Background on BRIC economies
This is a study, which will portray the investment opportunities in the emerging markets. The countries that have been selected for analyzing the investment opportunities are Brazil, Russia, India and China. These four countries are emerging in nature and is grabbing the attention of the foreign investors because of the lucrative setup of these market economies. Brazil is one of the largest economies in the continent of Latin America and exporters of energy. The market economy of the country is dependent on the oil and natural gas market (Al?Mulali, Solarin and Ozturk 2016). Similarly, Russia is also dependent on their oil reserves and has faced a lot of challenges in making a transition from the economy that is planned to a free market economy. The GDP of the country has progressed immensely and the country is among the largest economies in the world (Yang et al. 2017). India is one of the largest economies and one of the market leaders of the manufacturing industry. India has made commendable growth in the service sectors as they provide quality labours at cheap prices (Negi and Prakash 2016). China is the largest member of the BRIC in terms of GDP and size. China is one of the fastest growing economies in Asia and the foreign companies are making an effort to build relationship with this Chinese government to make an entry in to foreign market (Wang et al. 2016.). The report will consist of analysis of all the emerging countries, which will help, in identifying the investment opportunities and selecting a suitable market for the investors in Australia. Finally, the report will conclude with the development of the balanced portfolio for the chosen market.
The market analysis will consist of the portfolio investment opportunities in the countries of Brazil, Russia, India and China.
This table shows the foreign direct investment of the United States in Brazil and vice versa. This is a Historical Cost Basis analysis, which shows that United States have the highest number of Foreign direct investment in Brazil.
Host Country Statistical Source |
USG or International Statistical Source |
USG or International Source of Data: |
|||
Economic Data |
Year |
Amount |
Year |
Amount |
|
Host Country Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ($M USD) |
2016 |
$1,799,436 |
2015 |
$1,774,700 |
World Bank BCB |
Foreign Direct Investment |
Host Country Statistical source |
USG or International Statistical Source |
USG or International Source of Data: |
||
U.S. FDI in partner country ($M USD, stock positions) |
2014 |
$111,714* |
2015 |
$65,272** |
BEA data U.S. is Historical-Cost Basis |
Host country’s FDI in the United States ($M USD, stock positions) |
2015 |
$9,606* |
2015 |
$23,660** |
BEA data |
Total inbound stock of FDI as % host GDP |
2015 |
26% |
N/A |
N/A |
IMF CDIS 2015 total inbound investment |
Table 1
(Source: Vargas et al. 2016)
The table 2 shows the countries who have invested in the Brazilian Market and the data is little different from the data that has been sold in the previous table. This is due to the discrepancy between the BCB and IMF where BCB calculates the FDI distribution by checking the country with the ultimate investment (Vargas et al. 2016). However, IMF considers the country with the most current FDI investment so there is a change in the values in both the tables.
Foreign direct investment in Brazil and Russia
Direct Investment from/in Counterpart Economy Data (IMF Coordinated Direct Investment Survey, 2015) |
|||||
From Top Five Sources/To Top Five Destinations (US Dollars, Millions) |
|||||
Outward Direct Investment |
|||||
Total Inward |
460,381 |
100 % |
Total Outward |
145,043 |
100 % |
Netherlands |
110,210 |
24 % |
Cayman Islands |
52,456 |
36 % |
United States* |
82,125 |
18 % |
Austria |
30,937 |
21 % |
Spain |
57,426 |
12 % |
Brit Virgin Islands |
24,523 |
17 % |
Luxembourg |
34,732 |
8 % |
The Bahamas |
20,730 |
14 % |
United Kingdom |
23,213 |
5 % |
Spain |
11,403 |
8 % |
“0” reflects amounts rounded to +/- USD 500,000. |
Table 2
(Source: De Carvalho,Gallucci-Netto and Siqueira 2017)
The table 3 will show direct investment survey created by the IMF and includes the investment portfolio amounts for different countries in the market.
