Introduction to HAIs
Complete the details marked in the coloured text and leave everything else blank. Where appropriate, copy and paste your submission after the first pages as indicated. You are reminded of the University regulations on cheating. Except where the assessment is group-based, the final piece of work which is submitted must be your own work. Close similarity between submissions is likely to lead to an investigation for cheating. You must submit a file in an MSWord or equivalent format as tutors will use MSWord to provide feedback including, where appropriate, annotations in the text.
Student Name |
Reasonable Adjustments |
||
Student Number |
Check this box [x] if the Faculty has notified you that you are eligible for a Reasonable Adjustment (including additional time) in relation to the marking of this assessment. Please note that action may be taken under the University’s Student Disciplinary Procedure against any student making a false claim for Reasonable Adjustments. |
||
Course and Year |
MPH 2021 September Cohort |
||
Module Code |
LBR7455 |
||
Module Title |
Public Health – From Health Protection to Community Development |
||
Module Tutor |
Nawel Bessedet |
||
Personal Tutor |
First Marker Name: |
Cate Wood |
First Marker Signature: |
C Wood |
Date: |
06.06.2022 |
Feedback: General comments on the quality of the work, its successes and where it could be improved |
|||||
Thank you for submitting this assignment. You choose an appropriate public health challenge but then fail to follow the assignment guidance of what was expected for you to provide to meet the learning outcomes. There is insufficient evidence of understanding of health protection practice, individual change or community development and no analysis relating to this. You try to examine the 3 domains as you were required to do but you, do vaguely address some aspects –without any critical appraisal or analysis. You do not references your work in your writing and many of the references you give in your list are not used There are a number of paragraphs where you choose to write and explain your thoughts but with no referenced material to support this. Take care to always follow the instructions given to you on the assignment guidance- sadly you have not done this. |
Provisional Uncapped Mark Marks will be capped if this was a late submission or resit assessment and may be moderated up or down by the examination board. |
||||
45% |
|||||
Feed Forward: How to apply the feedback to future submissions |
|||||
See comments in the margins of your assignment |
Quality and use of Standard English and Academic Conventions |
If the box above has been ticked you should arrange a consultation with a member of staff from the Centre for Academic Success via [email protected] |
Moderation Comments (Please note that moderation is carried out through ‘sampling’. If this section is left blank, your work is not part of the sample.) |
0 – 39% Fail |
40 – 49% Fail |
50 – 59% Pass |
60 – 69% Strong Pass (merit) |
70 – 79% Very Strong Pass (distinction) |
80 – 100% Exceptionally Strong Pass (distinction) |
|
Criterion 1 Mark: |
Analyse examples of Health Protection practice with an emphasis on perceptions of health, people and data. |
|||||
Insufficient evidence of understanding of health protection practice. No analysis |
Some understanding of health protection practice but with a limited attempt at analysis |
Good understanding of health protection practice with some analysis |
Good use of key principles to analyse health protection practice |
Key principles used very effectively to analyse health protection practice |
Analytical, novel and integrative application of key principles to analyse health protection practice |
|
Criterion 2 Mark: |
Critically evaluate Individual Change Approaches; consider their effectiveness especially in relation to ethics. |
|||||
Insufficient evidence of understanding of how to evaluate individual change approaches with reference to ethics. No analysis |
Some understanding of how to evaluate individual change approaches with reference to ethics but with a limited attempt at analysis |
Good understanding of how to evaluate individual change approaches with references to ethics with some analysis |
Good use of key principles to analyse how to evaluate individual change approaches with reference to ethics |
Key principles used very effectively to analyse how to evaluate individual change approaches with reference to ethics |
Analytical, novel and integrative application of key principles to analyse how to evaluate individual change approaches with reference to ethics |
|
Criterion 3 Mark: |
Critically appraise the extent to which Public Health Policy and Practice support Community Development Approaches |
|||||
Insufficient evidence of understanding of how public health policy and practice supports community development. No analysis |
Some understanding of how public health policy and practice supports community development but with a limited attempt at analysis |
Good understanding of how public health policy and practice supports health community development with some analysis |
Good use of key principles to analyse how public health policy and practice supports community development |
