Understanding VOC, CTC, and CTQ
Voice of Customers, or just put, the VOC is the way to demonstrate the means to capture aversions, preferences and expectations of customers. It identifies the needs of customers. Here the specific challenges to be faced by the expectations and requirements of customers are to be understood. FIFA must comprehend whether those services and products are meeting those necessities (Crawford, G., Muriel & Conway, 2018). For these qualities, such as features, freeways from defects, a value of money or costs and delivery time and lean time are understood. It also includes various warranties and availability of parts along with corporate roles. VOC is also useful to understand the different environmental effects, ethical and legal compliances.
This indicates particular, measurable and precise expectations of what customers have been considering important regarding products and services. The aspects that are vital for customers or what the customers have been caring are requirement specification, must be based on must have attributes, satisfying customers, delighting them potentially. This is measurable and established as a target. This also includes customer specifications with an acceptable range of performances. Here, many customer expectations have been about various product and service aspects such as speed and quality. Then the customers are expected to refuse to purchase from any competitor as the expectations are not met (Elias, 2016). Here, decisions have been based on complicated systems of various critical customer requirements. As the ways to decode the essential elements of customer are known, one can decide on multiple business processes without any confidence. These measurable performance standards for services and products are vital to meet the requirements of customers. For FIFA, these are elements targeted for different process improvement initiates for determining various ways to develop business and manufacturing process. It is the input to activities such as Quality Function Deployment, from the side of customer requirements (Garza-Reyes, 2015). These requirements are the attributes to services and products fulfilling necessities of customers. Here the customers have been defining those necessities. These are the “must-haves” for services and products. The critical to customer elements have been targeted concerning process development initiates for identifying ways to develop manufacturing and business processes.
These internal critical parameters of quality are essential to meet the wants and needs of customers. These are known as critical-to-quality outputs. Here, they have been identifying concerns and requirements that are vital for customers. Here, FIFA can use “trees” for drawing lines between various components of CTC and CTQ. This tree is a kind of tool for designing diagrams. It interconnects multiple dots that are present between measurable performance requirements, and specific to customer needs (Messnarz et al. 2018). For gaining the necessities of customers of lesser noisy tires, the components of CTQ are a new kind of tire material for design. It is lessening that these tires are made on the road. This is a measurable characteristic helping business to gain positive results coming from customers who are satisfied already.
Implementing Lean Project Management for FIFA
Here CTQs and CTCs are both parts of quality programs that are known as Six Sigma. They have been using methods and data to eradicate defects under any process. This has been taking place from manufacturing for transactional and also from different products and services. It is a measurable element of the service that is provided to customers. This has been needed to be present under the service for customers. This is to say that what has been delivered to be good (Orzen & Bell, 2016). However, as quality is considered, customers are ultimate judges to reveal anything to be good. Here, for FIFA, their opinions are based on whether these factors are supposed to be any quality exists with performance levels of every element exhibiting. Moreover, FIFA also needs to stay under CTQ and their different corresponding performance levels. However, their standards must be the same or exceed those of their customers.
In the current case of FIFA, first of all, the project managers must understand the values. It has been stressing on understanding services and products from a customer viewpoint. Any customer willing to pay for services and products has been related directly to how much they have been valuing that. This is to know product value as the initial step towards effective pricing with lean management. In the FIFA 2018 event, the project adopted a top to bottom approach pricing that has been defining how much those customers have wished to pay from products for the specific value. Then they have wastes from various manufacturing processes for metering the price (Furterer, 2016).
Next, FIFA has mapped the value stream. This is a sequence of activities that are involved in delivering end-products having agreed-on values and mapping value streams indicate tools to visualise. This includes spaghetti diagrams, flowcharts and Kanban. This has helped business managers and strategy makers of FIFA to determine parts of value streams from where those wastes have been taking place. This has optimised value stream for waste reductions.