Portfolio Investment Assets (IMF Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey, June 2016) |
||||||||
Top Five Partners (Millions, US Dollars) |
||||||||
Total |
Equity Securities |
Total Debt Securities |
||||||
All Countries |
23,595 |
100% |
All Countries |
71,816 |
100% |
All Countries |
5,779 |
100% |
United States |
10,316 |
44 % |
United States |
6,936 |
39 % |
United States |
3,380 |
58 % |
Cayman Islands |
2,604 |
11 % |
Cayman Islands |
2,481 |
13 % |
Spain |
713 |
12 % |
Spain |
1,685 |
7 % |
Bermuda |
1,502 |
8 % |
Denmark |
650 |
11 % |
Bermuda |
1,503 |
6 % |
Luxembourg |
1,105 |
6 % |
Republic of Korea |
487 |
8 % |
Luxembourg |
1,135 |
5 % |
Spain |
972 |
5 % |
Cayman Islands |
123 |
2 % |
Table 3
(Source: Maier, Street and McKinnon 2016)
The economy of Brazil is in turmoil and the financial index in a bad shape. The market for jobs has declined significantly and the value of the currency is very low. The rate of interest in the market is high and so there is limited opportunity of investment in the market. However, many analysts suggest that that is the best investment opportunities for the foreign investors. This is due to the fact that the currency of the country is weak and the exchange rate has a high ratio. Dollar, pound and Euro are the currencies, which are dominating the Brazilian market so this, can be considered to be the best opportunity for selling (Maier, Street and McKinnon 2016). The export prices have decreased significantly due to weak currency of the country and this has increased the export of the products from the country. The banks are providing the consumers loans at higher rates so that they can gain even higher return from the market. The international banks feel that the best possible strategy is to invest in the emerging markets. The decision making of the foreign investor is the factor, which will decide the amount of revenue they can generate from the emerging markets.
The Table 4 shows the foreign direct investment of United States in Russia and vice versa.
Host |
USG or |
USG or International Source of Data: |
|||
Economic Data |
Year |
Amount |
Year |
Amount |
|
Host |
2016 |
$1.232 |
2015 |
$1.331 |
|
Foreign Direct Investment |
Host Country Statistical Source* |
USG or International Statistical Source |
USG or international Source of Data: BEA; IMF; Eurostat; UNCTAD, Other |
||
U.S. FDI in |
2016 |
$2.95 |
2015 |
$9.2 |
|
Host country’s |
2016 |
$8.09 |
2015 |
$4.6 |
|
Total inbound stock of FDI as % host GDP |
2016 |
0.2% |
2015 |
0.7% |
N/A |
Table 4
(Source: Kolupaev et al. 2015)
Direct Investment from/in Counterpart Economy Data |
|||||
From Top Five Sources/To Top Five Destinations (US Dollars, Millions) |
|||||
Inward Direct Investment (2015) |
Outward Direct Investment (2015) |
||||
Total Inward |
257,287 |
100% |
Total Outward |
286,583 |
100% |
Cyprus |
86,281 |
34% |
Cyprus |
104,446 |
36% |
Netherlands |
32,368 |
13% |
Netherlands |
57,461 |
20% |
Bahamas |
21,297 |
8% |
British Virgin Islands |
33,501 |
12% |
Bermuda |
13,562 |
5% |
Austria |
21,054 |
7% |
Germany |
13,523 |
5% |
Switzerland |
16,456 |
6% |
Table 5
(Source: Watson and Seetharam 2014)
This table shows the amount of investment made by the countries in which shows that Cyprus is one of the leading traders of the foreign direct investment. This shows that the Russian market is lucrative and is able to grab the attention of lot of foreign investors.
Portfolio Investment Assets (as of December 2015) |
||||||||
Top Five Partners (Millions, US Dollars) |
||||||||
Total |
Equity Securities |
Total Debt Securities |
||||||
All Countries |
68,119 |
100% |
All Countries |
2,814 |
100% |
All Countries |
65,304 |
100% |
Luxembourg |
24,612 |
36% |
United States |
546 |
19% |
Luxembourg |
24,257 |
37% |
Ireland |
19,379 |
28% |
Cyprus |
437 |
16% |
Ireland |
19,377 |
30% |
Netherlands |
4,420 |
6% |
Luxembourg |
355 |
13% |
Netherlands |
4,179 |
6% |
United States |
3,514 |
5% |
Netherlands |
241 |
9% |
United States |
2,968 |
5% |
Cyprus |
2,468 |
4% |
Ireland |
42 |
1% |
Cyprus |
2,031 |
3% |
Table 6
(Source: Fischer 2016)
The table 6 shows the portfolio investment of the various countries in the Russian market. The table will highlight the investment of the various countries in securities market in the country of Russia.
The investment sectors in Russia consist of the high risk and all the major multination companies have to face challenges in operating. The local players dominate the Russian sectors and portfolio investment is very risky, as the companies are partly owned by the state. The reputational risk is high as most of the companies in the oil and gas sector are facing serious disputes in ecological issues. The technology sector is also a risky sector as the amount of return on investment is low due to the intervention from the government. The country is not stable at an political level and the decision making of the companies in the market are influenced by the government in the industry (Fischer 2016). However, the retail industry in Russia brings about a lot of opportunities for the foreign investors and the growth in the retail segment is promising. There is a lot of demand of the luxury items in the market so the foreign investor has the opportunity of investing in this market.