Key principles used very effectively to analyse how public health policy and practice supports community development |
Analytical, novel and integrative application of key principles to analyse how public health policy and practice supports community development |
Healthcare-Associated Infections is my chosen public health challenge. A patient can get an infection while receiving medical treatment, known as a healthcare-associated infection. Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) can arise in hospitals, outpatient clinics, or home settings. HAIs are caused by bacteria, viruses, and fungus, microscopic creatures. There are several different types of HAIs. A patient can contract a healthcare-associated infection (HAI) while receiving treatment at a healthcare facility (Schreiber et al., 2018). HAIs, including central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or surgical site infections, occur in around one in every 25 hospital patients every day. To help prevent HAIs, the CDC and its partners have developed several tools and services. As we all know, hospitals play an important role in assisting patients to recover and mend from disease and injury. Still, we tend to overlook the risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The use of medical devices, such as catheters and ventilators, might cause these symptoms. When they arise at surgical sites, they are referred to as surgical site infections. Even though there has been some success, much more needs to be done to prevent these HAIs (Haque et al., 2020). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that one in every 31 patients has an HAI on any given day.
An infection that can be contracted while obtaining healthcare in a healthcare facility is healthcare-associated. The majority of these ailments can be prevented. Infections can occur at a hospital, long-term care institution, outpatient surgical centre, dialysis centre, or doctor’s office (Weiner-Lastinger et al., 2020). In order for you to get sick while obtaining these services, bacteria must first enter your body. It is possible for an infection to originate from a cut, a piece of medical equipment such as a catheter, or even the lungs themselves. A bad surface may quickly transfer germs to healthcare personnel, patients, and visitors. Pneumonia, urinary tract infections, surgical site infections, and central line-linked bloodstream infections are some of the most prevalent ailments seen in hospitals. Clostridium difficile infection is another potentially harmful side effect of antibiotic usage.
One out of every twenty-five hospitalized patients may become infected due to their treatment. Patients are expected to die at a rate of about 75,000 each year worldwide. Many healthcare facilities have made the prevention and reduction of HAIs a top priority due to their threat to patient safety (Suetens et al., 2018). Prevention and medical procedure breakthroughs are now top priorities due to these efforts and resources. You or a family member will be a patient at a healthcare facility at some point in your life. Emotional stress, financial and medical costs, a lengthier hospital stay, and even mortality can result from illnesses like these. Numerous precautions can be taken to lessen the risk of contracting an HAI, ensuring your family’s well-being (Wa?aszek, et al., 2018).
Prevalence of HAIs
Within the first 48 hours after admission to a hospital or healthcare facility, or the first 30 days of departure from hospital care following inpatient treatment, the term “nosocomial infection” is used to describe these disorders (Suleyman et al., 2018). The patients’ existence of the infection or its stage of incubation at the time of admission had nothing to do with the underlying condition that led to their hospitalization. In the twenty-first century, nosocomial illnesses are becoming an increasingly significant concern. Hospitals that house a large number of sick people with weak immune systems, an increase in outpatient treatment, many medical procedures that bypass the body’s natural protective barriers, medical staff moving between patients, allowing pathogens to spread, and inadequate sanitation protocols regarding uniforms, equipment sterilization and washing.
Patients of all ages are at risk of developing healthcare-related disorders. Regarding healthcare-related illnesses in children and adults, urinary tract infections are the most common, followed by pneumonia and bacterial meningitis. Paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have a higher incidence of healthcare-associated infections than other patients. The most effective containment method is disinfection of medical equipment, hospital personnel, and visitors. Many of the negative side effects of the surgeon’s disinfection process can be traced to mechanical irritation, chemical stress, and perhaps allergic stress on the skin. Hand washing is a problem that medical professionals face daily (Lake et al., 2018). The sterilization of medical equipment using this technique has been practiced for quite some time. Due to the fact that they operate on an atomic and molecular level, they are capable of disinfecting even hollow needle injections and other locations that liquid disinfectants are unable to reach.
