Discussion
Environmental Management System (EMS) implementation in the agricultural sector of Australia has been facilitated by industry as well as government co-investments. The elevating interest by Australian Federal and state governments in order to evaluate the capacity that EMS has been identified as the National EMS implementation plan. EMS will contribute to the agricultural sector in relation to delivering environmental and marketplace results have resulted in the national Framework for EMS in agriculture (Collins et al., 2016). The increasing utilisation of EMS specifically in non agricultural sector across the world tends to vary with the delay of EMS in order to establish a ground work in agricultural sector. Industry and Government interest along with investments in EMS in agriculture signifies the quest by diverse range of stakeholders for advanced approaches of focusing on environmental issues in agriculture (Cary & Roberts, 2011). The research question of the essay is “what essential benefits does EMS bring to the Environmental Sector of Australia?’
Discussion
EMS similar to Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been designed and implemented in wide ranging organisations with several forms of performance dimension technological advances and other motivations for pro-ecological activities. Lewandowska has mentioned that environmental in LCA used for evaluation of environmental aspects in EMS comprises both benefits and limitations (Lewandowska, 2011). The extensive time consumption expense and challenges of the evaluation has been identified as one of the critical areas in comparison to the customary approaches used for life cycle assessment. It was further been observed that LCA proficiently captures indirect factors and evaluate the critical impacts related to the environment and the presence of a standardized methodology with relation to every phase of the valuation and the opportunity of acquiring continuous and quantitative outcomes (Lewandowska, 2011).
However while delving into the article it can be observed that the author has efficiently taken into consideration LCA as an effective tool that can be implemented for the recognition and evaluation of environmental determinants in the context of EMS.
Certain disproportion assessed by the author is important to distinguish at this juncture which have been found between input and output centric environmental factors existing in major proportion of analysed registers. However it has been noted that the potential justifications for such discrepancies lied on the output related environmental manageable aspects which are directly regulated by legal actions are vital determinants in the environmental aspects evaluation (Lewandowska, 2011). The achievement of an EMS primarily relies on commitment from all levels and performance of the organisation which is fundamentally directed by top management. However top management can efficiently focus on areas related to risks and potentials by incorporating environmental management into the enterprises’ business procedures associated with strategic direction and decision making procedures into the general management system.
The article based on EMS on Australian or New Zealand standard emphasizes on the implementation of international standard to ensure interested associations are efficiently aligned with EMS (Standard, 2004). However the implementation of international standard tend to vary from one organisation to the other because of organisational perspective whereby two organisations can execute similar performance but comprises varied compliance obligations regulations in their environmental system and performance goals. The evaluation of (Plant Do Check Act) PDCA model highlighted by the article is important to mention which provides a highly iterative process utilised by enterprises in order to attain persistent development and can further be applied to EMS (Standard, 2004). The comprehensive evaluation of the terms related to performance assessment and improvement of EMS has facilitated my awareness related to the context of the organisation. It is important to know that every organisation must establish both external as well as internal challenges which are critical towards goal and further tends to impact its potential to acquire the expired consequences of EMS. However such areas of challenges can involve environmental conditions which are affected or can be capable of causing threats to the organisations. Standard, (2004) has further shed light on the environmental policy where top management must determine, use and sustain environmental regulation within the defined scope of its EMS area, relevant to the purpose as well as the context of the organisation and further offers an important framework for establishing any type of environmental objectives that involves sincere commitment to the safeguard of the environment and relevant to the context of the organisation (International Organization for Standardization, 2006).
de Oliveira et al., (2017)emphasized on organisations needs to implement transitions in the process of production in order to increase the level of environmental performance and activities that are required by their stakeholders. In order to facilitate this performance, the relevance of Cleaner Production (CP) along with EMS based on ISO 14001 has been reflected. In my perspective the article is when observed as it has provided have with details knowledge that EMS and CP management speak proficiently designs in an integrated approach to enhance the productivity of resources used and the efficacy of the outcomes (de Oliveira et al., 2017). The increase of insights reveals that the dimension and business segment can further determine the implementation of CP practices and the pursuit of ISO 14001.
Studies revealed by El Hanandeh, (2015) state that the olive oil industry in Australia has been expected to acquire 25000 m³ various types of olive mills has been used in order to extort the oil from the fruit. However the production generates extensively polluting solid waste as well as waste water which impact the environmental sustainability of the industry (El Hanandeh, 2015). Extensively analysing the article I have developed the insight that waste utilisation in order to manufacture pellets for domestic water heating can be identified as an alternative approach to efficiently deliver the highest environmental gains.
Methodical exploration conducted by me on the paper of Collins et al., (2016) on agricultural diffuse pollution has enhanced my understanding on the existing combined regulatory and voluntary implementation relevant to the UK agricultural sector that has been Incompetent to efficiently deliver essential environmental results for a diverse explanations which includes failure to attain high adoption rates. Thus it has been considered to be highly practical to distinguish certain on farm mitigation measures which can assist farmers to articulate assertive attitudes for enhanced perspective uptake rates (Collins et al., 2016).. The article has been successful in considering DTC program in England that aimed to focus on specific farming practices to water and issues regarding air quality outcomes in order to provide an efficient approach of delivering projections on the direction of change.