Portfolio investment assets in India and Russia
Host Country Statistical Source* |
USG or International Statistical Source |
USG or International Source of Data: |
|||
Economic Data |
Year |
Amount |
Year |
Amount |
|
Host Country Gross Domestic Product (GDP) |
2015 |
$2.1 trillion |
2015 |
$2.095 trillion |
Mospi |
Foreign Direct Investment |
Host Country Statistical Source* |
USG or International Statistical Source |
USG or International Source of Data: |
||
U.S. FDI in partner country (stock positions) |
2015 |
$19.280* billion |
2015 |
$28.335 billion |
BEA data available at BEA |
Host country’s FDI in the United States (stock positions) |
2012 |
$2.052* billion |
2014 |
$9.3 billion |
BEA data available at BEA |
Total inbound stock of FDI as % host GDP |
2014 |
1.8% |
2015 |
2.1% |
World Bank |
Table 7
(Source: Garg and Dua 2016)
The table 7 highlights the investments that have been made by United States in India and vice versa
Direct Investment from/in Counterpart Economy Data |
|||||
From Top Five Sources/To Top Five Destinations (US Dollars, Millions) |
|||||
Inward Direct Investment |
Outward Direct Investment |
||||
Total Inward |
312,152 |
100% |
Total Outward |
84,826 |
100% |
Mauritius |
63,077 |
20% |
Singapore |
17,721 |
21% |
United States |
50,152 |
16% |
Mauritius |
15,322 |
18% |
United Kingdom |
45,802 |
15% |
Netherlands |
12,259 |
14% |
Germany |
33,112 |
11% |
United States |
8,889 |
10% |
Singapore |
32,909 |
11% |
UAE |
4,449 |
5% |
“0” reflects amounts rounded to +/- USD 500,000. |
Table 8
(Source: Dua and Garg 2015)
The table 8 shows the investment that has been made by all the countries in India and the data suggest that Mauritius has the maximum investment among all the countries.
Portfolio Investment Assets |
||||||||
Top Five Partners (Millions, US Dollars) |
||||||||
Total |
Equity Securities |
Total Debt Securities |
||||||
All Countries |
1,650 |
100% |
All Countries |
1,640 |
100% |
All Countries |
10 |
100% |
United States |
496 |
30% |
United States |
494 |
30% |
Singapore |
6 |
60% |
United Kingdom |
292 |
18% |
United Kingdom |
290 |
18% |
United States |
2 |
40% |
Luxembourg |
273 |
17% |
Luxembourg |
273 |
17% |
United Kingdom |
2 |
40% |
China P.R. Mainland |
236 |
14% |
China P.R. Mainland |
236 |
14% |
|||
Mauritius |
77 |
5% |
Mauritius |
77 |
5% |
Table 9
(Source: Yildirim and Masih 2014)
The table 9 shows the capital spent by the companies on the portfolio investments in the Indian market. United States and United Kingdom are the two countries who have invested the maximum amount in the portfolio market.
The foreign portfolio investment in the country is increasing at an rapid rate due to the stability in the political aspect of the country. The investment pattern this year shows that the foreign investors have increased the investment in equities and there high expectation from the market. The new government has established new reforms, which is changing the market scenario of the country (Yildirim and Masih 2014). The performance in most of the sectors has increased rapidly and basic materials have outperformed all the other market. Telecom and Information technology market are underperforming. Thus, the overall scenario shows that it is feasible to invest in the market as it proving the foreign investors with a lot of opportunities.
Economic Data |
Year |
Amount |
Year |
Amount |
Host Country Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (in US$) |
2016 |
$11.39 trillion |
2015 |
$11.01 trillion |
U.S. FDI in partner country (in US$, stock positions) |
2015 |
$70 billion |
2015 |
$74.56 billion |
Host country’s FDI in the United States (in US$, stock positions) |
2015 |
$40.8 billion |
2015 |
$14.84 billion |
Total inbound stock of FDI as % host GDP |
2014 |
16% |
2015 |
11.1% |
Table 10
(Source: Dollar 2017)
The table 10 shows the foreign investment made by United States in China and vice versa.
From Top Five Sources/To Top Five Destinations () |
|||||
Inward Direct Investment |
Amount (US Dollars, Millions |
% |
Outward Direct Investment |
Amount |
% |
Total Inward |
2,579,564 |
100% |
Total Outward |
100% |
|
China, P. R. Hong Kong |
1,238,823 |
48% |
|||
Brit Virgin Islands |
328,085 |
13% |
|||
Japan |
151,926 |
6% |
|||
Singapore |
111,218 |
4% |
|||
United States |
78,490 |
3% |
Table 11
(Source: Carpenter, Lu and Whitelaw 2015)
The table 11 shows the various who have made their investment in the country of China.
