Business Case and Needs Analysis
The report is based on implementation of new cloud based integrated system in Star Car Rentals so that their business operations are improved and it leads to increase in market share of the company. There are various issues in the current system of the company which are required to be improved on scheduled time. This particular report analyzes the business case of Star Car Rentals with its business needs and benefits. It also analyzes the project cost to determine the budget for implementation plan. An organization structure and work breakdown structure is analyzed to determine the project team and work activities in this project. The paper analyzes the project schedule to determine start and end date of project, earned value analysis to determine various project cost analysis and risk to identify possible risks in the plan.
Star Car Rentals attained a market share of 45% of New Zealand car rental market with implementation of IT systems to cover its operations in areas such as customer relationship management, vehicle pick up, returns management, accounting, payroll, reservation management and others. The major problem with its existing applications is lack of integration. The current system has problems related to incorrect information about availability of vehicle, poor vehicle maintenance, incorrect invoicing and others. Those problems provide effect on rapid decline in revenue as the customers are moving away from the company. In the year 2018, the market share of company is stood at 20%. There is also reduction in sales as well as fall in the market share of the company. In order to overcome with those problems, the company decided to upgrade its existing systems and integrate a new cloud based integrated system.
Star Car Rentals will benefit from the new cloud based integrated system. The proposed system connects different application, system as well as IT environments for real time exchange of the data as well as processes. The system improves connectivity, visibility and optimization of the business operations. This system eliminates existing issues of data duplication as well as manual business work. The system will automate the entire business operations to make it time consuming, faster and efficient. It allows using of cloud applications without installation, access private as well as business files from whichever location throughout a remote internet access. It can improve computing efficiencies by centralization storage, memory as well as processing. It helps to configure of on-premise as well as cloud applications to share of data over cloud. The system is provided up-to-date information related to various business activities. Change into manual segments to automated system improves accuracy of level of business operations such as customer relationship management, vehicle pick up, returns management, accounting, payroll, reservation management and others. The system is also secured as username and password is being allocated to each employee to verify and gain access to the cloud.
Project Cost and Budget
From the financial point of view, the implement of new cloud integration system is required of total one-time cost for setting the proposed system is $510,000 with recurring cost per month is $35,000. It is estimated that the company will save an amount of $650,000 per year by means to eliminate lost sales as well as improve operating efficiencies.
The one-time cost for setting the systems are:
.Project Phase |
Cost |
Estimated Elapsed Time in Months |
Requirements Analysis |
$150,000 |
2 |
Configuration and Testing |
$200,000 |
3 |
User Acceptance Testing |
$80,000 |
3 |
Implementation including user training |
$50,000 |
2 |
Setup cost for networking and communication |
$30,000 |
3 |
Total |
$510,000 |
10 |
Following organization structure shows roles of the members those are involved in the project work throughout implementation of new cloud based integrated system in Star Car Rentals.
Following are the project deliverables which are provided while implementation of new cloud based integration system in Star Car Rental:
- Project charter:It defines statement of objectives in the project. It provides detailed project goals, roles and responsibilities, stakeholder list, level of authority of the project manager, timeline and project cost.
- Project management plan:It is an approved document used to manage the project execution work. PMP documents coordinate the planning activities and define the project execution, monitoring, controlling and closing. Each roles and responsibilities of project member is analyzed in this document.
- Requirement analysis document:This document provides details on success and failure of the system project. The system is described in terms of functional in addition to non-functional requirements. It serves contractual basis among customer as well as developer.
- Budget analysis report:It is a financial plan for defined period of year. It is included with sales volumes, revenue, cost and expenses, liabilities and cash flows. This report provides cost for networking of system across the project lifespan.
- Testing and implementation plan:This plan provides details of system features which are required to test, entry and exit criteria. The test cases are written to keep track of the software implemented, and the test analysis report will record results of tests.
- Risk management plan:It is a document prepared by the project manager to foresee the project risks, estimate its possible impacts and define the responses to project issues. It provides negative and positive effect on the project objectives.
- Lessons learned report:It provides details of learning gained from process to perform the project work. It provides insights of how project processes are to be improved.