Instrumentation used in various operations and the presence of systemic signs and symptoms of infection may indicate the source of healthcare-associated infections. UTI patients may or may not experience a fever. Patients with cystitis may report suprapubic discomfort, while those with pyelonephritis may experience pain in the costovertebral region. When their urine is checked, it can be cloudy and smelly. Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a main cause of morbidity and mortality amongst those getting medical treatment (Voidazan et al., 2020). The costs associated with these illnesses — both direct and indirect — put additional strain on the already thin healthcare budget. Lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, and surgical site infections account for most HAIs. Antibiotics are overprescribed, resulting in the selection of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics.
Due of the bidirectional transfer of hospital resistance into the community and the other way around, it might be difficult to differentiate multidrug-resistant bacteria collected in the community from nosocomial diseases. This is because of the bidirectional transmission. Antibiotic resistance monitoring, an antimicrobial use strategy that makes sense, and infection control are all critical components of an integrated program that aims to prevent the establishment and spread of multidrug-resistant organisms. Nosocomial healthcare-associated diseases, regardless of whether they are multidrug-resistant, are a primary target of infection control efforts, irrespective of their severity (van Buijtene, and Foster, 2019). Infection control measures must be supplemented with a highly restrictive antimicrobial-use regimen to prevent further and manage the spread of antibiotic resistance. Such an approach must be realistic, flexible, and consider the severe resource limits frequent in many developing nations.
Types of HAIs
In addition to putting patients’ health and lives at risk, healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) also have a significant financial impact on patients and the healthcare system. The incidence of HAI is well-known to increase the entire length of time spent in a hospital. Healthcare-associated infections impact tens of millions of people worldwide. There is a link between HAIs and longer hospital stays, which increases healthcare costs and patient suffering, and even medical disputes worldwide (Stewart et al., 2021). Because of HAI’s impact on hospitals, the number of patients admitted and their medical revenue are likely to decline. After 18 days, the average cost of a hospital stay is lower than a patient’s visit. Treating new patients may be a more cost-effective strategy for a facility than treating patients who have already been admitted. When HAIs, which have an average stay of 11 days, are managed, the number of patients can be treated rises. Increased length of stay can lead to higher healthcare costs, but estimating these costs may be difficult due to time-dependent bias. Stevens, et al., 2020 claims that HAIs may lead to longer hospital stays, which increases the risk of infection. In recent years, it has become increasingly common for researchers to use tendentiousness and tool factors to address this endogeneity, but they have not been very successful.
Plachouras has used to look into how healthcare-associated infections are transmitted in the community. The goal of prevention is to reduce or eliminate the possibility of disease or illness occurring. Positive health education aims to improve well-being and prevent illness through communication to improve knowledge and attitudes. A population’s health can be safeguarded in several ways, including through legislation, funding, and other social programs (Plachouras, et al., 2018).
Infectious disease prevention and control and the response to chemical or radiation disasters or bioterrorism are part of health protection. Clean air, water, and food are all part of its purview, including preventing and treating environmental health problems (Rock, et al., 2018). The collaboration of specialists in diagnosing, preventing, and reducing the consequences of infectious diseases and ecological, chemical, and radioactive threats protects individuals, groups, and communities. Preventing illness, extending life, and promoting health through coordinated social activities are part of public health (Russo, et al., 2018).
