New professional standards and frameworks for providing personal advice
Discuss about the Financial Planning Education And Training Agenda.
This article was based or founded on the release of new professional standards framework that sought to address more particularly the aspects revolving around the provision of personal advice to retail clients on superannuation SMSFs, personal insurance and investments, life assurance et cetera. The article further sought to address new professional models to practitioners licensed financial advisers and employs these advisers in their practices and duties. The new professional standards or the critical reforms underwent series of consultations, with new working groups and draft that will influence the contemporary financial advisers, or even when considering becoming financial advisers in the future (Keddie, 2018). Similarly, the new model will affect the current professional accountants who may be having their own limited Australian Financial Service (AFS) license or to be an authorized representative of the company. Finally, it will influence entities that employ financial advisers, because they will have to consider and probably adopt the impacts of these new frameworks on their existing staff, and also consider the influence it may cause on the future staff.
Ideally, the very critical commencement by January 2019 is the escalation of the minimum education requirement to become a financial adviser to the level of a degree (bachelor). However, the current education or training standards set by the ASIC in the Regulatory Guide 146 Licensing: training of the financial advisers is equal to a diploma. Now, for any practitioner to qualify for the new education requirements which are coming to work by January 2019, he or she must complete the RG146 Compliance Solution Program since it is compatible with the very current training needs (Keddie, 2018). Otherwise, in case you are a current licensed financial adviser as at the end of 2018, you will be on the vantage point of the transitional arrangements giving you an opportunity to meet the new education standards. Regarding the preempted article, the RG146 Compliance Solution program is the framework that addresses the competency requirements highlighted in the ASIC Regulatory Guide 146. This requirement is very relevant for the practitioners who wish to offer specialist financial planning advice to their customers in the areas of general and life insurance, financial budgeting and planning, derivatives margin lending, controlled investments, superannuation and SMSFs (Davis, 2011). In this context, for any practitioner to enroll for into the Advising ion SMSFs or evaluating an only product, the persons or the candidates must have passed the pre-requisite procedures of completing module4. Superannuation or the RG146 studies in the field of superannuation
Requirements for becoming a financial adviser
The article presents the fact that, if you are studying either diploma or the advance diploma training in the hope of meeting the contemporary RG 146 training needs, the study may not be considered as a channel to get you through becoming a financial advisor from January 2019. This is to say; one will need to finish their studies and be licensed as a financial advisor by the end of the year 2018, to be fit for transitioning into the new financial framework standards as an existing financial advisor (Keddie, 2018). Furthermore, the study holds that for the individuals thinking of maybe of providing financial planning advice, but is yet to begin their studies; they need to decide the appropriate time or session to move into this sector. Perhaps, this year or after the commencement of the new framework noting the requirements should remain distinct (Bruce & Gupta, 2011).
Regarding the current needs or requirements, the practitioners must complete RG 146 Guide and have a basic training o a diploma level as the minimum (Cull, 2009). While on the other hand, a requirement for the future one must complete an authorized or approved bachelor degree of the equivalent, pass an exam and finally undertake a professional year of experience voluntarily.
If one decides to move into the sector before its new commencement by January 2019, it is very critical to be assured that the requirements of the bachelor degree or an equivalent will also apply to the current financial advisers (Evetts, 2009). However one will have up to 1 of January 2024 to meet these obligations and at the same time view channels or the pathways will be established (Malmendier et al., 2011). The Financial Advisers Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) are the recognized and licensed body responsible for the establishing of the channels and other components of the new framework. Recently, FASEA released proposed guidance on education channels for the financial advisors which was focused on the previously completed qualifications (Keddie, 2018). In the proposal, a similar degree will incorporate bachelor degree or higher, despite the time it was finished, with one major subject in one of the listed disciplines:
- Accounting
- Financial planning
- Finance
- Tax
- Law
- Economics
However, FASEA has also released for comment a draft code of ethics, which upon its enforcement, the codes and standards within it will be legalized, with compliance examined and monitored through a new framework of code monitoring yet to be released (Zeff, 2010).