Then they have flows of value streams. Here the goals are to preserve and optimise flows. This indicates evenness and rates with which information and data have been proceeding through the value stream (Zhang et al. 2018). The next one is employing pull approach the conventional manufacturing that is used to push approach is production targets that are seen from internally-determine schedule and quota of productions. This has been reactive to customer demands and is leading to the output of exceeding and failing to meet demand. On the other hand, pull approaches has been allowing customer demands for finding creations. Hence here, nothing is developed toll any client asks for that. This been appropriately done has eradicated wastes that have been caused through overwork and inventory costs. This pull approach is complicated to deploy. The reason is that it has depended on an efficient and accurate analysis of the market. It was comprised of the ability to vary production very fast and on demand. This delivery has been speedy for ensuring that the requirements of customers have been existed by the time the ultimate product gets ready (Cherrafi et al. 2016). Ultimately, the pull approach has also needed strong efficient coordination of information across the stream of value. In this, every people has been aware of production requirements and various inefficiencies that have never aroused due to mismatched and confused expectations. Then there is pursuing constant development. Lean management, at the heart of FIFA 2018 event has been an incremental and ongoing event.
PMBOK Guidelines
This has been a waste-free system. This has been practically unattainable. However, these as goals have been driving necessities of consistent development (MacRae, 2014). In the case of FIFA, the value stream has been optimised continuously. This is a defective procedure that has been developed continuously and replaced with an effort for improving quality. Here, a primary principle for developing Lean software has included amplification of learning, deciding as late as possible and providing quick and empowering teams.
It is used as the standard through PMP certification is retrieved. This has been from a survey of various practices of FIFA. Here, the benefits of using PMP Certified Project Managers and team members have been the resources that are trained already. PMBOK is costly for employees and companies. It valuable for FIFA, as it has been helping to standardise various practices around many departments. This has indicated that the people have been involved in developing managing projects in the same way to that in distribution (Hill et al., 2018). Secondly, PMBOK has been helping project managers to work with standardised systems around FIFA. Again, PMBOK has been discussing that task. Here, the method has documented the project management community. This has been assisting those who have been uncertain of how to go through risk management. Further, PMBOK has also discussed what has not been working. It has prevented project failures. FIFA, who has been familiar to PMBOK standards, has been customising tailoring of project management processes for best fitting the necessities of companies. To break the rules, the rules are needed to be known. Hence the project managers have been investing time to learn the control. They have also been spending time to determine how and where these rules are broken. As far as project structure is concerned, PMBOK is a practice that has been highly spreading and growing across the world. This is seen as a globally identified and strategic competency, as a subject and career path to train and educate. This PMBOK system has consisted of various processes, few knowledge areas and project management processes.
This method has highly emphasised in various processes. This is about starting projects, initiating that and continuing management process having specific guidelines. This has ultimately finalised plans to transfer that over the average business. This can best be seen as a linear method moving through sequential steps. This has been a predictive and a plan-based approach. This has been focusing on higher goals around the project. Here the responsibilities and role o management team members are demonstrated clearly. They are provided with freedom work towards the goal they please. These are structured and defined clearly. Here the primary focus has been on product quality (Hofmann, Gems & Smith, 2018). Here, PRINCE 2 is also changed as per any suit, and as it has been planned highly, this has been saying under time and expense barriers. Here, the primary drawback has been related to the idea is rigidity. This has been deemed unsuitable for small projects where these requirements have been changing quickly. The complexity has been to pivot because of the staggering quantity of documents generated and maintained across the project. PRINCE 2 has been an effective process-based method for FIFA 2018 project. This has provided an easily tailored and scalable solution for managing various kinds of projects. All type of procedures is defined with multiple primary inputs and outputs along with particular aims to get achieved and tasks to be carried out.
Thus it is seen that PRINCE 2 is readily applicable to any sector like FIFA. It is widely identified and providing common vocabulary regarding everything included in the project that is helpful for quick communication. It is also applicable for various types of explicit identification of project roles where the participants have understood role and needs. Developing PINCE 2 is driven by feedbacks from end-users, specialists of project management and reviewing panel of 150 private and public sector companies. Thus it has created a generic best practice that has been sufficiently flexible to get tailored to particular necessities of various organisations for every project that has been an Agile delivery. Hence, besides FIFA, it is also compatible with multiple other certifications of project management. It has provided a technical framework for projects. This has complemented to softer skills that are learnt from various other qualifications.
