Impact of Poor Employment Conditions on Health Status
Discuss about the Global Prospective On Social Determinants of Health.
Improving the health status of people that are living below poverty line in the western country remains to be the longstanding challenge for different authorities in the region. The gap that exists in health status, as well as non-indigenous families, continues to be unacceptably wide. Employment conditions that affect the health of individuals have been identified as the human right concern by different organizations that work to improve rights of humanity in different states within western countries (Pega & Veale, 2015). Due to the significant amount of time individuals spend in their workplaces in various places around Australia, employment has the significant impact on an individual’s level of stress along with mental, physical, and social health among lower caste families in India. Different working conditions that include severe or working conditions yield different health among individuals (Friedrick, 2016). Among individuals that are found in families living under the poverty line in the western country like Australia, working conditions generally linked with health. Some of the linkages of employment conditions with the health of these families include physical status at the workplace, working duration, work-life balance, work pace, stress and its control, along with participation together with relationships of people at work. Besides, families that live below poverty line in Australia are the nation’s most vulnerable population that employment conditions affect their health. The Australian government has tried to put various policies and procedures to attempt to alleviate some of the problems brought by employment conditions that these groups of families face (Camargo, 2011). The major challenge that these families face is the need to understand the social patterns of health and illness and then improve as well as refine the existing measures in employment conditions. Therefore, this research paperwork explores how employment conditions remains to be a vital factor of social determinant of health among families living under the poverty line in the western country about the Australian community.
Poverty brought by poor employment conditions among Australian community has the substantial influence on the health status of individuals. The task of improving working conditions in most organizations as societal determinant of well-being imposes significant challenge to policymakers of health in regions with families that live below poverty line (Duncan, Kalil, & Ziol-Guest, 2013). Most families that live below poverty line in Australia have required concentrating on best approaches on attaining their economic activities by minimizing the employment inequalities in health that characterize their population groups. Therefore, achievement of ideal working together with employment conditions remains to be the essential factor that shapes social and health position of people that live below poverty line in Australia. Employment conditions that affect the well-being of people range from various elements that consist of the steady job in safe working conditions that include the paycheck. Ideal working conditions provide the benefit and stability vital to maintaining proper health among families that live below poverty line in Australia (Hui & Wenbin, 2017). Besides, cases of job loss along with unemployment among individuals associated with the variety of adverse effects of health among these people in Australia.
Challenges Faced by Families Living Below the Poverty Line Due to Poor Employment Conditions
Families that live below poverty line in Australia are faced with cases of poorly-paying jobs. These jobs make it easier for employees to live in unhealthier. They are also unable to offer quality education for their siblings and children as others who live above the poverty line in the region do to their families’ members. In most cases, low paying job has made it difficult for the families that live below poverty line in Australia to secure child care services to their children that are essential for their wellbeing (Saunders, 2015). The condition of employment resulting in low pay has made it impossible for these families to buy more nutritious food that can help in supporting their bodies to remain healthier. The lack of enough money to purchase food has primarily affected the health status of families that live below poverty line in Australia as they are unable to acquire much-needed food that contains nutrients vital for proper body functioning. Additionally, lack of money to secure best health care for their children in most cases has given rise to deaths of their kids as they are unable to access quality health checkups (Rivillas & Colonia, 2017). Poor employment conditions led to bad benefits as lower earnings among these families translates to the shorter lifespan.
In most cases, unemployed Australian from these families that live below poverty line faces other numerous challenges that are beyond the loss of income. Cases of laid-off employees are far percent more probable than those continuously employed to comprise of fair or poor health, and always develop stress-related health concerns. Some of these health concerns that results due to cases of laying off of workers from families that live below poverty line in Australia include instances of stroke, heart attack, arthritis, or heart disease (Ataguba, Day, & McIntyre, 2015). For example, concerning mental health report, it is reported that unemployed Australians from families that live below the poverty line were far more likely than employed Australians to be diagnosed with cases of depression and report different feelings of sadness as well as the worry in their daily operations. However, most families that live below poverty line in Australia that is employed are always classified as “working poor.” The status of such families is forever linked with different health challenges as well during their operations. Most workers from families below the poverty line have been unable to cater for health insurance coverage that requires substantial monthly subscriptions (Gea-Sanchez et al., 2017). Therefore, employees from these families that have lower wages are less likely to access necessary preventive care services that most medical insurance systems may cover like screenings for cases of blood pressure together with cholesterol.
