Question and Steps to Help Answer
Q1)
Site 1Area of Complete squares = 138 cm2
Area of Incomplete squares = 40/2 = 20cm2
Total area = 158 m2
But the scale = 1: 40 000
Actual area = 158 * 40000 *40000 = 2.528 *1011 cm2
But,
1Km2 = 100000cm * 100000 cm
1Km2 = 10000000000 cm2
2.528 *1011 cm2
= 25.28 km2
Site 2Area of Complete squares = 119 cm2
Area of Incomplete squares = 70/2 = 35cm2
Total area = 154 m2
But the scale = 1: 40 000
Actual area = 154 * 40000 *40000 = 2.464 *1011 cm2
But,
1Km2 = 100000cm * 100000 cm
1Km2 = 10000000000 cm2
2.464 *1011 cm2
= 24.64 km2
Evaluation
The calculation of the area of the sites involves subdividing the area using equal squares of dimension of 1 cm, where the incomplete squares covered will be divided by two and added to the total number of complete squares, the total will then be multiply by area of one square since they are similar to determine the total surface area covered, after which it will be multiplied by the scale to determine the actual area then it will be converted to square kilometers.
Assumption
- The square are equal and have a dimensions of 1 cm
- The incomplete squares are made complete by dividing their total number by 2
Relevance to real world
The surveyors and architectures will use this method in drawing their plan and also interpreting it, to easily help to determine the surface area of a particular land or area to be covered with a building respectively.
Q2)
Table 2.1: Chirp rate of crickets at different temperatures.
Chirps per second |
||
Temperature (oC) |
Species A |
Species B |
20.8 |
15.4 |
16.0 |
20.9 |
14.7 |
12.7 |
22 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
24 |
15.5 |
15.0 |
24.6 |
14.4 |
18.9 |
26.4 |
15.0 |
12.8 |
27 |
17.1 |
17.1 |
27 |
16.0 |
16.3 |
27.8 |
17.1 |
18.3 |
28.1 |
17.2 |
19.1 |
28.5 |
16.2 |
15.9 |
28.6 |
17.0 |
17.8 |
29.5 |
18.1 |
14.0 |
31.4 |
18.5 |
21.0 |
34.1 |
19.8 |
20.7 |
Chirps per second |
|||
Temperature (oC) [X] |
Species A [Y] |
X2 |
XY |
20.8 |
15.4 |
432.64 |
320.32 |
20.9 |
14.7 |
436.81 |
307.23 |
22 |
16 |
484 |
352 |
24 |
15.5 |
576 |
372 |
24.6 |
14.4 |
605.16 |
354.24 |
26.4 |
15 |
696.96 |
396 |
27 |
17.1 |
729 |
461.7 |
27 |
16 |
729 |
432 |
27.8 |
17.1 |
772.84 |
475.38 |
28.1 |
17.2 |
789.61 |
483.32 |
28.5 |
16.2 |
812.25 |
461.7 |
28.6 |
17 |
817.96 |
486.2 |
29.5 |
18.1 |
870.25 |
533.95 |
31.4 |
18.5 |
985.96 |
580.9 |
34.1 |
19.8 |
1162.81 |
675.18 |
400.7 |
248 |
10901.25 |
6692.12 |
Normal equation
10
10
248 = 400.71 + 150
6692.12 = 10901.251 + 400.70
Solving by elimination method
1 = 0.3408
Substituting into the equation
248 = 400.71 + 150
0 = 7.4292
Equation in the form of y =mx + c
y = 0.3408x + 7.4292
For Species A, calculate the chirp rate at 45 degrees Celsius
y = 0.3408x + 7.4292
Substituting x = 45 degree
y = 0.3408*45 + 7.4292
= 22.80
Chirps per second |
|||
Temperature (oC) [X] |
Species B |
X2 |
XY |
20.8 |
16 |
432.64 |
332.8 |
20.9 |
12.7 |
436.81 |
265.43 |
22 |
16 |
484 |
352 |
24 |
15 |
576 |
360 |
24.6 |
18.9 |
605.16 |
464.94 |
26.4 |
12.8 |
696.96 |
337.92 |
27 |
17.1 |
729 |
461.7 |
27 |
16.3 |
729 |
440.1 |
27.8 |
18.3 |
772.84 |
508.74 |
28.1 |
19.1 |
789.61 |
536.71 |
28.5 |
15.9 |
812.25 |
453.15 |
28.6 |
17.8 |
817.96 |
509.08 |
29.5 |
14 |
870.25 |
413 |
31.4 |
21 |
985.96 |
659.4 |
34.1 |
20.7 |
1162.81 |
705.87 |
Total |
Total |
Total |
Total |
400.7 |
251.6 |
10901.25 |
6800.84 |
251.6 = 400.71 + 150
6800.84 = 10901.251 + 400.70
Solving by elimination method
1 = 0.4045
Substituting into the equation
251.6 = 400.71 + 150
0 = 5.969
Equation
y = 0.4045x + 5.969
Determine at what temperature the species would stop chirping.
y = 0.4045x + 5.969
at y = 0
0 = 0.4045x + 5.969
0.4045x = -5.969
X = -14.80C
The test is correct since it is expected at negative temperature the cricket will stop chirping just as what has been shown in calculation
Site 1 and Site 2 calculations
Evaluation
A regression model involves the following variable
- The unknown parameters denoted by which represent a scalar or a vector
- The dependent variable x
- The dependent variable y
To carry out regression analysis involves finding solution for the known parameter
In our case we involve in determining linear regression , where the model specification of y is a linear combination of of the parameters.