Resource Name |
Work |
Project Manager |
1,664 hrs |
Preparation of project proposal |
16 hrs |
Allocation of requirements among development segments |
88 hrs |
Apply lessons learned from earlier projects |
24 hrs |
Review to determine readiness to design phase |
120 hrs |
Requirement sign off |
16 hrs |
Sign off the configuration phase |
16 hrs |
Availability of business requirements |
216 hrs |
Development of application code |
216 hrs |
Regression analysis completion |
144 hrs |
Sign off the user acceptance testing |
16 hrs |
Sign off the project report |
48 hrs |
Project review and closure |
64 hrs |
Final project report submission |
8 hrs |
Analyze the business requirements |
16 hrs |
Revalidate the business needs |
80 hrs |
Identify non-functional requirements |
120 hrs |
Installation of hardware and software |
96 hrs |
Staff training |
360 hrs |
Business Analyst 01 |
288 hrs |
Analyze the business requirements |
16 hrs |
Identify functional requirements |
96 hrs |
Support the build process |
96 hrs |
Software configuration |
80 hrs |
Business Analyst 02 |
1,176 hrs |
Revalidate the business needs |
80 hrs |
Identify functional requirements |
96 hrs |
Identify non-functional requirements |
120 hrs |
Source code, test scripts |
104 hrs |
Third party software and hardware |
96 hrs |
Support the build process |
96 hrs |
Installation of hardware and software |
96 hrs |
Unit, integration and system testing completion |
128 hrs |
Staff training |
360 hrs |
Testers |
1,344 hrs |
Source code, test scripts |
104 hrs |
Third party software and hardware |
96 hrs |
Development and test documentation |
80 hrs |
Management of testware and test results |
152 hrs |
Support the build process |
96 hrs |
Software configuration |
80 hrs |
Sign off the configuration phase |
16 hrs |
Availability of business requirements |
216 hrs |
Development of application code |
216 hrs |
Unit, integration and system testing completion |
128 hrs |
Regression analysis completion |
144 hrs |
Sign off the user acceptance testing |
16 hrs |
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Predecessors |
Resource Names |
0 |
Implementation of new cloud based integration system |
297 days |
Tue 10/9/18 |
Wed 11/27/19 |
||
1 |
Requirements analysis |
60 days |
Tue 10/9/18 |
Mon 12/31/18 |
||
1.1 |
Preparation of project proposal |
2 days |
Tue 10/9/18 |
Wed 10/10/18 |
Project Manager |
|
1.2 |
Analyze the business requirements |
2 days |
Thu 10/11/18 |
Fri 10/12/18 |
2 |
Business Analyst 01 ,Project Manager |
1.3 |
Revalidate the business needs |
10 days |
Mon 10/15/18 |
Fri 10/26/18 |
3 |
Business Analyst 02 ,Project Manager |
1.4 |
Allocation of requirements among development segments |
11 days |
Mon 10/29/18 |
Mon 11/12/18 |
4 |
Project Manager |
1.5 |
Apply lessons learned from earlier projects |
3 days |
Tue 11/13/18 |
Thu 11/15/18 |
5 |
Project Manager |
1.6 |
Identify potential product and servce providers |
27 days |
Fri 11/16/18 |
Mon 12/24/18 |
||
1.6.1 |
Identify functional requirements |
12 days |
Fri 11/16/18 |
Mon 12/3/18 |
6 |
Business Analyst 01 ,Business Analyst 02 |
1.6.2 |
Identify non-functional requirements |
15 days |
Tue 12/4/18 |
Mon 12/24/18 |
8 |
Business Analyst 02 ,Project Manager |
1.7 |
Review to determine readiness to design phase |
15 days |
Fri 11/16/18 |
Mon 12/31/18 |
4 |
Project Manager |
1.8 |
Requirement sign off |
2 days |
Tue 12/25/18 |
Wed 12/26/18 |
9 |
Project Manager |
2 |
Configuration and testing |
90 days |
Thu 12/27/18 |
Wed 5/1/19 |
||
2.1 |
Determine items make software and system |
25 days |
Thu 12/27/18 |
Wed 1/30/19 |
||
2.1.1 |
Source code, test scripts |
13 days |
Thu 12/27/18 |
Mon 1/14/19 |
11 |
Business Analyst 02 ,Testers |
2.1.2 |
Third party software and hardware |
12 days |
Tue 1/15/19 |
Wed 1/30/19 |
14 |
Business Analyst 02 ,Testers |
2.2 |
Development and test documentation |
10 days |
Thu 1/31/19 |
Wed 2/13/19 |
6,15 |
Testers |
2.3 |
Management of testware and test results |
19 days |
Thu 2/14/19 |
Tue 3/12/19 |
16 |
Testers |
2.4 |
Support the build process |
12 days |
Wed 3/13/19 |
Thu 3/28/19 |
17 |
Business Analyst 01 ,Business Analyst 02 ,Testers |
2.5 |
Installation of hardware and software |
12 days |
Fri 3/29/19 |
Mon 4/15/19 |
18 |
Business Analyst 02 ,Project Manager |
2.6 |
Software configuration |
10 days |
Tue 4/16/19 |
Mon 4/29/19 |
19 |
Business Analyst 01 ,Testers |
2.7 |
Sign off the configuration phase |
2 days |
Tue 4/30/19 |
Wed 5/1/19 |
10,20 |
Project Manager ,Testers |
3 |
90 days |
Thu 5/2/19 |
Wed 9/4/19 |
|||
3.1 |
Availability of business requirements |
27 days |
Thu 5/2/19 |
Fri 6/7/19 |
21 |
Project Manager ,Testers |
3.2 |
Development of application code |
27 days |
Mon 6/10/19 |
Tue 7/16/19 |