The Relationship Between Employment Conditions and Health Outcomes
Families that live below poverty line in Australia that is unemployed are always having a higher risk of death, and they also have more cases of illness and disability compared to that are coming for well-established families regarding financial status. The psychological stress caused by instances of unemployment among these families that live below poverty line in Australia has the strong influence on physical as well as mental health together with their wellbeing in the society (Marmot, 2011). For some individuals in these families that live below poverty line, unemployment status is caused by instances of illnesses, but for the majority, it is unemployment itself that causes health problems through its psychological consequences along with the financial difficulties that it brings on an individual. In Australia, rates of unemployment conditions among families below the poverty line are generally higher. These families have people with no or little qualifications, understandings, or skills to enable them to secure an ideal employment opportunity (Stergiopoulos et al., 2018). Cases of lack of essential factor among these families result because they are unable to attain the quality education that later makes them unable to understand how to improve their health status. Besides, cases of increased unemployment remain to be great among people that live below poverty line in Australia, especially those with poor mental condition or disabilities, individuals who have caring responsibilities, and people in ethnic minority groups. Those people within Australia that live below poverty line tend to be socially excluded in most services and operations of governments on ideal ways of improving their health status (Paradies et al., 2015). Therefore, without being employed in different organizations around Australian community that deal with health delivery and care, most families that live below poverty line in Australia tend to be negatively affected on receiving improved services and products to control and improve their wellbeing.
Health employment conditions have remained to be the state of being in which all of the operating systems that make up human body system usually operates. For the extended period, the majority of the history of present medical science, the health status of individuals has been primarily viewed as the absence of defect or disease among people in different sections like employment and education. Stress in work can result in cases were an individual have the destabilizing effect on health (Chan et al., 2015). Poverty among families such as in Australia remains to be the most precise upstream or social determinant of the health of individuals from Employment conditions as the social determinant of health. There is a need for the health concern organizations to move upstream in addressing the social along with economic factors that influence the health of families such as education, financial stability, as well as employment (Honey, Emerson, & Llewellyn, 2011). The need to concentrate appropriate representations of all families in employment sector around Australia and any other nation within western countries can help in improving health outcomes for lower-income individuals.
Unemployment and Health Outcomes
It is evident according to study conducted by Fredrick (2016) that most families that live below poverty line in Australia are more probable than higher income Australians to have the variety of chronic conditions of health status, both physical along with psychological. The most significant disparities that exist within these two groups in employment sector remain to be the rates of depression among individuals. For instance, adults within Australia that are below the poverty line continue to be almost twice as likely to have been diagnosed with cases of depression at some point in their lives than were those individuals with higher incomes or those living above the poverty line in the region (Hiilamo et al., 2017). Conversely, most families that live below poverty line in Australia have instances of higher rates of health disorder such as obesity, diabetes, asthma, high blood pressure, as well as cases of heart attack or diseases. As illustrated by Conway, Tsourtos, & Lawn (2017) in their research, he stated that “Poverty within families is a thief.” Besides, poverty that negatively affects employment conditions does not only diminish the chances of an individual of progress within the Australian community. It steals several years of wellbeing and development from an individual’s life. Consequently, health does not just depend on instances of having employment or money that extends life, but it depends on various factors around employment setting. However, employment conditions in different organizations around Australia help in addressing several elements leading to poor health that comprise of developing the sense of control over an individual’s circumstances as well as future operations. Employment conditions that help in empowering people through financial empowerment as they engage in activities help in building economic security of an individual while improving quality of lives among most families that live below poverty line in Australia (Saavedra et al., 2016). Therefore, ideal employment conditions continue to be the significant factors that help in promoting health and wellbeing of individuals while it also fosters self-sufficiencies among most families that live below poverty line in Australia
In many scenes, impoverished workers within Australian community are always more likely to hold different jobs such as works done on part-time basis, converging in as well as out of work, be refugee employees, or occurrences of stress that associates with being jobless. Cases of health stress result due to the instances of probing ineffectively for joblessness that in shift effects results of health for most families that live below poverty line in Australia. According to the report by Cooklin et al., (2011), cases of employment, as well as working conditions, much impact health equity among individuals that live below poverty line. Such situations occur because inferior conditions of employment expose different individuals to instances of health care hazards that are more probable for low-status job opportunities. Besides, various pieces of evidence have confirmed that high rate of job demand in Australia, low control; along with little rewards for effort in these low-statuses of job opportunities remain to be risk factors for cases such as mental together with physical health issues (Hiswals et al.2017). For instance, employment conditions impact these families such as they become likely to excess risk to different health disorders like heart attack and pressure by fifty percent.
