Examples of the difference in culture in logistics sector
Discuss about the Literature Review for Culture in Logistics Sector.
During the 21st century manufacturing operations are located all around the world and the efficient transportation of the goods has become one of crucial sustainability factors of the same. With the easy mobilisation of the goods logistics service during the present date has become one of the essential success factors and lifeline for the manufacturing units as well that can decide the growth and the success of the same (Karagoz and Akgun 2015). Under the global endeavour of the logistics service it has become one of the common factors that they come across different culture that showcase different problem depending upon the various place of operations. Cultural difference among the operational zone of the logistics need to be assessed in order to understand the importance of the same for the growth of the manufacturing operation of different region (Zailani et al. 2015). In case a logistic service provider fails to understand the importance of the cultural difference and the business environment, then there is high chance of loss of money, misunderstanding, loss of contracts and various other complications. This section of the research work is aimed to discuss the impact of business and culture in logistics sector utilising the various literary evidences.
It has been observed that cultural difference is one of the factors that possess potential to alter the logistics business by a large extent. For instance, case of the United States can be considered, where earning money is the primary motive of all the decisions. Brands in order to minimise the cost of the operation imply only few amount of people with high amount of skill. On the other hand, china in order to reduce the price of the operation employ more number of people at a lower wage (Van et al. 2016). When it comes to the logistics service in these two regions, then it can be seen that both state has their own set of principal in order to control the market. When it comes to the employing logistics service in US, then it will be more of capital centric, contrary to the labour intensive logistic services of china. On the other hand in case of the Central America, workers refuse to return in order to work till an exorcism has been performed in a warehouse due to the fact that they may be haunted (Wiengarten et al. 2015). Whereas, in japan since personal relationship are not much important a deal may fall through foreigner turns down an invitation to go on a ‘hashing’ that define the less importance of the cultural values.
Impact of the cultural difference in logistics
Impact of the cultural difference in logistics:
It is well established that a totally plenty logistics system framework can improve the depth of each government what is more, enterprise endeavours. Coordination and administration approaches can likewise help with the enhancement of modern assembling and appropriation bureaucracy increasing the effectiveness and depth of the project. This is constant with. Which expressed that there may be a proven and memorable a part of coordination in incorporating showcasing and management frameworks of a business enterprise (Brettel et al. 2015). From the exploration, coordination administration turned into resolved to have three key additives which includes the physical supply, bodily appropriation and the ecological situation. Physical supply and physical appropriation. Those elements contain every one of the physical activities blanketed in shifting products, each from the company to the begin of the creation technique and from the give up of the introduction system to the customer. They likewise middle around the coordination sports after crude materials are integrated with finished items and utilized with outbound transportation. Moreover, physical dispersion with its outbound introduction speaks to about 66% of coordination prices (Alkhatib et al. 2015). Logistics too impacts inventory level, line shutdowns and delays and likewise the use of introduction of the non-beneficial programs for the supply chain.
As it can be seen from the above picture effective supply chain management need to follow the same. Present key points of the diagrams represent the parameter of success of the firm under the differentiated cultural preference of the logistics. The firm essentially need to provide comfort of service, warranty, quality as well as the variety in products and service in order to enhance the performance of the same (Aguezzoul 2014). Otherwise it can be seen that the different cultural value of different operational zone will reduce the overall performance of the firm causing a high loss of the revenue as well as the future sustainability too.
Key element that determine the good quality service with variation in the cultural difference are as follows:
As per the researchers environmental condition is one of the major factors that determine the fate of the logistics by a large amount because difference in the environmental conditions leads to the difference in the culture that determine the phase of the logistics service under which the firm will be operational. Moreover, it has also been observed that political environment as well as the economic environment of the place of operation leads to the differentiation in the cultural factor that further escalated the factors like governmental laws, dynamics in labour employment and in various cases (Subramanian et al. 2015). Thus environmental factor is one of the terms that determine the fate of the culture.
Key elements of successful logistics
Organizational effectiveness is another factor that determine the various ways to deal with the culture difference. One of the main tool with which the firms try to influence the organizational effectiveness is the efficiency with which the firms tries to meet their objectives. Another one can be the ability to produce while producing minimum amount of waste. Organisational condition is also another factor that determine the work culture in the firm and enables the workers to enjoy large amount of benefit. Organisational effectiveness also define the external standard that how good a firm operates while meeting the demand of the customers. Fulfilling the organisational goal while fulfilling the personal goal of the employees provide a good amount of cultural stability inside the firm that enhance the performance in case of the logistics service providers (Urciuoli 2016). Value added services from the logistics service providers can largely be influenced by the organisational condition because it depends on the performance parameters of the firm by a large extent. In this situation, in case of the good stability of the firm, it can be seen that it will perform a good amount cultural unity within the firm, however in case of lack of the cultural stability can bring the firm into a dangerous position.
