Evaluation of PRINCE2 and PMI Methodologies
The development of the effective methodology for the project activities would be integrated with the formation of the improved work alignment and management (Apostolopoulos et al. 2014). The project management methodologies would be integrated with the simplification of the works. The management of the implication management would be eased with the formation of the effective alignment and the significant listing of the project management works. The comparison of the works would be integrated with the utilization of the works for aligning the development of the PRINCE2 and PMI methodology.
The following assignment has been developed for the listing of the innovative work alignment and integrating the listing of the information for the project. The following assignment has aligned the evaluation of the PRINCE2 and PMI methodology. The evaluation of the methodologies of PRINCE2 and PMI has been given in the following sections. The literature review on the two methodologies has been executed with the utilization of the improved work completion management.
Evaluation of PRINCE2 and PMI methodology
The PRINCE2 and PMI methodologies are the project management methodologies that are helpful for the deployment of the processing for the implication of the project management works. The implication of the PRINCE2 and PMI methodologies ensure the management of the project activities using specific knowledge tools and principles for the project. According to Ahimbisibwe, Cavana and Daellenbach (2015), PRINCE2 stands for projects in controlled environment and it is used in large scale for the completion of the project and it would imply the successful approval of the project.
The integration of the project management methodology would be integrated with the formation of the implied project management works. The alignment would be integrated with the information management processing. The listing of the functions of PRINCE2 would allow the controlling of the resources and the management of the business development. The risk management would be deployed for effective management of the risk. It would benefit the increment of the prospect of operations and the implication of the successive work formation.
Karaman and Kurt (2015) have provided detail analysis of the PMI methodology and it defines it as the implication of the effective work formation and the utilization of the traditional PMBOK supplied operations. The PMI have been used by most of the project managers as it comprise of all basic methodologies and processes of project management methodologies. The information alignment of the project management methodology would be supported by the utilization of the work and effective implication of the works.
The listing of the probable management works would be aligned with the methodology of integrating the works and aligning the listing of the works and forming the development formation. According to Mousaei and Gandomani (2018), the PMI follows the processes of initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing. These methods would be integrated with the continuation of the improved work alignment and development.
According to Yao, Siang and Yih (2016), the PRINCE2 and PMI have relative functions as both of them are project management methodologies deployed for effectively completion of the works. The PRINCE2 methodology would help in listing the management for excavating the work for deploying the successful listing management. The PRINCE2 certification can be done very easily and it helps in the faster execution of the management. The implication listing would be developed for the continuation of the smart work analysis.
PRINCE2 Methodology for Project Management
PRINCE2 can be effectively used in many projects and it helps in forming the complete analysis of the project (Tavan and Hosseini 2016). The methodology would help in focusing the main requirements of the project owner for the project works. The completion of the project using the methodology would help in easing the approval of the final outcome of the project.
The methodology of PRINCE2 has a definite structure in terms of execution of the project work alignment. The improvements in operations would be aligned with the formation of the improved construction works. It would help in listing flexible operations for the project and ensuring the alignment of the works (Skogmar 2015). The project management methodologies would be integrated with the simplification of the works. The management of the implication management would be eased with the formation of the effective alignment and the significant listing of the project management works.
The PRINCE2 and PMI methodologies are the project management methodologies that are helpful for the deployment of the processing for the implication of the project management works. The implication of the PRINCE2 and PMI methodologies ensure the management of the project activities using specific knowledge tools and principles for the project (Saad et al. 2014). The integration of the project management methodology would be integrated with the formation of the implied project management works. The alignment would be integrated with the information management processing.
The listing of the functions of PRINCE2 would allow the controlling of the resources and the management of the business development. The risk management would be deployed for effective management of the risk. The PMI have been used by most of the project managers as it comprise of all basic methodologies and processes of project management methodologies (Vardy 2015). The information alignment of the project management methodology would be supported by the utilization of the work and effective implication of the works.
The listing of the probable management works would be aligned with the methodology of integrating the works and aligning the listing of the works and forming the development formation. The PMI follows the processes of initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing (Maric 2017). These methods would be integrated with the continuation of the improved work alignment and development.
Hence as per the study by Tavan and Hosseini (2016), the PMI and PRINCE2 would be helpful for deploying the effective alignment of the works for taking care of the innovative and effective work alignment. The PMI and PRINCE2 both employs the utilization of the successful work alignment for the project management methodologies.
Context why PRINCE2 is best for the project
PRINCE2 methodology is helpful for the listing of the project works and the listing of the works for the alignment of the innovative work completion (Ahimbisibwe, Daellenbach and Cavana 2017). The PRINCE2 methodology would help in listing the management for excavating the work for deploying the successful listing management. The PRINCE2 methodology would be implied with the focusing on the implication of the successive work alignment.