This strategic framework of execution has used portfolio, program and project using enabling practices that have been always and predictability delivering strategy of sustainable competitive advantage, better results. It has joined techniques, tools, processes and knowledge. This is to identify standards for creating platforms from where FIFA has fitted those proven abilities for unique necessities and cases of the strategy. In the current instance of a world cup, OPM has integrated talents, knowledge and process resources around FIFA’s project. This irrespective of the situation of the market has been assuring every stakeholders and function to deliver the strategy. The project has represented priority changes for operations and services and products to provide to customers. This has been happening through the shift that FIFA has grown and achieving competitive advantage. Here, the projects are how changes are delivered (Karout & Awasthi, 2017). The integration of resources of FIFA around its stakeholders and functions has been vital to assure that the proper combination of the rights of the project to be done. It has been delivering value within the strategy. OPM has needed to replace management system is necessary for effectively leading and managing a business. This has been ensuring integrating of maximising the contribution and engagement for delivering the strategy.
An agile team has to create fast feedbacks, constant adaptation and queries on the best practices to iterations. They have been adopting processes like continuous integration and deployment by using technologies automating steps to quicken release and product uses. Moreover, Agile project management has been calling for teams to assess cost and time to move through their tasks constantly. They have been using burnups, burndowns and velocity charts for calculating their responsibilities. This is done instead of various Gantt charts and milestones of projects to measure progress (Kryger, 2018). They have needed to participation and presence of project managers. The project managers have been vital for the success through conventional project method methods like waterfall model, like waterfall model. However, the role of project manager under APM has been distributed among various members of the team.
It is the framework that addresses management systems, methodologies and metrics. As far as methodology is concerned, it has helped in the business development of FIFA. This has been a proven toolset for achieving transformational change in FIFA. The business development process has been focusing on timely execution, analytical rigour which is data-driven, alignment of operations and client requirements. Here, the management system has been including govern-applies of management processes for assuring sustainable outcomes, accelerating the applications. As is sigma training sessions have been frequently across a few questions from various participants. DMAIC Six Sigma has been applicable as FIFA has observed process defects. They have been waiting for six sigma projects in FIFA. They have been starting six sigma project. Here the philosophy beyond DMAIC Six Sigma is that whatever they have been focusing has been acquiring focuses (Lehmann & Ekert, 2018). Next, what they have focused has been leading to development. Next, critical success factors have been used or business processes. Having six sigma is helpful to develop the overall procedure and is a logical approach for improving business process.
Sigma is a statistical term, measuring the amount in which the process has been deviating from. It is also a standard deviation of a process from the mean. It is helpful for FIFA in calculating the amount of defect in any means, and various methods have been eliminating them and get close to multiple zero effects as possible (Loge, 2018). Managers have been facing problems in terms and efficiency and quality of business at FIFA. To overcome FIFA, they have required to deploy the best methods and tools for controlling and analysing those processes. Here, the most effective way to develop the result is to enhance the overall process.
In the above study, there have been various methods of implementation that are allowed over multi-faced visions. Here, arguably the most relevant aspect of FIFA’s lean project has been that the products are manufactured in a timely fashion and only on customer demand. As shown in the study FIFA can built into and product through Six Sigma strategy. The underlying and driving ethos prevailing on the others are the unrelenting pursuits of perfection under any system. FIFA’s project management is developed through consistent inventory shedding, quality improvement and waste-cutting potentials. The study shows various ways to operate more comfortably, faster and better. Hence, here a high importance of the ethos has been to make standard for every procedures and organization systems. Here, the above are some reasons why those businesses have been turning to be norm instead of than that exception. However, despite at times inexplicable with lack of appreciation, lean manufacturing has been gaining momentum. This has been spreading for the upcoming years. As the central principles of lean project management have been generic that the lean philosophy has been adopted FIFA.
