Price Elasticity of Demand for Good 1 and Good 2
- Since, the interest payment is done annually, number of time interest would be paid is 5 when the bon is received at maturity (Dormady et al. 2019). Hence, the annual coupon payment of £ 80 would be received every year for a period of five years. Therefore, the annual repayment of coupon would be £ 400.
- The annual repayment made to the investor at the end of five years is computed at £ 1400.
- Present value of the bond due to be paid at the end of five-year lifetime is computed by adding up the present value of the face value of bond and the stream of interest payments made till maturity. Present value of interest payment is computed by adding up the present value of interest received at the end of five years as the maturity value includes both the present value of the principal amount and the interest rate. Or, the present value of bond can be obtained directly by discount the bond’s maturity value with the interest rate (Siziba and Hall 2021). It is computed that the present value of the bond to be repaid at the end of five year is £ 952.82, which implies that the bond is purchased at the higher price.
- There exists an inverse relationship between the price of bond and market rate of interest, that is when the rate of interest declines, market price of the bond increases and vice versa (Sarwary 2020). It is clearly evident from the above calculation as when the rate of interest declines from 8% to 7.5% and 6.5%, the value of bond increases from £ 952.82 to £ 967.09 and £ 957.77 respectively. On other hand, when interest rate increased to 9%, it is observed that bond value reduced to 942.4.
Where P1 and P2 are the price of good 1 and good 2 respectively.
- Toral revenue would represent the total revenue for the revenue earned on first and second goods respectively.
- i) Equation for total revenue (TR)= P1*Q1+ P2*Q2=)* Q1+Q2
- ii) Profit is the difference between total revenue and total cost, hence equation for profit is given as
Profit= TR -TC
Profit=
- TR is maximized when MR is zero
TR1=8Q1 -2 Q1* Q1
TR2= 20Q2– 0.5*Q2*Q2
MR1=8-4 Q1
When marginal revenue is zero
Q1=2
MR2= 20-Q2
Q2= 20
The number of units to be sold for maximizing revenue is 2 units Q1 of and 20 units of Q2.
TR1= 8*2-2*2*2=16-8=8
TR2=20*20-0.5*20*20=400-200=200
- The condition for maximization of profit is that its first order differentiation should be zero (Cohen et al.2019).
Hence, profit= TR-TC
Profit
Profit= 8Q1 -2Q12 + 20Q2 -0.5Q22 -10-4Q1 -6Q2
= 4Q1 +14Q2 -2Q12 -0.5Q22 -10
Now, ð π/ ð Q1= 4- 4Q1 =0
ð π/ ð Q2 =14-Q2= 0
Q1 =1 and Q2= 14
Therefore, profit is maximized when Q1 =1 and Q2= 14.
- Price elasticity of demand is computed by following formula
Percentage change in quantity demanded/percentage change in price
Price when revenue is maximum that is when Q1 =2 and Q2= 20
P1=8- 2Q1= 4
P2= 20-0.5Q2 = 10
Price when profit is maximum that is when Q1 =1 and Q2= 14
P1=8- 2Q1= 6
P2= 20-0.5Q2 = 13
For good 1
Percentage change in quantity demanded= (2-1)/1.5= 67%
Percentage change in price= (2/5) *100= 40%
Price elasticity of demand for Q1 = 1.66
For good 2
Percentage change in quantity demanded= 7/17= 41%
Percentage change in price= (3/7.7) *100= 39%
Price elasticity of demand for Q2 = 1.05
Answer to Question 3:
There are three variables x1, x2 and x3 and the partial derivatives of f with respect to all the variables is to be found.
f (x1) = ð f/ð x1 = x2 + 2 x1
f (x2) = ð f/ð x2 = x1 -2 x2 x3
f (x3) = ð f/ð x3 = – x22
- b) Now, substituting the point (4,2,1).
f (x1) =2+2*4=10
f (x2) =4-2*2*1=0
f (x3) =-(2) ^2= -4
d(f)= 10d(x1) -4 d(x3)
Substituting the change in value (3.8,2.1,1)
f (x1) = 2.1 +2*3.8=9.7
f (x2) = 3.8-2*2.1*1= -0.4
f (x3) = -(2.1) ^2= 4.41
d(f)= 9.7d(x1) -0.4 d(x2) + 4.41 d(x3)
Actual value of f = 4*2 +4^2-1*(2) ^2= 8+16-4= 20
When (4,2,1) changes to (3.8, 2.1,1)
d(x1) =0.2
d(x2) =-0.1
d(x3) =0
Value of f = 10*0.2-4*0= 2
The change in the value of f when (4,2,1) changes to (3.8, 2.1,1) is 2.
- Second order total differential
f (x1) = ð f/ð x1 = x2 + 2 x1
f (x2) = ð f/ð x2 = x1 -2 x2 x3
f (x3) = ð f/ð x3 = – x22
Again, f is differentiated with respect to all the three variables and the second order total differentiation is given by
d(f)= x2 + 3x1-2 x2 x3– x22
d2(f)= 3 + (1-2 x3-2 x2) + (-2 x2)
=3+1-2 x3-2 x2-2 x2
=4-2 x3-4 x2
1. Present value of investment= £10,000
Discount rate= 15%
In order to determine the profitable investment, present value of the future cash flow of both the projects is computed using the discount rate of 15%.
