Profile of the selected region or the country
Discuss about the Corrosivity Of Flue Gases During Co-Firing Chinese Biomass.
Waste Management is a theory that encompasses the various aspects of the task of managing waste right from the collection to the treatment to the final disposal. The whole process of waste management is one of the pivotal ways to control the amount of waste produced with proper regulation and monitoring of the same (Hoornweg& Bhada-Tata, 2012). The concept has been followed by most of the developed countries of the world and is subsequently entering into the developing countries with the better usage of technology and proper techniques. Hazardous waste management is the process of dealing with the wastage generating from different sources but they are hazardous in nature. This defines that hazardous waste will cause health issues for the involved ones and thus waste management of hazardous waste should be more effective and efficient. The following report examines the hazardous waste management technique that is being followed by the area of Queensland in the province of Australia with the existing waste management system (Lu Jordan&Berge, 2012). The following paragraphs highlight the various institutional and financial aspects of the process with the prediction of future waste quantities. The major problems and issues are being considered with recommendations for the same.
The profile selected for the report is Queensland, one of the major province of Australia. It is situated to the north-east of the Commonwealth of Australia and is the second largest and third most populated state in the country. This makes the waste management of Queensland one of the major task of the local government with some of the desired and anticipated results in the end (Glanville&Chang, 2015).
Hazardous waste generation is defined as the type of waste that is being extracted from the common manufacturing unit having specific characters of problems and can cause both physical and social illness to the people and the surroundings (Higgins, 2017). The terms that can be associated with the term of hazardous waste are ignitability, corrosively, reactivity or toxicity which means that the waste that has the characteristics features of the above can be termed as hazardous waste (Greenberg, 2017).
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the characteristics of hazardous waste are as follows (Daniel, 2012)–
- Ignitability, or something flammable – This means that the substance, either solid or liquid or gaseous that have the characteristic features of getting fire if comes in contact to another substance (Pausas, Keeley & Schwilk, 2017). The examples are solids and liquids that get fire really easily and combustible gases.
- Corrosivity, or something that can rust or decompose – These substance can hamper the environment through leakage as most of these are acidic substances that have the character of eating up the container in which they are kept (Aho, Envall & Kauppinen, 2013). The common examples of these kind of wastes are acids like hydrochloric acid, nitric acid and sulphuric acid and the common battery acids and rust removers that affects the substances in which they are kept(Higgins, 2017).
- Reactivity, or something explosive – These refer to the solid, liquid or gaseous substances that are instable in their approach and can cause a great deal of danger when exposed to other forms or substances (Kirsch, 2013). There are various forms of instable gases and other forms that can cause problem.
- Toxicity, or something poisonous – These refer to the common poisonous materials that can hamper the overall and individual health of the society and the people when in contact with the various parts of the body and environment (Albert, 2012).
The Queensland government has imposed a number of measures including acts and regulations for the proper management of hazardous waste in the province so that the amount of waste is not affecting the society or the people in general. The government has introduced the Waste Reduction and Recycling Actin the year 2011 which has a number of measures that helps to reduce the amount of waste produced and encourages the process of recycling (Rochmanet al., 2013). The act makes sure to implement modern measures for the proper management of waste and increase the process of recycling. The act introduced a proper waste management plan by the local government and a proper dumping ground for the waste with strict action against littering and other issues(Kaufmann, 2017).
Hazardous waste generation and physical characteristics
Under the act, there is the Waste Regulation and Recycling Regulation in the year 2011 which introduces the fees for the application of waste management and the person to whom the reports and the complaints should be considered (Gandy, 2014).
The act and regulation altogether implies a number of restrictions on the type of waste management techniques and the various ways that can be implemented to regulate the amount of waste materials taken. There are various means which has been said in the acts and are given multiple means and ways that can be implanted to regulate both chemical and toxic materials(Wilson et al., 2012). There are given various email ids and phone numbers to lodge the complains that the people have regarding any type of waste management issues and also states the various types of ways and measures that has to be implemented for the same.