References:
Akpolat, H. (2017). Six sigma in transactional and service environments. Routledge.
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015). Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 182-201.
Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., & Benhida, K. (2016). The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828-846.
Crawford, G., Muriel, D., & Conway, S. (2018). A feel for the game: Exploring gaming ‘experience’through the case of sports-themed video games. Convergence, 1354856518772027.
Downing, C. G., & Belt, M. B. (2016). Stress Fracture: Adverse Effects of Lean Initiatives.
Drohomeretski, E., Gouvea da Costa, S. E., Pinheiro de Lima, E., & Garbuio, P. A. D. R. (2014). Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), 804-824.
Elias, A. A. (2016). Stakeholder analysis for Lean Six Sigma project management. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(4), 394-405.
Furterer, S. L. (2016). Lean Six Sigma in service: applications and case studies. CRC press.
Galily, Y., & Samuel-Azran, T. (2018). Israel. In The Palgrave International Handbook of Football and Politics (pp. 369-384). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 6(3), 226-248.
Gillett, A. G., & Tennent, K. D. (2018). Shadow hybridity and the institutional logic of professional sport: Perpetuating a sporting business in times of rapid social and economic change. Journal of Management History, 24(2), 228-259.
Hill, J., Thomas, A. J., Mason-Jones, R. K., & El-Kateb, S. (2018). The implementation of a Lean Six Sigma framework to enhance operational performance in an MRO facility. Production & Manufacturing Research, 6(1), 26-48.
Hofmann, A., Gems, G. R., & Smith, M. (Eds.). (2018). Games and Sporting Events in History: Organisations, Performances and Impact. Routledge.
Holmemo, M. D. Q., Rolfsen, M., & Ingvaldsen, J. A. (2018). Lean thinking: Outside-in, bottom-up? The paradox of contemporary soft lean and consultant-driven lean implementation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(1-2), 148-160.
Kao, J. H., Lai, F., Liaw, H. T., & Hsieh, P. H. (2015). Study of Customer Value and Supplier Dependence with the RFM Model. In Ubiquitous Computing Application and Wireless Sensor (pp. 283-296). Springer, Dordrecht.
Karout, R., & Awasthi, A. (2017). Improving software quality using Six Sigma DMAIC-based approach: a case study. Business Process Management Journal, 23(4), 842-856.
Kryger, K. O. (2018). Player protocols for football boot testing(Doctoral dissertation, © Katrine Okholm Kryger).
Lehmann, V., & Ekert, D. (2018). Assessing Agile in Automotive Embedded Development Projects Using Automotive SPICE 3.1. Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, 443.
Li, X., Zhao, W., Zheng, Y., Wang, R., & Wang, C. (2014). Innovative product design based on comprehensive customer requirements of different cognitive levels. The Scientific World Journal, 2014.
Loge, P. (2018). Soccer Thinking for Management Success: Lessons for organizations from the world’s game. John Hunt Publishing.
MacRae, B. (2014). LEAN in the Laboratory: A Case Study With Eight Years of Continuous Improvement. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 142(suppl_1), A150-A150.
Messnarz, R., Sechser, B., Höhn, H., Lehmann, V., & Ekert, D. (2018, September). Assessing Agile in Automotive Embedded Development Projects Using Automotive SPICE 3.1. In European Conference on Software Process Improvement (pp. 443-455). Springer, Cham.
Orzen, M. A., & Bell, S. C. (2016). Lean IT: Enabling and sustaining your lean transformation. Productivity Press.
Tenera, A. M. B. R., & Luís Carneiro, P. (2014). A Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project management improvement model. SELECTED PAPERS FROM THE 27TH IPMA (INTERNATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION), 912-920.
Terpstra, M., & Verbeeten, F. H. (2014). Customer satisfaction: Cost driver or value driver? Empirical evidence from the financial services industry. European Management Journal, 32(3), 499-508.
Zhang, X., Azhar, S., Nadeem, A., & Khalfan, M. (2018). Using Building Information Modelling to achieve Lean principles by improving efficiency of work teams. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(4), 293-300.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
