Scope Statement
Purpose: The sustainability policy is developed for executing the activities of the operative development. The purpose of the sustainability development would be helpful for aligning the strategies for dealing with the probability of sustainability issues.
Scope: The alignment issues can result in forming the major problems for BC software Pty Ltd would result in forming the major problems for the execution of the improved functional issues and development.
Definitions: The sustainability problem would result in forming the utilization of the effective implication development for the issues identified for the BC software Pty Ltd. The sustainability policy is a set of rules defined for the execution of the activities in the organization along with the definite solution to the definite problems.
Policy Statement: The new policy of BC software Pty Ltd. would take necessary steps for decreasing the consumption of equipments and materials, improving the equipments and materials, increasing the energy efficiency, space utilization, and reduction of office waste.
Responsibility: The policy would be helpful for reducing the wastage of the materials and effective utilization of the sustainability policy and deployment of the improved operations. The major responsibilities of the sustainability operations are the factors that would allow the utilization of the improved functional and development factors.
Legislative Context: The sustainability policies would be aligned with the industry information and applicable legislative and occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines.
Associated Documents: Green Design of the activities of sustainability policy
Implementation: The implementation of the sustainability policy would be dependent on the activities of,
- Green Power Implementation
- Reduction in the amount of waste produced
- Maximization of the reused amount
- Reusable office wastes that can be recycled
- Adopting the strategies for prevention of the pollution
- Environmental Management system adoption
Approved and version
Approval Authority: |
CEO |
Original Issue |
Lack of Sustainability Policies |
Policy Sponsor: |
Current Version: |
1.02.130 |
|
Policy Code |
00SP-876 |
Review Date: |
05/29/18 |
Source of information |
Information |
Past Reports |
Decomposition of the wastage |
OHS rules |
Green Power utilization guidelines |
Documentation |
Usage of the resources |
State Regulations |
Strategy Implementation guide |
Company Policies |
Sustainable Policy implementation |
Record of Meeting |
|||||
Next Meeting: 18th July, 2018 |
|||||
Recorded by: John Keith |
|||||
Date: |
7th June, 2018 |
Time: 10:00 AM |
Close: |
||
Venue: Office of BC software Pty Ltd |
|||||
Present: CEO, President, Vice President, Board Members, Documenter, Employees, and Staffs |
|||||
Issues: |
Decisions: |
Action by: |
|||
Wastage Generation |
Reducing the wastage by implementing recycling items |
Employees and Staffs |
|||
Excess Power Utilization |
Introduction of green power utilization |
Employees and Staffs |
|||
Lack of sustainability |
Development of the sustainability policies |
Employees and Staffs |
|||
Some recommendations of the sustainability policy development and execution are,
- Implication of the improved activity development using SDLC process
- Feasibility analysis of the strategies using cost benefit analysis
- Effective time frames would be deployed using proper project scheduling methods
- Implementing PDCA cycle for easing the implementation
Using PDCA cycle for the implementation of the sustainability policy would be helpful for dealing with possible pitfalls. The PDCA cycle is deployed using planning, executing, checking, and acting cycle. The implication of the PDCA cycle would be helpful for executing the implication of the activities and using the implication of the professional execution of the activities. The PDCA cycle would be helpful for using the alignment methods and forming the implication of the sustainable development model.
Plan: planning the actions for the implementation of the program and development of the activities
Develop: developing the operations and aligning the implication of the improved processes for the sustainability practices
Check: Checking with the implementation of the activities for forming the utilization of the green power
Act: The act considers the implementation of the rectification actions for the problems identified in the system
Step 1: Following the existing environmental legislation
Step 2: Continuous Improvement of the Environmental Practices by considering and assessing the required actions
Step 3: Emphasizing at all levels of employees for developing responsibility in improving the operations
Step 4: Displaying and auditing the provided policies for improving the activities
Step 5: Auditing the policy developed with the base of financial and professional attributes
3.2 Action (strategy) plan for continuous improvement in resource efficiency
The PDCA cycle is deployed using planning, executing, checking, and acting cycle. The implication of the PDCA cycle would be helpful for executing the implication of the activities and using the implication of the professional execution of the activities. The PDCA cycle would be helpful for using the alignment methods and forming the implication of the sustainable development model.
