The Role of Leadership in Effective Management
Leadership and management are related to each other and leadership is the important part of the effective management. Leadership is the crucial part of the effective managementas the leadership behavior helps to build up an environment, where each employee will be able to develop his or her skills (Culey, 2018). Leadership can be defined as the potential for influencing and driving the team for achieving the goals. The manager has some traits of the leader and he must have the leadership qualities.
Leader develops the strategies for building and sustaining the competitive advantages. The leader need to impose the business morals on the employees and need to ensure that the subordinates are encouraged and trained in such a manner which meet the needs of the business. Leading and managing both forms the framework for the skills, knowledge and the abilities, which are necessary for an individual to drive the team towards the success of the organization (Mendez & Busenbark, 2015). The concept of the leadership and management both are transposable in describing the performance effectiveness of the employees in the organization (Campbell & Reyes-Picknell, 2015).
Leading describes the person who he or she is and the managing is describes more of the crafts, primarily skill that can be learned and developed and suggested as the former to be cultivated within the individual. Leadership development is the internal process of developing the self-reflection for becoming the better manager (Huber, 2014).The situational approach towards leadership has various strengths, the leader can assume the different position, and within one year, the team will be completely different. The leader who are not flexible, would be unable to understand the ever-changing aspects of the team (Thaba-Nkadimene, 2017).
The recruiting flight where I use to work in, being a leader I was responsible for the five Airmen. The recruiters those who are present, some are brand new and some were doing the job for years. There was the circumstance that calls for the situational approach of the leader. I have the directive approach, which was suited for the new recruiters as they were still in the learning phase. They will get benefit from the leader, which will help them to focus on the goal achievement. I endowed the coaching or the supporting style leadership, which will be better for those recruiters; those have been working there for years.
The business leadership is quite different from the military leadership as in case of business leadership, the person who leads the group of the other persons, decides the overall strategy and manages or delegates whatever the internal process required to be done (Zhu & Lee, 2017). The military units have the distinct division in the external leadership that is involving the strategy and the internal leadership that is involving the team management. Every military unit ranging from the smallest unit to the largest unit has separation in the leadership.
In the military leadership, the other person does not question the orders given by the leader. This shows that the juniors are projected to implement the specified rules. In military relationship, the respect is one of the essential characteristic features and the military respect is given to the rank from where the choice of decision initiates. This entire factor is not compulsory to be there in the business leadership as the business leadership look after the enhancement in the productivity by encouraging the employees. For efficient management, the leader should have the qualities of understanding the group members, andneed to have excellent communication skills, motivating skills.Whereas, the military leadership is concerned with the management of the entire country’s armed forces, and the commanding officer appoints those.
Defining Leadership and Its Potential
In the military leadership, the leaders are responsible to such organizations, which provide them the instruction to introduce the leadership and to manage the concerns on the behalf of the entire mass. Like, the defense force chief of any country is specially responsible for the action in the military actions. The office deliverers is responsible for such actions to the assigning authority. There is no such responsibility for the case of business leaders as the role of the business leader is to enhance the skills of the employees and require motivating the employees rather than imposing the rules over the employees (Zumitzavan & Mumi, 2014). Thus, in military management, there is complete respect for the rank and nobody is projected to question the specified orders but for the business leadership, there is admiration for both the rank and position and questioning of decision is commonplace.
The changes, which can be proposed for the better improvement of the process, are utilizing the structured change management approach from the beginning of the project work and recruiting the supports of the management involving the frontline supervisors and the middle managers as the advocates of the changes. This will be also involve the communications for the need of the change and the impact on the employees and also involves the benefits of the employees (Kazmi, Takala, & Naaranoja, 2015).
The employees need to be imposed with the proper technical features, educational qualifications of the company proposals, the prizes and awards for motivating the employees for the better performance. The elaborate explanations regarding how the company carries out the production process in details are to be explained to the employees. The employees need to address what is in it for me in order to enhance their performance for the success of the organization (Odumeru & Ogbonna, 2013).
Activity 4D
I played the role of the charismatic leader and adopted the transformational leadership style, as this requires the ability to inspire the followers and to stimulate them regarding the high capacity of risk taking, clear vision of the future of the company. This helped to inspire the employees and helped them to develop their skills as the vision of their future. The teamwork was successful as the team members are able to achieve the organization goals. I was the leader of the five Airmen and they was able to fulfill their goals and this success helps me to understand the value of the different leadership management style for varied employees and this also shows that the new employees are need to be handled by the different leadership management styles.
