Introduction to Intercultural Communication
Intercultural communication refers to discipline that helps in studying the communication across the various cultures along with the social groups. It is indicative of wide range of the processes that appears within an organization or the social context. The society is made up of individuals coming from various religious, ethnic and the social background and the communication of one group of people varies from another group of people. Intercultural communication emphasizes on how the people of a culture communicate with the world that is around them. Backpack Bed for Homeless is the name of an Australian charity that is instrumental in distributing emergency beds for the people who are homeless (Swags.org.au., 2019). It provides the people who are homeless with dignity, comfort along with safety and plays an important role in improving the quality of lives of these people. Indonesian Red Cross Society is instrumental in offering useful service to the survivors of tsunami who are plagued with diseases on account of the experiences that they had to go through in life (Pmi.or.id., 2019) This report elaborates on the intercultural challenges that Backpack Bed for Homeless may have to face on arrival in Sulawesi that has been struck by tsunami. The report elucidates on the challenges that Backpack Bed for Homeless have to face while working with that of Indonesian Red Cross Society. The report also states the recommendations that can help Backpack Bed for Homeless in dealing with the challenges.
In the event of interacting with people, an individual carries his own set of values, assumptions along with beliefs. The communities and the workforce are becoming diverse in the present age and it is important in the present age that an individual knows how to carry out interaction with a large number of people. There are immense opportunities that one can enjoy in the event of being able to communicate effectively with people coming from different backgrounds. There are a large number of minority groups in the workplace and communication in the workplace can prove to be difficult in the event of not knowing about the nuances of intercultural communication. Language barriers along with cultural misunderstanding hampers the process of communication in an organisation (Bulbeck, Pasqu & Di Lello, 2000). The expertise pertaining to cross-cultural communication can help in individual in communicating properly in an organisation. Intercultural communication helps in offering the ability that helps an individual in dealing with the various cultures that has become important owing to the advent of globalisation (Diversicare.com.au., 2019). In the event of an individual being able to deal with cultural differences in a peaceful manner one can survive and thrive within the global environment.
Challenges faced by Backpack Bed for Homeless
The purpose of this report is to talk about the different cultural value in Sulawesi that may pose problems for Backpack Bed for Homeless that is instrumental in offering social services to the people who are homeless. The report also throws light upon the different styles in relation to communication that can act as a barrier in the path of Backpack Bed for Homeless. The report also states how the various cultural norms in relation to decision making throws open challenges for the workers of Backpack Bed for Homeless. The report also states the recommendations that can help in mitigating these challenges in the path of Backpack Bed for Homeless.
The report in the beginning highlights on the intercultural challenges that Backpack Bed for Homeless in the event of carrying out operations in Sulawesi. Firstly, the report talks about the challenge that Backpack Bed for Homeless may have to face in relation to cultural values along with etiquettes. It then talks about the barrier that the organisation may have to face in relation to that of style of the communication. The report then elaborates on the problems related to decision making that Backpack Bed for Homeless may have to face while dealing with that of Indonesian Red Cross. The report also suggests the recommendations that can help the organization in dealing with the issues that can help them in doing the work successfully in the region of Sulawesi.
Culture is indicative of complex system of the meaning that helps in defining way of the life for group or the society. Culture value refers to standards that is accepted or not accepted within community or the society. Indonesia can be said to be a country that is predominantly Muslim that can give rise to friction in the event of the Indonesians encountering the liberals from that of Australia. Indonesia is a Muslim country who does not like to consume alcohol. The Indonesians look with contempt on the aspect of homosexuality along with revealing flesh by the women. Australia on the other hand does not deride the aspect of homosexuality and it gives more freedom to the women in the society. The people living in Australia are used to drinking a lot of alcohol and the homosexuals in Australia enjoy the support of the government along with media (Mulvaney & Soejono, 1970). The orthodoxy of the Indonesians can pose to be a threat for the employees of Backpack Bed for Homeless who would serve the homeless people of Indonesia who have been struck by tsunami. In the event of the workers of the company going out to help the helpless people on the streets of Indonesia, they may encounter problems in assimilating with the orthodox-minded people of Indonesia. Indonesian Red Cross Society refers to humanitarian organization that is situated within Indonesia. The Australians like to consume a lot of alcohol and the employees of Backpack Bed for Homeless can be looked upon with derision by the Indonesian Red Cross that has lend its hand in looking after the people who have been struck by earthquake and the tsunami in the region of Sulawesi (Setyaningrum, Wijaya & Subagyo, 2018).