Preventing the spread of pathogens is also made easier with PPE such as gloves, gowns, face shields, head covers, and masks. During patient treatment, gloves are the first line of defense against the spread of pathogens and the contamination of hands. The HBV and herpes simplex viruses, in particular, cannot be completely avoided by wearing gloves (Stewart et al., 2021). After the procedure is over, the gloves, masks, and any other protective apparel that was used should be thrown away. Gloves protect patients: When conducting surgical operations, caring for immunocompromised patients, or accessing bodily cavities, it is imperative that sterile conditions be maintained on the hands. Gloves that aren’t sterile should be worn whenever there is contact with a patient’s mucous membranes or when there is a chance that the hands may get contaminated during such interaction. When doing many operations on the same patient, it is best to utilize gloves that are disposable. If the previous pair of gloves has been contaminated with blood, a new pair should be used instead. Workers in the healthcare industry who come into contact with patients who are at risk of developing infectious illnesses should use examination gloves that are not sterile.
Challenges Posed by HAIs
The defining and promotion of ethical behaviour in occupational health settings is sometimes more complicated than in other areas of health care. Primary care physicians are tasked with placing an emphasis on the unique requirements of each patient, whereas community health specialists put group health requirements first. As a consequence of this, the occupational health practitioner has two obligations: the first is to the individual patient, and the second is to the group. Because of this, there is a possibility of having commitments that are in contradiction with one another. When one person in particular has the potential to endanger the wellbeing and safety of the whole workforce, ethical problems are certain to surface. There are many responsibilities that an occupational health practitioner has to bear in mind, including protecting workers and the general public from harm caused by others. Working in occupational health necessitates a delicate balancing act between the individual’s rights and those of the group. Legally, health practitioners in most jurisdictions are required to report sexually transmitted illnesses, tuberculosis (TB), or child abuse, even if doing so would violate the individuals’ privacy (Plachouras, et al., 2018).
Care bundles, which are groupings of three to five tried-and-true practices, are one way that the quality of care that patients get may be enhanced. In healthcare settings, the use of care packages for the purpose of preventing and managing a broad variety of health disorders is standard practice. A number of preventative measures were taken in order to reduce the danger of bloodstream infections brought on by the use of central venous catheters. Many methods were taken to improve patient care, including dressings and closed infusion systems, aseptic skin preparation, prominent venous line bundles; quality improvement initiatives; education; and more intensive care unit personnel (Weiner-Lastinger et al., 2020). No matter where an organization is, it must engage and educate its people, build mechanisms that encourage control infection adherence, and offer regular feedback on process measure performance. Healthcare-associated infections can be prevented by practicing in this area. The purpose of prevention is to limit or eliminate the risk of disease or sickness happening. Positive health education attempts to increase well-being and prevent sickness via communication to promote awareness and attitude. A population’s health may be preserved in numerous ways, including via law, money, and other social initiatives.
A person’s personality becomes more stable and predictable as they age because they form thinking, acting, and feeding habits. As we become older, our personalities continue to evolve. A person’s biological and social transitions may also influence a person’s development (O’Toole, 2021). When people consider of change management, they often think about our activities, such as communicating, seeking assistance, and dealing with opposition. These are all aspects of change management. Nevertheless, using a person’s own personal change model is one of the most important aspects to successfully managing change. This is due to the fact that the success of activities and treatments relating to change management is contingent on having an awareness of how a person feels about change. Change management activities and interventions are based on an individual change model to improve outcomes with the Prosci methodology (Nguemeleu, et al., 2020).
Prevention and Control of HAIs
Hand-washing practices can be improved and disease transmission prevented with regular training for healthcare workers. In low-resource settings, minimizing HAI can be a powerful, cost-effective, and reasonable solution to overcome human behavior that leads to low compliance with infection control strategies. One of the most important behavioral changes that healthcare professionals may make to reduce the risk of HCAIs is hand cleanliness (Shang et al., 2019). Nosocomial infections can be reduced by 40% to 70% when Hand-wash is strictly controlled. Despite this, many research reports have found that regular Hand-wash by healthcare professionals often falls below 40% in many hospital wards. As a global public health issue, noncompliance with the guiding principles of Hand-wash needs more defined norms, regular monitoring, surveillance, and expanded study of hand hygiene. Maintaining the cleanliness of healthcare facilities and equipment. Assuring that surgical instruments and wound care supplies, such as intravenous cannulas and urinary catheters, are handled with sterility.