Activity 4E
The five ideas of the new leadership style that can be introduced in the work place, for the better success of the organization are the Participative leadership, laissez-faire leadership, transactional leadership, servant leadership and transformational leadership. The participative leadership style involves the advice and the information of the team members while taking any final decision and the team members are allowed to make the final decisions themselves (Beer & Higgins, 2004).The laissez-faire leadership is the loose style leadership, which places emphasis on the decentralized and independent decision making process.
Different Approaches to Leadership
The transactional leadership involves the understandings of the employer- employee relationship. The loyalty are need to be used as the part of the exchange relationship (Arslan & Uslu, 2014).The servant leadership are mostly used by the leaders in the not for profit organizations and the leaders act primarily for supporting and enabling their staffs (Campbell & Jardine, 2001). The employees under the active servant style headship tend to have the great emotional attachment with their job roles and the organization, which leads to competitive productivity towards the organization. The transformational leadership style involves inspiring of employees by sharing the role of the leader with the, which helps them to develop the skills and the vision of their future (Zumitzavan, 2014).
The new leadership styles like the participative leadership style can be introduced as it is needed for motivating the employees and for gaining the employee’s trust and this leadership, style is mostly suited during the time of low stress (Meredith & Mantel Jr, 2011). The laissez relationship can be more better than the supporting leadership styles for the experienced employees as this leadership styles allow the independent decision making process and the leader requires the self-motivation by the staffs in order to be effective (Johnson, 2014).
The transactional leadership follows the leadership that occurs when the leaders and the followers are involved in the exchange of the relationship. This is ideal for the recruiting flight as the employees will be more easily shares their problems with the leader and it will be more convenient for the leader to train them. The servant and the transformational leadership styles mostly encourage the team member and inspire the team members towards the achievement of the goals of the organization (Pfeffer & Sutton, 2000).
The limitations of applying the industrial techniques in the organization is that the technology in the industrial field all the time need to be updated and there were various opportunities of applying the industrial techniques and the employees would be trained on the industrial techniques applied in the organization. The employee training will be better by the application of the industrial techniques in the organization and this will bring the achievement of the desired outcome.
References
Arslan, H., & Uslu, B. (2014). The relationship between learning styles and leadership orientations of pre-service teachers. Egitim Ve Bilim, 39(173).
Beer, A., & Higgins, C. (2004). Environmental Planning for Site Development: A manual for sustainable local planning and design. Routledge.
Campbell, J. D., & Jardine, A. K. (2001). Maintenance excellence: optimizing equipment life-cycle decisions. CRC Press.
Campbell, J. D., & Reyes-Picknell, J. V. (2015). Uptime: Strategies for excellence in maintenance management. CRC Press.
Culey, S. (2018). Leadership and Culture: Part 2–Engaging the Enterprise: Creating a Growth Mindset Tribe. Reliance.
Huber, D. (2014). Leadership and management principles.
Johnson, R. (2014). 5 Different Types of Leadership Styles. 5 Different Types of Leadership.
Kazmi, S. A. Z., Takala, J., & Naaranoja, M. (2015). Sustainable solution for competitive team formation. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 9(1), 5-16.
Mendez, M. J., & Busenbark, J. R. (2015). Shared leadership and gender: all members are equal… but some more than others. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 17-34.
Meredith, J. R., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2011). Project management: a managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Odumeru, J. A., & Ogbonna, I. G. (2013). Transformational vs. transactional leadership theories: Evidence in literature. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(2), 355.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Harvard business press.
Thaba-Nkadimene, K. L. (2017). Lessons learnt in the implementation of school leadership and managment programme by universities in Limpopo Province (Doctoral dissertation).
Zhu, X., & Lee, K. S. (2017). Global virtual team performance, shared leadership, and trust: proposing a conceptual framework. The Business & Management Review, 8(4), 31.
Zumitzavan, V. I. S. S. A. N. U. (2014). The impact of different styles of ‘personal knowledge management’and ‘leadership’on ‘organisational performance’: a case of healthcare industry in Thailand. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 11, 430-441.
Zumitzavan, V., & Mumi, A. (2014). An Evaluation of ‘Subjective Measures’: Organisational Performance influenced by Personal Knowledge Management and Leadership Styles: An Investigation into the Healthcare Industry in Thailand. RECENT ADVANCES in ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT and DEVELOPMENT, 146.