China is the fastest growing nation in the world and the economy of the country is growing at a rapid rate. This has made the country lucrative for the foreign investors and investment in the country has increased significantly in the year of 2017 (Carpenter, Lu and Whitelaw 2015). The record suggest that there has been surplus in the investment and foreign direct investment have increased significantly.
China is the market that is most suitable for Australian investment as the growth in the Chinese market is highest among all the other countries in the world. Australia is among the countries who invest a lot in the foreign market and the Australians have invested a lot of amount in the foreign market (Borst and Lardy 2015). India, Russia and brazil are also growing but it is the best time for the investor to be investing in the Chinese market as the revenue that they can be generated from this market will be more than the other markets.
Economic data of analyzed countries
In order to gain from the Chinese market the investors will have to create a balanced portfolio so that they can mitigate all the risk and improves the return from the market. The balanced portfolio in the Chinese market is shown below:
XS1068221230 |
0 LONGFOR PROPERTI LNGFOR 6 3/4 05/28/18 |
10.08% |
700 HK |
Tencent Holdings Ltd |
8.25% |
884 HK |
CIFI Holdings Group Co Ltd |
5.84% |
XS1014156274 |
KWG PROPERTY HOL KWGPRO 8.975 01/14/19 |
5.80% |
XS1149696996 |
YUZHOU PROPERTIE YUZHOU 9 12/08/19 |
5.71% |
Table 12
(Source: Created by author)
This is a portfolio, which consist of the unit holders that have a moderate capital appreciation in the long term and the potential to generate revenue by investing in the fixed securities and equities. These securities and equities are available in both on shore and off shore China.
Conclusion
Thus, form the above report it can be concluded that the Chinese market is the most suitable market for Australian investors. The three other emerging economies are also growing but the economic growth of China is far greater than the other nations. This is the right time to capitalize on the market situation and the investors will have to make sure that they analyze the market thoroughly before entering the Chinese market.
Reference
Al?Mulali, U., Solarin, S.A. and Ozturk, I., 2016. Biofuel energy consumption?economic growth relationship: an empirical investigation of Brazil. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 10(6), pp.753-775.
Borst, N. and Lardy, N., 2015. Maintaining financial stability in the People’s Republic of China during financial liberalization.
Carpenter, J.N., Lu, F. and Whitelaw, R.F., 2015. The real value of China’s stock market (No. w20957). National Bureau of Economic Research.
De Carvalho, A.G., Gallucci-Netto, H. and Siqueira, E.M., 2017. Determinants of success in venture capital investments: evidence from Brazil. Venture Capital, 19(3), pp.147-161.
Dollar, D., 2017. United States-China two-way direct investment: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Asian Economics, 50, pp.14-26.
Dua, P. and Garg, R., 2013. Foreign Portfolio Investment Flows to India: Determinant and Analysis. Centre for Development Economics, working paper, (225).
Fischer, P., 2016. Foreign direct investment in Russia: a strategy for industrial recovery. Springer.
Garg, R. and Dua, P., 2014. Foreign portfolio investment flows to India: determinants and analysis. World Development, 59, pp.16-28.
Kolupaev, R.V., Rogacheva, L.I., Moskalenko, A.V., Ulrikh, I.V. and Mikhailova, T.A., 2015. Special considerations of the financial investment in Russia. Asian Social Science, 11(7), p.297.
Maier, S., Street, A. and McKinnon, K., 2016. Risk-averse portfolio selection of renewable electricity generator investments in Brazil: An optimised multi-market commercialisation strategy. Energy, 115, pp.1331-1343.
Negi, G. and Prakash, S., 2016. Economic Growth and Disparities in India. Amity Business Review, 17(1).
Vargas, A., Saavedra, O.R., Samper, M.E., Rivera, S. and Rodriguez, R., 2016. Latin American Energy Markets: Investment Opportunities in Nonconventional Renewables. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 14(5), pp.38-47.
Wang, S., Li, Q., Fang, C. and Zhou, C., 2016. The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO 2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 542, pp.360-371.
Watson, J. and Seetharam, Y., 2014. Building a Portfolio with BRICS: The Case of the International Diversifier. Investment Risk and Performance Feature Articles, 2014(1).
Yang, X., Lou, F., Sun, M., Wang, R. and Wang, Y., 2017. Study of the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the economic growth of Russia based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Applied Energy, 193, pp.162-173.
Yildirim, R. and Masih, A.M.M., 2014. The Effect of Recent Financial Crisis over Global Portfolio Diversification Opportunities–Empirical Evidence A Comparative Multivariate GARCH-DCC, MODWT and Wavelet Correlation Analysis.