Cultural Values and Etiquette
The Australians lay stress on the aspect of equality whereas the people of Indonesia believes in the existence of difference hierarchical levels in the society. The Australians have been found to score high in relation to egalitarianism and they score low on that of hierarchy (Ahern, Daminelli & Fracassi, 2015). It has been found that cultural differences exist between the Asian and the Australian society and this can pose problems for the Backpack Bed for Homeless. The Indonesian culture has high power distance culture and more importance is laid on the aspect of obedience along with conformity (Acciaioli, 1985). The decisions are made by the authorities in Indonesia whereas in Australia everyone is treated equally and the decisions of every individual are treated with respect in the Australian culture. Australia has low power distance that holds the idea that there should be minimization of the aspect of inequality in the society (Adams, 1995).
The culture of Indonesia can be said to be highly collectivistic where the focus is laid on the aspect of group rights along with needs. The people in Indonesia have long and stable relationships. The people of Indonesia have many rules that deals with the aspect of human interaction along with public behaviour. In the Indonesian culture, living together is given more emphasis and they have the tendency of restraining the emotional expressions. The Australian culture on the other hand is individualistic where the focus is laid on the aspect of independence along with self-reliance. The network of relationship was found to be much looser as compared to that of Indonesia. The Indonesian culture can be said to be uncertainty avoidance culture and the Indonesian society thinks that ambiguity along with risk should be minimized (Bulbeck, Pasqua & Di Lello, 2000). The society in Indonesia is conservatist and it is characterized by a high amount of stress along with anxiety. The people in Indonesia want stability along with security and they want law along with order in the society. The Australians on the other hand are more prone to taking risks and they want to take challenges in the society. The disparity in the cultural values of Indonesia and that of Australia will pose intercultural challenge for Backpack Bed for Homeless in doing the relief operations with Indonesian Red Cross.
The social life in Indonesia is regulated with the help of formal etiquette. The Indonesians are polite and self-controlled in their behaviour. The Indonesians believe in the aspect of “steady state” that is indicative of correct manner of doing the things (Everyculture.com., 2019). Within Australian culture, corresponding aspects of the life are related. Expressing the negative emotions are thought of to be normal in Australia. The concepts that Indonesia has like ‘ halus’, and ‘selamat’ acts as base that helps in the aspect of promoting of interpersonal relationship with that of the Australian host. The presence of another person is acknowledge in Indonesia with the help of a smile or by the shaking of hands. The Indonesian etiquette highlights that one should talk for some time before they go on to ask about the family along with the affairs of another person (Indonesia-investments.com., 2019). The Australians have brief form in relation to greeting that is thought of by the Indonesians to be impersonal along with indecent. The difference in etiquette in between Australia and Indonesia can set the stage for problems when the Backpack Bed for Homeless goes out to work with that of Indonesian Red Cross.
Direct versus Indirect Styles of Communication
There exist different styles of the communication in between Australia and that of Indonesia that can poses challenge for the Backpack Bed for Homeless in the event of working with that of Indonesian Red Cross. The difference in dimension in relation to individualism and that of collectivism gives rise to communication difference in between the two cultures. Indonesia has high context culture and information is sent in the country by taking recourse to that of non-verbal message (Kwintessential.co.uk., 2019). The means of communication is non-verbal and indirect within Indonesia. The high-context culture makes use of smoothing strategies that helps them in managing conflict within the inter-personal relationships. The people who live in Indonesia are very careful about the initial interaction and the assumptions are made by the Indonesians on the basis of cultural background of strangers. The people living within Indonesia have the tendency of asking more questions and they have smaller self-disclosure in relation to relationships (Bulbeck, Pasqua & Di Lello, 2000). It has been found that the Australians belong to that of low context culture and they give more amount of importance on the aspect of straight logic. They give more importance to the element of verbal communication that is direct that has many written rules along with explicit instructions.
It has been found that the members of a group can adapt to group (collectivism). It has been found that in Australia on the other hand the group members are supposed to act in an independent manner even when they have to go against the group (Naidu, 2018). The Eastern culture can be said to be polychromic and the human relations are oriented towards the family. The human relations are not dependent on the aspect of time. The western culture on the other hand can be said to me monochromic and it is more procedure oriented (Samovar et al., 2014). Indonesia makes use of high context communication and they lay great amount of emphasis on the aspect of body language along with the silences. Australia on the other hand makes use of low context communication and the information is delivered to another person directly by taking recourse to words. The meanings can be communicated by stating the things in the direct manner.