Assumptions
There is one independent variable x and two parameters 0 and 1 giving a straight line
Y = 0 + 1x
Given a random sample from a population we estimate the population parameters and obtain the sample linear regression model
, this equation is known as the least squares line of regression of y on x
Relevance
In statistical modeling, regression analysis is a set of statistical processes for estimating the relationships among variables. It includes many techniques for modeling and analyzing several variables, when the focus is on the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables (or ‘predictors’). More specifically, regression analysis helps one understand how the typical value of the dependent variable (or ‘criterion variable’) changes when any one of the independent variables is varied, while the other independent variables are held fixed.
Most commonly, regression analysis estimates the conditional expectation of the dependent variable given the independent variables – that is, the average value of the dependent variable when the independent variables are fixed. Less commonly, the focus is on a quantile, or other location parameter of the conditional distribution of the dependent variable given the independent variables. In all cases, a function of the independent variables called the regression function is to be estimated. In regression analysis, it is also of interest to characterize the variation of the dependent variable around the prediction of the regression function using a probability distribution. A related but distinct approach is Necessary Condition Analysis[1](NCA), which estimates the maximum (rather than average) value of the dependent variable for a given value of the independent variable (ceiling line rather than central line) in order to identify what value of the independent variable is necessary but not sufficient for a given value of the dependent variable.
Q3)
Total number of medals (including gold medals) won by Australian and British Olympic Athletes since World War II.
AUSTRALIA |
GREAT BRITAIN |
|||
Olympics |
Gold |
TOTAL |
Gold |
TOTAL |
1948 London |
2 |
13 |
3 |
23 |
1952 Helsinki |
6 |
11 |
1 |
11 |
1956 Melbourne |
13 |
35 |
6 |
24 |
1960 Rome |
8 |
22 |
2 |
20 |
1964 Tokyo |
6 |
18 |
4 |
18 |
1968 Mexico |
5 |
17 |
5 |
13 |
1972 Munich |
8 |
17 |
4 |
18 |
1976 Montreal |
0 |
5 |
3 |
13 |
1980 Moscow |
2 |
9 |
5 |
21 |
1984 Los Angeles |
4 |
24 |
5 |
37 |
1988 Seoul |
3 |
14 |
5 |
24 |
1992 Barcelona |
7 |
27 |
5 |
20 |
1996 Atlanta |
9 |
41 |
1 |
15 |
2000 Sydney |
16 |
58 |
11 |
28 |
2004 Athens |
17 |
50 |
9 |
30 |
2008 Beijing |
14 |
46 |
19 |
47 |
2012 London |
8 |
35 |
29 |
65 |
2016 Rio De Janiero |
8 |
29 |
27 |
67 |
Australia data
AUSTRALIA |
|
Olympics |
TOTAL |
1976 Montreal |
5 |
1980 Moscow |
9 |
1952 Helsinki |
11 |
1948 London |
13 |
1988 Seoul |
14 |
1968 Mexico |
17 |
1972 Munich |
17 |
1964 Tokyo |
18 |
1960 Rome |
22 |
1984 Los Angeles |
24 |
1992 Barcelona |
27 |
2016 Rio De Janiero |
29 |
1956 Melbourne |
35 |
2012 London |
35 |
1996 Atlanta |
41 |
2008 Beijing |
46 |
2004 Athens |
50 |
2000 Sydney |
58 |
Calculate a five number summary for Australia
The total has been arranged in ascending order as shown on the table
Minimum number = 5
Maximum number = 58
Median number = average of the 9th number and 10th number
Median = (22 + 24)/2
= 23
Quartile
Q1 can be thought of as a median in the lower half of the data, and Q3 can be thought of as a median for the upper half of data
5,9,11,13,14,17,17,18,22,24,27,29,35,35,41,46,50,58
Lower quartile (Q1) = (13+14)/2 = 13.5
Upper quartile = (35+41)/2 = 38
Great Britain data
GREAT BRITAIN |
|
Olympics |
TOTAL |
1952 Helsinki |
11 |
1968 Mexico |
13 |
1976 Montreal |
13 |
1996 Atlanta |
15 |
1964 Tokyo |
18 |
1972 Munich |
18 |
1960 Rome |
20 |
1992 Barcelona |
20 |
1980 Moscow |
21 |
1948 London |
23 |
1956 Melbourne |
24 |
1988 Seoul |
24 |
2000 Sydney |
28 |
2004 Athens |
30 |
1984 Los Angeles |
37 |
2008 Beijing |
47 |
2012 London |
65 |
2016 Rio De Janiero |
67 |
Calculate a five number summary for Great Britain
The total has been arranged in ascending order as shown on the table
Minimum number = 11
Maximum number = 67
Median number = average of the 9th number and 10th number
Median = (21 + 24)/2
= 22.5
Quartile
Q1 can be thought of as a median in the lower half of the data, and Q3 can be thought of as a median for the upper half of data
11,13,13,15,18,18,20,20,21,23,24,24,28,30,37,47,65,67
Lower quartile (Q1) = (15+18)/2 = 16.5
Upper quartile = (30+37)/2 = 33.5
Mean of Australian
= 494/18
= 27.44
Mean of Great Britain
= 471/18
= 26.67
It is clear that Australian gotten more medals when the means was compared similarly to the median which shows that the Great Britain had less
Evaluation
A five number summary involve determination of minimum value from the data, maximum value from the data, median value of the data, lower quartile value of the data and finally upper quartile value of the data.
Where the minimum value is the smallest number of the data, while the maximum value is the highest value of the data, median value is the center values of the data, while the upper quartile is the median of the upper values after the median of all the data while the lower quartile is the median of the lower values before the median of the whole data.
Assumptions
All the data should be first be arranged in ascending order, failure in which all the five number summary will be wrong.
Relevance
- The five-number summary provides a concise summary of the distributionof the observations.
- The five-number summary gives information about the location (from the median), spread (from the quartiles) and range (from the sample minimum and maximum) of the observations.