The Concept of JIT
Discuss about the Spatial Pattern Of Adoption Of Manufacturing.
Toyota is considered as one of the largest car manufacturing companies in the world. They are the largest in terms of volume production. It was established in the year 1937. They are trying to accomplish the production of cars with the elimination of the waste involved in the production process of Toyota (Rahani & Al-Ashraf, 2012). They try to accomplish that there should not be any inventory costs to be beared by the company by which they can increase the capacity of production. The name of the process is JIT. The process JIT is defined as the integrated series of tasks which is designed in achieving the high production volume with the application of the raw materials, process and the finished gods as well (?iarnien? & Vienažindien?, 2012).
JIT is the inventory strategy or the production model which is useful for Toyota to improve the work processes and for improving the performance of Toyota. The process explains that Toyota has the production capacity annually and they were trying to increase the production on a constant basis so this production process indicates that the raw materials and the activities are reached at the destination workstation at the right time as well in the right quantity (Belekoukias, Garza-Reyes & Kumar, 2014). This is important that the process needs to be eliminating the different types of wastes from the production process or system of Toyota.
The listing of the key tasks are depicted below
- Focused factory networks
- Departmental Specialization
- Group technology
- Uniform Plant loading
- Inventory hides problems
- Kanban Production Control System
- Determination of number of kanbans
Step 1: In this step, there are small plants which are limiting the range of the products to be produced. It is seen that the top management need to increase the capacity of the small plants so that the production volume could be enhanced.
Step 2: In this step the materials which are not required for the production should be identified and it should be eliminated from the process of production
Step 3: There is the investigation to be taken place which is useful in reducing the movement of the raw materials and this will be improving the flow of product within the system.
Step 4: In this step there should be the uniform plant loading to be taken place. This will involve that from a production plant In Toyota there are same number production capacity is realized by loading the products similar in different loading schedules.
The Implementation of JIT in Toyota
Step 5: In this step the defective products are identified from the vendor and the downstream work is processed.
Step 6: In this step the product are placed on the assembly line which involves pulling the materials from storage.
Step 7: In this step there is the setting of the Kanban system to be done.
The people who are involved in the production process for Toyota should be the production manager, the quality manager, the employees working in plants as well the employees who are working in the workstations, suppliers and the distributors.
The equipments to be used should be the production machineries, digital equipments like projectors, computers and other electronic devices. The use of the furnaces and other equipments as well are to be involved in the production process of Toyota.
The environmental conditions for the production of the cars through the concept of JIT need to have all the equipments to be in great conditions. The employees should have the technical knowledge of working in work stations and the plants where the production process is performed (Lai & Cheng, 2016).
The work method which is used for the production of cars through the JIT production technique is done by the application of the Kanban card system. This Kanban card system is used in order to pull the materials out of the inventory system if any so that there should be the elimination of waste took place. The material used should be the Kanban which is found in the shape of card as well as box.
The external players in this production process should be the customers as Toyota is trying to deliver the products with high efficiency and zero defects. The other could be the suppliers who are supplying the raw materials for the production to be involved (Singh & Ahuja, 2012). The internal players are the process operators who are operating in process plants.
For both the internal and the external customers, the customers want the products that have high demand in the market. The products which is cost effective but the quality is at the top most level for the products they deliver it to them.
The qualitative data which involves the efficiency rte of the cars produced, the lead and lag times of the production process is collected in better understanding of the process (Ghosh, 2012).
The JIT process only has the problem of excessive variation. This indicates that while in JIT there is no inventory to be there for Toyota. So if any production process gets delayed then the customer will get the product with a delay only. So Toyota could not be able to fix the volume of production per year which is varied.
Key Tasks Involved in JIT
The cause of this problem is the inefficient distribution of cars manufactured in times of the volume on a constant basis (Sundar, Balaji & Kumar, 2014). The impact of this problem on the process performance is negative. The top management could be able to provide the products at the right time when the customer wants it.
The solution to this process is to develop same portfolio of products for Toyota. This solution is suddenly helping the predetermined targets of production for Toyota to be achieved by the top management.