The people living in Indonesia are expected to be moderate in various kinds of the communication situations. The honourable people in Indonesia does not have tendency of raising voices and they do not openly disagree with that of the people. It is found that the disrespectful individuals in Indonesia does not engage themselves in raising voices and they do not disagree with other people in the public (Johnson, 2016). The people of Indonesia can control their emotions very well. The Indonesians have the tendency of expressing disagreement in a vague manner and by the use of silence. The people of Indonesia have a pause before they answer each question and Australia on the other hand do not make use of pauses when they are communicating (Neuliep, 2017). The Australians engages in open confrontation in the public and they speak out their opinions very clearly. The disagreements are expressed by the Australians very clearly and hence it can be easily understood by other people. These factors can pose to be a challenge for that of Backpack Bed for Homeless while working with the Indonesian Red Cross (Yoshida et al., 2018). The workers of these organisations may not be able to get along owing to the different style of communication in between Australia and that of Indonesia.
Different Cultural Norms of Decision Making
The cultural norms being different in Indonesia and that of Australia can act like a challenge for the Backpack Bed for Homeless that is an Australian charity when they would be working with that of Indonesian Red Cross. There are two components of the decision making process in Australia- content along with process. Content is indicative of data information along with knowledge on the basis of which a decision can be made (Henderson et al., 2018). The process is indicative of the steps that an individual goes through when they are making a decision. The managers in Indonesia have paternalistic attitude towards the employees (Piller, 2017). The managers demonstrate concern for the employees which goes beyond that of workplace. The decision making process in Indonesia is carried out to a great extent by the manager who involves themselves in the family, housing along with the health issues.
Culture within Indonesia can be said to be group oriented and emphasis is laid on the aspect of harmony. The managers are involved in making the decisions and they have the tendency of accepting the responsibility for the work that is performed by the subordinates (Oetzel, 2017). On the other hand in Australia the employees of an organisation or social institution can make the decisions in an independent manner. The subordinates have their own voice and their decisions are listened to by the people in the management of the organization.
The women in Indonesia earn less as compared to the men and the occupations in which they work in are characterised by that of low wages. On the basis of the cultural norm, the ability of decision making mainly rests on the male members of the family and they take the precedence in relation to the making of decisions. It has been found that in the organisations of Indonesia it is primarily the male employees who enjoys the ability of making the vital decisions in the organisation. In Australia the power of decision making is vested on the female employees along with the female members of the organisation (Sorrells, 2015). The position of the women is strengthened in the Australian society as they are given the ability of making decisions that endows on them a distinct social status. This disparity can pave the ground for confusion when Backpack Bed for Homeless of Australia would work with Indonesian Red Cross (Halualani, 2017). It can create challenges in the event of working in Indonesia for lending help to the homeless people on the streets.
Recommendations for Solving Intercultural Challenges
It is held that the Indonesians perform the duties on the basis of communal law. The individuals in Indonesia are supposed to obey representatives of village group along with elders (Arthur, 2017). The decisions that are made by the superiors are not pit under any kind of questioning in Indonesia. The Australians on the other hand lay great importance on the element of egalitarian relationships. The decisions that are made by the superiors can be challenged in Australia.
Conclusion
Intercultural communication is indicative of discipline which helps an individual in studying communication that exist in the different social groups. Cultural value helps in defining the standards which exists within community or society. The people in Indonesia are mainly Muslim which can pave the way for friction when the Indonesians will face liberals from Australia. The people within Indonesia do not have alcohol and they look down upon homosexuality existing in the society. Australia has a positive approach towards homosexuality and more amount of freedom is provided to women in society. Equality is laid stress on by the Australians and the Indonesian people believe in the fact that there are hierarchical levels within society. The Australians believe in egalitarianism and they do not believe in the existence of hierarchy in the society. Indonesians lay importance on living together and they restrain the emotions. The culture of Australia is individualistic and they focus on the element of independence. There exist differences pertaining to communication that can create challenges for the Backpack Bed for Homeless when they are working with the people of Indonesia. The information within Indonesia is sent by taking recourse to non-verbal message. The communication means can be said to be indirect within Indonesia. The culture in Indonesia is group oriented where importance is laid on that of harmony. The managers in Australia have been found to make decisions and responsibility is accepted by them for work of subordinates. The employees of Australia can implement their decisions in a manner that is independent.
The employees of Backpack Bed for Homeless can make use of technology so that they can learn more about the cultural pattern of the Indonesian people. They can carry out extensive research that can help them in knowing about the distinct culture of the Indonesians. The Australian employees can go through the online news sources that can help them in gathering more information about the distinctive practices of the Indonesian people. A workshop can be organized in Backpack Bed for Homeless that would throw light on the cultural beliefs of Indonesia so that they can easily assimilate with the people of the Indonesian Red Cross when carrying out work with them for distributing the emergency beds for the street sleeping homeless who are living without shelter in Indonesia. The workshop can train the employees about the nature of the Indonesian people that can help them in dealing easily with the Indonesian people. The success of the workshop can be measured with the help of feedback from the employees of the organization.