Changes that will apply to existing advisers
In this regard, CPA Australia is critical to engage with members on this very crucial aspect and has been holding various conferences during April and May to have the insight of the practical sense of the proposed ideas (Kirkpatrick, 2009). Various consultations are also waiting on the very end of other components, for instance, the professional year of experience and the examinations which as per the regulations underlying this new framework, all the financial advisers will partake. Otherwise apart from this article, further details regarding the new framework and professional standards can be found at either the Australia website or the FASEA website (Keddie, 2018).
Accounting frameworks are dependent on the stipulations of the current or existing accounting theories. This exploratory article sets out to trace the evolution of accounting thought, the financial reforms that impact practice staffing. It results into the theories of income Determination, incorporating it with areas of diversities in the utilization of the accounting information, and perhaps, the review of the recent growths and developments in accounting are not disregarded (DRURY, 2013). Essentially, the article adopts the exploratory research methodology of reviewing the existing account models to come up with explicitly new framework standards. In fact, the evolution of these theories and the emergence of the standard financial framework are meant to curtail or minimize fraud, errors, mismanagement, and filtration of corporate assets. Accounting the contemporary times has critically influenced socio-economic and political developments particularly, on preparing, recording, interpretation, auditing, and management. Other change or impact is seen in the3 merger acquisition, planning, controlling and keeping of business operations (Keddie, 2018). Accounting standards postulates, presumptions, principles, rules laws, and theories. This article shows the constitution of the c basic practicing accounting and the adherence of the financial advisers to the normal accounting standards. Various institutions of higher learning have come up with new training programs and researches for the growth and improvement of accounting standards, particularly for the financial advisers.
Now, the theory of public interest has got some bearing on the information provided in the article. For a very long there has been an attempt by the management accounting to provide proper financial services to the society, the public sector has, in turn, become the determinant of the policy environment for the entire management accounting perspective (Keddie, 2018). As a result, the effectiveness and efficiency of the public sector is a critical process to the success accounting development or new frameworks, sound financial management through proper financial advises from the licensed financial advisers and accountants. Similarly, the public sector has ensured fair collection of taxes and spending through their participation in the budgetary process, transparency devoid of corruption. Otherwise, with the public sector involvement, the demands for accountability and efficiency in planning and management of the scarce resources and the engagement of the public sector accounting reforms and adoption of the new frameworks as presented in the article are possible.
Proposed guidance on education channels for financial advisors
In this context, the article present yet another essential aspect of accounting called the Going Concern Assumption (GCA). In this aspect, the new frameworks demand that when the financier’s advisers and accountants are drawing various financial they are obliged to see that the entities continue to exist in its present form into the endless future (Horngren, 2009). It states that the organizations will continue to exist for life as far as they can still meet or keep up with their immediate financial obligations. The evolution of the new framework presented in the article will help bring to the surface the methods and procedures of inventory valuation, cost ascertainment, and other provisions through the contracting qualified and licensed personnel in those respective areas.
Justification and the application of the Exposure Draft are usually made to enable various professional associations and the persons or the entities using financial statements globally to first assess the accounting implication and adhere to a uniform perspective before the publication of Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP) (Hopper et al., 2009). In this essence, the uniformity, convertibility and the comparability of the financial statements across the globe will be encouraged. Let’s take a look;
https://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Page/SectionPage&cid=1176157086783
EXPOSURE DRAFT: Proposed Accounting Standards Update—Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Targeted Improvements.
The changes in this proposed Update would make focused enhancements to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for integrated game plans as below:
- Add unit-of-account direction in Topic 808 to line up with the direction in Theme 606 (that is, an unmistakable decent or administration) restricted to when an element is evaluating the extent of Topic 606.
- Clear up those specific exchanges between collaborative members ought to be represented as income under Topic 606 when the collaborative member is a client with regards to the unit of record. In these circumstances, the majority of the direction in Topic 606 ought to be connected, including acknowledgment, estimation, introduction, and divulgence prerequisites.
- Clear up that in an exchange that straightforward with deals to third parties, exhibiting the exchange as income would be blocked if the collaborative counterparty is not considered as a client.