There can be witnessed an increasing development in recent times to execute Agricultural Waste or By-Products AWB as the substrates for the rise of phosphate biosorbents. Nguyen’s article on Bio Resources Technology reveals that the deficit of anion binding sites is typically unproductive for phosphate distillation process (Nguyen et al., 2014). This area of concern has enhanced my awareness of the importance of amendment procedure for enhancing phosphate sorption’s possessions of raw AWBs. The paper has further mentioned that efficient change can enhance phosphate eradication ability of AWBs by limiting phosphate ion onto developed AWBs through electrostatic interaction (Nguyen et al., 2014).
Through Cary & Roberts, (2011) paper on environmental management it has been observed that EMS are mechanisms which are used to sustain the environmental impacts and pro-environmental behaviours of agricultural in order to evaluate the productivity of government aided programs which facilities improved management system of land and water related with agricultural land in Australia. It has been observed that environmental results can generate greater degree of efficiency by directly investing land management practices which comprises highest public net revenues. Cary & Roberts, (2011) has further mentioned that unambiguous management goal for specific land management regulation has greater propensity to attain results rather than comprising diverse goals in series of international programs in recent times.
Notarnicola in his article based on life cycle assessment considered life cycle thinking as a fundamental Concept for ensuring change towards highly sustainable production as well as consumption techniques. Through the comprehensive insights it can be observed that LCA is highly relevant to evaluate agricultural patterns and food processing system along with manufacturing performance (Notarnicola et al., 2017). However the article reveals the importance of several methodological aspects related to LCA to guarantee sufficient facilitation for decision making in both organisational and policy developmental contexts.
The analysis of the journal on environmental management by Daddi et al., (2016) focuses on the significance of coercive, mimetic as well as normative forces in influencing advance as well as competitive responses by organisations with an environmental approval. It has been observed that the article has thoroughly emphasized on higher level of assertive impact of mimetic as well as normative pressures rather than focusing on coercive ones. In recent times wild energy forces universally identified as clean and environmentally sustainable energy resource can facilitate reduction of human dependence on fossil fuels (Daddi et al., 2016). Leung’s paper has facilitated my understanding regarding advanced technologies and considerately economical expenses as essential energy source which can be crucial for prospective environmental usage (Leung & Yang, 2012).. The paper has provided comprehensive insights regarding the overview of World wind energy and the current scenario of wind turbine development as well as the climatic effect of wind farms on the environmental sector.
Conclusion
The attainment of EMS in agricultural sector primarily based on the way cultivators in varied agricultural sectors adapt it. EMS in agriculture holds an extensive dedication, however the precipitate perspective of EMS as an environmental management solution has been cautioned. Thus to conclude it can be stated that in the formulation of agri-environmental policy preferences, federal governments must take into consideration most efficient options in order to stimulate diverse and persistent development in EMS in the agricultural sector.
References
Cary, J., & Roberts, A. (2011). The limitations of environmental management systems in Australian agriculture. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 878-885.
Collins, A. L., Zhang, Y. S., Winter, M., Inman, A., Jones, J. I., Johnes, P. J., … & Noble, L. (2016). Tackling agricultural diffuse pollution: What might uptake of farmer-preferred measures deliver for emissions to water and air?. Science of the Total Environment, 547, 269-281.
Daddi, T., Testa, F., Frey, M., & Iraldo, F. (2016). Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness: an empirical study. Journal of environmental management, 183, 647-656.
de Oliveira, J. A., Silva, D. A. L., Guardia, M., do Nascimento Gambi, L., de Oliveira, O. J., & Ometto, A. R. (2017). How can Cleaner Production practices contribute to meet ISO 14001 requirements? Critical analysis from a survey with industrial companies. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(6), 1761-1774.
El Hanandeh, A. (2015). Energy recovery alternatives for the sustainable management of olive oil industry waste in Australia: life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 78-88. Notarnicola, B., Sala, S., Anton, A., McLaren, S. J., Saouter, E., & Sonesson, U. (2017). The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 399-409.
International Organization for Standardization. (2006). Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment; Principles and Framework (No. 2006). ISO.
Leung, D. Y., & Yang, Y. (2012). Wind energy development and its environmental impact: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 1031-1039.
Lewandowska, A. (2011). Environmental life cycle assessment as a tool for identification and assessment of environmental aspects in environmental management systems (EMS) part 1: methodology. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 16(2), 178-186.
Nguyen, T. A. H., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W. S., Zhang, J., Liang, S., Lee, D. J., … & Bui, X. T. (2014). Modification of agricultural waste/by-products for enhanced phosphate removal and recovery: potential and obstacles. Bioresource technology, 169, 750-762.
Standard, D. (2004). Environmental management systems requirements with guidance for use. DS/EN ISO, 14001.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