It has been under rigorous research work that whether quality enhance the performance of the firms and bring in cultural parity within the operational parameters of the same or not. Many researchers has argued that quality is such a factor that can bring in performance within the firm if utilised properly and as per some researchers it has been found that the cultural difference can lead to fall in the overall quality of the firm. Under the different working group if there is no bonding within the working environment of a logistics firm, then it will bring the firm’s operation in failed state. It will reduce the operations of the firm amusing loss of the valuable assets as well as the revenue too (Shi et al. 2016). Loss in the revenue will further impact the performance of the firm. Thus, cultural difference is one such import factor that can impact the cultural stability of the firm.
As opposed to evolution, there is existing program within the firm which is known as the flexibility in operation. Higher level of flexibility brings in better performance as argued by many researchers, whereas some has argued that it is not true. In case of higher amount of flexibility, workers become reluctant that cause loss in the revenue (Dufour et al. 2018). On the other hand, if there is lack of flexibility then it will cause the demotivation for the workers and finally loss of the performance as well. when it comes to the logistics service providers then it can be seen that they operate in different region that provide them scope to face different mount of norms regarding the employee flexibility causing difference in the performance of the performance of the firm (Raue and Wieland 2015). This difference in the flexibility in the different business leads to the different degree of ability of different logistics service. Thus it can be considered that flexibility can alter the cultural value of the firm that cause change in the performance as well as the behaviour of the firm.
One of the key element of cultural harmony within the operational framework of the firm lies on the staff satisfaction. As it can be seen that higher level of flexibility leads to higher reluctance among the workers and in case of stringent flexibility leads to demotivation for the employees, it can be argued that in absence of the staff motivation, there will be loss of the staff satisfaction. Loss in the staff satisfaction will cause the firm to face different problem and as per the researchers, most of the problems lies within the cultural disturbance bracket (Sabiote et al. 2016). As it can be seen from the previous research that there is lack of trust among the workers that allow them to think different cultural group is gaining different benefit that leads to the turbulence for the firm in case of the logistics service, there are different type of employee irrespective of field of operations. It will allow them to face serious issues regarding the performance of the firm and thus it is also an important factor that leads to the cultural difference in the business and hampers the performance of the same (Govindan and Chaudhuri 2016).
Life of a logistics service rotates around the delivery of goods and services thus the firms need to look into the matters so as to enable them to have good delivery system that aids them to enhance their performance. With the effective delivery system, it can be seen that the firms will gain good amount of reputation whereas fall in the delivery system will allow the firm to loss its business as well. considering the case of the Structural Equation Model, it can be seen that firms operate in such a scenario where the supply chain management and logistics management works in such an environment that tries to enhance the organisational environment (Gregson et al. 2017).
As it can be seen that there is a cyclical relationship between the supply chain management, logistics and the organisational effectiveness. If the SCM of the firm is good, it will be gained through the effective logistics management. If both the SCM and LM are good, then the organisation will operate with good amount of effectiveness (Evangelista 2017). This will further enhance the cultural commitment of the firm and will cause reduction in the difference in order to have better performance. In addition to this, it has also been argued that good delivery system enhance the acceptance of the firm among the large amount of customers that enhance the revenue generation of the firm. This rise in the revenue will aid the firm to fulfil its organisational goal while completing the personal goals of the employees. This rise the bonding among the workers and the cultural difference is mitigated leading to smooth operations of the firm.
Today, logistics system are essentially visible as a ware where cost rules. Count on, that this will alternate as customers, policymakers, and companies start to keep in mind that logistics system and mastery are the key components to giving maintainable preparations. Inside the push and draw of patron requests and administrative measures on the one aspect, and imaginative modifications on trade, logistics will become an enterprise in which entire mastery and management satisfactory overwhelm over the honest inquiry of comparing. As financial and ecological troubles grow to be steadily weaved, this could likewise circulate logistics agencies from being providers of an object to attending to be skilled counselling accomplices that help “decarbonize” deliver chains and dissemination forms (Multaharju and Hallikas 2015). The main logistics corporations might be those that have the amazing presenting suggestion and differentiator of giving these practical administrations; people who contend at the playing field of mastery in place of absolutely supplying the least highly-priced association. powerful deliver chains have for quite a while been considered as key for an company’s economic fulfilment, but as market and administrative hobby for greener items upward push, effective, naturally inviting supply chains will steadily be looked for. Logistics’ one of a type component as a machine enterprise, interfacing agencies from all segments and from all regions, makes it fated to cope with the issues of CO2 outflows up and down the deliver chain. The advancement in the direction of logistics as a manageability enhancer won’t just originate from suppliers revaluating their advertising (Arway 2016). Groups will considerably modify their view about their own specific logistics strategies and come to peer them as key levers that can perceptibly effect their marketplace function. This is gradually the case. Within the green styles Survey, commercial enterprise clients as of now envision that, in destiny, logistics tactics and activities will be adjusted with the objective of lowering carbon emanations. Those adjustments in organizations’ supply chains may not just reduce their carbon affect; they’ll, in the intervening time, assist to decrease cost, increment fine and use new marketplace openings. at the off risk that agencies take into account their save network a key element in their business method, they’ll likewise turn out to be extensively greater mindful of capability improvements – as far as price funds, expanded unwavering great, and CO2 diminishments, that greening their production network can convey (Zhao et al. 2017). Moreover, it has also been observed that the technological changes can be utilised in order to maintain the cultural difference inside the operational framework of a firm. With the new solutions to deal with the cultural difference generated by the newer technologies, it can be seen that the firm can handle the cultural difference by a large extent. It will further reduce the scope of the failure of the firm and lead them towards a harmonic place of operations. When it comes to the logistics service providers, then it can be seen that the firm operate in different place that provide different set of cultural scenario. Under this situation, if the firm fails to operate as per the local environment while utilising latest technologies in order to maintain the environmental, economic as well as the cultural balance within its operation, then it will face grave problem (Hu et al. 2016). For the purpose of the effective handling of the logistics, it can be seen that the firm can utilise the collaborative logistics as well as the new business model for the development of the business efficiency. As per the new model, there will be less amount of carbon emission as well as the performance of the firm under the differentiated cultural model will be valued leading to change in the overall performance and acceptance of the firm.