The objective of this exposure draft, therefore, is to uphold the financial reporting through the provision of the useful information to both the existing investors, creditors, donors and other capital market parties in making informed decisions regarding their investments and allocation of the resources. And perhaps, the benefits related to the provision of such critical information should explain or justify the related costs (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2013).
Is the Exposure draft introduced to the public interest?
This Exposure is in line with the public interest since the FASB Accounting Standards Codification is the wellspring of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) perceived by the FASB to be connected by nongovernmental elements. An Accounting Standards Update is not definitive; rather, it is a report that imparts how the Accounting Standard Codification is being amended. It likewise gives other data to help a client of GAAP see how and why GAAP is changing and when the changes will be successful (Gasper, 2016).
COMMENT LETTERS
ONE
By Mind the GAAP LLC
The views
Evolution of accounting thought and impact on financial reforms
Some FASB Board individuals trust that implementation costs related with a Collaborative course of action on focused enhancements like computing arrangements represented as an administration contract that doesn’t meet the reasonable meaning of an advantage, and along these lines ought not to be represented all things considered. We can’t help contradicting that attestation. Much of the time, the execution costs related with actualizing a cloud-based computing arrangement can be commonly bigger than the facilitating expenses under the cloud course of action. That huge forthright speculation alone firmly recommends that a client sees these execution costs as giving future monetary advantages that it controls by the excellence of having a privilege to utilize the supplier’s product under the distributed computing Collaborative arrangements (Lin, 2009).
The comment letter is for the regulation since they believe that the proposed amendment will explicitly give the clarification that the unit account guidance in Topic 606 will be applied or implemented for the determination of the transactions within the much scope of the amendment or the confines of Topic 606.
BY TEEKAY
The Views
The revenue from the Collaborative Arrangement that passes the required criteria will be recognized as the operating capital, while the revenue lease component contracts that do not fully adhere to the required regulations will not be considered as the part of the operating capital. The alternative amendment gives a provision for the separation and the allocation of them as proposed in the Proposed Update. We, therefore, request the FASB to reconsider their position and amend the disclosure requirement instead.
The comment letter, otherwise, is not for the regulation since; we believe the fundamental issue raised is not an issue of allocation of consideration but rather an issue of disclosure (Gray, 2010). As a stakeholder, we are reluctant to bear the costs associated with separating and allocating our consideration amount lease and revenue component if such allocation does not have any impact on accounting measurement and recognition. Also, as the recognition pattern remained the same and given the general nature of the integrated service and vessel leases, this allocation does not provide meaningful disclosure to the users of our financial statements.
By Charter
The Views
We applaud the Board’s continuous endeavors to proactively address execution issues raised by partners encompassing the reception of Topic 808 and bolster the FASB’s particular activity hidden this ED to diminish the cost of actualizing the new rents standard by (1) including a change choice that would allow a substance to apply the progress arrangements of the new standard at the date of appropriation rather than toward the start of the soonest similar period exhibited in its money related proclamations and (2) adding a pragmatic catalyst to allow leasers to not separate non lease parts from the related rent segments if certain conditions are met (the “Partition PE”) (Pearce et al., 2013). We trust that these revisions if systematized, will, in reality, meet the Board’s expressed objective of lessening costs around the execution of Topic 808 over the arrangement of money related explanation preparers without relinquishing a definitive nature of data gave to financial specialists. Regarding the Separation PE, be that as it may, we might want to offer proposals on the plan of the practice because we trust that the criteria required.
Basic practicing accounting and adherence to accounting standards
The comment letter is for the regulation since, A cooperative plan, as characterized by the direction in Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements, is a legally binding game plan under which at least two parties effectively take an interest in a joint working action and are presented to huge dangers and prizes that rely upon the movement’s business achievement. Topic 808 does not give far-reaching acknowledgment or estimation direction for communitarian game plans and the representing those game plans is frequently in light of a relationship to other bookkeeping writing or bookkeeping strategy methods (Osborne, 2010). A few elements apply income direction straightforwardly or by relationship to all or a segment of their courses of action, and others apply an alternate bookkeeping technique as a bookkeeping strategy. Those bookkeeping contrasts result in assorted variety practically speaking on how elements represent exchanges based on their perspective of the financial aspects of the community course of action.