Context why PRINCE2 is best for the project
The PRINCE2 methodology would be integrated with the formation of the effective work alignment management. The PRINCE2 certification can be done very easily and it helps in the faster execution of the management. The implication listing would be developed for the continuation of the smart work analysis. Krysinski and Miller (2016), have stated that the PRINCE2 methodology would help in effective alignment of the processes for the project. PRINCE2 can be effectively used in many projects and it helps in forming the complete analysis of the project. The benefits of implication of the PRINCE2 methodology for Lakeside Café Construction are,
Focus on customer requirements: The main benefit of using PRINCE2 methodology for the project of Lakeside Café Construction is that the methodology focuses on the customer’s requirements. The methodology would help in focusing the main requirements of the project owner for the construction of the café. The completion of the project using the methodology would help in easing the approval of the final outcome of the project.
Following definite structure for management: The methodology of PRINCE2 has a definite structure in terms of execution of the project work alignment. The management of the works would be implemented with the formation of the definite work alignment management. The organizational structure for the project would be supported by the implication of the work development for the Lakeside Café Construction.
Product based emphasis: The PRINCE2 methodology is supportive to the product based operations and the alignment of the works. The deployment of the works sustained with the formation of the café. The utilization of the methodology would focus more on the final outcome of the project that is the café by the Lakeside.
Flexibility in operations: The implication of the PRINCE2 methodology would support the flexibility in operations and the alignment management. The improvements in operations would be aligned with the formation of the improved construction works for the Lakeside Café Construction. It would help in listing flexible operations for the project and ensuring the alignment of the works.
Conclusion
It can be concluded from the assignment that both PRINCE2 and PMI helps in developing the completion of the effective goal alignment. The PMI had been largely deployed and executed with the formation of the success for project managers. The PMBOK methodology had been effectively deployed for the listing of the innovative work completion. The integration of the project alignment for forming the evaluation of the works definite to the implication of the progressive work development.
The project management methodologies had be integrated with the simplification of the works. The comparison of the works had been integrated with the utilization of the works for aligning the development of the PRINCE2 and PMI methodology. The following assignment had been developed for the listing of the innovative work alignment and integrating the listing of the information for the project.
The following assignment had aligned the evaluation of the PRINCE2 and PMI methodology. The evaluation of the methodologies of PRINCE2 and PMI had been given in the following sections. The literature review on the two methodologies had been executed with the utilization of the improved work completion management. The report had been developed for the listing of the information related to the project management methodologies.
References
Ahimbisibwe, A., Cavana, R.Y. and Daellenbach, U., 2015. A contingency fit model of critical success factors for software development projects: A comparison of agile and traditional plan-based methodologies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), pp.7-33.
Ahimbisibwe, A., Daellenbach, U. and Cavana, R.Y., 2017. Empirical comparison of traditional plan-based and agile methodologies: Critical success factors for outsourced software development projects from vendors’ perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(3), pp.400-453.
Apostolopoulos, C., Halikias, G., Maroukian, K. and Tsaramirsis, G., 2014. Towards the Facilitation of Project Change Risks: An IT Service Management Perspective.
Karaman, E. and Kurt, M., 2015. Comparison of project management methodologies: PRINCE2 versus PMBOK for it projects. Int. Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Research, 4(5), pp.657-664.
Krysi?ski, M. and Miller, P., 2016. The Role of Conflict in Project Management in the PRINCE2 Methodology. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsi?biorstwa, (6), pp.3-12.
Mari?, A., 2017, January. COMPARISON OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS AND TOOLS AND THEIR IMPACT ON PROJECT SUCCESS. In 2nd International Scientific Conference LEAN Spring Summit 2017.
Mousaei, M. and Gandomani, T.J., 2018. A New Project Risk Management Model based on Scrum Framework and PRINCE2 Methodology. development, 9(4).
Saad, S., Ibrahim, A., Asma, O., Khan, M.S. and Akhter, J., 2014. PRINCE2 Methodology: An Innovative Way for Improving Performance of Malaysian Automotive Industry. The Journal of Technology Management and Technopreneurship (JTMT), 1(1).
Skogmar, K., 2015. PRINCE2®, the PMBOK® Guide and ISO 21500: 2012. White Paper, AXELOS.
Tavan, F. and Hosseini, M., 2016. Comparison and analysis of PMBOK 2013 and ISO 21500. Journal of Project Management, 1(1), pp.27-34.
Vardy, A., 2015. PRINCE2 Project Management For Beginners: The Ultimate Beginners Crash Course To Learn PRINCE2 Project Management Quickly And Easily.
Yao, C.C., Siang, L.F. and Yih, C.H., 2016. Comparing and Identifying the Similarities and Differences of Global Project Management Philosophies. INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, p.1677.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
