The social constructivist approach of non-state actors
In Rwanda, during the year in 1994, there two major ethnicity clashed that later rose to become genocide. UN being a non-state actor had to act within their moral authority to salvage the situation. The world watched as over 800000 people were killed. UN served in recovering the case as an international organization that derives their powers from moral and expert authority H?ng, Meijer, Bulte and Pilot 2015 (). The model used by the UN nations is explained as per the model of Banner and Finnemore of bureaucracy. The model describes different models that were applied by the UN in trying to find the stalemate that had hit the Rwanda people.
The first model of authority is the social constructivist approach that argues that international nonstate actors are autonomous. They act by what they feel is right in their capacity. They do not dance to the tune of any political player. They work by inner workings of the institution. The bureaucratic character is what profoundly shapes the action and the decision they take.
The above model was applied in the Rwandan case after the death of over 800000 people and rising. Non-human conditions around children and women it was undeniable that the nation needed help. Therefore the UN being a non-state actor, led by Kofi Annan. They set a task force to stop the genocide through halting the ethnic clashes, find the people responsible and convict them. The UN army was therefore sent to Rwanda in 1994 to prevent armed without the knowledge and accent of the Rwandan government (Anderson 2017). These deconstruct the idea of the neorealism that the non-state actors act in agreement with a few large states to control their operation.
The second authority that nonstate actors derive their operations from is the pillar of the center of ideas. Being an international organization, it’s only logical that the organization derive their reasoning from real purpose. The logic that was used in solving the Rwandan case is that UN had a high level of bureaucracy and with the inner workings operation they had. They did not release information on how they were going to solve the stalemate but had to act. They were guided by the fact that they were operating bureaucratically, and so did not need the approval of anyone (Barnett and Finnemore 2004). There sending of the UN army to disarm the Tutsi fighters against the Hutus was merely on logic and inner working of the organization. The idea that they were helping the weaker or suppressed group as it seemed was farfetched.
UN’s task force in Rwanda
The other model of Banners and Finnerman that the non-state actors operate from applying in the Rwandan contest is the engagement in advocacy and fundraising activities for the case in they are. The model requires that expert authority allows the organization to collect fund from other donors with the aim of securing financial support for the mission (Klotz and Lynch 2014). The organization can do these in many ways including forming a body to receive funds; these will seem as if the body are the ones in charge of the operation, yet it’s the more prominent umbrella organization.
In the case of Rwanda, UN sends a peacekeeper mission that collected funds for the process. The purpose was also responsible for giving the essential amenities to the ones who were affected by the clashes. They provided a humanitarian condition to the Rwandese people. These seek to deconstruct the ides that the donors seek to have decision-making portions in the operations of non-state actors. The particular group only works authoritatively under the mandate of the more important organization. The united nation assistance mission for Rwanda was formed in Arusha to help; solve the Rwandan civil war, one of their purpose was to help the civilians who were affected. UN Security Council took up the blame when the mission failed as more civilians were killed leading to genocide.
The non-state actors also can use institutional and discursive resources to induce deference for others who are in need of it. This is explained as the body taking resources from another country or nation not based on the consent of that country, but based on the overall authority; they have over that the states (Michael and Finnemore 2004). This is a dynamic concept since some nations may be willing to donate to the state actors. Others might adapt to these orders. These are a social construct view of dynamic approach as explained by Barnett and Finnemore. In the Rwandan perspective and according to the Arusha treaty the, the soldiers that were supposed to help in solving the civil war, were not only the un soldiers but soldiers from the neighboring countries, Tanzania, Uganda and Rwanda were to donate some of their soldiers. They were also to grant refuge for affected persons (Dower and Williams 2016). They also hosted the UN soldiers who were camping at that place.
The moral authority that nonstate actors operate from is the perspective of hierarchy, in this sense, each person working at the organization is answerable to his superiors and acts within his sphere of competence .there is also a division of labor. The exact words used by the two is work is conducted according to prescribed rules and operating procedures that eliminate any influence from any external authority. The foreign power may include arbitrary and political influencers (Hay 2016). The Rwandese case there were explicit orders from the secretary general of disarming the army rebels. The UN army was, therefore, acting with the authority of hierarchy and not for the benefit of the primarily formed Hutu government (Muldoon Jr 2018).
