The presented professional practice scenario
Discuss about the Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing for Moral Model.
The presented professional practice scenario reveals the ethical controversy that arose due to the absence of a well-defined patient nutrition policy in the general practice clinical facility. The registered nurse (RN) Sam experiences a positive interpersonal relationship with Lee (i.e. the treated patient). Lee received chronic leg wound dressing intervention from Sam and exhibited the clinical history of cerebral palsy and reduced weight. Lee’s wish to walk with Sam at the roadside for pasta consumption created an ethical scenario that requires evidence-based resolution by the registered nurse. The presented paper discusses various ethical concerns and complications related to patients’ nutritional and dietary management in the medical facilities/clinics. The paper also advocates the need for the development of patient catering standards and conventions in the context of minimizing the risk of trauma or psychosocial adversity that might arise due to patients’ nutritional mismanagement in the healthcare settings. The paper categorically discusses social learning, psychodynamic, and moral models and their implications in the context of the presented ethical scenario.
The greatest moral dilemma presented in the paper relates to the deontology and consequentialism that directed Sam’s action in response to Lee’s requirement eating requirement (Crockett, 2013). Consequentialism is a moral attribute that determines the authenticity of individual actions on the scale of their outcomes. The outcome of the presented scenario is based on the accomplishment of Lee’s feeding requirement without disrupting Lee’s and Sam’s interpersonal relationship. Contrarily, deontology approach in the presented case advocates ethical actions based on a set of global rules and ethical conventions. Lee’s food-based outing with Sam appears unjustified since it increases Sam’s professional liability related to any adverse outcome that Lee might experience during traveling and pasta consumption outside the clinic. Therefore, Sam needs to select either deontology or consequentialism based ethical approaches for taking a moral/ethical decision in the given scenario. The Moral Model considers unconventional behavior or addiction as a moral weakness (DOH, 2004). Lee experienced the addiction of eating in the group despite his underweight status. The Moral Model’s conventions, therefore, radically negate the need for Lee’s outing with Sam in the context of satisfying his hunger. The principle of beneficence advocates the requirement of making ethical decisions in the best interest of the treated patients in the context of minimizing the risk of adversity and deterioration in a nurse-patient relationship (Downs, et al., 2016). Furthermore, the ethical conventions advocate the requirement of safeguarding patient’s autonomy and self-identity through ethical decision-making. The patient in the presented scenario shared the desire to consume a refreshing meal outside the clinic in accordance with his dietary habit and pattern (Entwistle, et al., 2010). Restraining the patient from an outdoor meal in the absence of any fixed clinic policy required downgrading patient’s autonomy as well as a good patient-nurse relationship. This ethical perspective advocates patient’s outdoor meal consumption for the sake of maintaining the therapeutic relationship and treatment compliance.
Greatest moral dilemma presented
The RN in the presented scenario needs to utilize practical wisdom/ethics expertise and neutrality notion while giving a rational advice to the patient regarding outdoor meal consumption. The explanation of the risks associated with outdoor meals in the context of patient’s chronic leg wound and cerebral palsy is highly needed to modify his outdoor eating decision (Gasparetto, et al., 2018). Empirical ethics advocate the requirement of innovative utilization of innovation and research in the context of taking calculated decisions in relation to a given ethical scenario (Gardner & Williams, 2015). The RN in the presented scenario needs to understand the patient’s eating requirement with respect to his healthcare status and clinical manifestations prior to taking a final decision regarding outdoor meals. Chronic wounds substantially elevate patient’s socioeconomic constraints a considerable extent (McDaniel & Browning, 2014). Furthermore, the socioeconomic burden effectively elevates patient’s risk of mental manifestations including stress, anxiety, and depression (Dorner & Mittendorfer-Rutz, 2017). Therefore, Sam’s disapproval of Lee’s outdoor meals could not only disrupt the nurse-patient relationship but also increase the risk of adverse mental complications. The ethical conventions necessitate the requirement of administering healthcare interventions to the cerebral palsy patients while safeguarding their preferences and values (Larivière-Bastien, et al., 2013). These conventions also advocate the requirement of shared decision-making with the treated patient in the context of enhancing the healthcare outcomes. The criticality of Lee’s case can be understood from the fact that a denial from Sam’s front could potentially overshadow Lee’s preferences and individualized values in the clinical setting. This might lead to miscommunication, and deterioration of cooperation between Lee and Sam during the prospective treatment sessions in the clinic. Contrarily, the ethical conventions emphasize the need for maintaining the quality of life of patients affected with various neurodevelopmental disabilities. Lee’s cerebral palsy status, therefore, requires ethical and clinical management while maintaining his quality of life across the community environment (Racine, et al., 2013). The outdoor visit of Lee with Sam and consumption of unhygienic meals could deteriorate Lee’s quality of life to a considerable extent. This ethical perspective does not approve of Lee’s outdoor meals consumption in the presented context.