The present waste management techniques of Queensland in Australia is one of the better waste management techniques that has been implemented in the country and ensures a
number of measures to make the work more effective for the government (Wilson et al., 2012). The state is measured to be made free from hazardous activities and waste materials released.
The state government is making means and ways to make sure that the state is going waste free and to implement the measures for the same(Greenberg, 2017).
Institutional aspects of the country refers to the agencies and other means of the government with the addition of social organizations and other enterprises. The waste management of Queensland, Australia has been upgraded and initiated by the local government of Australia and has tried to implement a number of measures for the same(Kirsch, 2013). The government agencies are taking complaints and queries about the various forms of waste management techniques and measures adopted to make the state one of the best in this purpose. The proactive role of the government in the act is one of the most effective ways to conduct the work and assure effective management(Kirsch, 2013).
The financial aspects of the waste management techniques of Queensland, Australia is one of the major positives as the government is urged to invest an amount of money necessary for the better results of the same. The government has introduced a number of agencies and committees to deal with the situation and make effective management of the same(Zaman, 2014). The government is prone to invest more in the situation and has one of the effective summations of monetary issues in it. The government has approximately 100$ million in the construction of Waste to Energy Plant which is one of the best in the world and to make the state clean and safe for the inhabitants(Zaman, 2014).
Existing hazardous waste management system
With the growing amount of industries and population in the province of Queensland, Australia, the amount of waste quantities is surely going to soar high in the future (Kiddee, Naidu & Wong, 2013).
The local government of Queensland has introduced a number of new laws for the same like
The local government of Queensland has introduced a number of new laws for the same like Environmental Protection Regulation of the Chapter 6 of the year 2008 is being modified and implemented from 1st July, 2018 (Kaufmann, 2017). The government is also keen to introduce Queensland Waste Avoidance and Resource Productivity Strategy (2014 – 2024)measuring various strategic management techniques with monitoring and effective implantation (Hardie et al., 2012). The state has developed various Waste to Energy Conversion is to be introduced (Brunner & Rechberger, 2015). The state budget is to increase
for the proper waste management means and some of the other means that is to decrease the landfill for waste materials by approximately 15%. The Resource Recovery Industry Program in the 2018-2019 State budget also states that electrical production will be done by the waste generated in the state producing approximately 32 MW of electric supply for over 40,000 houses (Martin & Rice, 2012). The internal environment for the state has to improve to accommodate the changes and also to have better means for the same. The government and non-government organizations are implemented for the better management of both solid and degradable waste materials to make sure that the country remains free and clean(Martin & Rice, 2012).
The major problems that has been considered in the province of Queensland is the fact that in spite of the number of measures that has been implemented by the government for the better management of the waste materials and also to make sure that people of the country have better understanding of the same, problems regarding overpopulation and heavy industrialization have made the problem worse(Pausas, Keeley & Schwilk, 2017).
The effective waste management strategies implemented by the government in the better allocation of waste materials and the segregation of the waste substances in terms of toxic and normal waste materials has been partially successful (Ludwig, Hellweg & Stucki, 2012). With the introduction of better and modern techniques for the proper waste management in the state, the government is trying their bit in the process but at the end, due to some of the unavoidable circumstances, the evident results are not as prominent as it is to be expected(Pausas, Keeley & Schwilk, 2017).
Institutional and Financial aspects
One of the primary recommendations that is to be implemented for the better waste management techniques is to make sure that the people of the state are implementing better provisions for the management of waste. More waste management plans and procedures are to be implemented by the government to make sure that the amount of waste generated can be less and toxicity can also be reduced (Zaman, 2014). The industries and houses should be also be subjected to production of less waste and industries should be directed to recycle their own waste materials as much as possible. This will make sure that the waste materials are non-hazardous and have less implications on the life of the people and the society as a whole(Ludwig, Hellweg & Stucki, 2012).
Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be said that Queensland, one of the major states of Australia has implemented a number of measures including some of the best modern techniques for the effective waste management in the province. However, it still has a long way to go to make it among the bestin the waste management category. The government and non-government institutions have means to adhere to the concepts and also to make sure that people of the province are taking the recycling concept on a serious note to avoid any sort of littering and other bad habits. They have developed various kinds of means and used Green measures for developing the machines for the waste management. Industries and commercial hubs are also regulated through effective acts and regulations to make sure that the place is clean and safe for the inhabitants. At the end of the report, the state is seen to develop the Waste to Energy Conversation thatmeans that there is a positive hope in the waste management techniques of Queensland and the government is implementing better procedures to curb it in future.
Reference
Aho, M., Envall, T., & Kauppinen, J. (2013). Corrosivity of flue gases during co-firing Chinese biomass with coal at fluidised bed conditions. Fuel processing technology, 105, 82-88.
Albert, A. (2012). Selective toxicity: the physico-chemical basis of therapy. Springer Science & Business Media.
Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2015). Waste to energy–key element for sustainable waste management. Waste Management, 37, 3-12.
Daniel, D. E. (Ed.). (2012). Geotechnical practice for waste disposal. Springer Science & Business Media.
Gandy, M. (2014). Recycling and the politics of urban waste. Routledge.
Gies, T. (2018). The ScienceDirect accessibility journey: A case study. Learned Publishing, 31(1), 69-76. doi: 10.1002/leap.1142
Glanville, K., & Chang, H. C. (2015). Mapping illegal domestic waste disposal potential to support waste management efforts in Queensland, Australia. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(6), 1042-1058.
Greenberg, M. R. (2017). Hazardous waste sites: The credibility gap. Routledge.
Hardie, M., Khan, S., O’Donnell, A., & Miller, G. (2012). The efficacy of waste management plans in Australian commercial construction refurbishment projects. Construction Economics and Building, 7(2), 26-36.
Higgins, T. E. (2017). Hazardous Waste Minimization Handbook: 0. CRC Press.
Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: a global review of solid waste management.
hyenademolition.com.au. (2018). Hazardous Waste In Australia -. Retrieved from https://hyenademolition.com.au/information/hazardous-waste-australia/
Kaufmann, W. (2017). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Routledge.
Kiddee, P., Naidu, R., & Wong, M. H. (2013). Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Management, 33(5), 1237-1250.
Kirsch, P. (2013). Modern fluoroorganic chemistry: synthesis, reactivity, applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Lu, X., Jordan, B., & Berge, N. D. (2012). Thermal conversion of municipal solid waste via hydrothermal carbonization: comparison of carbonization products to products from current waste management techniques. Waste management, 32(7), 1353-1365.
Ludwig, C., Hellweg, S., & Stucki, S. (Eds.). (2012). Municipal solid waste management: strategies and technologies for sustainable solutions. Springer Science & Business Media.
Martin, N. J., & Rice, J. L. (2012). Developing renewable energy supply in Queensland, Australia: A study of the barriers, targets, policies and actions. Renewable Energy, 44, 119-127.
Pausas, J. G., Keeley, J. E., & Schwilk, D. W. (2017). Flammability as an ecological and evolutionary driver. Journal of Ecology, 105(2), 289-297.
Rochman, C. M., Browne, M. A., Halpern, B. S., Hentschel, B. T., Hoh, E., Karapanagioti, H. K.,& Thompson, R. C. (2013). Policy: Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature, 494(7436), 169.
Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Scheinberg, A., Velis, C. A., & Alabaster, G. (2012). Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Waste Management & Research, 30(3), 237-254.
Zaman, A. U. (2014). Measuring waste management performance using the ‘Zero Waste Index’: the case of Adelaide, Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 407-419.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
