Understanding Organizational IT and IS Infrastructure
Organizational IS/IT infrastructure is one of the most effective and important aspect that needs to be managed with respect to organizational goals and functional activities that are performed by the organization with respect to their organizational system architecture and domain of applications. Infrastructure is entirely different from architecture that provides support to the system architecture of any organization for managing significant work culture and work flow of the organization. In addition to this, the implementation of IT and IS infrastructure needs to be managed and also needs to be functionally compatible with objectives of the organization.
The infrastructure is defined as the physical hardware that helps in interconnecting the computers and users involved within any system architecture. There are various types of infrastructure, such as activity system infrastructure, information system infrastructure and data system infrastructure. The IT and IS infrastructure is mainly considered as one of the major constraint for any organizational development. In addition to this, the organizations generally relies on the core set of back end information systems that are developed by the organizations with the help of the functional IT and IS infrastructure of the network architecture. Henceforth, this aspect is clear that the organizational contexts manages the functional activities of the organizational IT and IS infrastructure for further developmental aspects.
In contrast with these facts, there are mainly three segments about the network computing that needs to be understand and known by the organization or network administrators which helps the organizations in exchanging data involved within the system architecture of the organization with respect their organizational goals and objectives involved within their business processes. There are mainly four things that are needs to be included while studying the efficiency of the network architecture. These are velocity, volume, variety and veracity etc. One example can be given for managing significant development of functional areas of development in case of the network operations, such as computer network is on system that connects various significant computers for managing interactions and sharing of data as well as information over their this network. Every network needs internet protocol support for establishing and managing their communication within significant domain of operations within the network infrastructure and functional areas of operations. In addition to these elaborations, there is also one interesting and important thing that is mobile technologies which is dependent on the functional network activities that are gained by the significant approaches and protocol usages within the network architecture as well as infrastructure. Now IS manager is responsible for managing these activities within any IT and IS infrastructure of any organization that includes management of network infrastructure as well as management of network layer protocols for managing significant development of functional activities involved within any network infrastructure.
Mobile Technologies and Network Operations
Vendor management is one of the most effective and functionalities involved within any organizational infrastructre3 that needs to be managed with respect to various functional as well as non- functional measures involved within the organizational structure. In addition to this this assignment is considering the leading aerospace giant Airbus w3hich manufactures aerospace elements such as aircrafts (Cme-mec.ca 2017). Therefore, it is very important to study their IT and IS infrastructure that are being used by this organization in order gain competitive advantages over their target market. The vendor management can also be identified as the procurement management strategies and functionalities of the organization. Therefore the functionalities of vendor management or procurement management of Airbus is being elaborated as follows:
The vendor management principles of the Airbus are: identification of important procurement commodities, identification and prioritization of procurement operations, identification and prioritization of the specialized operating units in procurement management and last but not the least five procurement governance units that are mandatory and important part of the Airbus procurement or vendor management system architecture present or used by the organizational members and heads of the organization (Galperin et al. 2013).
Supply chain management is another important and effective IT infrastructure that helps the organization in maintaining their system architecture for managing their operational excellences over their own target market and infrastructural change that they have experienced within their organizational structure (Everett, Sahai and Sabharwal 2014).
The supply chain management infrastructure of Airbus is divided within various significant areas of development as well as functional measures. Some of the important aspects are being elaborated as follows: implementation of information system that streamlines the communication measures, selection of supplier based prioritization of values, new implementations of R&D capabilities within organization, RFID technology inclusion within aircrafts, supplier portal management technologies etc. (airbus.com 2017). The above figure is showing the segmentations that are managing the supply chain infrastructure within Airbus that in terms providing them competitive advantage over their target market. Supply chain risks identification are also prioritized by Airbus in order reduce errors from their system architecture as well as infrastructural architecture.
The risk management infrastructure is also one of the most effective and important concept that needs to be implemented within any organization in order to gain competitive advantages over the target market (Sword-activerisk.com 2017). Airbus have implemented Active Risk Manager Concept within their risks management concept that not only managed but also solved various issues and functional errors involved within the network infrastructure of the organization (Gärdenfors et al. 2014). The risks that resolved by this Active risk manager are: identification conflicts and issues involved within the development and manufacturing of aeronautics, use of common language for risk resolutions, functional measure identification for technical risk management processes etc.