Lee’s cerebral palsy manifests with the clinical complications including difficult muscle coordination, uncoordinated movements, gait imbalance, impaired vision, and risk of brain infections (NIH, 2018). Therefore, consumption of non-supervised outside meals might substantially elevate Lee’s risk of somatic complications and trauma. Therefore, it would be unethical for Sam to accept Lee’s request for an outdoor meal in the context of minimizing his risk of infection and other health risks. On the other hand, the ethical conventions of nursing practice emphasize the need for maintaining a therapeutic alliance with the treated patients to improve their resilience, vitality, and overall mental health (Allen, et al., 2017). This therapeutic alliance is highly needed with the objective improving patient’s trust in the administered healthcare interventions. Sam in the presented scenario had worked hard to maintain a smooth and interactive therapeutic relationship with Lee through compassionate and empathetic attitude. The straightforward rejection of Lee’s eating request could instantly impact the process of therapeutic communication and deteriorate the patient care outcomes in an unprecedented manner. This created an ethical dilemma where Sam required taking an ethical decision while considering Lee’s existing health risks and predisposition towards psychosocial complications. Psychodynamic model necessitates the need for improving patient’s understanding of the repetitive conflicts that prove to be the causes of psychosocial and ethical complications (Churchill, et al., 2010). The resolution of these conflicts requires shared decision-making through empathetic/compassionate attitude. Sam in the presented scenario needs to counsel Lee in a manner to avoid any potential communication conflict while enhancing Lee’s understanding of the risks associated with the outdoor eating. This might not appear feasible in the presented scenario in a short interval due to Lee’s persistent group eating behavior. However, behavior counseling and support interventions through interdisciplinary coordination could improve and modify Lee’s decision of outdoor eating in the presented scenario.
RN in the presented scenario
Ethical conventions also advocate the use of mind-body awareness techniques to facilitate the utilization of appropriate nutritional interventions in the patient population. The availability of nutritional and flavored food in the clinical setting could have assisted Sam in modifying Lee’s desire for outdoor meals. However, denial in the absence of an indoor meal facility could have caused the patient’s emotional detachment from the registered nurse. Furthermore, healthcare ethics emphasize the capacity of nutritional methods to facilitate the pattern of self-therapy in the treated patients (Essen & Mårtensson, 2014). Lee’s acquisition of the desired food option through Sam’s coordination and support could have improved their emotional/interpersonal bonding and the associated healthcare outcomes. Therefore, Sam’s consideration of Lee’s outdoor meal choice could potentially improve his mental health and overall well-being to a considerable extent. Bandura’s social learning theory substantially extends wide ethical implications in the presented case scenario. This theory advocates the need for developing innovation, ethical and mediating interventions after thorough observation of the stimuli and their respective outcomes (or responses). Social learning theory also promotes observational learning and self-efficacy of individuals while facilitating their behavioral orientation with environment and circumstances (Ghazi, et al., 2018). Sam in the presented scenario required to mediate the ethical situation after analyzing patient stimuli and proactively evaluating the expected behavioral outcomes following the ethical intervention. This proactive ethical mediation through cognitive and behavioral interventions could effectively stabilize Lee’s behavior and convince him to reconsider the decision of outdoor meals.
Sam’s preliminary objective in the presented scenario attributes to the mitigation of patient’s moral distress that might emanate after receiving a denial for outdoor meals. The maintenance of morality during patient handling is of paramount importance and warrants utmost consideration by the registered nurse. Furthermore, the incapacity of the nurse or physician in handling the ethical dilemma might also induce moral distress in the concerned nurse/physician (Newson, 2015). Therefore, the registered nurses need to undertake medical and ethical interventions while safeguarding their own mental well-being and conscience. This step is substantially required to effectively maintain the quality of patient care interventions in the clinical setting. Sam’s coordination in with the treated patient require professional orientation while minimizing the risk of ethical and moral dilemmas and associated patient care adversity. The management of ethical concern in the presented case scenario by the registered nurse necessarily requires discussion with other experienced colleagues and healthcare professionals (Doran, et al., 2015). Sam in the presented scenario therefore needs to telephonically coordinate with other healthcare professionals before taking a decision to accompany Lee to Vinny’s pasta.
Importance of maintaining therapeutic alliance
Sam requires evaluating the medicolegal aspects of Lee’s health risks while taking an ethical decision regarding the acknowledgement or rejection of the outdoor meal request. Sam also needs to understand Lee’s nutrition risk facts before approving/disapproving the outdoor meal request. Lee experiences elevated risk of malnutrition because of pre-existing cerebral palsy. This indicates that Lee might experience overnutrition or undernutrition in the absence of appropriate dietary regimen (Verschuren & Peterson, 2016). Sam needs to evaluate Lee’s risk of nutrition-based medical emergency while accepting or denying the request of an outdoor meal. Lee in the presented scenario experiences the risk of collapsing under the impact sustained hunger or weakness in the context of his existing physical and mental health. The reduction in blood glucose level due to sustained hunger/lack of eating could drastically deteriorate Lee’s health in the clinical setting. These facts categorically warrant the comparative analysis of Lee’s health risks, mental health factors, and expected adverse outcomes that might immediately occur in the absence of meals consumption. Sam could allow Lee to consume roadside pasta if the benefits of the same overweight the associated risks in the presented scenario. Furthermore, Sam needs to theorize and speculate the extent of psychosocial deterioration that Lee might experience after receiving a denial for the outside meal. In summary, the assessment of medicolegal complications, ethical concerns, psychosocial dilemmas, and healthcare discrepancies is substantially required while resolving the ethical concerns and issues related to the presented patient scenario. The case findings necessitate the requirement of configuring policies and procedures to guide the registered nurses and other healthcare professionals in the context of addressing patient’s individualized concerns and challenges in the clinical setting.
