Changes in CSC during the COVID-19 pandemic
When it comes to social care, it involves the provision of human services, homecare, protection of children, and social support programs to children or adults who have special needs as a result of disease, disability, or old age, as well as other concerns such as unemployment. This is divided into four categories: care supplied in nursing homes, help an individual or personal care, care given into the day centers, residential care, and unpaid caregiving assistance (Bradbury and Isham 2020).
From March 16 to March 23, 2020, the practice of children’s social care in England underwent the most significant upheaval it has ever seen, according to experts. Since mid – February and then into the early weeks of March, the prospect that COVID-19 will cause service interruptions has been raised, providing a chance for strategies to be considered and prepared at the local, regional, and federal levels alike. Community care workers continued to operate in their offices throughout the week of March 16th, as well as visiting homes and attending meetings (Comas et al ., 2021).
However, in a relatively short period of time, the technique that had been put in place to help workplace staff was forced to respond to support requests from a working population that’s now working from home but still required access to their networked computers. There was very little space for a system to go wrong. The CSC’s basic responsibility for ‘at risk’ children was maintained, and it was necessary to find measures to ensure that some of the current societal most vulnerable children were still under surveillance.
Due to the obvious nature of delivering social care, patients and families are often in intimate touch with one another. It is possible for residents at care homes, for example, to have close interaction with one another in situations when there are several people in a single residence. There is compelling clinical proof that the danger of increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 rises with age, as well as for people who have specific pre-existing medical disorders that are likely to be prevalent among those receiving therapy. The combined effect of the characteristics of those seeking treatment, the essence of the attending, and the surroundings in which it is provided puts the social care system at increased risk of suffering a disproportionately negative effect from COVID-19 when compared to the general population. According to statistics, between March 2020 and June 2020, there’s been a disproportionately unfavorable effect on persons who receive or engage in social care in the United Kingdom (Sarkodie and Owusu 2021).
The researchers of this research want to demonstrate how well the Civil Service Commission (CSC) responded to the conditions of the shutdown in order to put into context whether social services were able to support children and their families. The general goal of this study is to evaluate the changes that happened in CSC during this early phase of the epidemic in England, as well as the benefits and problems that these changes provide for a post-COVID-19 environment (Crawley et al., 2020).
Impact of COVID-19 on patients and families in social care
How the children of social care are being impacted by covid 19 in UK? How did they over come the issues?
A qualitative study was conducted on 15 English local authorities’ students’ classroom care (CSC) organizations (sometimes referred to as child protection services divisions) in both the immediate wake of the closure and over a period of months afterward. In the first months after the Coronavirus epidemic in the United Kingdom, that was not apparent how long efforts such as lockdown (the remain at home order), safeguarding of clinically extremely sensitive populations, and macroeconomic (or, more precisely, physical) dissociation would be in place (from late May to early June 2020). Following extensive consideration, it was determined that the recruiting of 15 organizations was viable in the context of the epidemic and that these authorities constituted at least one agency from each of the nine English regions. Although several attempts were made, it was not feasible to recruit a regional authority in the ninth area (Davillas and Jones 2020). The choice to hire just a tenth of the total number of local authority CSCs was a realistic one, given the fact that there are 151 of them. Everyone hoped to find around 12 and 15 volunteers local councils who would be willing to interact with academics in a short period of time, and were successful. The use of a bigger sample would have resulted in higher sensitivity to execution and experience, however, this was not the case (Rosenthal et al ., 2020).
A set of problems discussed in moderate discussions was developed based on interactions with representatives from other local councils with whom the investigators had previously conducted research and evaluations, as well as articles published in the media today, social work journal articles, and other internet sites. After that, the technique for interviewing witnesses was tested with a team of specialists in senior roles from four different organizations, as well as with three different social therapists who operate in front-line roles. During the testing period, it was conducted in a setting where one of the researchers was working on a different project at the time of the assessment. (Rosenthal et al ., 2020).
Once it was determined who would be speaking for the majority of an agency, a timetable for the interview was issued to the individual(s) in question, and preparations were made for the interview to take place over the phone or through video call. Nine of the 15 interviews were performed by video conference, three were conducted over the phone, and three persons supplied an initial written answer through email that was then immediately followed with a phone conversation as part of the study.
Although there were difficulties in assessing data obtained in a variety of forms and through a variety of procedures, these were offset by the luxury of reading and hearing about experiences that would have been more difficult to record if just one strategy had been used. It was during this time period that the data was gathered that the respondents too were starting to work in a variety of different ways, but they’re also trying to manage both risk to children and youth while supervising staff who were dispersed across a wide range of places and continuing to work in a national setting of stress and hyper-insecurity.
Qualitative study on 15 local authorities’ CSC organizations
As part of our effort to put into context the ways that social task with youngsters and their family members has evolved as a result of the COVID-19 restrictions, It was seen how social services, as the important specialists involved in child safeguard underneath the Children Act 1989, were just being implemented following the nationwide shutdown. Despite the fact that there were a few reports of persons who had caught COVID-19, there had been no influence on the number of ill people in employment during this time period. For a career wherein home employment had historically been limited and typically devoted to administrative responsibilities rather to interacting with parents and kids, it was reported that the shift from a workplace to a home base had been very straightforward. Throughout the weeks that followed, each local authority offered guidance to employees on ergonomic issues such as resting on a good chair and viewing the computer screen at the proper angle to it.