Using the center of ideas pillar
The moral authority is rational but legal authorities. There is an authority based on legalities, procedures, and rules rendered by the rule of law. They, therefore, do not operate by individual thinking of rationality of what is wrong or right (Churcher 2014). They, therefore, base their appropriate course of action by written law. The case of Rwanda these were applied in two ways.
The first on being just, UN tried to end such impunity through legal, judicial action. The UN council set up an international criminal tribunal for Rwanda which began having a seat in 1995 after the UN Security Council resolved and found 92 indictments, two withdrawals and ten sent to national jurisdiction in France and 8 to Rwanda. Among the cases are former media operates involved in hate media speech? Famous politicians such as former states Prime Minister Jean Kambanda. Former mayor Jean-Paul whose judgment has not been released yet.
Secondly, administrative rules were used since the state was unable to prosecute the accused, over alleged issues, the international criminal court assist in providing all the required details in trials of the said individuals .in the Rwandan case in 2012 the global court helped deliver a fact that the nation could not. A judgment was made of the war crimes of Thomas Dyilo; a militia leader believed to have recruited soldiers from the neighboring state of Congo.
The use of legal law by non-state actors can further be established by the UN not getting involved by the genocide-accused of Sierra Leone and Lebanon. The two countries judicial systems had agreed with UN judicial system, that they weren’t going to interfere with the individual’s trials. However, they formed the special court for Sierra Leone and special tribunal for Lebanon to look over their genocide cases (Duvall and Barnett 2018).
The rational and idea that; just as they are bureaucratized, they deal with almost everything and are not bound up with any general, or impersonal forms of not assisting when they are needed too. Illogical if they would only help stop the civil war in Rwanda and abandon without help the people who were affected. Some of them involve, women, children under the age of five and persons living with disabilities. They, therefore, engaged in helping in all the way they can including offering medical support if they have to.
The non-state actors obtain their expertise authority on the basis that they are professionally trained. Employees of the non-state actors are trained and appointed by use of high standards, and therefore when they make particular decisions, is believed to be a professional one (O’Connor 2015). The choice is supposed to have to benefit not only the people intended but also the organization. These show their independent moral authority to help. In the Rwanda case the decisions made by the Arusha treaty security council it was in to help solve the stalemate in the possible ways that they stipulated, therefore the expert authority that the non-state actors have do not involve the country in any way. This even captures the decision of the then UN secretary general of making a taskforce to investigate probe into the case of the Rwandan civil and genocide war (Kentikelenis and Seabrooke 2017).
Engaging in advocacy and fundraising activities
From the above applications of moral and expert authority. The results could either be relative autonomy, where the non-state actors got the result they expected independently without the states influence and contingent influence where other factors determined the outcome that was received (Reus-Smit 2018).
The relative autonomy in the Rwandan case worked in the moral authority to use legal and logic laws. They successfully persecuted a perpetrated the ones with whom they had found wrong through the tribunal formed both locally and internationally. They successfully used the international wars to get to the final judgment.
The relative autonomy also worked with they are not bound to a particular activity as they are independent. UN doctors, medical experts, and other helpful organs were sent to Rwanda in a move of trying to help them. They were supported, and even refugee camps were set to benefit. Other experts like arbitrators were also sent to the country (Kiraly 2014). Other experts were sent later when the war had ended to help the nation get back on its feet through reconciliation measures.
The hierarchy based authority also had relative autonomy, as the orders of the secretary general were followed. The war that had been started by the ethnic armed gangs was countered by the UN Security Council. The investigations for the perpetrators was also done, and they were tried and accused.
The rest of the authority result become a contingent influence. The authority of forming a branch umbrella that spearheads the operations of the UN. The Rwanda peacekeeping mission was dependent on the member countries that were willing to join; this also depended on the willing of such nations to participate. This led to the failure of such method as the exclusive group sends for a peacekeeping mission in 1993 during failed to reduce the civil wars and ethnic clashes that later, matured into genocide.