It’s a two-way street when it comes to ethics and change management. The project/program manager should know the values of the individuals they work with, create an atmosphere that encourages open and honest communication, and show appreciation for their input (Lacotte, et al., 2020). A moral conundrum is also brought up by the altered appearance. When a company strives to change from a culture that has already established to a new culture that the management feel would be more productive, ethical conundrums are certain to develop. The operational culture of a corporation develops during the course of its history. The history of the organization serves as the foundation for the relationships between the many stakeholders. When change occurs, stakeholders’ relationships and responsibilities may have to be re-examined and redefined due to their desire to maintain a familiar way of doing things (Liu, et al., 2020).
As a general rule, infection prevention and control (IPC) measures can be beneficial in one hospital but not in another. Many theories have been put up to explain why this happened. Consequently, there has been an increasing drive to define and control organizational culture (OC) to improve healthcare performance in recent years. Bono and colleagues reviewed human behavior and corporate change publications to determine if and how OC affects IPC compliance and highlight the potential for OC modification interventions to improve IPC practices in hospitals (Behnke et al., 2021). The goal was to find out how OC and behavioral attitudes among healthcare professionals are linked. The authors examine OC in hospital settings and identify numerous factors influencing IPC-related behavior. They point out that rare studies have shown that well-designed and personalized OC change campaigns can positively impact IPC practices. The greatest strategy to deal with healthcare-associated infections is through this practice area (Manoukian, et al., 2021).
When it comes to the collecting, the actions of a single individual are considered illegal, but those of a group are not. Everyone who contributed to the project should share credit for its successes and failures as a member of the team. Learning is facilitated by the closed nature of the group. It is not necessary to conceal or disregard the requirements of a community only because that group has needs. Instead, they need to be made more transparent and geared toward problem-solving. Instead than providing individuals with temporary relief, society should work to liberate them from the socioeconomic factors that contribute to poverty. To put it another way, a rule need to be able to foresee possible difficulties. If the demand is to be satisfied for the vast majority of the population, including them is absolutely necessary. The community projects are meant to enhance people’s lives; thus, people should be active in the development that affects their life and take responsibility for their situation. It’s necessary to utilize strategic thinking while identifying needs to avoid creating unrealistic expectations (Jacob, et al., 2018).
According to one’s possessions, it does not mean that locals are entitled to make government shopping lists, but rather that they can use already-existing resources by getting involved. For community development to be successful, it is necessary to identify local assets, which may come from various sources. A community’s greatest asset is its people and ability to organize; Democratic Community development, as part of the local government’s Integrated Development Planning, is also a democratic activity (Coffin, et al., 2021). Extending democracy beyond the traditional three spheres of government is its specific purpose. Combining infection management with evidence-based therapy is necessary to lower the prevalence of HCAI. Surveillance programs play an important role in handling what and where the problems are (Baccolini et al., 2021). Whether or not a given set of control measures is successful
An environmental management strategy also helps avoid the spread of disease. Some of the procedures taken are cleaning (housekeeping), ventilation, waste management, linens (textiles), and laundry management. Proper housekeeping and sanitation measures prevent disease transmission in high-risk areas like nurseries, surgical rooms, and intensive care units. Regulated medical waste and unregulated garbage are two types of hospital trash (Burnett, 2018). The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) maintains that trash from hospitals is not any more contagious than other types of garbage. There is no evidence to suggest that the waste management procedures now used in hospitals have had a role in the dissemination of illness among the general population. Infections may spread from person to person via soiled clothes and linens, as well as through improper washing procedures (Caselli et al., 2018). The dirty laundry has a modest risk of disease transmission, unless the garments were contaminated by an isolated person. In this instance, however, the risk of disease transmission is high. When it comes to the handling, processing, and storage of textiles, it is essential to use common sense. The term “Engineering Controls” may apply to any instruments, devices, or pieces of equipment that are employed to get rid of or isolate a possible risk. By altering the way a task is carried out, workers might reduce or eliminate their risk of exposure to hazardous materials (Assi, et al., 2021).
