What is Drug Harm Minimization?
Drug harm minimization is defined by the International Primary Prevention Association as “policy initiatives, procedures, and practices that strive to lessen the harms associated with the use of psychoactive drugs in people who are unable or unwilling” to quit using them. With this tactic, which is directed at folks who continue to use drugs despite being counseled against doing so, the focus should be given on damage prevention rather than drug prevention, rather than the other way approximately.
It is widely acknowledged that drug use is associated with significant risks, and that drug users require a wide range of services in order to gradually reduce the harm that drugs cause to themselves, others, and their own families, among other things. Drug users also require a wide range of services in order to gradually reduce the harm that drugs cause to themselves, others, and their own families, among other things (Bonnecaze, O’Connor & Burns, 2021). It is founded on the generally held notion that drug use is associated with major hazards, and that drug users require a wide range of services in order to gradually minimize the harm that drugs bring to themselves, other people, and their families. The use of illicit drugs is not encouraged in conformity with this approach to policy formulation.
One of the most significant accomplishments of the previous National Drug Strategy has been the ongoing engagement between law enforcement and the health-care sectors. During this iteration, a number of sub strategies were developed that offered direction and context for specific difficulties, in addition to the construction of a national framework to lead a concerted effort to reduce the harms associated with all drugs over the course of this time period.
People who abuse alcohol and other drugs will require a wide range of treatments in order to gradually diminish the harm that these substances cause to themselves, the general public, and their families. It is recognized that drug use can be associated with significant dangers and that people who use alcohol and other drugs require a variety of services in order to gradually reduce drug-related harm to themselves and their families, as well as to the general public and other members of their communities, when pursuing a harm minimization policy approach. The use of illicit drugs is not encouraged in conformity with this approach to policy formulation (Noyes et al., 2022).
Due to the fact that harm minimization has been implemented in Australia since 1985, it is widely acknowledged by state and territory governments as the national framework for addressing a wide range of issues related to alcohol and other substances in the country. According to the National Drug Strategy (NDS) 2017-26, a harm reduction approach is employed to address the use of illegal drugs as well as the misuse of licit substances. The National Defense Strategy (NDS) goes into great detail about the harm reduction method. According to the National Defense Strategy (NDS), the following objectives are to be achieved by the United States:
The Need for Harm Minimization Strategies
As a result of eliminating or reducing the negative effects of alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, and other substances on their health, as well as on their social and cultural well-being and economic wellbeing, among other things, Australia would be able to build safe, healthy, and resilient communities Boyd et al., 2022).
In keeping with its long-standing commitment to harm minimization, the Australian government ensures that it considers all aspects of drug use, including the health-related, social-economic, and legal ramifications on individuals, families, and entire communities. To lay the groundwork for this commitment, the following considerations should be taken into account:
According to the circumstances, drug dependence can arise on a continuum ranging from infrequent use to complete dependence on a drug, depending on the circumstances (Resiak, Mpofu & Rothwell, 2021). In terms of drug usage, there are many different types of behaviors and patterns that are associated with a variety of negative consequences that vary based on the substance being abused. If we wish to be effective in dealing with these challenges, we must think outside of the box and be imaginative in our approaches.
Australia seeks to implement a balanced strategy in the area of harm minimization in general, focusing on the three pillars of harm minimization, which are as follows: lowering the demand for illegal drugs; decreasing the availability of illicit drugs; and decreasing the availability of illicit drugs. Consumption of alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, and other drugs is being restricted in order to prevent the uptake and/or delay the initiation of use of these substances in the community, as well as to reduce overconsumption and abuse of these substances in the community in order to limit the abuse of these substances among the general public. Evidence-based strategies are utilized in the treatment and prevention of addiction to a variety of substances, which aids in the recovery of those who suffer from addiction.
Drinking, smoking, and using other drugs are all related with social and health determinants such as discrimination, unemployment, homelessness, poverty, and family disintegration, to name a few examples.