Despite the fact that there was no considerable reduction in the social work workforce as a consequence of COVID-19, there was a greater awareness of the strains within which social services had been functioning, and it was far from obvious that this would continue to be the case in the future. When the surveys were performed, it was not feasible to analyze the entire effect of the very diverse modes of working on the population or on families because of the nature of the questions asked (Pietromonaco and Overall 2021).
Conversations among jurisdictions were centered on the possibility of an increase in complaints as a result of the discovery of concealed damage, and the scope and nature of this will have to be studied. It is possible that a lack of direct interaction among children and respective schools or healthcare providers had a role in the fast decline in referrals that occurred during the lockdown time period. The family had been confined to their homes for a long length of time, and it was impossible to determine the extent of family abuse, torture, or neglect that had occurred. Despite the fact that referrals dropped by as much as half in the aftermath of a disaster of the shutdown, several prognostications of significantly increased consultation rates were made in the interview sessions and more widely (by the Association of Executives of Child services (ADCS) and the Security and safety Board, among others). In late July, the Head of Kent Child services, one of the biggest local authorities, anticipated that when universities resume in September, applications will increase by 250 percent as a result of the closure (Hefferon et al ., 2021).
Labor turnover in the field of social work with children is a common occurrence in many jurisdictions, which has resulted in an over-reliance on newly certified and early-career professionals (see Institute for Government, 2019). The result is a group that is dependent on its colleagues to supply them with professional direction and day-to-day monitoring.
In the near term, the frequency of house calls will rise, although the virus is still in existence, everybody will exercise extreme care in their treatment. The long-term repercussions for children’s results, practice, and staff well-being may not be known until the offices reopen and the volume of home visitation has restored to some semblance of normalcy, at which point it may be impossible to evaluate them (Harper et al., 2020).
Conclusion
This collection of conversations captures CSC managers’ thoughts on framework recuperation and adjustment as well as personal risks and vulnerability during the first week of the epidemic. Even before COVID-19, public agencies worked together with those in the commercial and autonomous (third) sectors. However, it was discovered evidence that these institutional and professional relationships have been enhanced in recent years.
Although COVID-19 was seen as an important catalyst for social and economic development, it was also viewed as a potential harbinger of greater inequities. As a result of COVID-19, the role of digital connectivity in social work practice and systems has expanded in ways that were previously just hypothetical, if not outright forbidden. Consider if COVID-19 can alter England’s CSC over time, or whether it should be used as a litmus test to throw out some approaches that haven’t worked well in the first few weeks.
References
Baginsky, M. and Manthorpe, J., 2021. The impact of COVID-19 on Children’s Social Care in England. Child Abuse & Neglect, 116, p.104739.
Bradbury?Jones, C. and Isham, L., 2020. The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID?19 on domestic violence. Journal of clinical nursing.
Comas-Herrera, A., Fernandez, J.L., Hancock, R., Hatton, C., Knapp, M., McDaid, D., Malley, J., Wistow, G. and Wittenberg, R., 2020. COVID-19: Implications for the support of people with social care needs in England. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4-5), pp.365-372.
Crawley, E., Loades, M., Feder, G., Logan, S., Redwood, S. and Macleod, J., 2020. Wider collateral damage to children in the UK because of the social distancing measures designed to reduce the impact of COVID-19 in adults. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 4(1).
Davillas, A. and Jones, A.M., 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on inequality of opportunity in psychological distress in the UK. Available at SSRN 3614940.
Harper, L., Kalfa, N., Beckers, G.M.A., Kaefer, M., Nieuwhof-Leppink, A.J., Fossum, M., Herbst, K.W., Bagli, D. and ESPU Research Committee, 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on research. Journal of pediatric urology, 16(5), pp.715-716.
Hefferon, C., Taylor, C., Bennett, D., Falconer, C., Campbell, M., Williams, J.G., Schwartz, D., Kipping, R. and Taylor-Robinson, D., 2021. Priorities for the child public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic recovery in England. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 106(6), pp.533-538.
Levine, D.T., Morton, J. and O’Reilly, M., 2020. Child safety, protection, and safeguarding in the time of COVID-19 in Great Britain: proposing a conceptual framework. Child Abuse & Neglect, 110, p.104668.
Pietromonaco, P.R. and Overall, N.C., 2021. Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist, 76(3), p.438.
Rosenthal, D.M., Ucci, M., Heys, M., Hayward, A. and Lakhanpaul, M., 2020. Impacts of COVID-19 on vulnerable children in temporary accommodation in the UK. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), pp.e241-e242.
Sarkodie, S.A. and Owusu, P.A., 2021. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on waste management. Environment, development and sustainability, 23(5), pp.7951-7960.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