Frequently encountered ethical dilemmas and roadblocks in community development work, such as secrecy, individual consent vs. group consent, competing accounts of responsibility, and the rightness or wrongness of whistleblowing and violent protest. Progress in community development is founded on inclusion, equality, human rights, social justice, and equity. This is a positive transformation and value-based reform process. Individuals and groups in society can better their lives through community development (Behnke, et al., 2021). It is a positive transformation and value-based reform that aims to rectify imbalances in welfare and power based on inclusiveness, human rights, social justice, equity, and respect for diversity. Self-determination, empowerment, and collaborative action are some of the guiding principles of community development. The growth of a strong community relies on the trust of its citizens; Unethical behavior and performance by community development practitioners produce community negativity and damage the reputation of leaders and public personnel. Concepts like communication, surveillance, and sanctioning mechanisms all play a role in the ethical infrastructure’s construction (Behnke, et al., 2021).
The team did not sufficiently integrate into standard quality efforts to collect data on healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic use in the post-intervention and evaluation phase. Instead of an active surveillance team, passive surveillance monitored healthcare-associated diseases. Antibiotic use was not observed, or rational use was not implemented in the hospital Bonilla-(Gameros et al., 2020). Even though some educational activities had been completed, no audit-feedback activities were carried out. Healthcare-associated infections can be prevented by practicing in this area.
The most effective, impactful, and ethical strategy for preventing HCAI is health protection. The Health Protection Act states that therapeutic recreation’s goal is to help people recover from health risks and achieve the best possible state of health. It’s vital to improve patient safety by using policies, guidelines, and checklists; yet, they are regularly understood and applied contrarily by persons, departments, and organizations due to local influences and practices and a lack of behavioral science in their implementation (Burnett, 2018). Poor physician engagement and adherence to guidelines and rules were found in a study looking into the let-down of HCAIs plan. The practices of doctors and other health care workers deteriorated even at institutions where policies, procedures, and checklists were correctly implemented. Reasons included too much information, too complex to apply; guidelines conflicted with other procedures; and a lack of proof to support the management (Jacob, et al., 2018).
HCAI prevention and control must primarily focus on patient safety policy and planning. Health care facilities and public health specialists, health insurance companies, quality management, patient safety organizations, educational amenities, the general public, and the veterinary sector can all play a role in preventing and controlling HCAIs. An additional study on patient safety found that the following procedures assisted in maximizing the effect of a program: make sure that the educational program is well-introduced and practiced; publicly report program consequences; cautiously plan healthcare facilities with patient safety in mind; encourage a knowledgeable and transparent managerial method; offer clear direction as well as role modelling; enable cooperation amid the healthcare program.
References
Assi, M.A., Doll, M., Pryor, R., Cooper, K., Bearman, G. and Stevens, M.P., 2021. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections: An update and perspective. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, pp.1-2.
Baccolini, V., Migliara, G., Isonne, C., Dorelli, B., Barone, L.C., Giannini, D., Marotta, D., Marte, M., Mazzalai, E., Alessandri, F. and Pugliese, F., 2021. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare-associated infections in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective cohort study. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 10(1), pp.1-9.
Behnke, M., Valik, J.K., Gubbels, S., Teixeira, D., Kristensen, B., Abbas, M., van Rooden, S.M., Gastmeier, P., van Mourik, M.S., Aspevall, O. and Astagneau, P., 2021. Information technology aspects of large-scale implementation of automated surveillance of healthcare-associated infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 27, pp.S29-S39.