The authority of using resource and discursive in benefit of another country. The result was depended on the willingness of such nations to release their soldiers and how many they were releasing. Several cases were reported of nations pulling their soldiers out of such operations (Banerjee 2017). Some of the countries example Burundi closed their borders at some point for war-affected refugees, who were going into their country. This authority result was, therefore, contingent influenced. Many member states delayed contributing personnel until they were sure that the impact had diluted for sometimes. They were afraid of more deaths.
Inducing deference for others
The expert authority was also contingently influenced. The Security Council meeting made decisions that were supposed to be implemented through a peacekeeping mission and neglected the issues that the people faced from the government which was creating the civil war. This resulted in a genocide that blew up when one of the leaders was killed during a meeting to restore peace when his helicopter was shot (Pease 2015). The expertise that made the decision though on expert authority had an overlook that got things from bad to worse.
The judicial prosecution of the accused was also contingent influenced, ranging from the availability of witnesses, availability of specific legal laws, availability of prosecutors and many more. As there was no existence of ICC, the Rwandan tribunal had to be made as first as possible to investigate the matter. This could have taken a lot of time that might not have served the immediate purpose it was to .example, 2 of the suspects before the actual trials and conviction had passed away.
Being the center of power so that, they do not release their course of action in a stalemate they are solving worked to their disadvantage, the civil war they were hoping to prevent burst into genocide. This shows that the authority of center of power was contingently influenced. Other factors like history, background and culture had to be considered (Cogan 2006).
The moral authority of getting sponsored by the help of any donor was also contingent based. As much as the UN argued that they got funding and support from a group, it depended on the willingness of that group to cooperate with the group that is sent. The UNAMIR group posted by UN to keep stability. Withdrew from stabilizing the nation after the genocide in 96. The withdrawal was because the RPF group which was supporting the UN withdrew their support too (Banerjee 2017).
The authority of moral authority was also questioned during the genocide because of the result it caused. The use of solving disarming dispute using war that was proposed by the council even caused more lives to be lost leading to genocide. The decision led to a contingent influenced result as it was a grave loss of people. A reconciliatory method would have been used.
References
Anderson, B., 2017. How Cultural Factors Infl uence the Use of Social Constructivist-Based Pedagogical Models of Distance Learning: Examining Japanese Online Collaborative Behaviors. In Culture, Learning, and Technology (pp. 97-114). Routledge.
Banerjee, K., 2017. Rethinking the Global Governance of International Protection. Colum. J. Transnat’l L., 56, p.313.
Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M., 2004. Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Cornell University Press.
Checkel, J.T., 2017. Methods in Constructivist Approaches to International Security (SWP 55).
Churcher, K., 2014. ” Friending” Vygotsky: A Social Constructivist Pedagogy of Knowledge Building through Classroom Social Media Use. Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(1), pp.33-50.
Cogan, J.K., 2006. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics.
Dower, N. and Williams, J., 2016. Global citizenship: A critical introduction. Routledge.
Duvall, R. and Barnett, M., 2018. International organizations and the diffusion of power. In International Organization and Global Governance (pp. 79-90). Routledge.
H?ng, N.V.T., Meijer, M.R., Bulte, A.M. and Pilot, A., 2015. The implementation of a social constructivist approach in primary science education in Confucian heritage culture: the case of Vietnam. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), pp.665-693.
Hay, C., 2016. Good in a crisis: The ontological institutionalism of social constructivism. New Political Economy, 21(6), pp.520-535.
Kentikelenis, A.E. and Seabrooke, L., 2017. The politics of world polity: script-writing in international organizations. American Sociological Review, 82(5), pp.1065-1092.
Kiraly, D., 2014. A social constructivist approach to translator education: Empowerment from theory to practice. Routledge.
Klotz, A. and Lynch, C.M., 2014. Strategies for research in constructivist international relations. Routledge.
Michael, B., and Finnemore, M., 2004. Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Cornell University.
Muldoon Jr, J.P., 2018. The architecture of global governance: an introduction to the study of international organizations. Routledge.
O’Connor, M.K., 2015. Social work constructivist research(Vol. 1134). Routledge. Padgett, D.K., 2016. Qualitative methods in social work research (Vol. 36). Sage Publications.
Pease, K.K.S., 2015. International organizations. Routledge.
Reus-Smit, C., 2018. Seeing Culture in World Politics. Theorizing Global Order: The International, Culture and Governance, 22, p.66
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