23 |
Project Manager ,Testers |
3.3 |
Unit, integration and system testing completion |
16 days |
Wed 7/17/19 |
Wed 8/7/19 |
24 |
Business Analyst 02 ,Testers |
3.4 |
Regression analysis completion |
18 days |
Thu 8/8/19 |
Mon 9/2/19 |
25 |
Project Manager ,Testers |
3.5 |
Sign off the user acceptance testing |
2 days |
Tue 9/3/19 |
Wed 9/4/19 |
26 |
Project Manager ,Testers |
4 |
Implementation including user training |
60 days |
Thu 9/5/19 |
Wed 11/27/19 |
||
4.1 |
Staff training |
45 days |
Thu 9/5/19 |
Wed 11/6/19 |
27 |
Business Analyst 02 ,Project Manager |
4.2 |
Sign off the project report |
6 days |
Thu 11/7/19 |
Thu 11/14/19 |
29 |
Project Manager |
4.3 |
Project review and closure |
8 days |
Fri 11/15/19 |
Tue 11/26/19 |
30 |
Project Manager |
4.4 |
Final project report submission |
1 day |
Wed 11/27/19 |
Wed 11/27/19 |
31 |
Project Manager |
Type of risk |
Description |
Probability |
Impact |
Risk level |
Mitigation actions |
Organizational risk |
Star car rentals have lose over IT governance as well as control in cloud. The company is not carrying out IT auditing over the cloud. Therefore, the cloud provider is failing to support company to meet with its specific industrial regulations. |
Unlikely |
Moderate |
Medium |
The company should be careful when making decisions regarding selection of the cloud vendors. |
Operational risk |
The cloud provides have not defined Service level agreement among the cloud providers. Therefore, the company has no such capability to meet with established SLA. |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Medium |
There should be proper defined service level agreement helps the company to make proper contract between service provider and end user. |
Technical risk |
Due to various cloud applications, there is data fragmentation as well as data losses. The company has limited control to debug and test application within cloud. Sometimes, there is unauthorized access to the data application. |
Likely |
Major |
High |
The company should aware the staffs regarding unauthorized access to confidential information. Two-way password method is used to prevent towards accessing the data from third party access. |
Legal risk |
The cloud architecture are failed to meet with data privacy as well as protect regulations. Intellectual property issues are raised due to sharing of IT resources over cloud. |
Moderate |
Major |
Medium |
The company should implement of strict organizational legal rules so that all confidential data should be kept secured in one place. |
Resource risk |
The staffs and managers involved in the project are not coordinated and supported to meet with client’s requirements. |
Unlikely |
Minor |
Low |
A proper communication plan should be implemented for interaction and coordination purpose. The team members are also encouraged to work effectively for the implementation work. |
Quality control
Plan Quality Management |
Quality Assurance |
Control Quality |
Does the project able to meet with client’s requirements? |
Project timeline, budget plan and requirement analysis are ensured if the project meets with its client’s requirements. When the project is delivered on time and the budget is in limit, then the project plan should succeed. |
Usage of internal control standards to ensure about quality of timeline and budget. |
Does the project work follow each phases? |
Each the project phases are followed and a project schedule assures if all the project phases are followed by the project team members. |
Monitoring against the project phases. |
Does the system testing properly done? |
The system is tested using user acceptance testing to assure if the system would run properly. All the test cases are accurately used for system testing. |
User acceptance testing is performed. |
Does proper training provided to the staffs regarding new cloud based integrated system implementation? |
It ensures if the staffs can get proper training regarding use of system. |
Staff training program are conducted in this case. |
Does the project documented effectively? |
Proper system set up is done to document all the project phases and requirements. |
Implementation testing is performed. |
Does regular update provided to the project manager? |
A project management plan ensures that all the project phases are followed and regular updates are provided to finish the work on scheduled time. |
Project management plan documents all project work. |
Project Name: Implementation of Cloud based Integrated System for Star Car Rentals
Prepared by: Project Manager
Position: Project Manager
Date: 28th October, 2018
Version No: v1.0
Document Change Control
The following is the document control for the revisions to this document.