As of 2018, it is projected that at least 84 nations throughout the world had clearly supportive references to harm reduction in their national policy papers, according to the World Bank. According to the World Health Organization, this is the case (Patwardhan & Fagerström, 2022). Numerous harm reduction measures, such as needle and syringe programs, opioid substitution programs, and drug consumption rooms, had been put into effect in nations where such a supporting reference could not be found. These countries included:
Needle stick injuries can be reduced with the implementation of programs such as the Needle and Syringe Program (Obradors-Pineda et al., 2021). It’s been more than three decades since they were first introduced in Australia, and they’ve made a significant difference in reducing needle sharing and the spread of diseases among injecting drug users. Among other things, they have contributed to the reduction of the spread of HIV and Hepatitis C, as well as other blood-borne illnesses, among injecting drug users. Furthermore, examinations of these programs have found that they are incredibly cost-effective in terms of their deployment and maintenance, as well as in terms of their overall effectiveness.
National Drug Strategies and Harm Minimization
The use of medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependency, which is a sort of addiction treatment, is another technique for harm reduction that is frequently implemented (MATOD). This type of treatment has been accessible in Australia since the mid-1960s, when it was first made available. Making methadone treatment available was the tipping point, and later, buprenorphine preparations were introduced to the range of treatment choices, which effectively completed the circle. A growing body of evidence from large-scale research indicates that treatment for MATOD is associated with a variety of positive health and social outcomes for both the individual undergoing treatment and the larger community as a whole (Sud et al., 2022).
On a single day in 2019, about 51,000 customers in Australia underwent pharmacological treatment for opioid dependence, with doses provided at 2,940 locations around the country. A total of 3,395 licensed prescribers of opioid pharmacotherapy drugs worked in the United States at the time of the survey’s completion. Contrary to popular belief, current research suggests that more and more people are turning to MATOD to deal with the dependency problems associated with both pharmaceutical opioid use and illegal opioid use. This is despite the fact that MATOD has traditionally been associated with illicit opioid use, particularly heroin.
One of the negative repercussions of taking illicit drugs is being arrested for drug possession and charged with a crime. Another is having a criminal record, which is another result of using illegal drugs. Participants in drug diversion programs who commit less serious drug offenses may be able to benefit from drug education or treatment as a result of their participation in these programs. Participating in this type of program, in addition to providing the opportunity for early intervention into drug problems, can help you avoid accumulating a criminal record in the future.
In order to provide a safe environment in which drunk individuals can receive care and remain sober until the effects of the substance they have consumed have worn off completely, sobering up services are provided (Stapinski et al., 2022). If you are arrested by the police because you are intoxicated, it is possible that you will be able to make use of these services as an alternative to being detained in police cells. Although most people who are sobering up are concerned with their own safety, they can also provide brief/early intervention assistance, referrals to other agencies, as well as general information to others who are seeking it.
In order to reduce the risk of harm, individuals might employ a variety of strategies, including safer drug use, restricted consumption, and abstinence, as part of their harm reduction plan, which can take many various forms. In order to be considered effective, all harm minimization techniques, regardless of whether they are intended to reduce the supply of drugs, the demand for drugs, or the damages associated with drug use, is grouped together under the umbrella term “harm minimization.” This is because they all must result in a “net reduction” in the harm caused by drug use in order to be considered effective (Smiles, O’Donnell & Jackson, 2022). When it is proved that a practice causes or contributes to additional harm after it has been implemented, the term “harm reduction” can no longer be applied to the practice in question. Sincerely, genuine damage reduction procedures are designed and implemented as a consequence of pragmatic judgements made without prejudice and on the basis of facts obtained through assessment and evaluation, and they are then put into effect as a result of this process.
Harm Minimization in Australia
In order to discourage the use of illegal substances, preventive approaches are employed, whereas preventative measures are employed in order to discourage the intake of alcoholic beverages and the misuse of prescription medications in a potentially hazardous way. The use of harm reduction techniques can be an effective supplementary method of lowering the risk of injury or death associated with drug use if they are used with the intention of encouraging the individual to seek treatment and other forms of support at some point in the future.
When strategies are implemented with the greatest of intentions, they may have unintended negative implications for individuals and communities that were not anticipated at the time of their implementation (Allen et al., 2021). Specifically, it underlines the significance of doing regular reviews in this particular situation. When the threat of damage increases, it is critical to realign the plan and conduct a more in-depth review of the circumstances surrounding the situation. In this case, things are more complicated than they appear to be at first glance.
