a., 2005; Hatzelmann & Schudt, 2001).
Theophylline exhibits anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activity at doses lower than its bronchodilation. However, it exhibits activity on the multiple PDE 4 enzymes in multiple target tissues. Due to this, theophylline has more anti-inflammatory activity; however, it has narrow therapeutic effect due to its adverse effects and interactions with other drugs via competition with various cytochrome (CYP) 450 metabolizing enzymes. Hence, non-xanthine compounds were being studied for the PDE 4 inhibition. These non-xanthine based PDE 4 inhibitors exhibited improved selectivity towards PDE 4; hence there was improved clinical utility of non-xanthine based PDE 4 inhibitors. In non-xanthine based compounds like benzidines proved to be with improved clinical utility. Roflumilast belongs to benzidine group of compounds. Several PDE 4 inhibitors were developed; however only roflumilast and cilomilast reached to the advanced stages of clinical studies. Cilomilast exhibited greater specificity towards PDE4D subtype; hence it exhibited gastrointestinal disturbances, such as emesis and nausea. Oglemilast, AWD 12–281, ONO-6126, GSK256066, SCH900182, ibudilast, UK-500,001 and tofimilast were discontinued due to lack of efficacy. Roflumilast was identified aa potent PDE 4 inhibitor in comprehensive screening programme. Potency and selectivity of roflumilast and its metabolite were tested in PDE 1 – 11. Roflumilast was advanced in the clinical stages due to high potency and selectivity because it exhibited inhibition of PDE 4 without affecting PDE1, 2, 3 or 5 isoenzymes. Roflumilast is as subnanomolar inhibitor of PE 4 without affecting other PDEs (Fabbri et al., 2010).
Efficacy of Roflumilast in COPD Treatment
In vitro and In vivo efficacy : After synthesis and evaluating specificity and selectivity of roflumilast, it was evaluated in different in vitro assays. These assays exhibited results like decreased apoptosis (result in the clearance of sputum) and release of inflammatory mediators in neutrophils (a reduction in influx resulting in a reduction of neutrophils in the airways), decreased expression of cell surface markers in many cell types (e.g. adhesion molecules in T-cells), and decreased release of cytokines in many cell types (such as tumour necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1β and interleukin-10 in macrophages) (Lipworth, 2015; Hatzelmann & Schudt, 2001). In vivo it exhibited effects like inhibition of cell trafficking, and cytokine and chemokine release from inflammatory cells such as neutrophils, eosinophils, macrophages and T-cells. Roflumilast exhibited effect in reducing production of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in guinea pigs, mice or rats after short term exposure of tobacco smoke. It also exhibited effect in reducing accumulation of lung parenchymal influx of inflammatory cells in rats after combined exposure of tobacco smoke and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (Bundschuh et al., 2001; Lipworth, 2015; Hatzelmann & Schudt, 2001).
Toxicity studies : In single dose toxicity studies, 100 mg/kg was found to be non-lethal dose in rodents. Repeat dose toxicity studies were carried out in mouse (6 months), rat (6 months), hamster (3 months), dog (12 months) and monkey (42 weeks). In mouse and rat observed NOAEL were in the range 0.2 to 6 mg/kg/day. These values are much higher than the human dose (Karish and Gagnon, 2006).
Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions: After oral administration, roflumilast is rapidly converted to its active metabolite by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 1A2. It is evident that its metabolite is with equivalent specificity and potency with roflumilast and it is responsible for the 90 % efficacy of the roflumilast. Roflumilast is rapidly and completely absorbed after oral administration and reaches its plasma concentrations (Cmax) at approximately 1 hour. It exhibited approximately 80 % bioavailability (Bethke et al., 2007). Apparent plasma half-life (t½) of roflumilast was found to be 8 to 31 hrs with median half-life of 17 hrs. Steady-state concentration for roflumilast reaches within 3 – 4 days after once daily oral administration. Pharmacokinetic profile of roflumilast was found to be linear and predictable in the dose range of 250–1000 µg. By considering all the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of roflumilast, 500 µg once daily was decided as the therapeutic dose. Pharmacokinetics of roflumilast was also evaluated in patients with renal impairment and hepatic impairment at doses of 500 µg and 250 µg respectively. It was evident that in both renal and hepatic impairment patients, there was alteration in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of roflumilast. Hence, dose adjustment for roflumilast was suggested for patients with renal and hepatic impairment (Hauns et al., 2006; Hermann et al., 2007). During its development phase, drug interaction studies were conducted with various drugs like erythromycin, ketoconazole, midazolam, digoxin and Maalox®, an antacid containing magnesium hydroxide and aluminium hydroxide. From these studies, it is evident that there is no interaction of these drugs with roflumilast. However, consumption of roflumilast with rifampicin and fluvoxamine, there was increase and decrease in the PDE 4 inhibitor activity respectively (Rabe et al., 2011).
Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions of Roflumilast
500 μg orally once daily was decided as the dose of roflumilast for its safety and efficacy. This dose was decided after evaluating Roflimilast in number of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (Rabe et al., 2005; Calverley et al., 2007 ).
Roflumilast was evaluated in numerous clinical trials for confirming efficacy in COPD. Roflumilast was evaluated in patients with severe to very severe COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) ≤50% of the predicted value based on gender, age and height controls) associated with chronic cough and sputum (chronic bronchitis), with at least one documented disease exacerbation in the previous year. In this study, roflumilast exhibited efficacy in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and occurences of disease exacerbations. Roflumilast also exhibited improvement in lung function in comparison to the placebo. In these studies, inhaled corticosteroids, LABAs and theophylline were used as rescue treatment.