Version Number |
Date of Issue |
Author(s) |
Brief Description of Change |
Version 1.0 |
28th October, 2018 |
Project Manager |
Initial version for review of project plan |
Definition
The following are definitions of terms, abbreviations and acronyms used in this document.
Term |
Definition |
ARS |
Alpha Rental Software |
CRM |
Customer Relationship Management |
Introduction
The main purpose of this communication plan for Star Car Rentals is providing the stakeholders with information related to the project. The plan defines who should provide information, when the information is delivered and what communication channels used to deliver the information is. The plan is policy driven to provide the stakeholders with the information. This document is primarily for the stakeholders, sets out how Star Car Rentals plans to communicate regarding the implementation of new cloud based integrated system in the business processes. It is included with key group of stakeholders those are required to transfer information to other related to project work. The communication plan accomplishes work with support as well as cooperation with each stakeholder groups. The main goal of communication plan is to maintain control of project as well as ensure that the stakeholders can receive required information. Schedule of weekly project meetings keep the participants updated regarding the project progress.
The main objectives of communication plan are as follows:
- Creating awareness among the project team members about the project requirements
- Creating messages required to maintain public image of the company
- Determining analysis for each media outlet to reach specific target market
- Avoiding confusion which affects morale and business productivity
- Encouraging collaboration in addition to transparency
- Communicating results of process to broader public audiences
- Providing timely information and message related to project
- Communication Purpose and Target Audiences
This section provides details regarding the target audiences those are involved in the communication plan along with purpose of communication among the project team members. The below table provides the list of audiences and communication purpose with them.
Audience |
Communication Purpose |
Project Team |
Project plan, project update and project issues |
Business Analyst |
Project specification, business requirements, project deliverables and project direction |
Tester |
User acceptance testing results and test cases analysis results |
Project Sponsor |
Project budget and timeline, incorrect project invoices |
Communication Message and Delivery
This section provides details on targeted audiences, key messages to the audience, delivery method, frequency for delivery of message and communicator.
Audience |
Message |
Delivery Method |
Delivery Frequency |
Communicator |
Project Team |
Project plan, Project update Project issues |
Business meeting and presentation |
Weekly |
Project Manager |
Business Analyst |
Project specification, Business requirements, Project deliverables |
Presentation, Email and project report |
Weekly |
Project Manager |
Tester |
User acceptance testing results |
Business meeting and presentation |
Monthly |
Project Manager |
Project Sponsor |
Project budget and timeline |
Business meeting and presentation |
Weekly |
Project Manager |
- Communication Message Contents
This particular section provides details of message contents of key communication which are performed among targeted audiences such as:
- Providing update on project findings and development of proposed system
- Implementation related to next project phases and timeline
- Business case for project consultation
- Changes in the business case
- Executive decisions and project phases
- Current and future project plan for implementation of proposed system
- Project status report, summary and status of schedule and budget
- Goals of the project management plan
- Project issues and mitigation
- Project checklist
- Accomplishment of the project activities
Organization Structure and Work Breakdown Structure
The earned value analysis (EVA) is a method to measure progress of project at given period of time, forecast the completion date, final cost as well as analyze the schedule and budget variance as the project proceeds. It is analyzed by calculating three main elements:
- Planned value (PV)- It is first element of the earned value management. It is value of work to complete at provided time. It is authorized budget assigned to project work for accomplishment of an activity or component of WBS.
Earned value (PV) = planned % completed work * budget at completion
- Actual cost (AC)- It is second element of the earned value management. It is total cost incurred for actual work complete to date. It is total cost incurred in accomplishment of work performed for an activity or component of WBS.