Behnke, M., Valik, J.K., Gubbels, S., Teixeira, D., Kristensen, B., Abbas, M., van Rooden, S.M., Gastmeier, P., van Mourik, M.S., Aspevall, O. and Astagneau, P., 2021. Information technology aspects of large-scale implementation of automated surveillance of healthcare-associated infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 27, pp.S29-S39.
Bonilla-Gameros, L., Chevallier, P., Sarkissian, A. and Mantovani, D., 2020. Silver-based antibacterial strategies for healthcare-associated infections: Processes, challenges, and regulations. An integrated review. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 24, p.102142.
Burnett, E., 2018. Effective infection prevention and control: the nurse’s role. Nursing Standard (2014+), 33(4), p.68.
Caselli, E., Brusaferro, S., Coccagna, M., Arnoldo, L., Berloco, F., Antonioli, P., Tarricone, R., Pelissero, G., Nola, S., La Fauci, V. and Conte, A., 2018. Reducing healthcare-associated infections incidence by a probiotic-based sanitation system: A multicentre, prospective, intervention study. PLoS One, 13(7), p.e0199616.
Coffin, S.E., Abanyie, F., Bryant, K., Cantey, J., Fiore, A., Fritz, S., Guzman-Cottrill, J., Hersh, A.L., Huskins, W.C., Kociolek, L.K. and Kronman, M., 2021. Pediatric research priorities in healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial stewardship. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 42(5), pp.519-522.
Haque, M., McKimm, J., Sartelli, M., Dhingra, S., Labricciosa, F.M., Islam, S., Jahan, D., Nusrat, T., Chowdhury, T.S., Coccolini, F. and Iskandar, K., 2020. Strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections: a narrative overview. Risk management and healthcare policy, 13, p.1765.
Jacob, J.T., Herwaldt, L.A., Durso, F.T. and CDC Prevention Epicenters Program, 2018. Preventing healthcare-associated infections through human factors engineering. Current opinion in infectious diseases, 31(4), pp.353-358.
Lacotte, Y., Årdal, C. and Ploy, M.C., 2020. Infection prevention and control research priorities: what do we need to combat healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance? Results of a narrative literature review and survey analysis. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 9(1), pp.1-10.
Lake, J.G., Weiner, L.M., Milstone, A.M., Saiman, L., Magill, S.S. and See, I., 2018. Pathogen distribution and antimicrobial resistance among pediatric healthcare-associated infections reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2011–2014. infection control & hospital epidemiology, 39(1), pp.1-11.
Liu, W., Guo, T. and Haoxue, L., 2020. Healthcare-associated infection prevention and control management in a tertiary hospital and an overall evaluation. Ann Palliat Med, 9(4), pp.1536-1544.
Manoukian, S., Stewart, S., Graves, N., Mason, H., Robertson, C., Kennedy, S., Pan, J., Kavanagh, K., Haahr, L., Adil, M. and Dancer, S.J., 2021. Bed-days and costs associated with the inpatient burden of healthcare-associated infection in the UK. Journal of Hospital Infection, 114, pp.43-50.
Nguemeleu, E.T., Beogo, I., Sia, D., Kilpatrick, K., Séguin, C., Baillot, A., Jabbour, M., Parisien, N., Robins, S. and Boivin, S., 2020. Economic analysis of healthcare-associated infection prevention and control interventions in medical and surgical units: systematic review using a discounting approach. Journal of Hospital Infection, 106(1), pp.134-154.
O’Toole, R.F., 2021. The interface between COVID-19 and bacterial healthcare-associated infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 27(12), pp.1772-1776.
Plachouras, D., Lepape, A. and Suetens, C., 2018. ECDC definitions and methods for the surveillance of healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units. Intensive care medicine, 44(12), pp.2216-2218.
