Main argument presented in the article
1. The main argument that has been presented it in the article is regarding the effectiveness of the situational leadership model for the indigenous leaders in Australia. In the discussion, it has been highlighted that situational leadership is most effective in nature that helps in solving the different complex requirements of the indigenous populations. In the article, it has also been described that situational leadership provide the leaders proper flexibility as this enables them to connect with the indigenous people through culture as well as diversity that is supporting in nature among different communities (West et al., 2014).
It has been argued that the situational leadership model is allowed for supporting learning that is the key component of learning within the community that is indigenous in nature and they are consistent with the culture and values as well. In order to achieve the communal goals, situational leadership model was the most critical aspect that helps in improving the outcomes related to health of the indigenous people around the world. Therefore, it can be concluded that situational leadership is the most effective model of leadership that has to be followed by the indigenous leaders to solve the complex problems.
2. The assumptions as well as the limitations that have been discussed in the particular article are regarding the experiences of the leaders that have been discussed. The experience of the leaders that has been discussed in the article is common for all the indigenous leaders in the broad Australian context. The article also deals with proper analysis of the experiences of the leaders who are outside the health profession business and even across the world as well (Herd et al., 2016).
Furthermore, there are different limitations that have been properly discussed in the article that relates to the size of the sample of the research that is small as there is only description provided about one mental nurse along with the analysis of the data that is insufficient in nature as well that is regarding the effectiveness of the leaders and this have huge effect on the relationship between the leaders and other individuals around them (Giltinane, 2013).
3. In this article the research approach that has been discussed is relating to the narrative approach of research that is consistent with the nature of the indigenous culture. The methodology that has been used in the particular article is purely qualitative in nature and the participant is only one in this article as well. The method of research is appropriate for the particular study as it suited the narrative approach of the entire research. The particular kind of research method helped in permitting greater insight into different ideas as well along with concepts as well (Popescu & Predescu, 2016).
Assumptions and limitations readers need to be aware of
The research methodology helped in analyzing the proper usage of reflection on the different lessons that has been learnt by the author in the particular article that provided proper insight on the mental health of various nurses. This methodology helped in becoming proper evidence as this discussed about the effectiveness as well as style of leadership that is followed by the leaders in the particular article.
4. The main findings of the particular article are related to the situational leadership with the help of providing proper focus on the leadership model. The article helped in analyzing the different issues as well as complex kind of situations that has been faced by different indigenous leaders in Australia as well as other societal expectations (Ledlow & Stephens, 2017). The main findings that have been discussed are relating to the different models of leadership, styles as well as practices that are appropriate and suitable in different contexts along with different communities as well. It has been found that this article helped in being more appropriate in nature from the perspective that is indigenous in nature (Parris & Peachey, 2013).
Furthermore, in the conclusion it can be seen that study has found that leadership is an indigenous concept that is appropriate in nature (Montano et al., 2017). This kind of leadership style is owned by different leaders as well as different other communities that is required for proper achievement and this kind of model not only assist in proper improvement of the indigenous communities in Australia but it helps in proper improvement of the other communities as well in the other parts of the world as well.
5. The main idea that has been described in the article is exploring the leadership notion as the evolving journey that is dependent on core beliefs as well as relationships within indigenous community (Northouse, 2015). The different styles of leadership have been discussed that includes transformational as well as transactional leadership along with the situational leadership style that are the key themes of the that works towards the achievement of the smaller elements of the success of the organization that includes motivation as well as proper leadership.
The other main ideas that has been described is relating to the core beliefs, situational considerations as well as relationships that influences the effectiveness of leadership style (McCleskey, 2014). The article helps in discussing about the different approaches as well as theories on leadership such as relationships and culture as the vital factors of leadership. The other main and essential things that has been highlighted in the article is relating to the different concepts on leadership that includes situational leadership and the usage of the leadership style in the indigenous communities along with other communities as well. Proper discussion has been provided on the research that is related to the contingency theory of Fiedler as well as path goal theory (Vann, Coleman & Simpson, 2014).