Conclusion
Cases of informal conditions of employment and working conditions have the significant impact on the wellbeing of most families that live below poverty line in Australia. Intimate work in most cases can threaten health status of people through its precarious job instability, lack of appropriate regulations that focus on protecting working conditions, along with occupational safety and health of workers from most families that live below poverty line in Australia (Lopez et al., 2015). Evidence from the study conducted by Saunders (2015) suggests that instances of mortality are always rampant among most families that live below poverty line in Australia among temporary workers when compared to permanent employees in the region. The increased in such mortality cases among families result because majority of Australian employees work mainly under casual financial system. Conditions always influence these informal economies that affect the well-being of families in Australia set y every employment sector (Camargo, 2011). Besides, employment conditions are some cases continuously improve the health of people by increasing social capital among people who are employed by families living below poverty line in Australia.
The increased influence of enormous, multinational universal operations along with customs to situate appropriate work strategy and standard agendas have led to cases of disempowering workers, unions, and individuals seeking job. All these disempowerment have been rampant as it has subjected different individuals from most families that live below poverty line in Australia to different health damaging conditions that require particular attention to address (Ataguba, Day, & McIntyre, 2015). These arrangements comprise of informal work, part-time employment, temporary work, and piecework among individuals making them uncertain of their next move to earn quality life that supports their well-being. Inappropriate employment conditions have to lead to the rise in job losses and weakening of regulatory arrangements exposing most families that live below poverty line in Australia to be I n higher risk of health destructions like the inability to cater for medical expenses during emergent cases that require appropriate health concern and measures.
Employment along with working conditions remain to be vital factors that contribute to social inequality in health within most families that live below poverty line in Australia and across global generations, although the focus on the adverse effect of employment conditions have received less attention from health disparities. Employment exposes people to potential health harming physically as well as physical stressors (Fredrick, 2016). For instance, workers that handle explosive and volatile materials are at high health risk. The exposure to different substances when they get under an individual’s skin it affects individuals in the variety of ways. The effect of such employment conditions ranges from inhalation of dangerous dust or physical contact with volatile or toxins that result to adjustments in hormones levels in body in response to cases of stress, and later HPA axis dysregulation as well as occurrences of somatic disease together with psychopathology. Additionally, chemical and biological materials used in some employment sectors pose the physical risk to workers when they come into contact with the body (Hui & Wenbin, 2017). Such materials can lead to burns, irritation of skin and severe deformation of body structure among other factors that will then affect the wellbeing of individuals making most families that live below poverty line in Australia to lack essential commodities as these factors can primarily affect the breadwinners in these families.
Exposure to different employment conditions such as noise, vibration, heat, together with other physical and chemical hazards remain to be the subject of occupational health that affects the wellbeing of most families that live below poverty line in Australia. The involvement of people in such exposures can lead to repetitive strain related injuries among people making them incur urge charges for the medical support that most families that live below poverty line in Australia find tough to access. The inability to obtain quality healthcare services after being exposed to such conditions makes it tough for such families to progress in their operations (Marmot, 2011). For instance, women from these families that live below the poverty line that are employed in jobs with high job stress, or low management support tend to exhibit higher depress of fibrinogen that is always connected to cases of increased risk for occurrences of cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, for most families that lives below the poverty line in Australia to attain appropriate health status while working in different workplaces (Rivillas & Colonia, 2017). Therefore, there is the need for government to consider that all organizations that employ them offer the best pay, necessary equipment to handle dangerous items, and proper guidance during their operations.
Conclusions
Employment conditions remain to be the vital factor that helps in improving the physical and mental well being of most families that live below poverty line in Australia. Besides, loss of employment among individuals can have the detrimental effect on the health status of families that are in Australia as well as other communities around the global community. The existence of poor health that results from employment can impact the ability of every individual form most families that live below poverty line in Australia to et and maintain the job. It is evident from this discussion that families living below poverty line in Australia are the nation’s most vulnerable population that employment conditions affect their health. Therefore, there is a need for the Australian government to concentrate on placing various policies as well as procedures to attempt or help in alleviating some problems occurring due to employment conditions that these groups of families face. It is also clear that the significant challenge faced by these families is the need to understand different social patterns of health and illness and then improve as well as refine the existing measures in employment conditions within their operations.