There is usually disagreement about what constitutes a threat or injury, as well as over the most effective method of mitigating it or eliminating it. Aside from that, there are distinctions between the ways in which evaluation is carried out in the two countries. A same strategy may result in a variety of results for different people, organizations, and communities, and there may be competing interests at play at different periods in time as a result of these variations. The organization must make difficult decisions from time to time in order to maintain a sense of balance, and this is especially true when considering the requirements of all constituencies.
It is founded on human rights and public health concepts that serve as the cornerstone of harm reduction (Shayimovich, 2022). The ability to feel empathy and respect for drug users, their families, and the people in their communities is critical to lessening the harm they do. They have the right to have a healthy and safe life, as well as the right to be free from arbitrary detention and detention without cause.
It is vital to prioritize health and human rights in order to reduce harm. Persons who use drugs, their families, and the communities in which they live must all be treated with decency and respect if harm reduction is to be achieved. This includes the right to life and health, as well as the right to be free from arbitrary detention or treatment that is cruel and inhumane, as well as the right to respect for one’s personal privacy.
References
Allen, S. T., Wedlock, P. T., White, R. H., Schneider, K. E., O’Rourke, A., Ahmad, N. J., … & Sherman, S. G. (2021). Engagement in drug treatment following nonfatal overdose among people who inject drugs in Appalachia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 93, 103176. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02791072.2022.2028203
Bonnecaze, A. K., O’Connor, T., & Burns, C. A. (2021). Harm reduction in male patients actively using anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) and performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs): a review. Journal of general internal medicine, 36(7), 2055-2064. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-06751-3
Boyd, J., Maher, L., Austin, T., Lavalley, J., Kerr, T., & McNeil, R. (2022). Mothers who use drugs: closing the gaps in harm reduction response amidst the dual epidemics of overdose and violence in a Canadian urban setting. American journal of public health, 112(S2), S191-S198. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306776
Giulini, F., Keenan, E., Killeen, N., & Ivers, J. H. (2022). A Systematized Review of Drug-checking and Related Considerations for Implementation as A Harm Reduction Intervention. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 1-9. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02791072.2022.2028203
Noyes, E. A., Dunleavy, S., Mail, V., Plakas, I., Keyes, S., Gaeta, J. M., … & Chatterjee, A. (2022). Awareness, Utilization, and Preferences of Harm Reduction Interventions among Street-Involved Young Adults in Boston. Substance Use & Misuse, 57(5), 827-832. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10826084.2022.2040031
Obradors-Pineda, A., Bouso, J. C., Parés-Franquero, Ò., & Romaní, J. O. (2021). Harm reduction and cannabis social clubs: Exploring their true potential. International Journal of Drug Policy, 97, 103358. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395921002632
Patwardhan, S., & Fagerström, K. (2022). The New Nicotine Pouch Category: A Tobacco Harm Reduction Tool?. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 24(4), 623-625. https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article-abstract/24/4/623/6381108
Resiak, D., Mpofu, E., & Rothwell, R. (2021). Sustainable Harm Reduction Needle and Syringe Programs for People Who Inject Drugs: A Scoping Review of Their Implementation Qualities. Sustainability, 13(5), 2834. https://www.mdpi.com/1022874
Shayimovich, O. S. (2022). HARM OF SYNTHETIC AND NARCOTIC SUBSTANCES. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(1), 509-511. https://giirj.com/index.php/giirj/article/view/1068
Smiles, C., O’Donnell, A., & Jackson, K. (2022). Needle exchange practitioners accounts of delivering harm reduction advice for chemsex: implications for policy and practice. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 1-9. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09687637.2022.2027345
Stapinski, L., Routledge, K., Snijder, M., Doyle, M., Champion, K., Chapman, C., … & Newton, N. (2022). A Web-Based Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention Program (Strong & Deadly Futures) for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander School Students: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(1), e34530. https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/1/e34530
Sud, A., Salamanca-Buentello, F., Buchman, D. Z., Sabioni, P., & Majid, U. (2022). Beyond harm-producing versus harm-reducing: A qualitative meta-synthesis of people who use drugs’ perspectives of and experiences with the extramedical use and diversion of buprenorphine. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 135, 108651. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547221003779
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