The employees of Backpack Bed for Homeless can be sent out on a program and the employees of one organization can trade the places with the employees of another organization that can help in providing useful information about the means of communication of the people of another culture. The program can help in providing the few employees of Backpack Bed for Homeless complete information about the method of communication of the Indonesian people that can prove to be useful in preventing confusion when the employees of Backpack Bed for Homeless would go out to help the Indonesian people who have been affected by the tsunami in Sulawesi. The efficacy of the program can be measured by questioning the employees about the communication patterns in Indonesia for understanding the success of the plan.
The employees of Backpack Bed for Homeless should be taught by the top management of the organization to develop the aspect of cultural self-awareness that can help them in assimilating with the other culture. This can help them in understanding their own cultural makeup that can help them in understanding the values of people of another culture. The managers in the company can talk openly about the cultural barriers that can prevent the employees of a company in carrying out work efficiently. The meeting held with the managers of the company can help the Australian people in valuing the diverse views that can help them in easily adjusting to the employees of Indonesian Red Cross. This can help them in resisting the aspect of stereotyping that can prove to be useful in assimilation with the Indonesian culture. It can help the employees in becoming culturally responsive that can help them in mixing with the Indonesian people. The success of this process can be measured with the help of feedback taken on the website that can help in measuring success about the practice.
References
Acciaioli, G. (1985). Culture as art: From practice to spectacle in Indonesia. Canberra Anthropology, 8(1-2), 148-172.
Adams, K. M. (1995). Making-up the Toraja? The appropriation of tourism, anthropology, and museums for politics in upland Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ethnology, 34(2), 143-153.
Ahern, K. R., Daminelli, D., & Fracassi, C. (2015). Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 165-189.
Arthur, P. L. (Ed.). (2017). Migrant Nation: Australian Culture, Society and Identity. Anthem Press.
Bulbeck, D., Pasqua, M., & Di Lello, A. (2000). Culture history of the Toalean of south Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian Perspectives, 71-108.
Bulbeck, D., Pasqua, M., & Di Lello, A. (2000). Culture history of the Toalean of south Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian Perspectives, 71-108.
Bulbeck, D., Pasqua, M., & Di Lello, A. (2000). Culture history of the Toalean of south Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian Perspectives, 71-108.
Diversicare.com.au. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.diversicare.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Profile_Indonesian.pdf
Everyculture.com. (2019). Culture of Indonesia – history, people, traditions, women, beliefs, food, customs, family, social. Retrieved from https://www.everyculture.com/Ge-It/Indonesia.html
Halualani, R. T. (2017). Demarcating the “Critical” in Critical Intercultural Communication Studies. Critical Intercultural Communication Pedagogy, 1.
Henderson, D., Tangen, D., Alford, J., Hepple, E., Alwi, A., Shaari, Z. A. H., & Alwi, A. (2018). The global citizen: Exploring intercultural collaborations and the lived experience of Australian and Malaysian students during a short-term study tour in Malaysia. In The Globalisation of Higher Education (pp. 307-319). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Indonesia-investments.com. (2019). Indonesian Culture & Society – Life in Jakarta | Indonesia Investments. Retrieved from https://www.indonesia-investments.com/culture/culture-columns/item85?
Johnson, L. (2016). The unseen voice: A cultural study of early Australian radio. Routledge.
Kwintessential.co.uk. (2019). Indonesia | Kwintessential. Retrieved from https://www.kwintessential.co.uk/resources/guides/guide-to-indonesia-etiquette-customs-culture-business/
Mulvaney, D. J., & Soejono, R. P. (1970). The Australian-Indonesian archaeological expedition to Sulawesi. Asian Perspectives, 13, 163-177.
Naidu, K. (2018). Attending to ‘culture’in intercultural language learning: a study of Indonesian language teachers in Australia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1-13.
Neuliep, J. W. (2017). Intercultural communication: A contextual approach. Sage Publications.
Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Effective intercultural workgroup communication theory. The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, 1-5.
Piller, I. (2017). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Pmi.or.id. (2019). PMI – Palang Merah Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.pmi.or.id/
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., McDaniel, E. R., & Roy, C. S. (2014). Intercultural communication: A reader. Cengage Learning.
Setyaningrum, R., Wijaya, A. R., & Subagyo, S. (2018). The comparation of cultural dimention between Sulawesi, Indonesia and Philippine: a measurement of five Indonesian islands. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, (3), 107-115.
Sorrells, K. (2015). Intercultural communication: Globalization and social justice. Sage publications.
Swags.org.au. (2019). GoodNight Australia – Backpack Bed for Homeless. Retrieved from https://www.swags.org.au/goodnight-australia
Yoshida, T., Indurkhya, B., Larson, J., Dujmovich, J., & Keith, B. (2018). Integrating Intercultural Communication into the Language Classroom. Speakeasy, 11.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