Conclusion
The presented case scenario presents a range of ethical and moral conflicts that require categorical resolution by the registered nurse. The configuration of a rational decision regarding the patient’s roadside meal requirement appears highly challenging in the absence of an appropriate patient care policy in the clinical setting. The registered nurse in the presented scenario must keep in mind the requirement of administering holistic and person-centered ethical interventions while safeguarding the dignity, integrity, confidentiality, perceptions, cultural beliefs, and perspective of the treated patient. Contrarily, the consideration of medicolegal aspects of patient care interventions is also needed while catering to the individualized needs and nutritional requirements of the clinical intervened patient. The benefits and risks of patient’s outdoor meal in the presented scenario counteract each other, thereby creating the state of an ethical and moral discrepancy. The registered nurse finally requires taking an action in the best interest of the patient while mitigating the associated risk factors up to the feasible extent. The sustenance of a dynamic nurse-patient therapeutic relationship is highly required to maintain the patient’s trust and confidence in the recommended therapeutic approaches. This will not only improve patient’s treatment compliance but also minimize the overall healthcare burden of the clinical setting.
Mind-body awareness techniques in nutritional interventions
References
Allen, M. et al., 2017. Patient-Provider Therapeutic Alliance Contributes to Patient Activation in Community Mental Health Clinics. Adm Policy Ment Health, 44(4), pp. 431-440.
Churchill, R. et al., 2010. Psychodynamic therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
Crockett, M. J., 2013. Models of morality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), pp. 363-366.
DOH, 2004. 3.4 Models that help us understand AOD use in society. [Online]
Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/drugtreat-pubs-front5-wk-toc~drugtreat-pubs-front5-wk-secb~drugtreat-pubs-front5-wk-secb-3~drugtreat-pubs-front5-wk-secb-3-4
[Accessed 29 07 2018].
Doran, E. et al., 2015. Aust Health Rev. Managing ethical issues in patient care and the need for clinical ethics support, 39(1), pp. 44-50.
Dorner, T. E. & Mittendorfer-Rutz, E., 2017. Socioeconomic inequalities in treatment of individuals with common mental disorders regarding subsequent development of mental illness. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 52(8), pp. 1015-1022.
Downs, J., Forbes, D., Johnson, M. & Leonard, H., 2016. How can clinical ethics guide the management of comorbidities in the child with Rett syndrome?. J Paediatr Child Health, 52(8), pp. 809-813.
Entwistle, V. A., Carter, S. M., Cribb, A. & McCaffery, K., 2010. Supporting Patient Autonomy: The Importance of Clinician-patient Relationships. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(7), pp. 741-745.
Essen, E. V. & Mårtensson, F., 2014. Young adults’ use of food as a self-therapeutic intervention. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being.
Gardner , J. & Williams, C., 2015. Responsible research and innovation: A manifesto for empirical ethics?. Clinical Ethics, 10(1-2), pp. 5-12.
Gasparetto, A., Jox, R. J. & Picozzi, M., 2018. The Notion of Neutrality in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Philos Ethics Humanit Med.
Ghazi, C. et al., 2018. Social cognitive r learning theory use to improve self-efficacy in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Physiother Theory Pract, 34(7), pp. 495-504.
Larivière-Bastien, D. et al., 2013. Perspectives of young adults with cerebral palsy on transitioning from pediatric to adult healthcare systems. Semin Pediatr Neurol, 20(2), pp. 154-159.
McDaniel, J. C. & Browning, K. K., 2014. Smoking, Chronic Wound Healing, and Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 41(5), p. 415–E2.
Newson, A. J., 2015. The value of clinical ethics support in Australian health care. MJA, 202(11), pp. 568-269.
NIH, 2018. Cerebral Palsy Information Page. [Online]
Available at: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/All-Disorders/Cerebral-Palsy-Information-Page
[Accessed 29 07 2018].
Racine, E., Bell, E. & Shevell , M., 2013. Ethics in neurodevelopmental disability. Handb Clin Neurol, pp. 243-263.
Verschuren, O. & Peterson, M. D., 2016. Nutrition and physical activity in people with cerebral palsy: Opposite sides of the same coin. Dev Med Child Neurol, 58(5), p. 426.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