Plan: planning the actions for the implementation of the program and development of the activities
Develop: developing the operations and aligning the implication of the improved processes for the sustainability practices
Check: Checking with the implementation of the activities for forming the utilization of the green power
Act: The act considers the implementation of the rectification actions for the problems identified in the system
3.3 Record Keeping for Sustainability program
Item List |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Photocopier pages |
$1,000.00 |
$900.00 |
$810.00 |
$729.00 |
$656.10 |
$590.49 |
Laser printer pages |
$800.00 |
$760.00 |
$684.00 |
$615.60 |
$554.04 |
$498.64 |
MFD Pages |
$200.00 |
$190.00 |
$171.00 |
$153.90 |
$138.51 |
$124.66 |
Total reams paper |
$700.00 |
$665.00 |
$598.50 |
$538.65 |
$484.79 |
$436.31 |
Ream of paper |
$600.00 |
$570.00 |
$513.00 |
$461.70 |
$415.53 |
$373.98 |
Cost of paper |
$1,200.00 |
$1,140.00 |
$1,026.00 |
$923.40 |
$831.06 |
$747.95 |
Laser printer toners |
$2,000.00 |
$1,900.00 |
$1,710.00 |
$1,539.00 |
$1,385.10 |
$1,246.59 |
Printer toner cost |
$1,100.00 |
$1,045.00 |
$940.50 |
$846.45 |
$761.81 |
$685.62 |
Photocopier toners |
$1,500.00 |
$1,425.00 |
$1,282.50 |
$1,154.25 |
$1,038.83 |
$934.94 |
Photocopier toner costs |
$600.00 |
$570.00 |
$513.00 |
$461.70 |
$415.53 |
$373.98 |
MFD Toners |
$1,500.00 |
$1,425.00 |
$1,282.50 |
$1,154.25 |
$1,038.83 |
$934.94 |
MFD Toner Costs |
$1,200.00 |
$1,140.00 |
$1,026.00 |
$923.40 |
$831.06 |
$747.95 |
Cost p.p. for servicing |
$400.00 |
$380.00 |
$342.00 |
$307.80 |
$277.02 |
$249.32 |
Cost of servicing |
$200.00 |
$190.00 |
$171.00 |
$153.90 |
$138.51 |
$124.66 |
Total print costs |
$13,000.00 |
$12,300.00 |
$11,070.00 |
$9,963.00 |
$8,966.70 |
$8,070.03 |
1.Task 4: Review workplace sustainability policy implementation
4.1 Presentation
4.2 Modify the procedures
Step 1: Following the existing environmental legislation for saving paper
Step 2: Continuous Improvement of the Environmental Practices for reducing the paper usage by considering and assessing the required actions
Step 3: Emphasizing at all levels of employees for developing responsibility in improving the operations for paperless activities
Step 4: Displaying and auditing the provided policies for improving the activities for supporting the virtual books and reports
Step 5: Auditing the policy developed with the base of financial and professional attributes towards the save paper agenda
Arias-Maldonado, M., (2016). Real green: sustainability after the end of nature. Routledge.
Barr, S., (2016). Environment and society: Sustainability, policy and the citizen. Routledge.
Kontokosta, C.E. and Jain, R.K., (2015). Modeling the determinants of large-scale building water use: Implications for data-driven urban sustainability policy. Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 18, pp.44-55.
Luthra, S., Garg, D. & Haleem, A., (2015). An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Resources Policy, vol. 46, pp.37-50.
McKinnon, A., Browne, M., Whiteing, A. & Piecyk, M. eds., (2015). Green logistics: Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics. Kogan Page Publishers.
Mkhize, N. & Ellis, D., (2018). Consumer Cooperation in Sustainability: The Green Gap in an Emerging Market. In Promoting Global Environmental Sustainability and Cooperation. pp. 112-135. IGI Global.
Noorman, K.J. & Uiterkamp, T.S. eds., (2014). Green households: domestic consumers, the environment and sustainability. Routledge.
Norton, T.A., Zacher, H. & Ashkanasy, N.M., (2014). Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 38, pp.49-54.
Tayleur, C., Balmford, A., Buchanan, G.M., Butchart, S.H., Ducharme, H., Green, R.E., Milder, J.C., Sanderson, F.J., Thomas, D.H., Vickery, J. & Phalan, B., (2017). Global coverage of agricultural sustainability standards, and their role in conserving biodiversity. Conservation Letters, vol. 10, no.5, pp.610-618.
Zezza, A., Henke, R., Lai, M., Petriccione, G., Solazzo, R., Sturla, A., Vagnozzi, A., Vanino, S., Viganò, L., Smit, A.B. & van der Meer, R.W., (2017). Research for AGRI Committee-Policy support for productivity vs. sustainability in EU agriculture: Towards viable farming and green growth. European Parliament.