References
Ataguba, J., Day, C., & McIntyre, D. (2015). Explaining the role of the social determinants of health on health inequality in South Africa. Global Health Action, 8(1), 28865. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28865
Camargo, K. (2011). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Global Public Health, 6(1), 102-105. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2010.514617
Chan, E., Serrano, J., Li, C., Stieb, D. M., Jerrett, M., & Osornio-Vargas, A. (2015). Development of a Canadian socioeconomic status index for the study of health outcomes related to environmental pollution. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-8. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1992-y
Conway, J., Tsourtos, G., & Lawn, S. (2017). The barriers and facilitators that indigenous health workers experience in their workplace and communities in providing self-management support: a multiple case study. BMC Health Services Research, 171-13. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2265-5
Cooklin, A. R., Canterford, L., Strazdins, L., & Nicholson, J. M. (2011). Employment conditions and maternal postpartum mental health: results from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Archives Of Women’s Mental Health, 14(3), 217-225. doi:10.1007/s00737-010-0196-9
Duncan, G. J., Kalil, A., & Ziol-Guest, K. M. (2013). Early childhood poverty and adult achievement, employment and health. Family Matters, (93), 27-35.
Fredrick, N. (2016). Exploring Health Systems Within the Context of Social Determinants of Health: A Global Health Case Study. Mededportal Publications, 12. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10457
Gea-Sánchez, M., Gastaldo, D., Molina-Luque, F., & Otero-García, L. (2017). Access and utilisation of social and health services as a social determinant of health: the case of undocumented Latin American immigrant women working in Lleida ( Catalonia, Spain). Health & Social Care In The Community, 25(2), 424-434. doi:10.1111/hsc.12322
Hiilamo, A., Lallukka, T., Mänty, M., & Kouvonen, A. (2017). Obesity and socioeconomic disadvantage in midlife female public sector employees: a cohort study. BMC Public Health, 171-10. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4865-8
Hiswåls, A., Marttila, A., Mälstam, E., & Macassa, G. (2017). Experiences of unemployment and well-being after job loss during economic recession: Results of a qualitative study in east central Sweden. Journal Of Public Health Research, 6(3), 135-141. doi:10.4081/jphr.2017.995
Honey, A., Emerson, E., & Llewellyn, G. (2011). The mental health of young people with disabilities: impact of social conditions. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 46(1), 1-10. doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0161-y
Hui Jun, C., & Wenbin, L. (2017). Effect of unaffordable medical need on distress level of family member: analyses of 1997-2013 United States National Health Interview Surveys. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 1-7. doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1483-z
López-Ruiz, M., Artazcoz, L., Martínez, J. M., Rojas, M., & Benavides, F. G. (2015). Informal employment and health status in Central America. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 698-709. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2030-9
Marmot, M. (2011). Global action on social determinants of health. Bulletin Of The World Health Organization, 89(10), 702-702. doi: 10.2471/blt.11.094862
Paradies, Y., Ben, J., Denson, N., Elias, A., Priest, N., Pieterse, A., & … Gee, G. (2015). Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plos ONE, 10(9), 1-48. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138511
Pega, F., & Veale, J. F. (2015). The Case for the World Health Organization’s Commission on Social Determinants of Health to Address Gender Identity. American Journal Of Public Health, 105(3), e58-e62. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302373
Rivillas, J., & Colonia, F. (2017). Reducing causes of inequity: policies focused on social determinants of health during generational transitions in Colombia. Global Health Action, 10(1), 1349238. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1349238
Saavedra, J., López, M., Gonzáles, S., & Cubero, R. (2016). Does Employment Promote Recovery? Meanings from Work Experience in People Diagnosed with Serious Mental Illness. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 40(3), 507-532. doi:10.1007/s11013-015-9481-4
Saunders, P. (2015). Closing the gap: the growing divide between poverty research and policy in Australia. Australian Journal Of Social Issues (Australian Social Policy Association), 50(1), 13-35.
Stergiopoulos, V., Saab, D., Francombe Pridham, K., Aery, A., & Nakhost, A. (2018). Building flexibility and managing complexity in community mental health: lessons learned in a large urban centre. BMC Psychiatry, 181-9. doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1597-y
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