Actual cost (AC) = hourly rate* total hours spent
- Earned value (EV)- It is third element of the earned value management. It is the value of work completed to date. It is the value of work performed in terms of budget assigned to work of an activity or component of WBS.
Earned value (EV) = % completed work * budget at completion
Budgeted Cost of Work Schedule/Planned Value: |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
Project Manager |
Business Analyst 1 |
Tester |
||||||
Particulars |
Cost |
Estimated Elapsed Time |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Requirements Analysis |
$150,000 |
2 |
2 |
$135 |
$56,160 |
2 |
$110 |
$45,760 |
$80 |
||
Configuration & Testing |
$200,000 |
3 |
3 |
$135 |
$84,240 |
2 |
$110 |
$45,760 |
$80 |
$0 |
|
User Acceptance Testing |
$80,000 |
3 |
3 |
$135 |
$84,240 |
1 |
$110 |
$22,880 |
6 |
$80 |
$99,840 |
Implementation including user training |
$50,000 |
2 |
2 |
$135 |
$56,160 |
4 |
$110 |
$91,520 |
$80 |
$0 |
|
Setup Cost for networking & communication |
$30,000 |
0 |
$135 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
$80 |
$0 |
||
TOTAL |
$510,000 |
10 |
10 |
$135 |
$280,800 |
9 |
$110 |
$205,920 |
6 |
$80 |
$99,840 |
Budgeted Cost of Work Performance / Earned Value: |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Project Manager |
Business Analyst 1 |
Tester |
||||||
Particulars |
% of Completion |
Cost |
Estimated Elapsed Time |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Requirements Analysis |
100% |
$150,000 |
2 |
2 |
$135 |
$56,160 |
2 |
$110 |
$45,760 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Configuration & Testing |
80% |
$160,000 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
$135 |
$67,392 |
1.6 |
$110 |
$36,608 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
User Acceptance Testing |
0% |
$0 |
0 |
0 |
$135 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Implementation including user training |
0% |
$0 |
0 |
0 |
$135 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Setup Cost for networking & communication |
80% |
$24,000 |
0 |
$135 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
|
TOTAL |
|
$334,000 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
$135 |
$123,552 |
3.6 |
$110 |
$82,368 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Actual Cost of Work Performance/ Actual Cost: |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Project Manager |
Business Analyst 1 |
Tester |
||||||
Particulars |
% of Completion |
Cost |
Estimated Elapsed Time |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Requirements Analysis |
100% |
$157,500 |
2 |
2 |
$135 |
$56,160 |
2 |
$110 |
$45,760 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Configuration & Testing |
80% |
$168,000 |
2 |
2 |
$135 |
$56,160 |
4 |
$110 |
$91,520 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
User Acceptance Testing |
0% |
$0 |
0 |
0 |
$135 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Implementation including user training |
0% |
$0 |
0 |
0 |
$135 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Setup Cost for networking & communication |
80% |
$24,000 |
0 |
$135 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
|
TOTAL |
|
$349,500 |
4 |
4 |
$135 |
$112,320 |
6 |
$110 |
$137,280 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Estimates at Completion: |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Project Manager |
Business Analyst 1 |
Tester |
||||||
Particulars |
% of Completion |
Cost |
Estimated Elapsed Time |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Estimated Effort |
Cost per hour |
Labor Cost |
Requirements Analysis |
0% |
$4,500 |
0 |
0 |
$135 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Configuration & Testing |
20% |
$49,200 |
1 |
1 |
$135 |
$28,080 |
2 |
$110 |
$45,760 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
User Acceptance Testing |
100% |
$80,000 |
3 |
2 |
$135 |
$56,160 |
1 |
$110 |
$22,880 |
6 |
$80 |
$99,840 |
1 |
$140 |
$29,120 |
||||||||||
Implementation including user training |
100% |
$50,000 |
2 |
2 |
$140 |
$58,240 |
4 |
$110 |
$91,520 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
Setup Cost for networking & communication |
20% |
$6,000 |
0 |
$140 |
$0 |
0 |
$110 |
$0 |
0 |
$80 |
$0 |
|
TOTAL |
|
$189,700 |
6 |
6 |
$140 |
$171,600 |
7 |
$110 |
$160,160 |
6 |
$80 |
$99,840 |
In order to estimate Earned value analysis, following terms are used and its respective formulas such as:
- Cost variance (CV) -It is difference between cost of actual amount and budgeted or planned amount. It is completed work cost as compared to planned cost. Therefore, it is difference between earned value and actual cost.