By Goldman Sachs
The Views
Goldman Sachs appreciates the opportunities that allow the comments on the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Board’s exposure draft on the proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), Collaborative arrangements Topic 808, supports the additional benchmark interest rate purposes under Topic 808 of an adoption plat will institute all targeted improvements.
The comment letter is for the regulation since, they assert operations of the proposed amendment on presentation paragraph 808-10-3, and assess how the proposed amendment would lead to the reduction of the diversity in practice in this particular context (Burritt & Schaltegger 2010). Alter the direction to illuminate that certain exchanges between shared members ought to be represented as income under Topic 606 when the community-based member is a client with regards to the unit of record. In those circumstances, the greater part of the direction in Topic 606 ought to be connected, including acknowledgment, estimation, introduction, and divulgence necessities.
In this approach, the government is set up to manage ventures for the advantage of the general public and perhaps acts to the interests of the business. It is the minimum powerful hypothesis, and none of the comments have connected this hypothesis (Ehrenberg et al., 2016).
The main comment letters act in light of a legitimate concern for the general society where they concur that the permit ought to be given to the client. Along these lines they are centered on their clients and what is best for them and consequently accept by giving the permit to them is ideal (Baldwin et al., 2012). This approach is the best in clarifying these remarks. Every one of the organizations specified has concurred with the proposed ASU in ways that are important to their clients instead of to the organization itself.
Growth and improvement of accounting standards
The theory is adopted in the comment letters three and four acts in light of a legitimate concern for the organization where they specify that the Proposed ASU does not take care of all usage costs. Like this, they can’t comprehend what expenses to cover and the sum which is an issue for the organization. This hypothesis is the slightest compelling in clarifying these remarks. The greater part of the comments is important to the clients instead of to the organization itself (Benington et al., 2010).
Finally, Accounting like any other business and economics or any other field has experienced tremendous transformations modifications updates and developments in the very recent years and already discussed in the body.
References
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Bennington, J., & Moore, M. H. (Eds.). (2010). Public value: Theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2013). Financial management: Theory & practice. Cengage Learning.
Bruce, K., & Gupta, R. (2011). The financial planning education and training agenda in Australia. Financial Services Review, 20(1), 61.
Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829-846.
Cull, M. (2009). The rise of the financial planning industry. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 3(1), 26.
Davis, K. (2011). The Australian financial system in the 2000s: dodging the bullet. The Australian Economy in the 2000s, 313-314.
DRURY, C. M. (2013). Management and cost accounting. Springer.
Edwards, J. R. (2013). A history of financial accounting (RLE Accounting) (Vol. 29). Routledge.
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Smith, R. S. (2016). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy. Routledge.
Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: Changes, continuities, and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8(2), 247-266.
Gasper, D. (2016). Ethics of development.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, organizations and society, 35(1), 47-62.
Hopper, T., Tsamenyi, M., Uddin, S., & Wickramasinghe, D. (2009). Management accounting in less developed countries: what is known and needs knowing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(3), 469-514.
Horngren, C. T. (2009). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis, 13/e. Pearson Education India.
https://www.intheblack.com/article/2018/05/04/financial planning reforms impact practice staffing
Keddie W. (04 May 2018). Financial planning reforms impact practice staffing: INTHEBLACK
Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lesson from the financial crisis. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2009(1), 61-87.
Lin, J. Y. (2009). Economic development and transition: thought, strategy, and viability. Cambridge University Press.
Malmendier, U., Tate, G., & Yan, J. (2011). Overconfidence and early?life experiences: the effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies. The Journal of finance, 66(5), 1687-1733.
Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
Pearce, D. (2014). Blueprint 3: Measuring sustainable development. Routledge.
Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (2013). Blueprint 1: for a green economy. Routledge.
Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2010). Introduction to sustainability accounting and accountability. In Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 20-35). Routledge.
Zeff, S. A. (2010). The rise of “economic consequences.” In Insights from Accounting History (pp. 45-59). Routledge.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