Rock, C., Small, B.A. and Thom, K.A., 2018. Innovative methods of hospital disinfection in prevention of healthcare-associated infections. Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases, 10(1), pp.65-77.
Russo, P.L., Shaban, R.Z., MacBeth, D., Carter, A. and Mitchell, B.G., 2018. Impact of electronic healthcare-associated infection surveillance software on infection prevention resources: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Hospital Infection, 99(1), pp.1-7.
Schreiber, P.W., Sax, H., Wolfensberger, A., Clack, L. and Kuster, S.P., 2018. The preventable proportion of healthcare-associated infections 2005–2016: systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 39(11), pp.1277-1295.
Shang, J., Needleman, J., Liu, J., Larson, E. and Stone, P.W., 2019. Nurse Staffing and Healthcare Associated Infection, Unit-level Analysis. The Journal of nursing administration, 49(5), p.260.
Stevens, M.P., Doll, M., Pryor, R., Godbout, E., Cooper, K. and Bearman, G., 2020. Impact of COVID-19 on traditional healthcare-associated infection prevention efforts. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 41(8), pp.946-947.
Stewart, S., Robertson, C., Pan, J., Kennedy, S., Dancer, S., Haahr, L., Manoukian, S., Mason, H., Kavanagh, K., Cook, B. and Reilly, J., 2021. Epidemiology of healthcare-associated infection reported from a hospital-wide incidence study: considerations for infection prevention and control planning. Journal of Hospital Infection, 114, pp.10-22.
Stewart, S., Robertson, C., Pan, J., Kennedy, S., Haahr, L., Manoukian, S., Mason, H., Kavanagh, K., Graves, N., Dancer, S.J. and Cook, B., 2021. Impact of healthcare-associated infection on length of stay. Journal of Hospital Infection, 114, pp.23-31.
Suetens, C., Latour, K., Kärki, T., Ricchizzi, E., Kinross, P., Moro, M.L., Jans, B., Hopkins, S., Hansen, S., Lyytikäinen, O. and Reilly, J., 2018. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections, estimated incidence and composite antimicrobial resistance index in acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities: results from two European point prevalence surveys, 2016 to 2017. Eurosurveillance, 23(46), p.1800516.
Suleyman, G., Alangaden, G. and Bardossy, A.C., 2018. The role of environmental contamination in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens and healthcare-associated infections. Current infectious disease reports, 20(6), pp.1-11.
van Buijtene, A. and Foster, D., 2019. Does a hospital culture influence adherence to infection prevention and control and rates of healthcare associated infection? A literature review. Journal of infection prevention, 20(1), pp.5-17.
Voidazan, S., Albu, S., Toth, R., Grigorescu, B., Rachita, A. and Moldovan, I., 2020. Healthcare associated infections—a new pathology in medical practice?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), p.760.
Voidazan, S., Albu, S., Toth, R., Grigorescu, B., Rachita, A. and Moldovan, I., 2020. Healthcare associated infections—a new pathology in medical practice?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), p.760.
Wa?aszek, M., Ko?pa, M., Wolak, Z., Ró?a?ska, A. and Wójkowska-Mach, J., 2018. Patient as a partner in healthcare-associated infection prevention. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(4), p.624.
Weiner-Lastinger, L.M., Abner, S., Benin, A.L., Edwards, J.R., Kallen, A.J., Karlsson, M., Magill, S.S., Pollock, D., See, I., Soe, M.M. and Walters, M.S., 2020. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with pediatric healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2015–2017. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 41(1), pp.19-30.
Weiner-Lastinger, L.M., Abner, S., Edwards, J.R., Kallen, A.J., Karlsson, M., Magill, S.S., Pollock, D., See, I., Soe, M.M., Walters, M.S. and Dudeck, M.A., 2020. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with adult healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2015–2017. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 41(1), pp.1-18.