Background
Would workers in Australia, America or Europe accept the Taylorism in this form today?
There are various key thoughts that I have come across from the activity, which are said beneath:
- Logical productivity administration in light of the time taken for the assignments, which goes for enhanced financial effectiveness.
- Partitioning the extensive assignments into littler errand, which are less demanding to be finished.
- Sequential construction system generation for the assembling procedure.
- Increment in the wages gave to the workers of the association by diminishing the season of generation (Aitken 2014).
- Dealing with the workforce specifically by taking out the nearness of trade unions in the work environment, this thusly prompts better control and administration.
I don’t believe that the laborers in Australia, America or Europe will acknowledge Taylorism in this frame today, as this strategy for scientific management characterizes the representatives with less productivity to be doltish regardless of the possibility that it commends the specialists with great effectiveness in the work environment. The idea of Taylorism is offending to the specialists in light of the assumed low level of learning of the laborers by the administration (Waring 2016).
Consider the design of scripts for use in Call Centres, can you see Taylorism in that? Explain.
The contents utilized as a part of various call focuses in the present includes various predetermined reactions to the discussions with the clients. Indeed, I see Taylorism in the action of giving the call centre specialists with the contents of the reactions. It proposes that the specialists are not fit for deciding the powerful reaction to the questions of the clients (Berber 2016). A few sections of the thoughts are additionally being used in various associations in the present social orders, for example, Ford and Audi, which execute the idea of the mechanical production systems alongside the scientific management of the workers by diminishing the extent of the individual assignments (Brunsson 2017).
Some would say that ‘the world has moved on’ and these ideas are out of date. However, could there be parts of the world today for which these ideas might be just what they need? Explain.
The video shows the theories of Taylor and Ford. Fayolism is another strategy or hypothesis of administration which concentrates on various key thoughts specified beneath and was created by Henri Fayol:
- Control on the specialists to enable the association to have better profitability and productivity.
- Instructing the workers of the associations with respect to the different administration strategies and styles.
I trust that a portion of the thoughts communicated in the administration hypothesis of Fayolism permit various associations around the globe in the present businesses to have better administration in the working environment. The hypothesis of Fayolism concentrates on the administration of the working environment on the premise of correspondence of the specialists and inspiration of the laborers by various different factors alongside cash.
This permits the associations in the present enterprises to have better administration of the workforce and the different HR accessible to the association. This hypothesis of administration still permits the HR bureaus of various associations to decide the different qualities which ought to be controlled by the candidate to finally become a Manager. Some of these qualities recommended by the Fayolism hypothesis of administration are physical, mental, instructive, specialized and moral qualities. This hypothesis of administration additionally permits the whole plan of action of a present association to be partitioned into various undertaking gatherings, for example, money related, administrative, specialized, business, bookkeeping and security (Berber 2016).
Activity 1- Thomas Friedman on Globalisation; 3 Eras of Globalisation; World is flat
What would be some of the key drawbacks or risks of living in the flat world of Globalisation 3.0 as Friedman describes it?
Case Study Analysis
According to Friedman, the world is flat and is equivalent to a platform with negligible barriers and a place where people can work, convey messages and establish connection across the boundaries (Hadfield 2016). However, there are several disadvantages and hazards of living in the flat world of globalisation 3.0. Some of them are discussed as below:
- The freedom of an association to execute its operations is limited by the business ethics. For instance, the multinational companies nowadays has shifted to developing countries in order to curb the costs.
- People do not have the same thoughts and their ideas and beliefs vary from each other.
If there would have been no restrictions of boundaries then the individuals could have been able to do whatever they wished. This indicates that people could come up with their own policies to trade.
Do you agree with Friedman’s iron rule of the flat world? Explain.
Yes, I do agree with the Friedman’s iron rule of flat world. According to the rule when the world is flat “whatever can be done will be done and it will be done by only you”. With the advancement of technology, people nowadays can do whatever they wish to do. For instance, several airlines nowadays have their personal websites where people can book tickets and download them along with their boarding passes. This technology has enabled the people to become their own personal ticket agents. Therefore, individuals might change in order to learn some new ideas and thoughts and do things according to their wish (Roberts, Hite and Chorev 2014).
Is the level of globalisation uniform across the world? Explain.
No, the level of globalization is not the same across the world. This is because of the differences in the cultures of different nations. The culture of a place is much more powerful than a mere brand. For instance, the techniques of management that are best suitable for the employees of USA may not suit the employees of UK. Culture is a dynamic phenomenon (James and Van Seters 2014). Despite globalization, the culture of different places vary from each other. Several nations have their own movie culture too. I believe that it is not possible to have an uniform or standard global culture.
Activity 2 Pankaj Ghemawat on Globalisation
Has your view on globalisation changed after listening to Professor Ghemawat? Explain.
Yes, my view on globalization has changed after listening to Professor Ghemawat. The peril of Friedman’s flat world proposition is that it could make administrators confound the patterns they see in their own particular organizations and make possibly genuine vital blunders. Rather than seeking after a forceful limitation system, for instance, officials from multinational firms regularly choose to “endure it” in developing markets, for example, China and India. They hold the mixed up conviction that demand and supply conditions will soon smooth and focalize with those in created markets. In actuality, such solidification is exceedingly improbable to happen inside any sensible planning horizon (Ghemawat 2016).
Consider where you have seen the fears that people have about globalisation. Do you think these fears may subside with some data points that may suggest otherwise?
The world is still a long way from flat world, and, in numerous enterprises, it’s probably going to hold its arch for a long while to come. They may, for example, trust that China’s retail condition will unite moderately rapidly; subsequently, they may neglect to put resources into limited dissemination channels that are more suitable for the present economic situations. Administrators ought to be careful about depending excessively on Friedman’s externally convincing, yet genuinely imperfect, confirm. Rather, they would do well to embrace a more systematic approach for assessing how flat their world really is, presently and later on (Ghemawat and Altman 2016). This will require a profound, reality based comprehension of the particular flatteners in each of their organizations, and in addition a cautious thought of whether to overlook, adjust to, or endeavor to shape those drivers.
Conclusion:
The several management theories explained has enabled us to infer that the implementation the theories is highly dependent upon the structure of the organization. The report explained the concepts of Fayolism and Taylorism. In addition, the Friedman’s theory of flat world was analyzed along with the view on globalization.
References:
Aitken, H. G. (2014). Scientific Management in Action: Taylorism at Watertown Arsenal, 1908-1915. Princeton University Press.
Berber, A. (2016). Purpose, Change and Top Management in the Mid-1920s: Revisiting Selected Papers. Organizational Management: Policies and Practices, 15.
Brunsson, K. (2017). Management Methods. In The Teachings of Management (pp. 13-26). Springer International Publishing.
Ghemawat, P. (2016). The Laws of Globalization and Business Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Ghemawat, P., and Altman, S. A. (2016). 1 Defining and Measuring Globalization. The Laws of Globalization and Business Applications, 11.
Hadfield, G. (2016). Rules for a flat world: why humans invented law and how to reinvent it for a complex global economy. Oxford University Press.
James, P., and Van Seters, P. (2014). Global social movements and global civil society: A critical overview. Globalization and Politics, Vol. 2: Global Social Movements and Global Civil Society, vii-xxx.
Roberts, J. T., Hite, A. B., and Chorev, N. (Eds.). (2014). The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change. John Wiley & Sons.
Waring, S. P. (2016). Taylorism transformed: Scientific management theory since 1945. UNC Press Books.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