CV= EV-AC
When there is positive cost variance, then the project is under budget and when there is negative cost variance, then the project is over budget.
- Budget at Completion (BAC)- It is total budget allocated to project work. It is plotted over the project time.
BAC = Baseline Effort-hours * Hourly Rate
- Estimate at Completion (EAC) – It is calculated by dividing budget at completion by the cost performance index.
EAC = Budget at completion / cost performance index
Following table shows the earned value analysis for the project work:
Earned Value Analysis: |
||||
|
|
Labor Cost |
||
Particulars |
Total Cost |
Project Manager |
Business Analyst |
Tester |
Actual Cost |
$349,500 |
$112,320 |
$137,280 |
$0 |
Budget at Completion |
$510,000 |
$280,800 |
$205,920 |
$99,840 |
Earned Value |
-$334,000 |
-$123,552 |
-$82,368 |
$0 |
Estimate at Completion |
$525,500 |
$269,568 |
$260,832 |
$99,840 |
Actual Cost |
$349,500 |
$112,320 |
$137,280 |
$0 |
New Estimates |
$189,700 |
$171,600 |
$160,160 |
$99,840 |
New Estimate at Completion |
$539,200 |
$283,920 |
$297,440 |
$99,840 |
Variance |
-$13,700 |
-$14,352 |
-$36,608 |
$0 |
It is analyzed that the cost variance of this project is negative; therefore the project is over budget. There is an increase in cost as compared to actual cost and planned cost.
Conclusion
It is concluded that the cloud system implementation plan is consisted of various benefits in the business process of company so that there is increase in market share, increase in business productivity. Therefore, the business is benefited due to implementation and received positive project outcome. The project activities are followed of proper schedule to finish the work on scheduled time. After analyzing earned value analysis, it is estimated that there is negative cost variance; therefore the project plan is over budgeted. Communication plan helps the project stakeholders to interact and cooperate with each other to make a successful project plan. Risk management plan determines the project risks which are occurred due to implementation of proposed system in cloud computing environment. Mitigation steps are also taken to make the project risk free so that there is no possibility of project failure within scheduled time as well as budget. Quality is also analyzed for the project to deliver quality products and services to client for meeting with the business requirements.
[1] Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R.. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
[2] Turner, J.R. Handbook of project-based management (Vol. 92). New York, NY: McGraw-hill, 2014.
[3] Larson, E.W. and Gray, C.F. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK (®) Guide. Project Management Institute, 2015.
[4] Binder, J. Global project management: communication, collaboration and management across borders. Routledge, 2016.
[5] Hornstein, H.A. The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), pp.291-298, 2015.
[6] Joslin, R. and Müller, R. Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), pp.1377-1392, 2015.
[7] Muller, R.,. Project governance. Routledge, 2017
[8] Karaman, E. and Kurt, M. Comparison of project management methodologies: prince 2 versus PMBOK for it projects. Int. Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Research, 4(5), pp.657-664, 2015.
[9] Saltz, J., Hotz, N., Wild, D. and Stirling, K. Exploring Project Management Methodologies Used Within Data Science Teams, 2018
[10] Marcelino-Sádaba, S., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A., Lazcano, A.M.E. and Villanueva, P. Project risk management methodology for small firms. International journal of project management, 32(2), pp.327-340, 2014.
[11] Harrison, F. and Lock, D. Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge, 2017.
[12] Marchewka, J.T.. Information technology project management. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
[13] Martens, M.L. and Carvalho, M.M. The challenge of introducing sustainability into project management function: multiple-case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117, pp.29-40, 2016.
[15] Kerzner, H. Project management 2.0: leveraging tools, distributed collaboration, and metrics for project success. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
[16] Leach, L.P., 2014. Critical chain project management. Artech House, 2014.
[17] Kendrick, T. Identifying and managing project risk: essential tools for failure-proofing your project. Amacom, 2015.
[18] Bourne, L. Stakeholder relationship management: a maturity model for organisational implementation. Routledge, 2016.
[19] Newton, R. Project management step by step: how to plan and manage a highly successful project. Pearson UK, 2016.
[20] Ramazani, J. and Jergeas, G. Project managers and the journey from good to great: The benefits of investment in project management training and education. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), pp.41-52, 2015.