Daliresp is oral tablet need to be taken orally once daily. Daliresp was evaluated in eight clinical trials for evaluating efficacy. These trials were randomised double-blind, controlled parallel group. Trial 1 and 2 were placebo controlled trials and were conducted for six months. Daliresp 250mcg and 500mcg tablet once daily were administered. These patients were with COPD in the range 30 % – 80 %. In this study, 500mcg was selected in comparison to 250mcg based on nominal improvement in the lung function. Trial 3, 4, 5 and 6 were conducted for one year and these were placebo controlled trials. These trials were conducted in patients with COPD severity less than 50 %. (Calverley et al., 2009) Trial 3 and 4 were failed to reduce exacerbations in these patients; however exploratory studies indicated that there was improvement in the COPD exacerbations. Hence, trials 5 and 6 were conducted in patients with chronic bronchitis. These two trials exhibited improvement in exacerbations and Daliresp also exhibited safety at 500 mcg (Fabbri et al., 2009; Calverley et al., 2007). Trials 7 and 8 were conducted to for the duration of 6 months as add on therapy to bronchodilator. These trials were conducted in patients with moderate to severe (40%-70% predicted) COPD. These patients were not associated with chronic bronchitis and without history of exacerbations. Daliresp exhibited significant improvement in reducing improving exacerbations of COPD (Hurst et al., 2009).
Development : Daliresp was developed as immediate release tablet. Physicochemical and biological properties of Roflumilast were studied and it was described as Class II active substance. Different excipients were studied for preparing coated tablets and selected excipients were in comply with current compendial monographs. Formulation used in the clinical studies were studied for dissolution studies and results of these dissolution studies were comparable to in vitro dissolution studies. Stability studies for Daliresp were carried out under long term (25°C/60% RH), intermediate (30°C/75% RH) and accelerated (40°C/75% RH) conditions according to the ICH guidelines. Safety pharmacology studies were carried out on the central and autonomic nervous system, cardiovascular system and respiratory, renal, and gastrointestinal. Dog species are more sensitive to cardiovascular effects of roflumilast; however, roflumilast doesn’t exhibited effect on cardiovascular system in humans. Single dose and repeat dose toxicity studies were carried out in Daliresp (Gavaldà and Roberts, 2013).
Toxicity Studies of Roflumilast
Frequent exacerbations of COPD can lead increased rate of hospitalisations. Exacerbations can put significant economic burden. Cost of severe exacerbations can be $18,000 per severe exacerbatons. Total pharmacy cost was more in roflumilast treatment as compared to non-roflumilast treatment in severe exacerbations. However, total clinical resource utilization is less in roflumilast as compared to other treatments. Hence, there is no significant difference between treatment cost of roflumilast and other COPD medications. From the cohort studies, it is evident that most of the patients on roflumilast therapy also used maintenance medications as combination therapy. According to GLOD guidelines, roflumilast was recommended in combination therapy for severely ill patients. Treatment of severely ill patients can lead to more cost of roflumilast treatment (Wan et al., 2015).
References :
Bethke TD, Giessmann T, Westphal K, Weinbrenner A, Hauns B, Hauschke D. 2006, Roflumilast, a once-daily oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, lacks relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with inhaled salbutamol when co-administered in healthy subjects. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 44, pp. 572–579.
Bundschuh DS, et al. 2001, In vivo efficacy in airway disease models of roflumilast, a novel orally active PDE4 inhibitor. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 297, pp. 280–290.
Calverley PM, et al. 2007, Effect of 1-year treatment with roflumilast in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 176, pp. 154–161.
Calverley PM, et al. 2009, Roflumilast in symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: two randomised clinical trials. Lancet, 374, pp. 685–694.
Fabbri LM, Beghé B, Uma Y, Peter K. 2010, Roflumilast. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9, pp. 761–762.
Fabbri LM, et al. 2009, Roflumilast in moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with long acting bronchodilators: two randomised clinical trials. Lancet, 374, pp. 695–703.
Gavaldà A, Roberts RS. 2013, Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors: a review of current developments (2010 – 2012). Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 23(8), pp. 997-1016.
Hauns B, Hermann R, Hunnemeyer A, Herzog R, Hauschke D, Zech K. 2006, Investigation of a potential food effect on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast, an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in healthy subjects. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 46, pp. 1146–1153.
Hermann R, Siegmund W, Giessmann T, Westphal K, Weinbrenner A, Hauns B. 2007, The oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor roflumilast lacks relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with inhaled budesonide. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 47, pp. 1005–1013.
Hatzelmann A, Schudt C. 2001, Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory potential of the novel PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast in vitro. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 297, pp. 267–279.
Hurst JR, Wedzicha JA. 2009, Management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: a state of the art review. BMC Medicine, 7, p. 40.
Karish SB, Gagnon JM. 2006, The potential role of roflumilast: the new phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 40(6), pp. 1096-104
Lipworth BJ. 2005, Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet, 365, pp. 167–275.
Martorana PA. et al. 2005, Roflumilast fully prevents emphysema in mice chronically exposed to cigarette smoke. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 172, pp. 848–853.
Rabe KF, et al. 2005, Roflumilast — an oral anti-inflammatory treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 366, pp. 563–571.
Rabe KF. 2011, Update on roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163(1), pp. 53-67.
Wan Y, Sun SX, Corman S, Huang X, Gao X, Shorr AF. 2015, A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study on the impact of roflumilast on exacerbations and economic burden among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in the real world. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 10, pp. 2127-36.