Research methodology and methods used
6. a) The practical application of ideas that has been highlighted in the article that is related to the real life managers are that is that the situational leadership style has conflicted with the core values of managers as well as indigeneity. This mainly focuses on the complying of employees rather than building proper relationships. Furthermore, the transformational leadership is also problematic for the managers as it focuses on the requirements of the organization rather than the requirements of the employees (Hutchinson et al., 2015).
This kind of situation can have negative influence on the entire organization and morale of employees as well. The situational model of leadership is best for the managers as well as organization as this is the style of leadership that is pragmatic in nature. It helps in enabling proper flexibility in the work with diverse communities. This leadership style has allowed the leader to fulfill the different expectations of the employees.
b) The ideas can be properly used in order to analyze the different problems as well as management dilemmas. It helps in analyzing the issues related to the transactional leadership that does not provide proper flexibility (Stoller, 2014). There are different ethical as well as cultural issues as it does not provide diversity. This kind of issues is inapplicable within the setting that is indigenous in nature. The other management dilemma is related to the transformational form of leadership that causes issues for the managers in different organizations as this focuses on the requirements of the organization against the requirements of employees.
c) The recommendations that can be provided is that the managers of the organizations need to properly understand the style of leadership that is best suited for them as this will help them in analyzing the issues faced by them by applying other style of leadership. The managers as well as other employees in the organization can adopt proper situational leadership style as this will help in understanding the flexibility that will help in attaining proper goals in the organization. The push down as well as push up approach can be used by the organizations as this will help the employees and the managers of the organization to properly implement such techniques in the respective organization as well.
The mentor culture will help the entire organization to increase the entire productivity as well as this will include sense of shared values as well. The situational leadership style helps in making the tasks more effective and this will help in proving beneficial to the employees. The style of leadership that is best suited for the company has to be implemented by the company as this will provide proper welfare as well as legislative adherences. The situational model of leadership is essential and this will help in indigenous setting as well.
Main findings and conclusions of the article
7. Richter, A., Lornudd, C., Hasson, H., Mosson, R., Lundmark, R., & von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2015). iLead—a transformational leadership intervention to train healthcare managers’ implementation leadership. Implementation Science, 11(1), 108.
Nica, E. (2015). Moral leadership in health care organizations. American Journal of Medical Research, 2(2), 118-118.
8. Indirect paraphrased Quote- This article helps in analyzing the deeper understanding on the different procedures that constitute to the backbone of the entire organization. The proper importance of the moral leadership has been described that has huge importance on the healthcare sector as well (Nica, 2015, p. 118).
Direct Quote- In the research that is titled “a transformational leadership intervention to train healthcare managers’ implementation leadership”, authors Richter, A., Lornudd, C., Hasson, H., Mosson, R., Lundmark, R., & von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2015, p.108) asserted that there has been few attempts that has been made that helps in unifying the different leadership styles in the healthcare sector.
References
Giltinane, C. L. (2013). Leadership styles and theories. Nursing Standard, 27(41), 35-39.
Herd, A. M., Adams-Pope, B. L., Bowers, A., & Sims, B. (2016). Finding What Works: Leadership Competencies for the Changing Healthcare Environment. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(4).
Hutchinson, M., Daly, J., Usher, K., & Jackson, D. (2015). Leadership when there are no easy answers: applying leader moral courage to wicked problems. Journal of clinical nursing, 24(21-22), 3021-3023.
Ledlow, G. J. R., & Stephens, J. H. (2017). Leadership for health professionals. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117.
Montano, D., Reeske, A., Franke, F., & Hüffmeier, J. (2017). Leadership, followers’ mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta?analysis from an occupational health perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 327-350.
Northouse, P. G. (2015). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of business ethics, 113(3), 377-393.
Popescu, G. H., & Predescu, V. (2016). The role of leadership in public health. American Journal of Medical Research, 3(1), 273-273.
Stoller, J. K. (2013). Commentary: recommendations and remaining questions for health care leadership training programs. Academic Medicine, 88(1), 12-15.
Vann, B. A., Coleman, A. N., & Simpson, J. A. (2014). Development of the Vannsimpco leadership survey: a delineation of hybrid leadership styles. Swiss Business School Journal of Applied Business Research, 3, 28-38.
West, M. A., Eckert, R., Steward, K., & Pasmore, W. A. (2014). Developing collective leadership for health care. King’s Fund.