Present value of CF of P1 |
Present value of CF of P2 |
1739.130435 |
869.5652174 |
1512.287335 |
756.1436673 |
1972.548697 |
1315.032465 |
1715.259737 |
3430.519474 |
1491.530206 |
1988.706941 |
8430.756409 |
8359.967764 |
Present value of net cash flows from project 1 is £ 8430.756409 and that from project 2 is £ 8359.967764. It is understood that the present value of future cash flow of project 1 is higher than project 2, which implies that project 1 is profitable than project 2. Hence, it would be advisable to invest in project 1.
- For computing the annual interest required to grow to£ 4000 from £ 2000 in 8 years, the formula to be used is
FV=PV(1+r/n) ^n*t
Hence, r= (FV/PV) ^1/t-1
r= (4000/2000) ^1/8-1= 2^0.125-1= 9%
- For computing the time period required£ 2000 to grow to £ 4000, with the interest rate of 8%, the formula is
PV=FV/(1+r) ^t
2000=4000/ (1+0.08) ^t
(1+0.08) ^t = 4000/2000
(1+0.08) ^t = 2
Partial Derivatives and Optimization
1.08^t =2
Applying log on both sides
Log 2= log 1.08^t
Log 2= t*log 1.08
t= log 2/log 1.08
t= 9 years
It is observed from the above computation that when the time period of investment is less, then return is rate of return is higher and vice versa.
Answer to Question 5:
TR= 20Q- Q2
- Profit is expressed as the difference between the total revenue and total cost
Profit = TR -TC
Profit (π)= 20Q- Q2 – (Q3– 8Q2 +20Q+2)
Profit = 20Q- Q2 – Q3+8Q2 -20Q -2
Profit = 7Q2-Q3-2
- Maximum profit can be found by differentiating the profit equation with respect to Q
ð π/ ð Q = 14Q-3Q2
the profit maximization point is where ð π/ ð Q= 0
14Q-3Q2 = 0
14=3Q
Q= 4.67
Hence, the maximum profit would be given by 7(s4.67) ^2-(4.67) ^3-2= 48.814
- Marginal revenue (MR)= -2Q+ 20= -2*4.67+20= 10.67
Marginal costs (MC) = 3Q2 -16Q +20= 3(4.67) ^2-16(4.67) +20= 10.67
Hence, MR is equal to MC at the optimal level of output that is 4.67.
Q= 20x0.2 y0.8
Total expenditure = £ 1450
Price of each unit of x= £ 20
Price of each unit of y= £ 2
Expenditure incurred on strawberries= 20x
Expenditure incurred on blackberries= 2y
- The equation of budget constraint can be given as
20x + 2y = £ 1450
- For determining the maximum production subject to the budget constraint, the Lagrange multiplier is set up. The Lagrange multiplier for the maximum production is set up as follows
L= Q= 20x0.2 y0.8 + λ (725- 10x-y)
ð L/ð x = 4 x -0.8 y0.8 -10 λ =0
4 x -0.8 y0.8 = 10 λ ………(i)
ð L/ð y = 20 x 0.2 y -0.2 -10 λ =0
16 x 0.2 y -0.2 = λ …… .. (ii)
Solving (i) and (ii)
yx-1 = 40
y=40x
solving for x and y using the equation 10x+y=725
The value of x and y is computed at 14.5 and 580.
Hence, the maximum production is Q= 20(14.5) ^0.2*580^ (0.8) = 5546.844
- The production is maximized at x= 14.5 and y= 580
It is required to show
The partial derivative of production with respect to raw material strawberries and blackberries gives the marginal product of both the raw materials (Mateer and Coppock 2018).
Q= 20x0.2 y0.8
MUx = 20*0.2*x0.2-1 * y0.8 = 4x-0.8 y0.8
MUy = 20*0.8* y0.8-1 x0.2 =16y-0.2 x0.2
In order to maximize the production, it is required to hold the following condition
MUx/ MUy
= y/4x
Substituting the value of x and y, it is found that
MUx/ MUy = 580/14.5*4= 580/58= 10
And Px/Py =20/2= 10
Therefore, it is observed that the production is maximized when.
References List
Agbeye, S.J., 2019. Capital Budgeting Techniques: Estimation of Internal Rate of Returns. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, pp.1-10.
Beaudreau, B.C., 2020. The Economics of Speed: Machine Speed as the Key Factor in Productivity. Springer International Publishing.
Browning, E.K. and Zupan, M.A., 2020. Microeconomics: Theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Cohen, J.P., Coughlin, C.C. and Paul, C.J.M., 2019. Agglomeration, productivity and regional growth: production theory approaches. In Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Dormady, N., Roa-Henriquez, A. and Rose, A., 2019. Economic resilience of the firm: A production theory approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, pp.446-460.
K?szegi, B. and Mat?jka, F., 2020. Choice simplification: A theory of mental budgeting and naive diversification. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), pp.1153-1207.
Mateer, G.D. and Coppock, L., 2018. Principles of microeconomics (Vol. 2). New York, NY: WW Norton.
Muslimin, M.S., Nordin, N.M., Mansor, A.Z., Ismail, I.M. and Hamdan, F., 2018. Application of Learning Theories in Design and Development of the Mobile Application for Microeconomics Course. Advanced Science Letters, 24(4), pp.2475-2479.
Sarwary, Z., 2020. Strategy and capital budgeting techniques: the moderating role of entrepreneurial structure. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 12(1), pp.48-70.
Siziba, S. and Hall, J.H., 2021. The evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques in enterprises. Global Finance Journal, 47, p.100504.
Zylbersztajn, D., 2018. Measurement costs and governance: bridging perspectives of transaction cost economics. Caderno de Administração, 26(1), pp.1-19.