Conclusion:
From the above discussion, it has been observed that there is huge importance of the cultural valuation in the case of the logistics. Difference in the culture of different place of operation define the performance as well as the ability of the firm for sustainability is determine. With the effective cultural program management team a logistics firm can lead tis business to the zenith of success whereas absence of the same can bring the firm on the verge of destruction due to the lack of the cultural compliance. Logistics service providers being operative in different region faces differentiated importance and it will lead to the fall in the performance as well. Under this situation, it is highly important to bring in cultural parity within the operational framework of the firm in order to enhance the performance of the same.
Reference:
Aguezzoul, A., 2014. Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods. Omega, 49, pp.69-78.
Alkhatib, S.F., Darlington, R., Yang, Z. and Nguyen, T.T., 2015. A novel technique for evaluating and selecting logistics service providers based on the logistics resource view. Expert systems with applications, 42(20), pp.6976-6989.
Arway, A.G., 2016. Supply chain security: A comprehensive approach. CRC Press.
Brettel, M., Chomik, C. and Flatten, T.C., 2015. How organizational culture influences innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk?taking: Fostering entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), pp.868-885.
Dufour, É., Laporte, G., Paquette, J. and Rancourt, M.È., 2018. Logistics service network design for humanitarian response in East Africa. Omega, 74, pp.1-14.
Evangelista, P., 2017. Information and communication technologies: a key factor in freight transport and logistics. In Training in Logistics and the Freight Transport Industry (pp. 29-50). Routledge.
Govindan, K. and Chaudhuri, A., 2016. Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 90, pp.177-195.
Gregson, N., Crang, M. and Antonopoulos, C.N., 2017. Holding together logistical worlds: Friction, seams and circulation in the emerging ‘global warehouse’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(3), pp.381-398.
Hu, M., Huang, F., Hou, H., Chen, Y. and Bulysheva, L., 2016. Customized logistics service and online shoppers’ satisfaction: an empirical study. Internet Research, 26(2), pp.484-497.
Karagöz, I.B. and Akgün, A.E., 2015. The roles of it capability and organizational culture on logistics capability and firm performance. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 7(2), p.23.
Multaharju, S. and Hallikas, J., 2015. Logistics service capabilities of logistics service provider. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management 5, 20(1), pp.103-121.
Raue, J.S. and Wieland, A., 2015. The interplay of different types of governance in horizontal cooperations: A view on logistics service providers. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(2), pp.401-423.
Sabiote-Ortiz, C.M., Frías-Jamilena, D.M. and Castañeda-García, J.A., 2016. Overall perceived value of a tourism service delivered via different media: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 55(1), pp.34-51.
Shi, Y., Zhang, A., Arthanari, T., Liu, Y. and Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. Third-party purchase: An empirical study of third-party logistics providers in China. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, pp.189-200.
Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M.D. and Zhou, X., 2015. Reprint of “Integration of logistics and cloud computing service providers: Cost and green benefits in the Chinese context”. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 74, pp.81-93.
Urciuoli, L., 2016. Port security training and education in Europe—a framework and a roadmap to harmonization. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(5), pp.580-596.
van Wenum, M., Adam, A.A., Hakvoort, T.B., Hendriks, E.J., Shevchenko, V., van Gulik, T.M., Chamuleau, R.A. and Hoekstra, R., 2016. Selecting cells for bioartificial liver devices and the importance of a 3D culture environment: a functional comparison between the HepaRG and C3A cell lines. International journal of biological sciences, 12(8), p.964.
Wiengarten, F., Gimenez, C., Fynes, B. and Ferdows, K., 2015. Exploring the importance of cultural collectivism on the efficacy of lean practices: taking an organisational and national perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(3), pp.370-391.
Zailani, S.H., Seva Subaramaniam, K., Iranmanesh, M. and Shaharudin, M.R., 2015. The impact of supply chain security practices on security operational performance among logistics service providers in an emerging economy: Security culture as moderator. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(7), pp.652-673.
Zhao, X., Yan, H. and Zhang, J., 2017. A critical review of container security operations. Maritime Policy & Management, 44(2), pp.170-186.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