Vendor Management Principles of Airbus
The company Airbus has implemented RFID readers within all their functional elements that are used by them in order to keep track on every single changes their products are making or being used within different infrastructures that are being used for their manufacturing processes. Airbus S.A.S began digitizing its operations with the help of implementing the RFID readers within their elements and other products they are manufacturing (Fujitsu.com 2017). This implementation benefits them with streamlining of the manufacturing processes and real time automatic visibility is provided by them in order to gain competitive advantages over their target market.
Boeing also have IT infrastructure for their infrastructure management process involved within their organza tonal infrastructure (Ouyang 2014). Boeing uses Quality Management System for managing their suppliers and vendors involved within their business process. Boeing use supply chain management for managing their competitive advantages over their target market in order to manage significant development of functional processes and measures involved within their organizational structure and processes.
There are various infrastructure theories present within the technical development era and these can be used for managing significant development of functional measures involved within the organization. Infrastructure theory is being elaborated as follows for managing these developmental aspects. These are given as follows:
The infrastructure theory is important for understanding the functionalities and sustainability of any system architecture that is being used within the organizational structure for gaining competitive advantages over the target market (Francis and Bekera 2014). The infrastructure theory consists of sustainability testing and economic evaluation of the infrastructure that is being implemented within the system architecture or organizational structure of any organization with respect to various functional and fundamental measures that are very important to be incorporated.
The sustainability testing the checked and made justified with respect to the functional testing approaches and functionalities involved within any system architecture of infrastructure that are implemented within the organization. In addition to this, the supply chain management system, risk management system, change management system, vendor management system, all of these falls under the infrastructure theory as these needs to be first checked and then these are managed and implemented within the organizational structure for managing significant development of fictional activities involved within the organizational structure and infrastructure (Pavoševi? et al. 2016). The figure is showing the functional areas of development in the infrastructure theory for implementing any system architecture within any organization that helps in managing the organizational operational excellences involved within their infrastructure.
Therefore this can be stated that infrastructure theory can be utilized for managing significant justification of architecture or information system that are being used for managing significant development of different functional aspects involved within the organizational structure of any organization with respect to their goals and objectives by following the marketing trends and technologies used by their competitors for managing competitive advantages within their target market. The diagram is providing the structured infrastructure that is mandatory for managing significant development of the IT infrastructure within the organizational with respect to their organizational objectives and functional demands from their customers and target markets. The infrastructure development and deployment within their organization will helpful for them in building a sustainable position within their target market.
References
airbus. (2017). Airbus.com | Airbus, Commercial Aircraft. [online] Available at: https://www.airbus.com/ [Accessed 10 May 2017].
Cme-mec.ca. (2017). [online] Available at: https://www.cme-mec.ca/download.php?file=4yoc79q0r.pdf [Accessed 10 May 2017].
Everett, E., Sahai, A. and Sabharwal, A., 2014. Passive self-interference suppression for full-duplex infrastructure nodes. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(2), pp.680-694.
Francis, R. and Bekera, B., 2014. A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, pp.90-103.
Fujitsu.com. (2017). Airbus reduces supply chain and maintenance efforts with RFID – Fujitsu CEMEA&I . [online] Available at: https://www.fujitsu.com/fts/about/resources/case-studies/cs-2016jan-airbus.html [Accessed 10 May 2017].
Galperin, S., Santesson, S., Myers, M., Malpani, A. and Adams, C., 2013. X. 509 Internet public key infrastructure online certificate status protocol-OCSP.
Gärdenfors, U., Jönsson, M., Obst, M., Wremp, A.M., Kindvall, O. and Nilsson, J., 2014. Swedish LifeWatch? a biodiversity infrastructure integrating and reusing data from citizen science, monitoring and research.
Larkin, B., 2013. The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, pp.327-343.
Lewis, T.G., 2014. Critical infrastructure protection in homeland security: defending a networked nation. John Wiley & Sons.
Ouyang, M., 2014. Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliability engineering & System safety, 121, pp.43-60.
Pavoševi?, F., Pinski, P., Riplinger, C., Neese, F. and Valeev, E.F., 2016. SparseMaps—A systematic infrastructure for reduced-scaling electronic structure methods. IV. Linear-scaling second-order explicitly correlated energy with pair natural orbitals. The Journal of chemical physics, 144(14), p.144109.
Sword-activerisk.com. (2017). Airbus Group – Active Risk . [online] Available at: https://www.sword-activerisk.com/airbus-group-case-study/ [Accessed 10 May 2017].
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