The productivity is defined as the amount of input and the output given in order to produce a product (academy/lesson/productivity-quality-profitability-and-the-role-of-managers, 2018). The quality is defined as how well the product can be able to measure the excellence and its flawlessness.
The product which is developed from less materials but the material is of high quality, then the product is said to be a productive product. The product which has high productivity has the high quality itself. So it is observed from the video that high productivity and high quality of a product is useful in enhancing the profitability of a company or organization.
The development of the highly productive product is the tactical plan for any organization. The short term goal attainment is to develop quality product. This is useful in improving the product.
As expounded by the speaker, the managers should be looking for the input given against the output to be determined. This showcases that f the ratio is high, then a product is productive and if the product achieves the customer expectations then the product developed is a quality product (academy/lesson/productivity-quality-profitability-and-the-role-of-managers, 2018). So the managers should be developing the products which have high productivity.
My experience tells that if a product has good productivity and quality then a product is sad to be a balanced product. The sustainability is defined as the process where the less productive product is developed but the quality is very high. The productivity is defined as the ratio of input and output. For example I am working in a company and my daily productivity is 8 hrs. If I can give my best for 8hrs then only the quality is developed but if I can work for less than 8hrs and complete the daily activities, then it is high productivity for me.
References
Hirano, H. (2016). JIT Implementation Manual–The Complete Guide to Just-In-Time Manufacturing: Volume 2–Waste and the 5S’s. Crc Press.
Javadian Kootanaee, A., Babu, K., & Talari, H. (2013). Just-in-time manufacturing system: from introduction to implement.
Lai, K. H., & Cheng, T. E. (2016). Just-in-time logistics. Routledge.
Singh, G., & Ahuja, I. S. (2012). Just-in-time manufacturing: literature review and directions. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 3(1), 57-98.
Kalpakjian, S., & Schmid, S. R. (2014). Manufacturing engineering and technology (p. 913). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson.
O’Grady, P. J. (Ed.). (2012). Putting the just-in-time philosophy into practice: a strategy for production managers. Springer Science & Business Media.
Rahman, N. A. A., Sharif, S. M., & Esa, M. M. (2013). Lean manufacturing case study with Kanban system implementation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 174-180.
Holl, A., Pardo, R., & Rama, R. (2013). Spatial patterns of adoption of just?in?time manufacturing. Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 51-67.
Li, W. S., Wang, H., & Sun, G. (2015). U.S. Patent No. 9,224,121. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9.
Sundar, R., Balaji, A. N., & Kumar, R. S. (2014). A review on lean manufacturing implementation techniques. Procedia Engineering, 97, 1875-1885.
Modi, D. B., & Thakkar, H. (2014). Lean thinking: reduction of waste, lead time, cost through lean manufacturing tools and technique. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 4(3), 339-334.
Belekoukias, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2014). The impact of lean methods and tools on the operational performance of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18), 5346-5366.
Ghosh, M. (2012). Lean manufacturing performance in Indian manufacturing plants. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), 113-122.
Suri, R. (2016). It’s about time: the competitive advantage of quick response manufacturing. CRC Press.
?iarnien?, R., & Vienažindien?, M. (2012). Lean manufacturing: theory and practice. Economics and management, 17(2), 726-732.
Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 35-47.
Rahani, A. R., & Al-Ashraf, M. (2012). Production flow analysis through value stream mapping: a lean manufacturing process case study. Procedia Engineering, 41, 1727-1734.
Kumar, N. (2013). Implementing lean manufacturing system: ISM approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4), 996.
Balakrishnan, N. (2015). Toyota Production System. In Dependability in Medicine and Neurology (pp. 239-260). Springer, Cham.
Chiarini, A. (2012). Lean organization: from the tools of the Toyota production system to lean office (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
academy/lesson/productivity-quality-profitability-and-the-role-of-managers (2018). Study.com. Retrieved 5 April 2018, from https://study.com/academy/lesson/productivity-quality-profitability-and-the-role-of-managers.html
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
